<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division" - Jalopnik Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:26:24 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:26:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4718233]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>The Trans Am is by far the best looking car that Pontiac and dare I say GM has ever put out. The only line that can be argued about is the Vette (and it is a good argument but you get my point). In seeing a pic of the new Camaro (not the concept), I am almost glad that The General has left my beloved Bird alone. The concept Camaro looked pretty good but the model closer to actual production doesn't have the same dramatic quality. Like I said, fine with me. I'll just continue to expand my TA collection and then eventually buy a Challenger. LOL</P> <p>Tbaum</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tbaum]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4718233]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:26:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4631761]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165697">-TheStig-</A>: I don,t understand why people continue to be self proclaimed experts on everything.Bmw was putting out rusted beer can 2002 series,while ferrari and other italian makes were made out of cheap fiberglass, both with inoperative blower motors (a tradition they carry on till this day) I know, Im an auto technician.Meanwhile, Pontiac had no 3 sales in the country back in the 60's.They should not die, the semi communist government should slack off, as well as these foreign car lovers.How about this-lets ship everyone to their favorite country of their choice, then ship there job elsewhere as well</P> <p>tdmtaa</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tdmtaa]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4631761]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:19:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4485538]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I owned a 79 TRANS AM for 18 years,the baddest car I ever owned,faster than todays vette, if GM doesn't revive the Trans Am, no camaro or any GM product for me,they'll lose my business forever,stop buying GM, buy any other domestic brand.</P> <p>et197994</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[et197994]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4485538]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:49:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4243783]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Alright!  So I got that goin' for me.</p> <p>Smells_Homeless</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smells_Homeless]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4243783]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:46:09 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4217111]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4202252">Smells_Homeless</a>: Excellent ideas.  You'll be one of the first hired.  LOL</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4217111]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:12:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4207866]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>General Motors DUM DA DUM DUM DUM<BR>
No new trans am DUM DA DUM DUM DUM</P> <p>donkeyassman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[donkeyassman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4207866]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:24:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4202252]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4195222">TheTooth</a>: Alright, I'm almost ready to subscribe to your newsletter.  A couple of things though:</p>
<p>Chevy:<br>
- I'm totally down with your plan here.  Spot on.</p>
<p>Pontiac:<br>
- I think there's definitely a market for a loaded T/A along with a Formula-style stripper.<br>
- I'd go along with the WRX AWD systems if they're available, but I think they may just have a winner with the Ecotec turbo.  Just develop that puppy, no reason for a boxer when there are other manufacturers that already do them very well.<br>
- Absolutely on the vibe.<br>
- The two-seather had better be right when it lands or you've got another Fiero.  Plus, I really don't see room for this car and the Solstice.  It's gonna be one or the other.<br>
- The Solstice can stay until the deathmatch with the car above is settled.  I suspect that would end with both of them dead.  Sad really.<br>
- I'm not sure about the CTS, I don't think the styling language would work with the Pontiac language.<br>
- The G8 wagon belongs here.  Especially if they play up the sportwagon aspects.</p>
<p>Caddy:<br>
Sadly, I just don't care about them.  Not quite old enough I guess.  I do know this, though, there is no place in my world for the SRX.</p>
<p>After the coup, can I have a job?</p> <p>Smells_Homeless</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smells_Homeless]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4202252]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:56:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4195222]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4183113">Smells_Homeless</a>: What would I do if I had that top office?  I'd offer a wide assortment of vehicles... maybe the same overall number of vehicles, but a better assortment.  The truly amazing thing is that they could do it given their current world portfolio.</p>
<p>- Mid-engined light roadster?  Sure... I'd bring over the Opel Speedster.<br>
- Station Wagon?  I'd bring over the Holden.  G8 wagon, baby, but mine would go to Chevy.  Pontiac needs to become a performance division in my world.<br>
- El Camino?  Sure... bring over the Holden Ute to the Chevy division.<br>
- Small turbo sedan?  Didn't GM get WRX internals for a SAAB or something?  Scrap that and use it for a Pontiac.</p>
<p>This is fun... I could spend a ton of time on this.  Here's what happens to GM after my hostile takeover:</p>
<p>Only 3 US GM divisions survive:  Chevy (family/economy/fleet), Pontiac (performance), and Cadillac (luxury).</p>
<p>Chevy:<br>
 - All truck, VAN and SUV lines<br>
 - El Camino (Holden Ute)<br>
 - Corvette (Too much history for me to move this)<br>
 - Full-size RWD sedan<br>
 - Mid-sized FWD sedan<br>
 - FWD Econo-box<br>
 - Camaro (Stripped down to basics and cheap)</p>
<p>Pontiac<br>
 - Firebird (Camaro with no "all-show-no-go" packages and unique styling)<br>
 - WRX-based AWD Turbo car<br>
 - Vibe (AWD and Turbo as options, at least)<br>
 - Mid-engined two seater.  Probably the Opal Speedster<br>
 - Solstice<br>
 - CTS and CTS-V</p>
<p>Cadillac<br>
 - DTS<br>
 - STS<br>
 - XLR<br>
 - SRX<br>
 - Escalade</p>
