Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

GM Death Fund Won't Cover All GM Ignition Switch Deaths

Illustration for article titled GM Death Fund Wont Cover All GM Ignition Switch Deaths

To date, General Motors’ outside fund has approved 119 death claims and 243 injury claims related to the defective ignition switch that sparked last year’s recall crisis. The fund is set to wrap up soon. Before it does, critics — including some family members of those killed — are wondering why the fund is covering certain deaths but not others.

Advertisement

Bloomberg reports that the compensation fund run by attorney Kenneth Feinberg only covers deaths and injuries that occurred in the 2.59 million cars recalled for that defect, including Chevrolet Cobalts, Saturn Ions and other small cars. What the fund doesn’t cover is GM’s other ignition switch defect found on larger cars last year, which also prompted a multimillion-vehicle recall.

The reason for this, the news service reports, is that GM recalled those vehicles immediately after finding out about the problem, and “because employees made no efforts to keep it under wraps,” as seems to be the case with the Cobalt ignition switch. The switch in question here is also a different design than the famously problematic Cobalt switch, so deaths or injuries that happened in other cars aren’t eligible for fund compensation.

Advertisement

Senator Richard Blumenthal, who urged GM CEO Mary Barra to expand the fund, has been critical of this outcome:

“I believe now more than ever that all of the injuries and deaths caused by defective ignition switches in GM cars should be covered by the compensation fund,” the Connecticut Democrat said in a telephone interview this week. “All of those other models suffered from an eerily and strikingly similar malfunction that caused death and casualties. There’s no logical or factual reasons that those victims should be excluded.”

A GM official said the fund’s scope is fair due to the second switch’s design and the circumstances under which it was discovered. Still, it comes as little consolation to several people, now deemed ineligible for compensation, whose loved ones were killed in these crashes; Bloomberg quotes one woman whose husband and four children were killed in such a wreck in 2005. (The woman sued GM, and the case was settled in 2010.)

Indeed, most of the 4,261 claims processed were deemed ineligible for compensation; about 81 remain under review.

Advertisement

Contact the author at patrick@jalopnik.com.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

There really isn’t anything “eerily and strikingly similar” unless you’re a dumbass politician who doesn’t really know anything about car design. The fact is: the ignition switches are different designs.

“Indeed, most of the 4,261 claims processed were deemed ineligible for compensation; about 81 remain under review.”

Is this really surprising? I mean, if you cut through all the media hyperbole, it’s a pretty small problem when it comes to numbers. (I am in no way trying to strip significance from the folks who lost their lives. My deepest sympathies to those families) But, because it was everyone’s favorite whipping boy (GM) we had to read about 24/7. That’s in stark contrast to the Takata recalls that seem to be non-existent in mainstream media headlines.