Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?

One of the advantages of having to fill in on a Saturday is that I feel like it’s okay to post things that may be, normally, even too niche or narrow or, let’s face it, idiotic, even for me. But it’s Saturday, so all bets are off! Which is why I’m going to ask you for your opinion on something I’d be stunned if anyone already has any opinions about: which taillight arrangement is better? Orange-red-clear, or red-orange-clear?

Now, there’s some caveats, of course, as you can imagine in anything as important as this: I’m only talking about taillights with three color, using amber/orange for the turn indicator, not just red, like we Americans often like.

I’m also talking about horizontally-oriented lights sectioned into thirds vertically; there’s a likely infinite way to section taillights, but for today I’m just pitting two of the most common methods against each other, because I want to constrain the scope of the debate, at least for now.

Advertisement

Let’s look at the two approaches and consider what we prefer. I’m going to use Mazdas as examples, because they have a few cars that switched between these two types. Let’s start with the RX-7:

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?

Hm. It’s tricky, right? Let’s go over some advantages and disadvantages of each:

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?
Advertisement

For this layout, I think there’s an aesthetic advantage. The progression of colors feels almost like a gradient, which I find visually pleasing.

Also, this arrangement allows for the red section to wrap around the corner of the car, which permits the rear side marker lamp/reflector to be integrated into the taillight unit, saving money and offering a cleaner design.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?

For this layout, I think the key advantage is that, conceptually, it makes more sense to include the turn indicator on the outer corner of the car. That just feels more right for a turn indicator, and allows the indicator to be seen from the side of the car if it wraps around a bit, which gives a safety advantage.

Advertisement

This method does require the use of a separate rear side marker lamp, or at least another red lens in part of the taillight housing if it wraps around the corner.

Mazda had the same indecision on their GLC as well:

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?
Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?

And, of course, other manufacturers all had their own preferences. Automotive lighting designers must have had their own opinions, but so far none I’ve spoken with have ever really articulated why one arrangement was chosen over another. The fact that they occasionally changed back and forth, though, must mean that someone gave a shit, right?

Advertisement

One case I’ve never really understood the taillight color arrangement decision made was Porsche, for their 911s in the late 1970s and 1980s. This is one of the few cases where it would seem one layout actually would make more sense than the other, but for some reason, Porsche seems to have chosen the opposite path. here, look:

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?
Advertisement

Also, this layout sandwiches the clear reverse light lens between the red and amber sections, which is a different discussion. For what it’s worth, I’m fine with this.

So, for most of the world, the 911 had amber indicators at the corner that wrapped all the way around the car; most European countries did not require side marker lamps, so this was fine. In America, though, cars had to have a red rear side marker lamp and reflector, so Porsche went with a red turn indicator that incorporated the marker lamp.

Advertisement

Now, normally, the largest section of a taillight is given to the red stop/tail section, with the turn signal section and reverse lamps being smaller. Porsche was doing the opposite here, relegating their stop/tail to a small square section (not counting the optional heckblende).

Illustration for article titled Quick Question: Which is The Better Taillight Color Arrangement?
Advertisement

So, why do it this way? If Porsche reversed the red and amber sections, like you see here, they could have just had one global taillight lens that would work with a red rear side marker in the important North American market, but retained the amber indicator for everywhere else.

Porsche didn’t ask me about this, though. I’m told they didn’t even try.

Holy shit, I can’t believe I’ve written this much about this. What the hell is wrong with me? Anyway, please make me feel better by showing me you have opinions and thoughts of this of your own. Then I won’t feel so alone.

Senior Editor, Jalopnik • Running: 1973 VW Beetle, 2006 Scion xB, 1990 Nissan Pao, 1991 Yugo GV Plus, 2020 Changli EV • Not-so-running: 1977 Dodge Tioga RV (also, buy my book!: https://rb.gy/udnqhh)

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

From inside to outside. White/Red/Orange.

Here’s Why;

The reverse lights placed closer together will illuminate the area better and brighter in the middle of the car for backing up.

The red lights situated in the center of the cluster just because that’s where they belong and that’s gives a better indication of the size/width of the car at night when from seen behind.

The turn signal ambers on the edge make sense there because they are closer toward the direction the car is indicating it’s intention to turn and provides the greatest visibility from the most angles for other drivers.