The Story of Those 'Barn-Find' Plymouth Superbirds Got Extremely Weird

Illustration for article titled The Story of Those Barn-Find Plymouth Superbirds Got Extremely Weird
Photo: amistadi

Last week, car internet blew up over eBay listings that purported to show two rare Plymouth Superbirds that had been “hidden from the public eye for 35 years.” It’s the sort of thing we report on all the time—barn finds are interesting and neat and fun. And then a law firm sent us a letter.


The law firm in question CC’d us on a cease-and-desist letter sent to the seller accusing him of overcooking that claim. Then I got on the phone with the seller as well as the guy he originally bought the Superbirds from, both of whom had wildly different versions of how everything went down.


Now, the Superbird story that caught everyone’s attention is a lot weirder than it initially seemed.

Let’s back up to the original story. Two Plymouth Superbirds were posted to eBay last Monday and were sold Thursday for $150,200 and $160,600, which is not surprising for a car coveted by many and made in such few numbers.

Attached to the cars is an extraordinary story relayed by the seller, Richard Amistadi, who describes how he bought the cars from a man later identified as Stephen Thum.

Amistadi says he met Thum after the former bought a different Superbird in August, at which point Thum told Amistadi that he owned two Superbirds and was looking to sell. A few days after that, Amistadi saw the cars in person for the first time.


“I was so incredibly excited to see them,” Amistadi wrote on eBay. “When I pulled into his yard, he opened both garage doors, and there staring me in the face were the two birds with their eyes looking straight at me, headlights open.”

That’s where their accounts begin to diverge. In part at stake is a term Amistadi put in the title of his eBay listings: “BARN FIND,” which to most people means a car that’s been sitting in dry storage for some period of time, usually forgotten and not in great shape but able to be brought back from the brink. It’s a dream to unexpectedly “uncover” a classic car and restore it to greatness.


Amistadi’s eBay listings play perfectly to this appeal.

“I am selling both just as I purchased them in non running condition,” Amistadi wrote on eBay. “Allowing the new owner to work his magic to properly take the right steps to get them up and running again.”


The problem is that Thum says that the cars aren’t barn finds at all, in particular the white one, which he had running as late as last year, and also took to local car shows over the years.

“Everybody knew that I’d had these cars around here for years,” Thum told me. “The guys around here are mad because they didn’t buy them ... [But] they really never made any serious offers.”


Amistadi, for his part, says that he stands by what he wrote, and that everything he put in the eBay listings are things that Thum told him at the time of the sale.

Amistadi says that Thum is backtracking now because he feels “embarrassed” by the price that he sold Amistadi the cars. Both men declined to divulge the exact price, but Amistadi said that it was “over $100,000” each, with Amistadi saying he hoped he would get at least $125,000 each for the cars on resale.


“It makes me sad,” Amistadi said, adding that he paid Thum in cash for the cars, possibly for reasons involving Thum’s ex-wife, according to Amastadi. This might have been part of the reason, too, why Amistadi now stands to make a big profit on the cars, since, as Amistadi says, “Why wouldn’t he know what the value is?”

(Asked about all the divorce allegations, Thum declined to comment, but said earlier in our conversation that he “hid the cars for a couple of years while my divorce was going on,” apparently to avoid potentially losing them in the settlement. “They were pre-marital property.”)


Thum doesn’t dispute most of the details in Amistadi’s eBay listings, but he was upset enough to get a lawyer involved, sending a five-page C&D letter to Amistadi on Friday. He said he was motivated by a sincere belief that the listings, particularly the parts about the cars being in “dry storage” for 35 years, were deceptive. The letter also said they amounted to defamation under Maine law.

“All’s I can say is good luck whoever buys them,” Thum said. “There is work that needs to be done. He’s building it up so he can get more money out of somebody.”


Amistadi said he’s tried to be as transparent as he can be.

“Bring your Superbird expert, please,” he said before the auction concluded. “Please, before you bid, come to my home and inspect these cars.”


Thum says the bidding had gotten out of control. A mechanic told him that it would take $50,000 or $60,000 to get the blue Superbird restored alone.

“He bought them, he owns them, he can do whatever he wants,” Thum said. “I hate to see someone who loves that type of car get home and say, ‘Holy shit, what did I just buy?’”


Thum sold them to Amistadi after concluding, at age 56, that it was “time to downsize,” as he owns five other cars.

“Probably what I should’ve done was kept the cars,” Thum said. “He’s been playing it up, and he’s going to score good. It’s not what he says. It’s wrong in my world.”


Since he got the legal threat, Amistadi said he called eBay, who assured him that the auction wouldn’t end.

“It’s just a sad situation,” Amistadi said.

Here’s the cease-and-desist letter in full:

Cease and Desist - Stephen Thum v. Richard Amistadi by Anonymous CmET6z on Scribd


News Editor at Jalopnik. 2008 Honda Fit Sport.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Low and slow

Imagine hiding two cars through a divorce and finally deciding the best course of action is to turn them into cash. You sell them for a decent amount then before you know it the guy who bought them turns around and re-sells them along with a story that goes viral. Ex finds out and comes after her half of the value of the cars, and I assume some penalty on top of that. Now is the value going to be determined by what he sold them for (200K-ish) or what they sold for on eBay (310K)? It also raises the question of what else he hid during the divorce.

There’s why the lawyers are sending out those little love letters, IMO. Kind of akin to closing the gate after the horse has run off but it’s not my legal problem.