<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn - Jalopnik Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:05:42 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:05:42 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c925424]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"Buy a Chevy truck if you want to spend less time fixing it."</p>
<p>
All my years around the parts and repair industry make that statement hilarious!</p>
<p>
Hell, the C/K series used up Idler and Pitman arms like candy...while the motors were on trial for "piston slap"...and the interior "set a new record for cheapness" (that last from Automobile magazine).</p> <p>Zanary</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zanary]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c925424]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:05:42 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c901239]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
broman78, double-check the equation for horsepower:</p>
<p>
[ HP = (torque x rpm)/5252 ]  where torque is given in ft-lb.</p>
<p>
That's the way it is, period. The idea that "horsepower is for speed and torque is for pulling" shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how an engine accomplishes work, and how the gear ratios in your drivetrain make a critical difference in performance.</p>
<p>
In general, for any vehicle, an engine with high peak torque at low RPM is NOT really what you want, but rather sufficient torque over a broad, flat RPM curve. </p>
<p>
Plot this and you'll see that, ideally, steady torque translates to a linearly increasing horsepower curve.  A high-rpm engine will do the job just like a high-displacement, low-speed "torque monster", especially now that modern transmissions are up to the task of converting high-rpm "speed" into stump-pulling power! The opposite is also true: a low-rpm diesel engine can set speed records or win the LeMans, as Audi did.</p>
<p>
A diesel's main advantages compared to an equivalent horsepower gasoline engine are fuel economy and durability. That's why all heavy trucks choose diesel engines, despite the expense of weight, noise, and useable RPM range.</p>
<p>
Bottom line: buy the right horsepower engine to match your job requirements. Buy diesel if you want to afford the fuel for it and drive it for 350k miles. Buy a Chevy truck if you want to spend less time fixing it.</p> <p><a href="http://powersports.honda.com/motorcycles/sport/model.asp?ModelName=Interceptor%20ABS&ModelYear=2006&ModelId=VFR800A6">my favorite car is a motorcycle</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[my favorite car is a motorcycle]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c901239]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:58:05 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c900860]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Hey Ray, I've got a nail appointment, can you wrap  it up? Blah Blah Blah.</p> <p>garagegurrl</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[garagegurrl]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c900860]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:04:37 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c900495]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
well... they said that todays Rolex 24 Hours of Daytona is the Super Bowl of sports car racing... the Daytona 500 is the Super Bowl of NASCAR... but i honestly cant tell you the origin of that saying...</p> <p>smokyburnout</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokyburnout]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c900495]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:52:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c900072]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Tonsoffun remeber horsepower is for speed and torque is for pulling.  GM uses their Duramax in the 4500 & 5500.  If you towing loads under 35M gross, I would go with the powerstroke. If your gross was to go over 35M, I would go with the 7.2 Cat.  Remember the cat is prob. a 7000 option.</p> <p>broman78</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[broman78]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c900072]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:11:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c899927]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
What is this "super bowl" everyone keeps talking about.</p>
<p>
Something to do with commercials?</p> <p>hermitizer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hermitizer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c899927]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:57:26 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c899673]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
What is really interesting is that Ford's trucks like the F-650 use Cummins and Cat diesels. And I believe the 5.9L Cummins that you can get in the F-650 and 750 is the same one Dodge uses. From what I have seen, the 7.2L Cat diesel can produce up to 860lb-ft of torque. While they may not be so advanced as the new 6.4, I would take a 7.2L Cat diesel over it...</p> <p>tonsoffun</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tonsoffun]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c899673]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:28:15 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c899516]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ford might build a decent heavy duty truck, but Navistar still hasn't figured out how to build a reliable diesel engine. </p> <p>grzydj</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[grzydj]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c899516]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:10:13 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c899481]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Too bad they don't know how to make money. They just reported a 12 billion $ loss.</p> <p>critical_matt</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[critical_matt]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c899481]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:47:46 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ad Watch: Ford's Super (Duty) Bowl Commercial Teasers Are Techie Porn]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-fords-super-duty-bowl-commercial-teasers-are-techie-porn-231967.php#c899427]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
i could totally watch a whole truck get put together that way. at least ford still knows how to build trucks...</p> <p>smokyburnout</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokyburnout]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12:231967:c899427]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:19:04 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>