How a Used $5,000 Subaru WRX From 2006 Compares to a New WRX That Costs $40,000

Illustration for article titled How a Used $5,000 Subaru WRX From 2006 Compares to a New WRX That Costs $40,000

We often forget what a landmark car the Subaru WRX was when it first came to North America. Spurred by intense demand from gearheads who fell in love remotely through anime and Gran Turismo, the early 2000s WRX gifted us the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and forced the entire sport compact segment to up its game from mildly warmer naturally aspirated sedans to the turbocharged monsters we have today. It even managed to hold its own against the expensive German stuff. But how does it drive now?

And when you compare a $5,000 used WRX to a brand new one that stickers in at $40,000, how far has this car come and what has it lost along the way?

That is the question this video from Canadian channel Throttle House, attempts to answer, and it’s a fun comparison between two cars made nearly a decade-and-a-half apart. (Also, Mr. Regular makes a cameo at the beginning, and that’s fun.)


The guys bought the 2006 WRX for $5,000 Canadian,—and it’s all-stock, which makes it practically a unicorn for its age—and they pit it against the new WRX Raiu Edition, a Canada-only special edition that as optioned is as expensive as this car gets before you hit the STI range.

They say the car hasn’t changed much over the years, but I don’t necessarily agree there. The old WRX had a 2.5-liter turbo boxer four rated at 230 horsepower, and the new one’s got a smaller and newer 2.0-liter with 268 HP.

The newer car is bigger, heavier and far more high-tech than North America’s first WRX was—those really were stripped-out, near rally-car machines with economy car interiors. A modern WRX is actually decent inside. The new Raiu WRX has a bunch of tweaks, like black accents and a six-speed short shifter, but the old WRX makes do with just a humble five-speed manual.

Both cars of course have all-wheel drive, but the old car benefits from an actual limited-slip in the rear. The new car has the advantage, however, of far less turbo lag and more linear power delivery. On the 2006 WRX, highway noise is intense, the interior’s slightly better than a Corolla and the clutch is super stiff, but it just feels more like a rally car than the new one does—a new WRX is a fast sedan, but it lacks that raw-edged character it had a decade ago. Both of them handle Canadian winters just as well, interestingly enough.


Anyway, watch the video for the full shakedown. And if you ever come across a rally blue early 2000s WRX with no rust, no mods and it hasn’t been beaten to hell or vaped in for $5,000, you should probably buy it!

Editor-in-Chief at Jalopnik. 2002 Toyota 4Runner.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


As you stated the new car is a “nicer” car. My question is though, WHY? Why does every car have to get nicer? Why cant companies just continue to offer a car for what it is? Why do they keep trying to have a car grow with the audience it is currently hot with? All that does is necessitate a NEW base model to come in beneath that model OR it alienates the entry level customer because you have raised the bar over what it used to be.

I dont mind minor things like bluetooth connection, thats cheaper than a CD player option and actually makes a car more simple. But why a super fancy dash, interior, and seats? All the extra sound deadening?

Why does every car seemingly have to “bloat”? Are consumers really that fussy now that they will accept nothing less than Recaro seats trimmed in alcantera in their WRX? I mean if it costs exactly the same to have a dash be stylized better I’m all for it but when you take what used to be a simple two piece dash and make it make it so complicated that parts and labor costs go up...on your entry level car...I dont get it.