DETROIT, 1:28 PM, SUN JUL 6 | 4 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@jalopnik.com | RSS

Jalopnik's Guide To Lemon Laws

With automakers producing hundreds of thousands of vehicles every month, there is the possibility that at least a few of them have serious problems. And with used cars there are so many things that could be wrong we couldn't possibly list them all (we'll list one: squirrels in the engine). There was a time when warranties were written to protect against this kind of thing. Then some smart lawyers got involved and there was a time when warranties were written to make it all but impossible to use your warranty. And then Lemon Laws came along.

Introduction to Lemon Laws

Generally speaking, a Lemon Law is any law written to give consumers protection form being sold defective goods. What a Lemon Law isn't is a guarantee that you'll be given a refund or replacement for your product without having to do some legwork. While Lemon Laws apply to a large segment of products, we're going to focus on cars.

Federal Lemon Law Protections

There are basically two dominant federal statutes protecting you from getting stuck with a malfunctioning car. The first is the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, named for Senator Warren Magnuson and Kate Moss.

Basically, this act protects consumers by defining the terms of a warranty and providing for a method of redress against suppliers that won't fulfill the terms of the warranty. The great breakthrough of this law is that it says if GM offers you a full warranty on your Chevy Cobalt, it doesn't work within the time-frame of the warranty, they not only have to replace or repair your car without charge, they have to do so within a reasonable amount of time.

Another component of this law is that it states that you'll be awarded attorney's fees if you win the case, thus preventing the supplier from merely waiting until you run out of money to pay your attorney. If you're buying a used car and it has a warranty, this is most often your best line of defense since most laws only cover vehicles purchased new.

The other important federal level protection comes from Article Two of the Uniform Commercial Code. To sum up the numerous subsections, you have the right to a replacement car IF you've completely complied with the procedures for replacing the vehicle (i.e., if they want to look at the car you have to take it in, provide documentation, et cetera).

State Laws

State laws vary from a recitation and agreement with the components of the UCC (making it uniform, get it?) to specific laws detailing what is and is not covered. When studying your state's Lemon Law, it's important to understand what is covered and the period of coverage.

For example, the Idaho Lemon Law covers all new vehicles (whether personal or business use), but doesn't cover motorcycles, trailers, farm equipment (so no tractor fighting folks). If you own a vehicle that qualifies in Idaho, the vehicle is liable for a replacement if four repair attempts have been made or it's been out-of-service for 30 business days out of two years or 24,000 miles (whichever is shortest). There's also a clause for unsuccessful repairs of a serious nature like steering or braking.

In Texas, the law covers motorcycles, RVs and other vehicles. Eligibility qualifies as four unsuccessful repairs when two of those repairs occurred within either one year or 12,000 miles and then the next two occurring within an additional period of the same length.

You can find a quick summary of these laws here, with more detailed information found on that state or on the site of your state's Attorney General or Consumer Affairs department.

What to do if you suspect your car is a lemon

If your brand new Cobalt is constantly in for repairs and/or is constantly out of service for problems related to the design and construction (not drunkenly driving it over ramps), you may be entitled to replacement under the warranty and under the law. But just because you're entitled, doesn't mean you'll actually get it. This is where thinking like a lawyer comes in handy.

First, save copies of everything that you get from the dealership, from the person who does any repairs. When you talk to someone, write it down and put in a file. You should be doing this with your major purchases anyways.

Second, Consumer Affairs recommends that you ask for Technical Service Bulletins related to your car, which are basically instructions sent from your carmaker to dealerships to let them know about specific defects. I.E., it may tell your Chevy dealership that the Cobalt's emissions sensor goes on the fritz in 2007 models in warmer climates. This will let you know if the company is aware of the problem or not.

Third, if your poor little Cobalt isn't getting better after a certain amount of repairs you need to contact the manufacturer and let them know you consider the car a lemon. The easiest way to do this is get a form from your state, if they have one, and submit it (always via certified mail!). For example, Wisconsin has a good form online.

If your manufacturer is enrolled in the BBB Autoline Program, you can do all of the work and arbitration through the BBB and their website.

Fourth, assure your car is in good shape. If you turn in your "lemon" and it's missing the radio and the door has been scratched then the manufacturer has a right to negotiate a lower price for your car. If it's still in good shape then you may still be able to get close to full value for it.

What if they won't take the car back

Most major automakers are going to do their best to maintain an image and avoid generating ill will. On the other hand, it's possible that the manufacturer doesn't buy that the car is defective and doesn't want to replace your Cobalt.

In most states, there's a non-governmental mediation program offered. This is usually either the BBB or another arbitration group. This is often cheaper and easier than going to court and is usually non-binding unless both parties agree to the conditions.

If you don't have the option of arbitration, or arbitration fails, you can take the manufacturer to court. There are thousands of lawyers that are more than happy to take your case (just Google it) because the laws to protect consumers are often strong. Most attorneys will look at your case for free and, because of the Magnuson-Moss Act, they can get attorney's fees paid by the manufacturer if they win.