<p>Stick to these and spend your R&amp;D dollars improving them.  I think that might work.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4195222]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:37:02 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4190923]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>well, I guess I'll just have to paint a flaming chicken across the hood of my '01 T/A to make me feel better...</P>
<P>I figured anyway that the next Firebird/TransAM would be based off a Holden platform, given the GTO and G8</P> <p>rickgrx</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickgrx]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4190923]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:21:31 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4185938]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Maybe GM will come around by the time they are ready to make the next generation Camaro - I'm praying it will be a bit more rounded like the 2nd gen. Firebirds and Camaros. Oh, to have a modern day 2nd gen. FB !!</P> <p>NewCarSmellCologne</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewCarSmellCologne]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4185938]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:13:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4184739]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>aw man, the Decepticons got the raw deal!</p> <p>skulldriveshaft</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[skulldriveshaft]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4184739]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:19:35 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4184647]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164623">Dr.Danger</A>: Hi, I'm Al Harrington, president and CEO of Al Harrington's WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KIT emporium and warehouse. Thanks to a shipping error, I am currently overstocked with WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KITs and I'm passing the savings on to you!!!</P>
<P>Anyway, I lie these Trans/Am concept drawings way better than the new Camaro. I do hope someone comes out with a body kit to build them, complete with shaker.</P> <p>squablow</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[squablow]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4184647]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:02:52 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4184099]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>oh and i like this concept better :D<br>
<img src="http://images.cardomain.net/sites/cardomain/features/john/trans-am.jpg"></p> <p><a href="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2637141">om nom de plume</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[om nom de plume]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4184099]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:41:11 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4184086]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>that f's the chance of a worthwhile GTO ENTIRELY!</p> <p><a href="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2637141">om nom de plume</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[om nom de plume]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4184086]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:40:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4183544]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Not that I was going to buy one, but this fake Trans Am looks better than the upcoming Camaro.</p>
<p>Hmm, a coin blank on one side would be an error coin and worth more to a collector than face value. Something I'm sure will happen with this Camaro...for different reasons.</p> <p>Nightwing</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nightwing]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4183544]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:49:26 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4183230]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I don't care what they say.</P>
<P>I am going to make my own Trans Am. I am going to get T-Tops, put the sticker on the hood, Grow a Mullet, buy the matching jacket, and pick up a stranded woman in a wedding dress while outrunning the LAW. I just won't do it in West Hollywood.</P> <p>hotrodmetal</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hotrodmetal]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4183230]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:17:46 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4183113]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4167238">tanooki2003</a>: Ouch.  I would say it was a subtle departure from the standard formula of bulges and flares and stickers in a rattle-prone chassis that had come before.  The GTO had vastly superior build-quality to any other GM I've ever been in (more than a few) with a very, very nice interior.  Not to mention the sledgehammer quality of the LS1/LS2 power. But it was overpriced by a mile and, in typical GM fashion, under-marketed.</p>
<p>I often hear the sentiment you mention that GM should have done something new, but rarely hear a suggestion as to what that would be.  What would you have ordered had you been in a top floor office in the RenCen?  Mid-engined 2-seater maybe?  Sexy turbo roadster?  Supercharged mid-sized sedan?</p>
<p>(Disclaimer - I waited for the bulgy-hooded LS2 version before I slapped my cash on the counter.)</p> <p>Smells_Homeless</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smells_Homeless]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4183113]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:05:37 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4182397]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>* Whats a 'Muscle Car' without the Muscle?!</P>
<P>Its like a BLT without Bacon, Lettuce &amp; Tomato!!!</P>
<P>WAAAAAHHH, MOMMY! ITS OVER!!! :(</P> <p>CARBONFIBER</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CARBONFIBER]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4182397]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:48 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4178508]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>EVERYBODY EVACUATE NOW!!! If you look towards the coast you'll find the exits located to the sides. West side for refuge to Australia, East side for Europe.</p>
<p>You'll find the people there much more accommodating as well as the car companies, who incidentally are actually run by car companies, who build cars people actually want.</p> <p>LandofMinos,Top Gear Australia sucked, 2 out of 3 hosts MUST DIE</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[LandofMinos,Top Gear Australia sucked, 2 out of 3 hosts MUST DIE]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4178508]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:28:47 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4178503]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>These fuel laws are bullshit.</p> <p><a href="n/a">Come&VetteMe</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Come&VetteMe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4178503]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:28:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4178343]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Badgineering should be an offense punishable by executive castration.</p>
