mspinelli
Mike Spinelli
mspinelli
Founded Jalopnik. Coasted on that shit for years.

It's like this: 10 is basically unobtainium. Practically no car should get a 10 — it's reserved for an honest-to-goodness world beater in that category. 9 is probably like top five in the world. 8 is perhaps top 10-20, etc. Arguments and debate are part of the point of this scale too — this isn't a buying guide, it's Read more

It doesn't work that way. The scale is weighted. 10 is basically unobtainium. Practically no car should get a 10 — it's reserved for an honest-to-goodness world beater in that category. 9 is probably like top five in the world. 8 is perhaps top 10-20, etc. Also, part of the point of these scores is to start arguments Read more

10s are basically unobtanium. A car would have to be the absolute best ever to nail a 10. A 9 is like top 5-10. Our system is industry-wide not within segment, so the results are more like a pub-fight-starting leaderboard than a consumer guide. Read more

The Avantador predated the new system. I'd love to redo it considering these new parameters. Read more

Ha! I just had the same discussion with another journo. It may be some sort of regulation. I'll have to ask about that. Read more

If I could have only one, I'd have to take the GT-R, since I couldn't imagine sitting in NYC traffic or dealing with chopped-up streets in the Viper. Otherwise, I could use the Viper in my life. Read more

Totally based on personal preference. Both are great buys for different reasons. Read more

My take on it is this. I don't care about corporate ownership. It's the builders that matter. I mean, how well does Jaguar truly reflect Indian sensibilities, or Volvo Chinese? Read more

No, with the GTS upgrade, it's truly a good interior. Great seats. Read more

No worries. Put it this way, I'm a freelancer working for two separate entities. I'm not sure how or why that might constitute a conflict of interest, since I'm not covering either company in a reporting capacity. Read more

DRIVE and Jalopnik have no financial relationship whatsoever. We have what's probably best described as a non-exclusive, non-binding content-sharing partnership. Read more

Oi! Didn't realize there was a colloquial difference. I blame the 1960 US advertising industry's looking for a phrase that meant horny but could float by the censors. Read more