The greatest car that nobody ever bought would be the Lotus Elan+2 in my opinion. Despite being far prettier than the two-seater Elan hardtop (but not as much so as the Series 1 Elan roadster), having something close to accommodations for four and good performance, only about 5,200 were sold worldwide between 1967 and 1973. Even by Lotus standards, that doesn't exactly add up to being a best-seller. The Elite/Eclat series that "replaced" the +2 couldn't hold a candle to the +2 in any respect except possibly safety and emissions, and made me think of the AMC Gremlin and Matador Coupe in respect to styling. Typical-of-Lotus poor reliability and build quality notwithstanding, the Elan+2 was an excellent Grand Tourer, and should have sold better.
@D.Wilhelm: Well, the first Elite series topped out at 2,535 units., which makes the +2 twice as good. Total Elan production was about 17,000, so the +2 was about 1/3 of that. 9,300 Europas. Total Esprit production was 10,675.
The Elan was a real breakthrough for Lotus. And Emma Peel didn't hurt. The Elite/Eclat were heinous successors. But I'd say that Elans weren't overlooked and that no one bought them. They found their market and sold well, given the circumstances. Lotus is still a small volume, niche producer of high priced specialty cars. A great car, but one that never had any expectation of selling hundreds of thousands. More's the pity. Good thing the Miata showed up.
@DrLemming: Not true. Studebaker was at death's door when they released the Avanti. It could have helped, but it wasn't going to save the company. At that point, they just couldn't compete in the full size and luxury markets, despite absorbing Packard.
Avanti was an amazing car for the time, and it's still in production. Pretty good for the last output of a failed company. A shame, because they might have been able to do better than AMC in the sixties.
@Van Sarockin, rogue trebuchet: There's a difference between something being "not true" and open to different interpretations. In 1961 new Studebaker management decided to axe development on a new generation of small cars in favor of the Avanti. Alas, the Avanti not only ended up costing the company much more than originally planned, but it suffered from production delays that badly hurt sales. Meanwhile, sales of Studebaker's aging family cars went south.
...
The Avanti is one of my all-time-favorite cars, but I do think that Studebaker would have lasted longer if it had invested its meager resources into its volume products rather than a niche car.
...
Yes, Avanti survived Studebaker as a limited-production vehicle for an amazing number of years. However, the original body went out of production quite a while ago and, last I heard, the parent company ceased production of a Camaro-based Avanti.
I guess these are all contempory, except the Tucker, and all are post-war, but I would put forth the 1935–1937 Auburn 351/352's which gave premium car looks and performance for mid-priced money; if you want to get more obscure, include the previous Alan Leamy styled Auburns (Gordon Buering was brought in to restyle them when the Leamy versions did not sell).
The 164 is a good choice but I would argue for the Alfa Milano (or 75 as it was known everywhere else). V6, 50/50 weight balance, rear wheel drive, drunken Italian ergos (window roller buttons on the roof...really?), inboard rear brakes, transaxle. Plus it was the last true Alfa Romeo (the 164 was built after FIAT got their greezy mitts on 'em).
I loved my 164-S, fast (160mph, don't ask.), reliable (no, really, It had over 370K miles on it when I sold it, and I put 110K on it in ONE YEAR, It still serves daily driver duty for the new owner.) good looking, comfortable, TERRIFIC in the snow, and sounded like a million bucks at WOT. A genuinely great car. The iron worm got to the suspension mounts pretty badly, but the Alfa 12v 3.0 V6 is bad ass, and the electrics and ancillary mechanicals are surprisingly well sorted. Not to mention that lovely Italian lazyness built into everything! People would reach up for the inside door handles and then look around in confusion trying to get out of it... this was my spiel: "Ok, relax, put your hands on your knees. take a deep breath. Now, you're relaxed remember, where does your hand want to go to open the door and let you get out? Thats right, just slide it off your knee and hook a finger on the latch, it's really that easy" There were hundreds of little touches like that on that car. despite using 100 gallons of Vaseline and a hydraulic press to cram that 3.0L into the engine bay they somehow managed to make servicing it a breeze. I still miss that car. I may try to buy another one some day...
