This is probably the most factually-correct joke-answer I’ve read in quite some time. Read more
This is probably the most factually-correct joke-answer I’ve read in quite some time. Read more
Oceans were smaller back then.
Read more
“crossing the Atlantic Ocean eastbound in three hours and ten minutes” Read more
Zero advertising visible with a proper adblocker (& a bit a of custom script to nuke that Taboola garbage). Read more
We already have these vigilante laws. They are called “stand your ground” laws in shithole states where you get to shoot people dead for looking at you sideways. The country doesn’t need any more stupid ideas to accerate our decline into a real-life Mad Max scenario. But thanks for your input anyway. Read more
Just so you know, you’re what’s wrong with America.
Read more
We all know what this was...
Maybe the rental company’s insurance will cover the damage, but rental agreements comes with all kinds of legal liabilities. For example, the renter may be liable for any lost revenue due to the vehicle being out of service until the damaged vehicle can be repaired or replaced, not to mention a whole of of other… Read more
Most insurance policies have a clause stating they will not pay out in the event the vehicle is used for a crime, and deliberately running someone off the road definitely sounds like a crime. I wouldn’t be surprised if all the insurances involved refused to pay out.
Read more
In this case, yes, the Turo insurance should cover this, IMHO (but I would not be surprised if they worm their way out of it). The insured is the owner of the truck, they are in the business of renting them, and it’s not like you can vet who is going to decide to be a vigilante with your truck. So Turo should pay out… Read more
$30,000 in damage to save a $20 Etsy necklace! Huzzah!
Read more
Its uh... definitely not.
Read more