<p>He he he - and, where, exactly, would you find an executive with balls to castrate?</p> <p><a href="http://www.donovangilhooley.com">guruscotty</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[guruscotty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4178343]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:20:28 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4177083]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Last I checked the Solstice and Sky were pretty far from horrible four cylinder sports cars and both offer turbocharged engines for motorheads.</P>
<P>I'm also hard pressed to think of what vintage GM car the Solstice is styled after and it looks quite contemporary.</P> <p><a href="http://www.offtopic.com/">TriShield</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4177083]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:22:13 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4176990]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>bah , im sure there will be tons of conversing kits comming out, if not make your own...</P> <p>phatnackySS</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[phatnackySS]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4176990]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:18:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4175582]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Bean Counters are Terrorists I tell you! Blasphemy!</P> <p><a href="n/a">RoninianHoon</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RoninianHoon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4175582]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:25:30 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4175482]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167575">TriShield</A>: Wouldn't 80K/year Camaros and 20K/year Firebirds lead to the same net sales for GM? Especially if the FBs have a $2k premium to make up for extra production costs? Make them distinct enough so that it's not just a different trim level.</P> <p>e30 guy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[e30 guy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4175482]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:22:32 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4173815]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Sniff.Sniff. :(    <BR>
 Now I am really upset, that picture alone has rekindled my manhood. Perhaps they will remake the jacket at least, so that we may wonder what might have been. Where are my Bee Gees albums.......</P> <p>Race7117</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Race7117]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4173815]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:34:32 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4173427]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4172485">POLAЯ</a>: I would hope... but I would have said the same of KITT before the new show.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4173427]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:22:15 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4172485]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4172192">TheTooth</A>: The Burt will never go Ford! He would be too worried that Frog would leave him once she saw Kermit hangin with the Eco-Hybrid crowd.</P> <p><a href="http://polar.squarespace.com/">POLAЯ</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[POLAЯ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4172485]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:52:18 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4172192]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4172144">POLAЯ</a>: I hadn't thought of that.  How will they remake Smokey and the Bandit now?  Oh well, I'm sure they'll just follow Knight Rider's lead and have Burt driving a Mustang.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4172192]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:41:56 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4172158]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4171415">tanooki2003</a>: Exactly!  Just making a small turbo 4-cylinder car or two doesn't preclude the necessity to make a GOOD one.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4172158]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:41:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4172144]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P><B>THE BURT IS NOT AMUSED!!!1!!!<BR>.<BR><IMG src="http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Burt-Reynolds-Photograph-C12141661.jpeg" < p></B></P> <p><a href="http://polar.squarespace.com/">POLAЯ</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[POLAЯ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4172144]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:40:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4171550]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm on my second pontiac right now, and was eager to save some money for a Firebird/Trans Am.  This makes me VERY sad :(</p>
<p>I feel like the Trans Am is the thinking man's Camaro, you know?  The sports car that refused to end up on blocks on your front lawn.  The pony car for the intellectual mustached man who would drive said car in his blue jeans, blue jean shirt, and blue jean jacket.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p> <p>stos</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stos]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4171550]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:21:25 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4171415]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4169636">TriShield</a>: the Solstice cars are ugly and money would be better spent on a Miata.  Also GM does not particularly offer any fresh looking 4 cyl turbo cars.  The Colbalt, no matter how supercharged, still looks as dry as a Caviler, same as the G5.  THe HHR really is a joke.  The Subaru Imprezza, Mitsubishi Lancer, and Hyundai Tiburon are good examples.  GM needs to also not make economy cars feel so much like you are being punished for not being able to afford a Malibu by sloppy handling, having torsion bars, hard plastics, a cheap sounding crap radio with NO features and copy machine paper thin speakers, crappy no frills high maintenance engine, seats that made you feel like you were riding one of those plastic Big Wheels tricycles, and eerie creaks when the car turns.</p> <p>tanooki2003</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanooki2003]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4171415]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:16:11 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4171213]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4169636">TriShield</a>: I think the Mazdaspeed Miata, WRX, SRT4, and Evo says the market for a light little four-cylinder turbo car is huge... the General just hasn't done a good job producing one yet.</p>