Van Sarockin, rogue trebuchet promoted this comment
JawzX2: Hoon The Earth @ www.cafepress.com/jawzx2 was starred
JawzX2: Hoon The Earth @ www.cafepress.com/jawzx2 was unstarred
I see one or two Alpines with surprising regularity every time I go to France, which is about one a month. Clearly, some Frenchmen bought them and I would too!
Van Sarockin, rogue trebuchet promoted this comment
Edited by Nickyboy - cruising the Autobahn and listening to the Scorpions at 08/10/09 6:35 PM
Nickyboy - cruising the Autobahn and listening to the Scorpions was starred
Nickyboy - cruising the Autobahn and listening to the Scorpions was unstarred
The thing about the Buick Reatta is that it can and has been made RWD using a C4 Corvette rear subframe. GM did it at the factory using a Grand National turbo engine. One could use a supercharged 3800 without the worry of wiring troubles as the Reatta came with a 3800.
The VW Corrado can also be made AWD. I have (packed up back home) a magazine showing how one could make their own AWD Corrado.
Both cheap cars that can be made to be truly special. However, the herds will continue to flock to the Civics for fear of actually being an individual.
Edited by that ain't the way to have fun, son at 08/10/09 4:34 PM
that ain't the way to have fun, son was starred
that ain't the way to have fun, son was unstarred
I rented both the Merkur and the XR4ii, the Merkur in Phoenix and the XR4ti in Houston. Both were super fun, eclectic quirky European rides. The Merkur sped from Phoenix to the Grand Canyon doing 120mph out in the wide open spaces with 4 passengers in quiet composure.
The XR4ti in Houston had an excellent ride and handling combo, but the engine took a bit long to get on song. But, power brake it, keep the peddle to the floorboard and the old girl hiked up her skirt and showed the world her bi-winged tail.
My friend rented a Lincoln LSC. The XR4ti matched him step for step but had way better brakes. We were doing about 110mph when we saw a police car in the bushes, I slammed on the binders, ABS flashing furiously, 50mph without drama. the Linc on the other hand, brakes a smoking made the "cherry blueberries" start flashing. While I puttered off to the Cajun restaurant for crawfish, laughing all the way.
Ah, the memories.
PS - The Reatta definitely doesn't belong on any list of "great" cars. YUCK! Replace that and the Alfa 164 (front drive Alfa - double YUCK) with the real Alfa's - GTV6 and the Milano 3.0 Verde. Yes, the Milano is ugly, but it drives beautifully.
I disagree with #4. The Reatta was a total turd and everyone knew it! It put the "Ick" in Buick. It was ugly and ill proportioned all over, especially from the inside where the only thing right was the angles on the dashboard. The touchscreen was a joke that nobody got. Plus, it was saddled with GM's ubiquitous and craptastic 3800 V6 AND FWD, which does not a sports car make. Even the name was one of the lamest to come out of GM, ever.
The Reatta was a craptastic handbuilt GM parts bin special, not a great car.
@slackinfux: If you think the 3800 is "craptastic", you're on the wrong site.
The Reatta was no sports car, but as a unique personal luxury coupe, it succeeded - or it would have, were it not for the overinflated MSRP.
@slackinfux: First of all, Buick never called the Reatta a sports car. Second of all, the 3800 was a excellent workhorse engine that served GM well for a long time. Maybe it had pushrods and an unsuitable angle for a V6, but it's torquey, reasonably smooth, and nearly unbreakable. Third, I bet your opinion about the styling is among the minority here. Fourth, FWD was still seen as highly acceptable in the late 80s. The backlash hadn't begun yet.
The Reatta failed because it cost too much, quality was somewhat iffy, and it got caught in Buick shifting its focus from sportiness to conservative near-luxury.
@slackinfux: Agreed, the touch screen did away with the tactile buttons everyone was accustomed to at the time (like I am today!). Although they overdid it in the late-80s Delta 88 with dozens of identical buttons on the dash. It requires taking your eyes off the road, more troublesome than texting while driving given that button position changes from screen to screen.
Reattas had awful problems with rear brake lockups as well. A good friend flipped his convertible reatta over on a freeway when his rear brakes locked.
