<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jalopnik: Talking Points]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jalopnik.com/tag/talking points</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Jalopnik posts tagged Talking Points]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Talking Points: Could Toyota Buy GM?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Toyota president Katsuaki Watanabe's non-denial to <em>Automotive News</em> of plans to buy a stake in a non-Japanese automaker sent clouds of speculative exhaust puffing from cranial smokestacks from New York to Tokyo and back. Would Toyota make a move on GM? Could it grab even a small piece of the General, without causing a political firestorm? And what would it gain? Lots of questions, and so far not enough good answers. Anyone? anyone? Watanabe? Watanabe?				<a href="http://jalopnik.com/131935/talking-points-could-toyota-buy-gm" title="Click here to read more about Talking Points: Could Toyota Buy GM?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/131935/talking-points-could-toyota-buy-gm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-131935]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Talking Points]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:26:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Spinelli]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=131935&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says" href="http://jalopnik.com/talking-points/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">talkingpoints</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says" href="http://jalopnik.com/131418/talking-points-foreign-automakers-have-dealings-with-terror-sponsors-group-says" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says" alt="Click here to read Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says" src="http://cache.jalopnik.com/assets/images/12/2005/10/small_terror_sponsor.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A group funded by Big Three retirees have launched an ad campaign accusing Nissan, Hyundai, Mazda and Toyota of dealing with rogue states that are "state sponsors of terror" according to the US State Department. The <a href="http://www.levelfieldinstitute.org/facts_toyota.php">Level Field Institute</a> blasted the companies for pursuing business in Iran, Syria and Sudan, while GM, they say, does not. Toyota, for example, "acknowledges pursuing a <a href="http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=164523">20% market share</a> of the Iranian import market, included the opening of 71 new, authorized dealers," according to a report on the organization's Web site. One of the ads, currently running in <em>Roll Call</em> and The Washington <em>Post</em> was rejected by the Detroit <em>News</em> for allegedly being  inflammatory to advertisers. What say you? Freedom of speech, or crowded-theater incitement? [Thanks to Brad for the tip.]				<a href="http://jalopnik.com/131418/talking-points-foreign-automakers-have-dealings-with-terror-sponsors-group-says" title="Click here to read more about Talking Points: Foreign Automakers Have Dealings with Terror Sponsors, Group Says">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/131418/talking-points-foreign-automakers-have-dealings-with-terror-sponsors-group-says]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-131418]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Talking Points]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ads/Promotions]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:10:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Spinelli]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=131418&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