<p>The Solstice has styling that sadly continues to try evoking GM cars of old which has a draw to an aging market... the precise market that doesn't embrace small turbo cars.  That's what they have the Camaro for.  The Solstice should be looking for another market.  That's how you expand your business... by appealing to as many people as possible with your options.</p>
<p>The General keeps trying to appeal to the same people with more cars that are very similar to what they already offer. This will bring no new sales.  It will just canibalize their other offerings' sales.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4171213]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:06 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4170359]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I have tremedous fondness for the Trans/Am of old - it was my
favorite Matchbox car for years. I laughed my ass off the first time I
heard the phrase "screaming chicken." So my emotional side is pissed.</p>
<p>Logically, however, I can see how a new Trans Am doesn't make a whole lot of business sense.</p>
<p>One alternative is to rebadge a super-high performance version of the Camaro a Pontiac Trans/Am instead of a Chevy Camaro SS.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c4166309">-TheStig-</a>: Teach me, oh master debater.</p> <p>Bumblebee</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bumblebee]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4170359]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:43:51 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4169754]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>.<br>
I am against inbreeding in all its forms.</p>
<p>Badgineering should be an offense punishable by executive castration.</p> <p><a href="http://powersports.honda.com/motorcycles/sport/model.asp?ModelName=Interceptor%20ABS&ModelYear=2006&ModelId=VFR800A6">my favorite car is a motorcycle</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[my favorite car is a motorcycle]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4169754]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:25:15 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4169636]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>The Firebird was never a part of GM's Camaro resurrection plan in the first place.</P>
<P>What GM did spend time working on was an American GTO to replace the rebadged Holden GTO. This project got as far as a rolling shell before it was completely scrapped. GM is leaving the G8s to wave the Pontiac muscle banner.</P>
<P>Apparently the market for a light little four-cylinder turbo car isn't as good as half you guys make it out to be since there are plenty of Solstice GXPs piling up at Pontiac dealers here in Phoenix.</P> <p><a href="http://www.offtopic.com/">TriShield</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4169636]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:22:03 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4169314]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>One more thing, 4 words, International Race of Champions. Yes I want the return of the IROC Z My chest hair and gold chains are waiting</P> <p>Race7117</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Race7117]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4169314]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:11:41 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4169198]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4167427">TheTooth</a>: We agree, oddly at the same exact time.</p>
<p>Building something different than usual is a great idea, It's the foundation of what originally made these cars great.</p>
<p>The most aerodynamic shape is the torpedo, and everyone is competing to build best looking torpedo.</p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4169198]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:07:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4168959]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>GM can start by putting some money into a G5 GXP. Wouldn't have to be much money since most development has already been done on the Cobalt SS. Mainly just styling enhancements, but please no more hammerhead spoilers or bugs bunny grills. DO IT.</P> <p>alex94z</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex94z]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4168959]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:00:42 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4168787]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Don't care about the Firebird, but can't believe they'd give up on product.</p>
<p>Pete D. was on Marketplace this morning talking about how GM's finally bringing back good product. A performance image is not the same as building performance cars.</p>
<p>Blows my mind that they're so short-sighted when it comes to product development. They could hit 35mpg with performance cars if they put their minds to it. Not to mention, there's a decent chance the rules will change between now and then.</p>
<p>So disappointing.</p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mad_science/sets/">Mad_Science</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mad_Science]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4168787]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:52 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4168670]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4167906">MrSpyder</a>: I think that's the problem.  They don't seem to want to compete head-to-head with any foreign automakers.</p>
<p>If they weren't making so much money at it already, I'd almost expect them to bow out of the full-size truck/SUV market now that there are other players.</p>