The plastics by the gross trainload don't age well in GMs either. In the 70's they had zero UV inhibitors in them, causing everything to crumble with sunlight exposure. In the 80's they were better, but still not exactly the right forumlation. Don't even get me started on the late-80's GM paint. How many Quasar Blue Olds/Pontiac/Chevrolets do you remember seeing with grey pock-marks the size of a quarter where the paint flecked off in droves. I've even seen beige cars do it -- and that's supposed to be the most "durable" color according to body men.
All that said, I'd still love a Reatta. Classy, compact, easy to drive, park, and reasonably efficient yet powerful (30 MPG highway!), and not looking like anything else on teh road FTW!
@ha1156w: It's the white GMs that really flake. They did it until the mid-'90s, anyway; there's a '95 or newer Lumina around with half its paint missing.
Volvo plastics were little better at the time. The dashes crack, map pockets and consoles shatter... most hard plastics turn to fine dust.
@tonyola: Yeah, I agree. I really wanted a Reatta when they came out, but I couldn't force myself to pay list, and they really were asking for it at the dealers I went to... unbelievably.
@FP - Funny how it seems quiet around here, eh?: The Reatta-- its segment position-- reminds me of Ford's last stab at the Thunderbird. Except the Reatta is more attractive.
Especially in 1988. Think about the crap we could buy in the US in 88-- the Reatta looks like a pretty good car in that light, I think.
@area_educator: Definitely. It's still attractive today (unlike much of what was around then) and it's still an okay car (see above). Overpriced, sure, but competent.
@FP - Funny how it seems quiet around here, eh?: I lusted after one. But then again, I come from a Buick family. My grandfather finished his career as a mechanic with many years working at Buick dealerships.
Say what you will about Buick, but for the late 80s they were pretty good cars.
Then they became pretty good cars for the people in their late 80s...
@Hart88: Especially the second-generation 2001-2003 models. Really good cars that never had a chance because Olds was already a dead brand walking by that point.
@tonyola: I'd argue harder for the 1rst gen cars, since they were never supposed to be the Antares that would slot in Olds's likeup below the real (stillborn) 2nd gen Aurora. The '01-'03 cars are still nice, but something about the earlier models feels more special.
@Hart88: Agreed. We had some Aurora and Alero rentals when I was working red cross disaster relief. They were way nicer than I anticipated. Competent styling, too.
@area_educator: I always liked the Intrigue - the W-body wouldn't get another modern, naturally-aspirated engine until the '05 LaCrosse. The blown 3800s were cool, though.
@FP - Funny how it seems quiet around here, eh?: GM is kind of wacky with this sort of thing. Neglect a promising brand until it's very nearly dead, and then the split personality-- one hand finally gives the brand good product again, the other hand pulls the plug.
Olds, Saturn, Pontiac...
The GTO deserved a better fate. However, upon its introduction the magazines went on and on about how dull it looked. That perception apparently spread to the public at large. Had everyone forgotten that the original GTO was based on the everyday, ordinary Pontiac Tempest? Until the 1968 Endura-nosed models, there wasn't all that much stylistically separating the GTO. No-one seemed to mind then. I though the new GTO was reasonably handsome, and if it people called it boring, I'd say that was a benefit for cruising underneath the notice of the police and boy-racers.
As for the Phaeton, the word that comes to mind is "hubris" - overbearing arrogance. It's not for nothing that "economy car" makers like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda created new brands for their luxury cars. Also, VW already had three premium brands with Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini. How did they think people in the US would pay $70K for a car with an economy name? I've never driven a Phaeton, but although they had wonderful interiors, the outside looked a little nondescript and I've heard the V8 models were none too exciting to drive. Hard to compete against a well-established supremely competent if seemingly dull Lexus LS, much less a Mercedes or BMW. And then there was VW's reputation for quality - or lack of. I've only ever seen a tiny handful of Phaetons here in car-conscious Miami.
@tonyola: Looking like a run-of-the-mill Pontiac wasn't a problem back in the 60s, but now that the brand is mainly known for making terrible rental cars, it's more of a liability.
I do think the styling is aging well so far, and hopefully the stigma will wear off now that Pontiacs won't be clogging rental lots for much longer.
@tonyola: A guy here at work has an '04 GTO.
The biggest issue with it is the lack of trunk space. I guess they had to modify the gas tank to bring it over, and put it mostly in there.
