Waymo's Insurance Plan For Drivers Doesn't Answer Who's To Blame Yet

Photo: AP
Photo: AP

While automakers and tech developers race to deploy fully-autonomous cars on the road, one question that’s still being worked out is who’s liable in the event of a crash. Google’s self-driving car unit, Waymo, delivered one possible answer on Tuesday: it’s teaming up with an insurance provider to cover everything from personal items to medical benefits for passengers who use the company’s driverless cars.

Advertisement

Trov, a five-year-old company that provides so-called “on-demand insurance” will provide coverage that’s customized for Waymo’s ride-hailing service. Waymo has said it plans to launch a driverless ride-hailing program for riders in Phoenix starting next year.

Advertisement

It’s an interesting concept. Through Trov, Waymo says it’ll insure riders for lost and damaged property as well as medical expenses. A spokesperson for Trov told Jalopnik that passengers won’t have to pay a separate fee.

“The coverage will be included as part of Waymo’s ride-hailing service, and covers lost or damaged personal articles/property, trip interruption, and medical expense reimbursement,” said Alex Pitocchelli, the spokesperson. You don’t actually select anything as a rider.”

The coverage is being underwritten for an undisclosed sum by a venture capital fund. It’ll only be used for passengers who ride in a fully-driverless vehicle, Trov’s CEO told the Wall Street Journal. (Waymo has said that any “driverless” cars that operate outside of the pilot program’s area will be accompanied by a safety engineer at the driver’s seat.)

Advertisement

There are some unknowns. For one thing, it’s not clear how much Trov would cover in the event of a crash. A spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on this, but we’ll update the post if we hear back.

It’s worth noting, because automakers and Silicon Valley don’t have a uniform stance on who’s liable in the event of a crash: a couple years back, Mercedes, Volvo, and Google all came out and said they’d be held responsible in the event of a crash. Others, like Tesla, have said they won’t. California recently shot down a General Motors-backed provision that would’ve seemingly let automakers dodge liability for crashes involving certain cars.

Advertisement

Waymo’s program is a step toward answering this important question. But, without clear, uniform regulations, assessing blame could be contingent on where a crash just happens to occur. That doesn’t seem workable at all.

Senior Reporter, Jalopnik/Special Projects Desk

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

urambotauro
Urambo Tauro

Blame can only be determined on a case-by-case basis. And just like with human drivers, it’s entirely possible for both parties to be at fault.

I’m sure that there will be plenty of examples where a HAV did everything right, but crashed anyway thanks to whomever was driving the other car. And there will probably also be instances of hardware/software failures that place the responsibility on the HAV manufacturer, or whomever was supposed to be maintaining that car.