Jalopnik

  • Jalopnik
  • spy-photos
  • jalopnik-reviews
Profile logout login
2011 Volvo S60: How Do You Say Buick In Swedish?

2011 Volvo S60: How Do You Say Buick In Swedish? #genevamotorshow #2011volvos60

Audi A1: Aluminum Und Small

Audi A1: Aluminum Und Small #genevamotorshow #audia1

Man Builds Mustang Out Of Lamborghini, World Goes "Huh?"

Man Builds Mustang Out Of Lamborghini, World Goes "Huh?" #customcars #fordmustang

Toyota Recall: Unexpected Veering Is The New Unintended Acceleration

Toyota Recall: Unexpected Veering Is The New Unintended Acceleration #beigebitesback #toyotarecall

Step Into Black: The Joy Of Driving At Night

Step Into Black: The Joy Of Driving At Night #rants #night

Ford Transit Connect Taxi: Say Hello To The Next NYC Cab

Ford Transit Connect Taxi: Say Hello To The Next NYC Cab #chicagoautoshow #fordtransitconnect

2011 Shelby GT500: A Snake With A 550 HP Aluminum Heart

2011 Shelby GT500: A Snake With A 550 HP Aluminum Heart #newcars #shelbygt500

Jalopnik

FAQ. Include # before tag:
#offtopic, #tips, #spyphotos, etc.

Detroit, 10:29 PM
Tue Feb 9
24 posts in the last 24 hours

JALOPNIK TEAM

Tip your editors:


Editor-in-Chief:
Ray Wert
| Twitter | AIM

Editor, News:
Matt Hardigree
| Twitter

Editor, Features:
Sam Smith |

Contributing Editor,
Road Tests:
Wes Siler
| Twitter

Contributing Editor, Weekends:
Murilee Martin |

Writer, Detroit:
Ben Wojdyla
| Twitter

Writer, Europe:
Peter Orosz |

Contributors:
Graverobber
John Krewson

Editor Emeritus:
Mike Spinelli

Follow Jalopnik on:
Facebook
Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO JALOPNIK RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1753 Subscribers


Please confirm your birth date:

Please enter a valid date
Please enter your full birth year
This content is restricted.

Grading The Not-So-Big Three's "Bailout" Plans

We spent the night reading the the not-so-Big Three's business plans presented yesterday to Congress and after we graded them below, we've one huge question. Given the Carpocalypse, what's with the overwhelmingly optimistic sales projections for the next three years?

The biggest factor into how well a cash loan will work with the automakers will be the number of total auto sales in the United States. If an automaker makes the right projections they should be able to figure out how much money they'll need to get them through this downturn. So how did they each do in their projections? Let's take a look and grade them. Here are the sale projections from the three automakers:

Ford

U.S. Total Vehicle Sales Projections (Slightly Improved Rate / Current Rate / Worse Rate)

2009: 12.5 / 11.0 / 10.5 million units
2010: 14.5 / 12.5 / 11.0 million units
2011: 15.5 / 14.0 / 12.0 million units
Analysis: Yesterday on CNBC, we said we were unimpressed with Ford's submitted business plan because we were concerned the results were overly optimistic after a quick skim and seeing only the "slightly improved" projection, thinking that there was no way the U.S. market would hit those numbers. Our first and snap response was "they'll need to dip into the line of credit they're asking for." Then we had a chance to read through the rest of the automaker's massive filing. We saw they'd not only created a "slightly improved" projection, but also a "current rate" and "carpocalypse now rate" projection. In those sub-sections, Ford frankly admits the automaker will not only need $9 billion in loans, they'll need up to $13 billion. While we still think the 2010 numbers are overly optimistic, we salute them for being honest and after seeing Chrysler's gameplans, we're of the opinion they really may be the U.S. automaker in the best position.
Grade: B+

GM

U.S. Total Vehicle Sales Projections (Slightly Improved Rate / Current Rates / Worse Rate)

2009: 12.0 / 12.0 / 10.5 million units
2010: 14.0 / 13.5 / 11.5 million units
2011: 15.5 / 14.5 / 12.0 million units
2012: 16.2 / 15.0 / 12.8 million units
Analysis: GM goes the extra step of providing a magic fun world of 2012 with a peaches and cream annual sales projection of over 16 million. Apparently in 2012, we're going to party like it's 2006. But whatever, the big number discrepancy between GM and the other two (well, Ford really), is their projection for 2010. 13.5 million units is a lot of vehicles to be selling without a serious boost in hiring in this country, something not expected until mid-2010 at the latest. Also, we're not sure GM's taking into consideration the increased longevity of their own products. With increased quality comes increased time owners will keep their vehicles. We think Ford's numbers for 2010 are much more reasonable and frankly, we're concerned about the numbers of people at the RenCen who may be wearing rose-colored glasses.
Grade: C-

Chrysler

U.S. Total Vehicle Sales Projections

2009: "lower than normal"
2010: Inc.
2011: Inc.
Analysis: If this were a real homework assignment, we'd award Chrysler with an incomplete and send them straight to detention. Hopefully there, they'd come up with something that resembles real work rather than something they scrawled in their notebook in the back of the bus on the way to school. UPDATE: A better analogy from the comments below — "It's like...an open book test...writing an essay where each automaker's allowed to bring whatever books they wanted with them into the test. Chrysler brought crayons and a coloring book."
Grade: Inc.


Photo Credit: Christopher Furlong / Getty Images News


Send an email to Ray Wert, the author of this post, at ray@jalopnik.com.


Upload an image | Add an image URL ×
×
×
Choose a file to upload:
×
Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
Loading comments ... -/|\
Earlier discussions Paging in progress... | Other discussions | Show all discussions | Show featured discussions only | Expand all threads Collapse all threads
Start a new discussion
By Ray Wert
Dec 3, 2008 10:00 AM 14,279 114
Edit » Set to Draft » Invite » Syndicate »

Syndicate this post


Site:
Mode:

sending request
cancel
more about #industrynews
More Cars Junked Than Sold For First Time Since WWII
Beijing Automotive Makes Deal To Build Saab 9-3, 9-5 In China
REPORT: Spyker Interested In Saab
read more: #carpocalypsenow, #industrynews, #gm, #ford, #chrysler, #salesnumbers, #salesprojections, #top, #consumerist, #feature, #financiapocalypse, #bankruptcy, #congress, #government, #bailout, #gettypic, #gawker
 
  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Jalopnik account.

Sign up here.



Send An Invitation

To invite commenters to this page, paste in a list of comma-separated email addresses, and then select send invites.

Please enter at least one email address.
Please use valid email addresses.
Please use unique email addresses.
Please enter fewer addresses.
requesting invites

Send a link

Send a link to this post 'Grading The Not-So-Big Three's "Bailout" Plans' via email:

Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your recipient's email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your message.
Sending message