@tonyola: It's not for nothing that "economy car" makers like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda created new brands for their luxury cars.
Which works. In America. In the rest of the world, not so much. Making a luxury car under an established non-luxury brand isn't an instant success, but it works way better than making up a fancy new badge and then expecting people to pay for the badge.
@MR42HH: But I am talking about America, where the Phaeton was a monumental failure. Toyota and Nissan were already known throughout much of the rest of the world for building some premium cars (Crown, Majesta, Century, etc. for Toyota; Skyline, Cedric, President, etc. for Nissan) as well as economy cars. However, we never really got these in the US, so the perception that they were econo car makers was reinforced. As for Honda, it's no secret that the Legend and, to a lesser extent, RL (sold as Hondas outside of North America) were fairly successful in the US but were something of a flop in Europe.
My point about the Phaeton was that VW already had a range of premium sedans in the US under the Audi banner. Marketing the Phaeton was like Chevrolet making some sort of uber-Caprice and selling it for high-end Cadillac money.
My dad worked on the Impact program with GM. Anyone remember that? Anyway, I got to sit in (not drive as I was 9 at the time) The coolest Reatta ever built. It had a laptop in the back which ran a program which was designed to trick the car computer into thinking it was electric. Why? I have no idea, but it had a full color screen similar to what the Tahoe Hybrid has now and had to be plugged in overnight. In 1990 this was the coolest thing a kid could see.
Novaload Wants the Jez 9 Back promoted this comment
Prawo Jazdy and The Velocity Trumpets: I miss Deartháir II was starred
Prawo Jazdy and The Velocity Trumpets: I miss Deartháir II was unstarred
My sister had a Merkur. it actually was pretty fast with the turbo. The problem with it, and the Corrado, was the little issue of RELIABILITY.
No one was going to buy a funky euro hatch that just happened to fall apart every other week. Oh, and you had to find someone who knew how to fix it. Not exactly easy.
Come back as a Contour please. Oh wait. That didn't work either.
@Rabbi Dave: The four-banger Contours were reliable enough, though they were miserable, hateful cars with the CD4E automatic. Now, the Duratec, somehow, wasn't.
08/10/09
08/11/09
The Elan was a real breakthrough for Lotus. And Emma Peel didn't hurt. The Elite/Eclat were heinous successors. But I'd say that Elans weren't overlooked and that no one bought them. They found their market and sold well, given the circumstances. Lotus is still a small volume, niche producer of high priced specialty cars. A great car, but one that never had any expectation of selling hundreds of thousands. More's the pity. Good thing the Miata showed up.
08/10/09
08/11/09
Avanti was an amazing car for the time, and it's still in production. Pretty good for the last output of a failed company. A shame, because they might have been able to do better than AMC in the sixties.
08/11/09
...
The Avanti is one of my all-time-favorite cars, but I do think that Studebaker would have lasted longer if it had invested its meager resources into its volume products rather than a niche car.
...
Yes, Avanti survived Studebaker as a limited-production vehicle for an amazing number of years. However, the original body went out of production quite a while ago and, last I heard, the parent company ceased production of a Camaro-based Avanti.
08/10/09
You forgot this one
08/11/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
The VW Corrado can also be made AWD. I have (packed up back home) a magazine showing how one could make their own AWD Corrado.
Both cheap cars that can be made to be truly special. However, the herds will continue to flock to the Civics for fear of actually being an individual.
08/10/09
The M45 was a killer machine for the $'s, and I'd have one of those had it not been for the orange cluster lights.
The Scorpio is a fave of mine, as is the Reatta.
I hope to find a Phaeton one of these days which hasn't been abused and is nicely priced.
Hey, a man can wish....
08/10/09
The XR4ti in Houston had an excellent ride and handling combo, but the engine took a bit long to get on song. But, power brake it, keep the peddle to the floorboard and the old girl hiked up her skirt and showed the world her bi-winged tail.
My friend rented a Lincoln LSC. The XR4ti matched him step for step but had way better brakes. We were doing about 110mph when we saw a police car in the bushes, I slammed on the binders, ABS flashing furiously, 50mph without drama. the Linc on the other hand, brakes a smoking made the "cherry blueberries" start flashing. While I puttered off to the Cajun restaurant for crawfish, laughing all the way.
