Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Ridley Scott Made A Super Bowl Ad For Nissan That Was Shown Only Once Because People Freaked Out

Screenshot: YouTube

I’m sure most of you are aware that acclaimed film director Ridley Scott, the man behind Alien, Blade Runner and Legend (the movie that inspired the look of Goth girls for decades) occasionally makes a bit of walking-around money by directing commercials for high-paying clients like Apple. Scott also directed a commercial for Nissan, but it aired only once because it caused a number of watchdog groups to freak out. In hindsight, it’s pretty hard to believe this commercial caused such a panic.

Advertisement

The commercial was shown during Super Bowl XXIV in 1990, and it was titled Dreamer. It’s a cinematic retelling of a dream had by a Nissan 300ZX Turbo owner, a person who perhaps was dealing with some fears and stresses in his life that came out as a dream about being pursued, and I suspect, threatened.

Here, watch:

I mean, it’s a fun commercial, at least for an ad that’s set in some sort of dystopian wasteland where well-equipped gangs pursue owners of then-new Japanese sports cars.

Advertisement

In the ad, the narrator describes a drive on a long, open and empty road as he’s chased by a pair of motorcycles, then some sort of menacing F1-type car with a matte-black paint job, a mysterious “X” on the front and a bunch of rectangular sealed-beam headlights mounted on the rear wing:

Illustration for article titled Ridley Scott Made A Super Bowl Ad For Nissan That Was Shown Only Once Because People Freaked Out
Screenshot: YouTube

After the motorcycles and race car fail to apprehend the Nissan, an airplane is sent to somehow stop the driver. (I’m not sure how, but not only is this a commercial, it’s a commercial about a dream, so that really doesn’t matter.) Impressively, the Z manages to get away from the aircraft, thanks to the twin turbos kicking in.

It’s clearly a sort of vaguely Mad Maxican fantasy, and while there’s plenty of fast driving, there’s zero traffic beyond the dreamer in his 300ZX and the unnamed members of the X gang, whoever they are.

Advertisement

That’s why I find it so surprising that the commercial was protested by groups like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Association of Governors’ Highway Safety Representatives and others.

The American Academy of Pediatrics? There weren’t even any kids in the ad! And none of the kids who weren’t there weren’t doing anything like eating poorly or swapping hats and getting lice. What’s the problem here?

Advertisement

The issue was that the ad was thought to glorify speeding, which, I suppose on some level it did, in the sense that the excitement of driving fast was a part of the ad, no question. But the whole situation is so removed from reality it hardly seems worth protesting.

But that’s just me. Brian O’Neill, president of the IIHS at the time, wouldn’t agree at all, saying...

“This is the worst example of an out-and-out speed ad that we have ever seen.”

...a statement that implies he has a mental category of “speed ads” that this fits into.

Advertisement

Nissan of course defended the ad, and while the company didn’t pull it from the Super Bowl slot, which would have been a colossal waste of money for them, they didn’t show it anywhere else afterwards.

Illustration for article titled Ridley Scott Made A Super Bowl Ad For Nissan That Was Shown Only Once Because People Freaked Out
Screenshot: New York Times
Advertisement

A New York Times article from January 11, 1990 quotes Nissan’s defense:

“We don’t believe that the Turbo Z commercial encourages irresponsible driving practices,” Mr. Hannum said. He added that the ad was clearly fanciful and thus would not be confused by viewers as representing realistic driving.

Advertisement

Yeah, I’m on Nissan’s side with this one. I’d even go so far to say that any driver who landed in a similar situation chased by various vehicles from an unknown, malevolent organization in the middle of an empty desert highway — ought to drive fast to get the hell away.

Really, by the logic of the complaints, any car commercial that suggested speed was enjoyable in any way would be as bad, and I think the non-realistic environment of this ad made it even more harmless.

Advertisement

Maybe when the new Nissan Z car finally goes on sale Ridley Scott could to do a sequel to the ad, and if the Insurance Institute wants to complain, they can just bitch about it on Twitter like everyone else in the world does now.

Senior Editor, Jalopnik • Running: 1973 VW Beetle, 2006 Scion xB, 1990 Nissan Pao, 1991 Yugo GV Plus, 2020 Changli EV • Not-so-running: 1977 Dodge Tioga RV (also, buy my book!: https://rb.gy/udnqhh)

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Always a thrill to see an article about the Ridley Scott Superbowl commercial.

 

A couple of years ago, I found the very same car used in the commercial on a government surplus website. I ended up buying the ZX from the University of California, Long Beach for $3500, there were no other bidders.

 

The ZX had been donated to the university after the commercial shoot, and after twenty-five plus years in storage, UC wanted to make room in their warehouse.

 

The car had less than 700 miles on the odometer and had never been registered.

 

 

 

I trucked it to the Bay Area and spent six months getting it running. (it was my second 300ZX). After years on sitting outside, the paint was sunburned, but thanks to three layers of window tint, the interior was perfect. The gas tank, fuel pump and rubber lines were shot. I replaced the timing belt, all the hoses, brake and clutch master cylinders and old tires. The front clip—damaged in the jump—had been replaced, but not the turn signals.

 

By the way, turns out at the time of the commercial, Nissan had yet to make any twin turbos. My car (vin number 037) was a naturally aspirated ZX with TT badges and rear spoiler.

 

When finished, I only drove it a short while—every new mile on the odometer was painful to see. I put it up for sale on Craigslist. Unfortunately, UC had no paperwork connecting the car to the commercial and a lot of folks emailed me to call me a scammer.

Then, Jalopnik’s Kristen Lee wrote this article;

Does This Nissan 300ZX Seller Know The Car Was Probably In A Famous Super Bowl Commercial? (Updated)

https://jalopnik.com/does-this-nissan-300zx-seller-know-the-car-was-probably-1786281585

It was nice to see Kristen else put all the clues together independently. I felt vindicated. And the car sold the same day the article came out. (a bargain at $8500)

Though my garage is a little crowded these days, I would still like another 300ZX, I’ve always considered them among the most beautiful cars ever built and a blast to drive. Next time I’ll pick one with enough miles so that adding a few more wouldn’t hurt.

 

Thanks Jason!