Apple's Original Plans For A Car Of The Future Don't Sound Very Revolutionary

Illustration for article titled Apple's Original Plans For A Car Of The Future Don't Sound Very Revolutionary

Apple’s new deal with Volkswagen to build some self-driving shuttle vans for its employees marks a severe departure from the tech company’s initial ideas for the car of the future, the details of which don’t really seem as revolutionary as many people initially wanted to believe.

A couple of years ago, people went nuts over the idea of Apple taking its innovation skills into the automotive industry under a super secret operation codenamed Project Titan. It was often predicted that whatever Apple came up with would revolutionize cars forever. Motor Trend even did an extremely odd panel about what they imagined the Apple car to be like before any real details were revealed.

But whatever the dream once was quickly fell apart, which is shocking considering Apple’s otherwise solid stronghold on the gadget industry. Judging from new details on what Project Titan could have been from the New York Times, it seems like the project team may have realized there just wasn’t a lot about the fundamental design of the car to improve upon.


Here’s what the New York Times reported:

Apple originally began its car project — known internally as Titan and T172 — in 2014. At the time, Apple planned to build a single vehicle that would upend society and industry, in what would be the automotive version of the iPhone.

Sounds great, so far. I wonder what they’ll come up with.

The company set to work on an electric driverless car with a lush interior reminiscent of a lounge or living room, where passengers face each other instead of the road, according to two early employees of the project.


Two former Apple employees also recalled how their colleagues built a model of a sport-utility vehicle with four seats facing each other, which some employees tested by sitting inside, similar to a design Mercedes advertised in 2015.


While unconventional on current vehicles, the idea of a living room on wheels has been conventional among self-driving car concepts since the very beginning. The fundamental significance of a self-driving car is to change the passenger dynamic, and the natural approach is enhanced leisure.

One would imagine Apple, a tech company that specialized in user interfaces and modern social interactions, could dream up something more significant in further developing the relationship between passengers and their cars.

Apple enlisted software programmers, automotive engineers, rocket scientists and the industrial-design team of Apple’s design chief, Jonathan Ive, to reimagine the car. They entertained a series of unconventional concepts, including augmented-reality or holographic displays embedded in windshields and windows, a sunroof made of a special polymer that reduces heat from the sun, and windows with adjustable tints — like those on Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner jets.


So, out of all of the unquestionably intelligent designers and engineers, the most significant change to the automobile they could dream up came down to cool window shades and next-generation screens—conceptual elements of future car designs that automakers have also managed to come up with on their own, without the perspectives of tech industry innovators and literal rocket scientists.

I don’t mean to mock the Project Titan team. I was genuinely excited to see a fresh perspective of what the car could be for people, especially coming from the company that created the best phone ever made. I was even more excited when it was rumored that they had a 1957 Fiat Multipla for inspiration.


But it’s hard not to be disappointed to learn they couldn’t come up with more than the rather obvious advancements the automotive industry was already promising, and now the project has been reduced to a handful of self-driving VW vans.

Reviews Editor, Jalopnik

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`


Does this actually surprise anyone?

Apple isn’t actually a tech company, they’re an advertising company. They pick up things other people invented that no one wanted at the time (iPhone, iPad, iPod, iMac are all good examples) market them to the right audience, and charge a huge premium (which incidentally also manages to make their products more appealing instead of less).

That business model doesn’t really work for the car, since basically all of the ‘good’ ideas have actually taken off, with the arguable exception of electric cars making zero progress for about a hundred years.