<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems! - Jalopnik Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:19:10 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:19:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1798901]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
They probably should've turbo'd everything. I still remember the C&D test of the Sundance America model. They said it would just do the ton, but with enough high-speed thrum to knock out your eardrums.</p>
<p>
My vote is for a Plymouth Scamp retrofitted with the full CSX treatment</p> <p>brandegee</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandegee]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1798901]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:19:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1795210]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1793763">danio3834</a>: Once they got them some intercoolers, that is.  Too bad they didn't make a Shelby New Yorker, my mom went through too many piston rings with the "hot" turbo setup.</p> <p>Turboner</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turboner]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1795210]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Jul 2007 05:31:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1793763]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
All these cars were pretty good performance for their day.  Most under rated probably the Shelby Lancer<br />
</p> <p>danio3834</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[danio3834]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1793763]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:15:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1793645]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
*cough*Subaru*cough*</p> <p>fiat22turbo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiat22turbo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1793645]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:52:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1793354]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
We need another mainstream manufacturer to turbo damn well near everything they make (hell, that'd justify Pontiac's existence).</p> <p>Maymar is convinced M.C. Escher engineered his car</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maymar is convinced M.C. Escher engineered his car]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1793354]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:45:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1792357]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Lest we also forget the 1989 Top Speed test where the 1989 Shelby CSX-VNT pulled 156mph.  Not bad for a 175hp SOHC turbocharged and intercooled 4-cylinder.</p>
<p>
Here's are a few more interesting articles:</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.front-runners.net/mopar_stuff/mag_articles/">[www.front-runners.net]</a></p> <p>fiat22turbo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiat22turbo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1792357]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:10:04 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Shelby Dodges: More Turbo Emblems!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/classic-ad-watch/shelby-dodges-more-turbo-emblems-274593.php#c1791478]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I own one of the '87s.  It was actually a Shelby, not a badge engineered one like these.  Road and Track did a comparison back in the day, and the CSX won.</p> <p><a href="http://www.last.fm/user/jpoRS/">jpoRS</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpoRS]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:274593:c1791478]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:16:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>