Advertisement
Advertisement

The United States, even in this day and age, runs on railroads. Without them, goods simply can’t make their way around the country with the speed and volume to which we’ve all grown accustomed. Any “disruption,” as the President put it, to that system risks throwing the country into turmoil. Guess those railroad workers are pretty important, huh?

A railroad workers’ strike would demonstrate, to railway owners and to the country at large, how deeply important these people are to the basic function of our society. It’s happened before — the Pullman strike of 1894 gave us Labor Day, after all. Now, just as back then, the workers’ asks are entirely reasonable. And now, just as back then, Congress wants to intervene to ensure the workers don’t get what they deserve, in favor of keeping the economy afloat.

Advertisement

Congress, and the President, realize the importance of railroad workers to the U.S. economy. That’s why they don’t want this strike to happen. Our “proud pro-labor President” loves unions, and supports strikers, but looks at “this critical moment for our economy, in the holiday season” for this heel turn. He’s right — the holiday season is the busiest time of the year for shopping. I understand that we, as Americans, will do anything to get our grubby mitts on our little capitalist treats, but should that come at the cost of railway workers’ health?

Advertisement

Sure, President Biden says that “no one should have to choose between their job and their health,” but he’s also actively stripping railway workers of any means to stop making that choice every day. Rather than have a holiday season light on presents, the President and Congress may instead set an unfortunate, perhaps fatal precedent — that some industries are simply too important to be allowed to strike.