Ah, the memories.
PS - The Reatta definitely doesn't belong on any list of "great" cars. YUCK! Replace that and the Alfa 164 (front drive Alfa - double YUCK) with the real Alfa's - GTV6 and the Milano 3.0 Verde. Yes, the Milano is ugly, but it drives beautifully.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
The Reatta was a craptastic handbuilt GM parts bin special, not a great car.
08/10/09
The Reatta was no sports car, but as a unique personal luxury coupe, it succeeded - or it would have, were it not for the overinflated MSRP.
08/10/09
The Reatta failed because it cost too much, quality was somewhat iffy, and it got caught in Buick shifting its focus from sportiness to conservative near-luxury.
08/10/09
Reattas had awful problems with rear brake lockups as well. A good friend flipped his convertible reatta over on a freeway when his rear brakes locked.
The plastics by the gross trainload don't age well in GMs either. In the 70's they had zero UV inhibitors in them, causing everything to crumble with sunlight exposure. In the 80's they were better, but still not exactly the right forumlation. Don't even get me started on the late-80's GM paint. How many Quasar Blue Olds/Pontiac/Chevrolets do you remember seeing with grey pock-marks the size of a quarter where the paint flecked off in droves. I've even seen beige cars do it -- and that's supposed to be the most "durable" color according to body men.
All that said, I'd still love a Reatta. Classy, compact, easy to drive, park, and reasonably efficient yet powerful (30 MPG highway!), and not looking like anything else on teh road FTW!
08/10/09
Volvo plastics were little better at the time. The dashes crack, map pockets and consoles shatter... most hard plastics turn to fine dust.
08/10/09
08/11/09
Especially in 1988. Think about the crap we could buy in the US in 88-- the Reatta looks like a pretty good car in that light, I think.
08/11/09
08/11/09
Say what you will about Buick, but for the late 80s they were pretty good cars.
Then they became pretty good cars for the people in their late 80s...
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
Olds, Saturn, Pontiac...
08/10/09
The GTO deserved a better fate. However, upon its introduction the magazines went on and on about how dull it looked. That perception apparently spread to the public at large. Had everyone forgotten that the original GTO was based on the everyday, ordinary Pontiac Tempest? Until the 1968 Endura-nosed models, there wasn't all that much stylistically separating the GTO. No-one seemed to mind then. I though the new GTO was reasonably handsome, and if it people called it boring, I'd say that was a benefit for cruising underneath the notice of the police and boy-racers.
As for the Phaeton, the word that comes to mind is "hubris" - overbearing arrogance. It's not for nothing that "economy car" makers like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda created new brands for their luxury cars. Also, VW already had three premium brands with Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini. How did they think people in the US would pay $70K for a car with an economy name? I've never driven a Phaeton, but although they had wonderful interiors, the outside looked a little nondescript and I've heard the V8 models were none too exciting to drive. Hard to compete against a well-established supremely competent if seemingly dull Lexus LS, much less a Mercedes or BMW. And then there was VW's reputation for quality - or lack of. I've only ever seen a tiny handful of Phaetons here in car-conscious Miami.
08/10/09
I do think the styling is aging well so far, and hopefully the stigma will wear off now that Pontiacs won't be clogging rental lots for much longer.
08/10/09
The biggest issue with it is the lack of trunk space. I guess they had to modify the gas tank to bring it over, and put it mostly in there.
08/11/09
08/11/09
It's not for nothing that "economy car" makers like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda created new brands for their luxury cars.
Which works. In America. In the rest of the world, not so much. Making a luxury car under an established non-luxury brand isn't an instant success, but it works way better than making up a fancy new badge and then expecting people to pay for the badge.
08/11/09
My point about the Phaeton was that VW already had a range of premium sedans in the US under the Audi banner. Marketing the Phaeton was like Chevrolet making some sort of uber-Caprice and selling it for high-end Cadillac money.
08/10/09
08/10/09
No one was going to buy a funky euro hatch that just happened to fall apart every other week. Oh, and you had to find someone who knew how to fix it. Not exactly easy.
Come back as a Contour please. Oh wait. That didn't work either.
08/10/09