Has Mini Lost Its Way?

Illustration for article titled Has Mini Lost Its Way?
CountersteerYour true stories of good and bad things that happen in cars.

A little more than a week ago, our own Bill Caswell expressed his displeasure at how BMW has been diluting the M brand with special editions that mean nothing and cars that no longer have anything to do with the word "Motorsport."

Advertisement

Now, In a column for Automobile, Jamie Kitman is raising the same concerns over another BMW owned company, Mini.

BMW is on a quest to increase marketshare, and this means adding models like the 5-Series GT, X6, Mini Countryman, Coupe, and Roadster.

As I never tire of saying, just because it sells doesn't mean it's good for your brand. Like some of the Kinks' late period hits, I don't begrudge Mini its Countryman success in the slightest — the company deserves to make loads of money for its maxi contributions to fun over the years. But while I know the Countryman is a Mini, it's not cute like its forebears, old and new. It's more, but somehow less.

Kitman, a huge fan of The Kinks, feels that these recent cars are like later Kinks albums. At the beginning, they were fantastic, fresh, and fun, but later in their career, the hits stopped coming.

Taken together with the alarmingly confused styling of the two-seat Coupe and Roadster Minis that have followed, the Countryman suggests a company that is spinning its design wheels. Indeed, each new iteration of Mini appears to set out to prove the limits of the brand's design language. Surely this can't be the plan, anymore than Kinks' leader Ray Davies set out to tank his band.

Advertisement

I tend to disagree with him on the Coupe and Roadster, which I find eminently cool and close to the spirit of Mini. They're small, fun, look cool, and bring a smile to your face when you see them.

But he's spot on with the Countryman. It's bulbous, ugly, goofy, has a weird interior, and, worst of all, not Mini in size or spirit. I typically refer to it as the Medium Cooper or, when I'm feeling really affectionate, "Hey You Ugly."

Advertisement

Even worse, Kitman says that the daring, inspirational spirit of Mini Cooper's gone by is gone.

But worst of anything must be the company's recent announcement that it will abandon the small, lightweight, high-tech Rocketman concept it showed last year. Not only did it look like a Mini — balanced, handsome, and right-sized — it was a reaffirmation of what the brand's core principles and mission should be. That is, building deluxe small cars with premium engineering and making money doing so.

Advertisement

Would the Rocketman have made the Countryman ok? I think of it as a Porsche scenario. If the Cayenne lets Porsche build awesome cars like the 918, then it's a necessary evil. But at Mini, the Countryman gets to exist and the Rocketman is dead. While sales are good, it's stifling and strangling the Mini brand.

But what do you think? Is Mini a shell of its former self or is the Countryman a proper Mini?

Advertisement

Photo Credit: Mini Passion via flickr

DISCUSSION

hammerheadfistpunch
HammerheadFistpunch

To be perfectly honest...I couldn't care less. The MINI brand was brought back to MAKE MONEY not to resurrect Alec Issigonis (God rest his zombie bones). They made a fun car, called the MINI cooper S, they also make other cars because the market demands that they do in order to stay relevant. People can moan all they want, MINI is a business case for BMW, not a pet company like Bugatti and they have to make a case for themselves or we have NO MINI's. period. If you like small quasi-British hatchbacks with feisty engines, buy a cooper S, if you want the spirit of a MINI cooper, buy an original one (have fun in that), If you want to look chic and funky but feel you need an SUV, but a countryman. Frankly, anyone who doesn't think they are buying into a marketing exercise for BMW when they buy ANY MINI is kidding themselves. If you like their cars, buy them, if you don't like them....buy something else. Buy a car on its merits, not its heritage.