<p>It confuses me because I don't think they are incapable of making better cars and competing head-to-head with foreign makes... they just don't seem interested in trying.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4168670]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:52:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4168362]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's to guessing that the real reason it's been axed is there's no transformer left for it to become. Damn, think of the plot potential for the sequel. Did Bumblebee have a gay brother? Anyone?</p> <p>Rootski</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rootski]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4168362]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:35 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167906]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166122">TheTooth</a>: Totally!  I've been saying that for some time.  Rear-drive, smallish platform, 2 doors-4 seats(small rear ones), 4 turbo or 6 with some power for the weight.  Maybe a hatch form factor optional.  Manual trans available.  Couldn't they make something like that on a stretched Solstice/Sky platform? If it looked good and the interior didn't suck that would sell.  Although I think I just described a Subaru.</p> <p><a href="http://www.johnschratz.com">MrSpyder</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrSpyder]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167906]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:28:00 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167808]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Unless it's got forced induction (something the Camaro's never had), it'll probably be little more than a rebadge. This may be a good chance to scrap Roger Smith's whole setup, and give each of the divisions their own engineering departments again.</P> <p>Maymar the technophobe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maymar the technophobe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167808]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:24:32 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167686]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4164607">Tachman</a>: That's exactly the way I feel about it.  It's unfortunate really there won't be one, I always preferred the TA.  Maybe it's the Pontiac 'exctiment' badge, maybe it's the relative rarity, but I know exactly how you feel.  I would get close, but I don't think I'd actually buy one.</p> <p><a href="http://www.johnschratz.com">MrSpyder</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrSpyder]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167686]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:36 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167576]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4167192">tanooki2003</a>: Exactly.  They need to stop trying to capture what made them relevant in the 60's and instead try to make themselves relevant for the 00's (and soon 10's).  Try something smaller, maybe, with a revving turbo 4 or 6.  There are already plenty of rear-drive full-size V8's available now.  I don't want 12 versions of the same car (GTO, 300, Charger, Challenger, Magnum, G8, Camaro, etc...).  Don't get me wrong... I do like those (I own a Magnum R/T), but let's add something different to that mix.  It's a great family vehicle that isn't too slow for me that can tow a couple of motorcycles when needed.</p>
<p>But, when I wanted a second fun car, GM/Ford/Chrysler didn't really have any options for me.  I bought a used BMW M Roadster for that.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167576]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:17:11 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167575]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>GM doesn't want a new Firebird cannabalizing the Camaro, especially when they want to sell 100,000 Camaros a year.</P>
<P>Pontiac has the Solstice as well as the G8 RWD muscle duo. G8Board confirmed there will be a G8 GXP with a manual transmission and the engine will likely be the LS3 V8. The G8 ST-amino will have a GXP model as well.</P>
<P>As far as Pontiac goes, it is a redundant brand. All of GM's brands are redundant except for Chevrolet, Cadillac and HUMMER.</P>
<P>I can't help but think both G8s would sell better as Chevrolets than Pontiac and that ultimately they are being wasted on a dead brand.</P> <p><a href="http://www.offtopic.com/">TriShield</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167575]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:17:08 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167430]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>GM is run by fucking morons.</p> <p>TPSreports</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TPSreports]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167430]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:11:14 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167429]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I thought it looked like a Grand Prix; but I digress, it followed the original recipe - after all the first GTO looked like a Le Mans.</p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167429]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:11:09 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167427]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166505">SpeedWagon</a>: Yeah, but it was nothing new.  They just imported it from Australia and it had the same exact formula.  Big, expensive, 5.7l V8, and bland styling.  I'm saying they should try building something different than their usual attempts.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167427]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:11:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167239]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Well, at least there is no more of that ribbed body cladding that would fall off after 2 years....Pontiac Grand Am...Ribbed for her pleasure</P> <p>Mysterious Utility Bento</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mysterious Utility Bento]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167239]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:03:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167238]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166505">SpeedWagon</a>: The GTO was trash when it came out.  It was nothign more than a boring flat looking 2 door Buick with the ugly G6 like open grilled snout on the front end.</p> <p>tanooki2003</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanooki2003]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167238]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:03:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167192]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166505">SpeedWagon</a>: I think what he is talking about is more of a car that goes back to the late 80's to late 90's.  It needs to be "Sporty" like the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, Dodge stealth with wings and a flowing body, sort of like the appearance like it is wearing a skirt.  Good examples are the 2nd gen Mitsubishi Eclipse, Ford Probe, 1st gen Hyundai Tiburon.  A covered front end with sleek cat like headlights, not a disgusting open grilled snout that looks like it belongs on a family sedan.  That is one reason why the Pontiac GTO miserably failed.  