kelseyfreeh
kelsey
kelseyfreeh

@Reini Grauer: So, according to you, horsepower is the only thing that matters? No one has refuted your statement that horsepower is important, but there is more to it than that. It's been explained over and over, so I'm not going to rehash the details here, but in the most banal sense, horsepower is a function of Read more

@Optixtruf: I'm embarrassed to be an engineer when people like that say they also are. And when people start arguing over the most basic of things. Le sigh. Read more

@jon_daniels: It seems interesting to me that you would join a thread and make comments without actually reading everything. If you had, you would see ample proof that you are quite wrong. But hey, you didn't bother to read in the first place so I don't see why you would now. Read more

@Reini Grauer: Seriously? Yes, they are using horsepower for their calculations, but torque and horsepower are intrinsically related and one depends on the other! You cannot say only horsepower matters because they are connected. You are completely ignoring physics and yet seem unaware of it. It's almost Read more

@Reini Grauer: Looking at only horsepower is wrong and renders your argument invalid. Both torque and horsepower are essential for engine performance. But the crux of the matter is that torque and horsepower are, essentially and on the most basic level, the same thing because one is a function of the other. Read more

@Reini Grauer: Pretty much all of it. You're getting your equations wrong, you're mixing up variables, and you're making assumptions. I won't get into details, but perhaps you should reread the posts of luisthebeast and nataku8_e30, they did a great job of explaining it. Of course, all of this is on top of the fact Read more

@Reini Grauer: This is an absolute joke. You say you're not dumb, but you're sure making a good case against yourself. Can I send you a book on mechanics? Or automotive mechanics? Read more

@Reini Grauer: Oh good lord. You've been proven wrong ten times over and I thought you were being stubborn. Turns out you either don't know how to read or are not very smart. Read more

@pj134: AHAHA. Don't mind Luis, that made me laugh. And I know you didn't mean anything by it... or at least I hope you didn't... Read more

@gyronic: There's no problem with the article, like with the Prius/Lexus HS, the Leaf/new Infiniti are different but still similar. It's a fair comparison, and I'm going to say it again, you were the one who misunderstood, was rude, and starting attacking everyone. And then started talking about the M35h, which no Read more

@gyronic: Seriously, you are the one making assumptions for other people and putting words in their mouths because you can't understand to begin with. He was not wrong, you misunderstood and now you're mad because he wasn't making the point you thought he was. Read more

@gyronic: Um, no, that wasn't his point. He compared two hybrids within one parent company to two electric cars within one parent company. Read more

@gyronic: wow, another insult? and you still don't understand that you are the one who misunderstood in the first place. You're arguing with luisthebeast about hybrids vs. electrics but if you reread his first comment, he never mentioned either of those; he's talking about regular vs. luxury brand names. Maybe you Read more

@Spasticteapot: But diesel has more emissions. So they've done what you said, just with less emissions. Read more

@Reini Grauer: Haha, I think he understands the physics just fine, but I think you misunderstood his point. Read more