New Top Gear's Ratings Were Shit Compared To Old Top Gear. FACT.

After Sunday’s Top Gear train wreck, host Chris Evans had a bit of a Twitter meltdown. He started citing weird statistics as if to prove that new Top Gear is better than old Top Gear, much in the same way that a trash fire is more popular than puppies. But it turns out that it actually wasn’t so popular after all.

Despite Matt LeBlanc, Sabine Schmitz, Rory Reid, and Chris Harris generally coming off okay, Evans and his use of brown people as props have been almost universally panned.


The only thing Evans—who definitely does NOT have ego issues, thankyouverymuch—has said about Top Gear since the episode aired were some tweets about its ratings:


But if you go beyond the measure of “audience share,” which is a weird yardstick for this sort of thing, as The Telegraph did, you’d actually find that not many people, relatively, actually watched it:

The show drew 4.4 million viewers, with a peak of 4.7 million, while the last series with Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May bowed out with 5.8 million viewers.

Evans said last week he would be ‘disappointed’ if the show attracted under 5 million viewers.


Those numbers were the lowest in a decade for Top Gear. FACT.

It’s gotten so bad that British bookies are now lowering the payouts on bets that Evans will be fired before the new Top Gear gets renewed for a second series.


Like every genius Twitter philosopher is pointing out, the Top Gear helmed by Jeremy Clarkson wasn’t so great when it first debuted. But also, it didn’t have nearly as many people watching, and it didn’t have nearly the same budget. And also, it wasn’t terrible. And also, it didn’t have Rory Reid and Chris Harris waiting in the wings.

Rock n roll?

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

About the author

Michael Ballaban

Deputy Editor, Jalopnik. 2002 Lexus IS300 Sportcross.

PGP Fingerprint: 0D03 F37B 4C96 021E 4292 7B12 E080 0D0B 5968 F14EPGP Key