it looked like a 2 door buick with it's boring G6 like front end.  it had no excitement, flare, curves, or any flows throughout the body.  it looked like a plain jane 2 door naked Buick with a big engine.  Not A Seller.</p> <p>tanooki2003</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanooki2003]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167192]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:01:22 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4167102]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166309">-TheStig-</a>: I'm not going to bite on this one and tell you why its silly to compare GM to luxury/niche manufacturers from Germany and Italy (which coincidentally all ignore CAFE and pay the fines).  All German and Italian vehicles sold here are luxury vehicles, except VW, which is obviously a niche manufacturer.</p> <p>JHJVJR</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHJVJR]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4167102]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:57:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166670]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Hmmph...</P>
<P>From what I understand, GM scaled back "Performance" in their "Revenue Division" too.</P> <p>DustyButt</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DustyButt]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166670]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:42:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166505]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4166122">TheTooth</a>: "Just build a fun two door, four seat, rear-wheel-drive machine with power and a manual transmission. Don't assume it has to look anything like a Firebird." They did, it was the second GTO - and it bombed.</p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166505]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:36:48 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166309]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165836">JHJVJR</A>: No flamewar enticement...just the truth.</P> <p>-TheStig-</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[-TheStig-]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166309]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:29:16 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166217]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Go out with a blaze of glory. Sell the entire Holden line. all V8 supercars, and kill Pontiac in 2019. The cars will be collectible and everyone will remember the 'good' years.  Don't water it down 'till it dies a slow natural death.</p> <p>MZЯ</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MZЯ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166217]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:25:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166125]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4165896">TheTooth</a>: I thought it was Benjamin Franklin all this time!!!</p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166125]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:22:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166122]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I'd like to see a Firebird, but a new Firebird.  Quit trying to recapture the exact products of 1969.  Instead, capture the spirit by making fast, fun, inexpensive machines with the technology of the times.</p>
<p>Just build a fun two door, four seat, rear-wheel-drive machine with power and a manual transmission.  Don't assume it has to look anything like a Firebird.  Don't assume it has to have a V8 (not that it can't or shouldn't, but a turbo 6 or 4 could be good depending on weight, etc...).  Be willing to sell a stripped down version with the bigger engine as an option.  Basically, try selling what people want rather than what people wanted.</p>
<p>Actually, if they do this they might be better off scrapping that name so some of us don't skewer them for "wrecking the firebird".</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166122]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:22:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4166091]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Brinnngggg back the birddddddd</P> <p>ChristianGM</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChristianGM]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4166091]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:21:20 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165926]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I forgot to add.......T-tops, we need T-tops. Not a targa, not some girly euro trash folding hardtop. T-tops and the gearshift lever should be as big as a baseball with the same stitching! Anyone seen my medication?</P> <p>Race7117</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Race7117]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165926]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:13:26 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165896]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4165640">Unevolved</a>: Um... check out Beercheck's avatar.</p> <p>TheTooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165896]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:12:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165836]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, from a purely business standpoint, not Trans/Am is a good idea.  The Camaro and Trans/Am both being offered is exactly the type of cannnibalism GM is trying to move away from.  The G8 is Pontiac's muscle car, and being larger and having 4 doors appeals to a different crowd.</p>
<p>The whole "Pontiac may not equal performance" thing is sad news.  If that's the case, then Pontiac has to go.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c4165697">-TheStig-</a>: Nice attempt at flamewar incitement.</p> <p>JHJVJR</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHJVJR]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165836]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:09:41 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165791]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165640">Unevolved</A>: Actually, um........ah, never mind.</P> <p>beercheck</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[beercheck]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165791]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:07:04 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165734]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Look on the bright side.  With no new Trans Am, none of us will have to regrow our mullets.  Of course, I'm sure there are a few of you that probably never chopped your mullets.