Conclusion

Ideally, your car will never be a lemon and your dealer/manufacturer will work with you to provide for you if a problem does arise. One reason why manufacturers are offering longer warranty terms is that they're continually building better products. If you do have a problem that the seller won't repair, you should take comfort in knowing the laws are written to benefit the consumer. There's not guarantee you'll win, but taking steps to document the process effectively is your best weapon.

Feature

1:00 PM on Fri Dec 7 2007
By Matt Hardigree
2,936 views
11 comments

Comments

  • This happened to my parents a long time ago. My father bought only GM until this point. The reason for that was that the sedans were all basically the same and this made repairs easy for him. He got two conversion vans, one Olds, two Buicks, and two Chevys. Then the last conversion van developed a steering problem immediately after purchase, meaning it just stopped being able to steer three days after the brought it home. We hardly ever got to use the car. GM even sent people from Michigan to look at it.

    After a terrible process my parents got a chunk of the money back under the lemon law but the GM lawyers were hideous. The car had less than 3000 miles after nearly a year and they used this to only return a portion of the money. The reality of the situation is not good. GM was able to really drag the whole process out and only return a portion of the money.

    My father then bought a Chrysler and never set foot into a GM dealership again. The owner and him had a falling-out, and they ended-up going to different Churches after that. They knew each other well before that.

  • I actually won a lemon law case up here in Washington state. It was a Landrover Freelander (surprise) that would constantly smell funny when you used the A/C. I was leasing the vehicle and had it in a number of times for the same problem, they finally told me that I wasn't using the A/C correctly (I didn't know that there was a correct and incorrect manner in which to use A/C, who knew?).

    I was able to win the case due to my tracking down service bulletins related to the problem, and bring that to the hearing. And in the hearing, they never even showed up, preferring to call it in (which I think helped as well). I also believe that most people don't take it to the level of getting a hearing in front of an adjudicator. If you've gotten the proper paper trail, and outlined your case in a substantial manner, I believe you can win. You can't get emotional in the whole ordeal, exclaiming that "It's not fair" won't win the case.

  • @Bizzy: That's good advice, thanks for sharing. Hope the smell went away.

  • *waiting for someone to make a 'snakes on a plane' joke*

  • My brother had an A6 quattro with a faulty fuel sending unit. He logged the first repair at the dealer at something like... 50 miles or something and by the 5th time they replaced the unit they said "This car is a lemon. Here is the money you paid us, we are even"

    The process was really easy because it was all documented (at the dealer and with my brother) so he bears no ill-will toward the manufacturer at all. I asked him about it the other day and he likes Audi even more because they took care of him like that without punching him in the gut about it.

  • My wife and I had a lemon suit against a certain European car conglomerate that I can not name thanks to an NDA. Thanks to the system of open bribery that is our government several very pro-consumer portions of GA state law no longer exist and we ended up settling for what amounted to a decent down payment on the replacement car and had to eat the monumental depreciation on a car that was in the shop 22 times in 18 months.

    It should also be pointed out here that Mag-Moss protects your right to modify your car. That is, it states that a warranty claim can be denied due to a modification only if that modification can be showed the have caused the defect. That is, to say if you install a new stereo and the shop can show that it killed your car's computer thanks to a short, they can deny you a warranty claim. They cannot, however, deny your warranty claim if you put in a new stereo and your transmission blows. They also can't specify , for instance, that you only get your car serviced at a dealer (although they can specify that you get your car serviced).

  • Kate Moss? The model? Are you just checking to see if we're paying attention? ;)

  • My little sister had her Land Rover Discovery bought back by Land Rover after catastrophic engine failure occured 5 times within a year. She actually got another Disco and proceeded to drive it for 6 years, putting more than 150k miles in the process. So I guess that's good customer service?

  • @Shadowman615: ha, yes. victory

  • Image of UDMan UDMan at 08:18 PM on 12/07/07 *

    I was in Sales at a Volvo Dealer (2002 Models) and only for a short time. However, I did sell a Cross Country to a guy who was trying to decide between a new BMW 5 Series, and the Cross Country. Well, he took the Cross Country, but a little over 2 weeks after he had the car, It started to not run right. I took a loaner to him, and brought the XC back, and yea, it ran like crap, pinging, no power, but I was able to drive it back. After some diagnostics, it was determined by the Volvo Service Rep (a few days later) that this was an engine that should have never been installed in this car. There were over torqued bolts, engine timing was way off, and there was other problems. I had another XC on the lot in the same color, with one additional option, so the Volvo Sales Rep said swap the vehicle. I was surprised! The car we took back in, went back overseas to Volvo Corporate.

  • In Texas, another law that might be helpful besides those mentioned above is the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) -- it theoretically has a longer statute of limitation/deadline to file a claim.

    I am an attorney and I handle these cases routinely in Texas. [www.texaslemon.com] I offer a free case review.

    Shadowman615 is correct -- it is not Kate Moss, it is Frank Edward Moss, a senator from Ohio who passed away in 2003.

Start a discussion:

Reply by Email

Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.