This Chart Shows How The Nissan GT-R's Price Has Skyrocketed 35% In Five Years

Illustration for article titled This Chart Shows How The Nissan GT-Rs Price Has Skyrocketed 35% In Five Years

Remember when the Nissan GT-R was considered a budget super car? Yeah, not anymore. The 2013 Nissan GT-R's price has ballooned to $96,820 for the base GT-R Premium model and $106,320 for the Black Edition. That's a 35% inflation in price since this model of the car first went on sale for $69,850 back in July 2008. Godzilla's now got a price to match its girth.

Any discussion of pricing with the GT-R comes with the gigantic caveat that, no matter how much it costs, it's damn fast. Using the metric of Nürburgring lap times it is — to borrow a line from A.J. Liebling — faster than anything cheaper than it, and cheaper than anything faster than it.


It was a remarkable value when it debuted. Grenaded transmissions aside, it would pull a 0-to-60 mph run in the mid 3.0-second range with a 193 mph top speed. Around the 'Ring it was faster than a Porsche 911 Turbo and roughly half the price.

Since then the performance and power has only gotten better. For the 2013 model year the GT-R now puts out 545 horsepower (up from 485 horsepower at launch and 530 horsepower last year) and hits 60 mph in just 2.7 seconds from a dead stop.

But the gap is narrowing. When the GT-R launched the Premium model (which is now the de facto base model) the MSRP was just $71,900. Few were likely to get that price at the dealer, but it's the only fair way to compare costs from year-to-year.


Before, the price difference between a Corvette ZR1 was around $30,000. Now the $111,600 ZR1 is only $5,000 more expensive than the comparable Black Edition GT-R (and the ZR1 is faster around the 'Ring). And the completely redesigned 2012 Porsche 911 is actually cheaper, with a base price of $82,100.


Few cars have ever gone up so much in price during a single generation, which leaves prospective buyers to wonder if the new GT-R is now too expensive or merely as expensive as it should have been all along. Only now Nissan's pocketing the profits rather than the dealerships.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


IMO, the GT-R was like the CTS-V of the super car ranks. Price is what made the package work. It's not a $100k car IMO. There is no widespread use of carbon fiber, there is no ultra-luxurious interior, no ceramic brakes, no magnetic suspension. I suppose with the GTR you are paying for development and research time, not necessary a spec sheet.

Still, I'd take a CTS-V at $30k less ANY day of the week.