Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ

Car enthusiasts love the Jeep Cherokee XJ for roughly the same reason rebel armies love the AK-47: It's reliable, cheap, effective, and absolutely classic. Therefore, the reveal of the crossovery 2014 Jeep Cherokee led many Jeep faithful to reach for their nearest available rifle and point it directly at their computer or themselves. They were wrong. The new Cherokee is an improvement in many ways.

Advertisement

I love an XJ just like everyone else. It's the Miata of offroaders. Or maybe the E30 of offroaders. It's the only car you'd ever need or ever want. Go to a forum and ask people what you should buy and they'll tell you an XJ (even if your parameters are: convertible, V8, sports car).

It's styling is classic, which is to say minimalist, which is to say simple, which is to say unrecreatable for the modern world. The hatred of certain Jeep fans towards the new Juke-fighting nose is strong, but those people are probably wrong. I haven't driven the new Jeep, so it's possible it's actually terrible, but there are some simple reasons why this new Cherokee is better.

Advertisement

1. The Original XJ Wasn't A Truck

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ

You know that ladder-and-frame XJ you miss? It doesn't exist. When AMC owned Jeep they invested $250 million Reagan-bucks into the XJ and its shorter, narrower, and lower unibody platform. That sound familiar? I'm sure if the Internet existed then everyone would be hearing about how the XJ was going to ruin everything pure about the SJ.

2. It's More Powerful

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ
Advertisement

The best version of the XJ was the 4.0-liter inline-six. That's a bulletproof engine. Yet, at best, it produced 190 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque. Now you're getting 271 horsepower and 239 lb-ft of torque out of the six-cylinder engine. Want the smaller version? You're still getting 184 horsepower and 171 lb-ft of torque.

3. It's Dimensionally Better

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ
Advertisement

Comparing a stock XJ to a stock 2014 Cherokee on off-road ability will be fun. Someone will do it. Maybe it will be us. The approach angle, departure angle, and break-over angle are going to be an important part of that.

Here's how they stack up:

  • Approach Angle: 38º (XJ) versus 29.8º (2014)
  • Departure Angle: 31º (XJ) versus 32.1º (2014)
  • Breakover Angle: 21º (XJ) versus 23.2º (2014)

That's fairly similar and, approach angle aside (welcome to the cruel modern world) it's better.

Advertisement

4. It's Taller

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ
Advertisement

The stock ground clearance on an XJ was 7.3 inches for a stock Cherokee and 8.3 inches for the Upcountry versions. The running ground clearance of the new Trailhawk Cherokee? 8.7 inches. Booyah.

5. Its Crawl Ratio Is Nearly Double

Illustration for article titled Six Ways The 2014 Jeep Cherokee Is Better Than The XJ
Advertisement

The crawl ratio is a measure of the lowest gear a vehicle is capable of getting into, which is important if you're going to try and crawl over something (thus the name). The stock crawl ratio in the Trailhawk is 56:1, nearly double that of the XJ.

6. It's More Fuel Efficient

The best mileage any Jeep XJ with AWD could produce was 20 mpg. The best the Jeep can produce is 31 MPG. We'll see what the Trailhawk ultimately gets, but a disconnectable rear-locker plus the nine-speed transmission means it'll almost certainly be a massive improvement. The big drawback, of course, is no manual transmission. Sad.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

To counter that, here's six ways it's actually worse than the XJ Cherokee:

1) It was never designed to be a Jeep.

It's a Jeep now, and they've done everything they can to make it as capable as it can be, but the fact remains that it was never intended to be a Jeep as the XJ was.

2) It's notably more expensive.

I don't think that anything short of the XJ Wagoneers would reach the approximate adjusted cost of the Cherokee.

3) It's a more complicated vehicle.

The beauty of the XJ Cherokee was that it really was as stupidly simple as they came. They were easy to fix and easier to modify, something that probably can't be said of the new Cherokee. Complication out on the trail is a bad thing.

4) It's heavier

To be perfectly fair, the majority of the weight difference can't be helped; safety regulations are safety regulations, and they have to be met. Still, though, the fact remains that the XJ will always have the weight advantage, which can be very helpful on the trail.

5) It's ugly.

Butt ugly. In terms of aesthetics, it's the automotive equivalent of a sumo wrestler with severe acne sucking on a lime. On the other hand, the XJ Cherokee was classically handsome.

6) It lacks a manual

I'm not overly bothered by that myself, but many are, and quite honestly, the option is always nice.