</p> <p>STR8SIX</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[STR8SIX]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165734]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:04:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165697]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Thank goodness. American cars are garbage and I hope Pontiac gets the axe, along with Buick....and Mercury.....and Chrysler. Useless trash cars from automakers that don't care about quality. German/Italian cars are superior.</P> <p>-TheStig-</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[-TheStig-]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165697]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:02:37 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165640]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4164825">beercheck</a>: No worries, I didn't catch the reference either.</p> <p>Unevolved 8.04</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unevolved 8.04]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165640]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:00:01 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165574]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>NASCAR is still growing and growing and your trying to tell me there is no market for the supreme redneck mobile? There are literally thousands (poetic license) of different kinds of mustangs and they are still selling like hot cakes and the new KITT will insure more and more of us white trash go further into debt. Dodge has both a charger and now a challenger which are selling very well. I commend Cadillac for there styling and willingness to pursue the big dogs of Germany with the CTS. But this is America, land of the muscle car and the dangling participle. I need my coors, my beef jerky, and of course pontiac firebird. I vow to put a bandana on my head and play Whitesnake until Lutz' ears bleed, the red dragon must live!</P> <p>Race7117</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Race7117]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165574]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:57:18 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165303]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4164825">beercheck</a>: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3QKvEy0AIk&amp;feature=related">[www.youtube.com]</a></p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165303]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:45:57 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165299]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164623">Dr.Danger</A>: That's not a bad idea. With new front and rear bumper covers, a new hood (with hood scoop and flying chicken), and different head lights and tailights the new Camaro can become the new Firebird/Trans-Am.</P>
<P>I hope an OEM quality aftermarket company (is there one?) makes the kit.</P> <p>no_slushbox</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[no_slushbox]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165299]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:45:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4165053]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164292">clinto</A>: Man, I thought you were going to offer something big when you started with "Face it, folks", but then all you delivered was a bunch of "I think" noise. Reminds me strongly of a Wikipedia entry that uses some bigoted shmuck's opinion piece as factual reference.</P> <p>beercheck</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[beercheck]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4165053]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:36:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164943]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>aww no man, that stinks...</p> <p>corvetterestoration</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[corvetterestoration]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164943]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:31:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164825]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164219">SpeedWagon</A>: ...</P> <p>beercheck</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[beercheck]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164825]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:26:06 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164792]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4164292">clinto</a>: <i>Face it folks, if you took a brand new BMW 330 and just stuck a Camaro or Trans Am nameplate on it, it would go from hip and trendy to redneck car instantly. Those nameplates say "Only buy this car if you want Mike Huckabee to be President".</i></p>
<p>If he's good enough for Lone Wolf McQuade, he's good enough for me. Besides, there's nothing wrong with GM muscle cars or Bimmer fanboys that a good roundhouse kick couldn't fix.</p> <p>Ben Wade</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Wade]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164792]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:24:50 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164790]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>.<BR>.<BR>Goodbye Pontiac<BR>Goodbye Pontiac<BR>Goodbye Pontiac<BR>So sad to see you go.</P>
<P>Just warming up the band for a song I hope we won't sing.</P> <p><a href="http://polar.squarespace.com/">POLAЯ</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[POLAЯ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164790]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:24:43 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164737]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4164292">clinto</a>: You got them mixed up, the Challenger is the $40k over priced pig.</p>
<p>I dislike huckabee, registered democrat(Hell.. I even figure dout how to register to vote), and can't wait for a camaro... Sorry you don't agree to a mullet(loving not wearing) ways.</p> <p>reefer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[reefer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164737]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:22:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164709]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm torn. For me, this is like being told that the dog next door crapped in my front yard, but won't be crapping in my back yard. There's still a stinky pile of dog crap out front - but thank the Flying Spaghetti mOnster there won't be one out back.</p>
<p>On the other hand the world needs more fun cars, so one less (poorly-made) fun car is a bad thing.</p>
<p>I'd much rather they bother with badge-engineering a Trans Am out of the Camaro, than foist off another truck or sport utility vehicle.</p> <p><a href="http://www.donovangilhooley.com">guruscotty</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[guruscotty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164709]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:21:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164623]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KIT!!<br>
WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KIT!!<br>
WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KIT!!</p>
<p>WACKY FLAMING CHICKEN SNAP-ON AFTER MARKET BODY KIT!!</p> <p>Dr.Danger, Hasta la victoria siempre!</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr.Danger, Hasta la victoria siempre!]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164623]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:18:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164607]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164292">clinto</A>: That's something I find myself at odds with. When I was a child, I loved Trans Ams. Now that I'm older and detest the Trans Am's redneck image, I don't think I own one. I still think about it but then I see a beat up one with some jackass behind the wheel and realize the image I'd portray. Nonetheless, I would rather own a new Trans Am than a Camaro.</P> <p>Tachman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tachman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164607]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:17:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164591]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.  Here we go again.  So when do we get blessed with the front wheel drive Mustangs and Camaros.</p>
<p>Back to the Future or deja vu all over again.</p> <p><a href="http://cgarison.blogspot.com/">cgarison</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cgarison]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164591]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:16:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164526]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164292">clinto</A>: Giuliani is the redneck choice! He's the one on the overt asskicking platform with all the marital infidelity. Porsche needs a 911GE with a Toby Keith launch party.</P> <p>Ash78</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ash78]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164526]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:13:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164476]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>So then, no Torrent of screaming chickens. Pontiac is long past its summer Solstice...but, wait, this totally opens the door for a rebadged Aveo called... Le Mans!</P> <p>brandegee</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandegee]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164476]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:11:28 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164347]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>as much as i would've liked this car to be built i knew it never would; unless you gave it 4 doors, awd, a tall and goofy roof and 19 cup holders with a DVD player in the back for the runts.</p> <p><a href="http://www.wayoffcourse.com">StuPidaso</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[StuPidaso]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164347]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:03:47 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164304]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Scarlett Johansson won't return my calls. I blame CAFE 35.</p> <p>badco/LoJ</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[badco/LoJ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164304]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:01:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164295]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Travesty!</p> <p><a href="http://mcflipper.blogspot.com/">ThnderbltDoherty</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThnderbltDoherty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164295]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:00:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164292]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>TA wouldn't have sold anyway.</p>
<p>Face it folks, if you took a brand new BMW 330 and just stuck a Camaro or Trans Am nameplate on it, it would go from hip and trendy to redneck car instantly.  Those nameplates say "Only buy this car if you want Mike Huckabee to be President".</p>
<p>And I think rednecks (for the most part) would rather spend $40K on a Z71 than a Z-28.</p>
<p>I don't think a modern banditmobile would find many buyers.</p>
<p>A few, but not enough to make production profitable.</p> <p>clinto</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[clinto]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164292]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:00:46 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164240]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>..."because of new legislation requiring vehicles to reach a fleet average of 35 mpg by 2020, Pontiac might not end up as GM's performance division."</P>
<P>So 2020 is 12 years away. They can't put gas guzzlers on the road now and if need be pull them in 2020 or limit quantities, or heaven forbid find a way to make them more fuel efficient. What is the life cycle of a car these days? I think you could probably put out a generation or two of what the hell they want.</P>
<P>No American car company has had to pay a CAFE fine yet. The government is pushovers, test them.</P>
<P>Maybe I am simple when it comes to this stuff and there is a grading period or something. But what ever lose another 39 billion I don't care I like buying my cars heavily discounted.</P> <p><a href="http://n/a">BLS</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BLS]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164240]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:57:33 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164219]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Once again a fuel crisis will kill the muscle car.</p>
<p>I feel like that Indian, atop the hill, looking down upon the freeway.</p>
<p>*Tear*</p> <p>SpeedWagon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpeedWagon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164219]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:56:38 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[No New Pontiac Trans Am, GM To Scale Back "Performance" In "Performance Division"]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/355405/no-new-pontiac-trans-am-gm-to-scale-back-performance-in-performance-division#c4164199]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Yay, special edition cars with dealer markups of stellar proportions.</P>
<P>I guess I'll just have to wait for somebody in the aftermarket to release a Firebird kit.</P> <p>WarShrike</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[WarShrike]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:355405:c4164199]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:55:38 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>