Let's see here, the change in internal energy of a system, measured from state one to state two, is equal to:
ΔU=αRn2T2- αRn1T1=αR(n2T2- n1T1)
At the same time, the work done by the pressure-volume changes as a result from this process, is equal to:
W= ∫ P dV
Since the process is not adiabatic......
Dammed that 2nd Law of Thermodynamics,… who ever it was that invented that, needs to come up with something more useful. I'm going to write the President and Congress and ask them to have it outlawed.
It's dead as a primary energy store. We've known that for years. This is hardly news. Where it shines though, is kinetic energy recapture. Particularly on heavy vehicles.
As usual, Berkeley points its beady little eyes at the tail of the snake sticking out of the hole, and pronounces that it is passing small, and therefore may be disregarded.
I've read it before, that for capacity vs weight, compressed air isn't that good. If I could point to one thing that kinda makes up for the lack, the exhaust air is actually cooler than ambient temperatures, so right there you've got AC.
I thought compressed air was supposed to be very efficient for energy storage. The article only points to a figure of energy density, which is apples-to-oranges. As for being more or less efficient than electric, it seems to me that efficiency isn't the only issue - there's also cost, infrastructure, and weight issues, for instance. I'm sure this kid knows what he's talking about - having an engineering degree from Berkeley I would certainly hope he does, but from what I've read and seen about these vehicles there are a lot of advantages.
@weatherman: I would think that compressed air is pretty inefficient, and if you're using an electrical air compressor - you're comparing the efficiency of the compression stage (lots of heat generated here) and then the expansion stage (some energy lost here as well, since the "exhaust" air is moving pretty quickly, and all of that energy is inefficiency) vs. the efficiency of a battery, which is really pretty good these days. The other issue is going to be weight savings - is the air system going to be substantially lighter than a similar range electric system? That could offer some major efficiency gains.
@nataku8_e30: you're probably right about generating the pressure. I guess I was only thinking of storing and releasing the energy. As for the weight issues though, all the stuff I've seen on these air cars suggests that the engines are very light and the weight of the "fuel" is about the same as a gasoline engine. Now, it won't take you near as far as gas, but I think for the same range on battery you'd need something weighing 2-4x as much.
@nataku8_e30: Right. You have to remove the heat during the compression stage, otherwise your hot high pressure tank cools to have all the stored energy of a farting balloon; this takes energy (and/or time). Also the cooling as the air rapidly expands in the car is wasted energy unless you run the air through some kind of intercooler. In theory you can use the heat from pumping up (to warm the bathrooms in air car pump stations?) and use the cooling from the engine as air conditioning, but overall the efficiency kills.
The badly-written Wikipedia article cites claims that compressed-air cars are at best 14% efficient, and that a 5-minute re-pump would require a 1 MegaWatt compressor. It's hard to overcome over the inefficiency, even if batteries weigh 500 pounds.
MDI has an AirPod car putt-putting around France and still claims Tata Motors will use the technology.
@skierpage: There is one big advantage to this, though. With a decent regulator, I'd have all the air I need to run my spray gun, vacuum pump, impact wrench, sand blaster, or any other air tools i end up buying. My 2hp compressor kind of blows.
Just restrict the drive-through lane to cars with a stop-start feature, hybrids, and battery-electric vehicles. It's in the bible - "Idling cars are the devil's playthings"!
Or as @GreenN_Gold: says, put a slope in the lane so everyone can coast through (banging into the rear bumper of the car in front). #wheels
If I'm expected to turn my engine off while in the drive through, then I expect the drive through to be downhill. Seems like a reasonable trade off. Call me when all the drive throughs are downhill. #wheels
11/20/09
ΔU=αRn2T2- αRn1T1=αR(n2T2- n1T1)
At the same time, the work done by the pressure-volume changes as a result from this process, is equal to:
W= ∫ P dV
Since the process is not adiabatic......
Dammed that 2nd Law of Thermodynamics,… who ever it was that invented that, needs to come up with something more useful. I'm going to write the President and Congress and ask them to have it outlawed.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
As usual, Berkeley points its beady little eyes at the tail of the snake sticking out of the hole, and pronounces that it is passing small, and therefore may be disregarded.
Aren't they cute?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/20/09
@nataku8_e30: Right. You have to remove the heat during the compression stage, otherwise your hot high pressure tank cools to have all the stored energy of a farting balloon; this takes energy (and/or time). Also the cooling as the air rapidly expands in the car is wasted energy unless you run the air through some kind of intercooler. In theory you can use the heat from pumping up (to warm the bathrooms in air car pump stations?) and use the cooling from the engine as air conditioning, but overall the efficiency kills.
The badly-written Wikipedia article cites claims that compressed-air cars are at best 14% efficient, and that a 5-minute re-pump would require a 1 MegaWatt compressor. It's hard to overcome over the inefficiency, even if batteries weigh 500 pounds.
MDI has an AirPod car putt-putting around France and still claims Tata Motors will use the technology.
11/20/09
(sorry)
#tips
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
While the ICE is only 'bout 20% efficient, +/-, but it's still better than most anything else which gives similar range/performance.
Now where's my Mr. Fusion?!
11/20/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Eh? ...
*reads*
Oh wait what!? The big guys are saying that the gov't should do something??
Err, my bad, that's different. That may actually go somewhere!
11/12/09
Or as @GreenN_Gold: says, put a slope in the lane so everyone can coast through (banging into the rear bumper of the car in front). #wheels
11/12/09
11/12/09
Take off.... #wheels
11/12/09
11/12/09