<![CDATA[Jalopnik: toyota]]> http://tags.jalopnik.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jalopnik.com.png <![CDATA[Jalopnik: toyota]]> http://jalopnik.com/tag/toyota http://jalopnik.com/tag/toyota <![CDATA[2011 Toyota Sienna L.A. Show Gallery]]>

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5417303&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[2011 Toyota Sienna: Like A Venza, But With Interior Space]]> The 2011 Toyota Sienna gets its chiseled looks and Gillette-like front end from the Toyota Venza, but makes room inside for eight people and now comes equipped with optional all-wheel drive for families that live in snowy climes.



Engine choices include the powerful 3.5-liter V6 or the asthmatic 2.7-liter four-cylinder. The former comes with a 3,500 tow rating thanks to its 266 HP and 6-speed automatic transmission. The Sienna arrives at dealers in February 2010, expect pricing to stick close to the current model's $24,540 base price.


Here's the press release:

ALL-NEW THIRD-GENERATION TOYOTA SIENNA MAKES WORLD DEBUT

LOS ANGELES (Dec. 2, 2009) – Toyota unveiled the all-new, third-generation Sienna
minivan at a media conference today at the 2009 Los Angeles Auto show.
The Toyota Sienna is well known as a transportation solution for moving people and
cargo comfortably and efficiently. The third-generation Sienna will look and drive more like a
sedan, conform to new ideas about personal comfort, easily accommodate cargo, and handle
big loads.
The 2011 Sienna has been reinvented to handle these needs as it shifts to a more
expressive and dynamic vehicle with a stronger profile, high shoulder character and responsive
handling. With state-of the art features and rewarding driving dynamics, it is a vehicle that car-
lovers will find satisfying to drive. Sienna will offer new models, including a sporty SE and a
four-cylinder powertrain, as it continues to be the only offering in the segment with an all-wheel-
drive option.
"The all-new Sienna is an example of Toyota's commitment to lead the marketplace as it
anticipates consumers' needs and changes in lifestyle," said Bob Carter, group vice president
and general manager, Toyota Division, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. The third-generation Sienna
combines a contemporary style with features not previously seen in a minivan, and a fun-to-
drive spirit that will surprise many, along with the flexibility, spaciousness and features that have
defined the segment.
The Sienna was designed by Toyota's Calty Design Research and developed at Toyota
Technical Center in Ann Arbor, Mich., with assembly being accomplished at Toyota Motor
Manufacturing, Indiana.

Visually Intriguing
The Sienna will come in five conveniently configured grades, all sharing a distinctly new
visual direction and features. The third-generation Sienna explores a more modernly advanced
and bold design. The sportier profile is complemented with distinctive window shapes. Working
closely with engineering, Sienna designers were able to create a high and wide shoulder to
embed a deliberately hidden door slider within the window graphic.

The strong high shoulder and distinct fender flares visually emphasize the wheels.
Dimensionally, the new Sienna rides on the same wheelbase as the prior generation, but it is
wider and slightly shorter overall.
In the front is a bold face design. Sophisticated headlamps angled higher than the grille
lends a confident front presence. The sculptural rear corner separates the Sienna from boxy
minivans as it surrounds the functional yet elegant LED taillights.
The interior features upscale quality and elegance, yet every element are logical and
functional. The distinctive swept shape of the IP creates the perception of increased personal
space for both driver and passenger. Careful attention to the details adds extra value to each
component. Sleek seat designs add flexibility and roominess while central climate and audio
controls are integrated into a single graphic element.
Overall, the new Sienna has a sportier, classier appearance. A Cd of 0.306 is the result
of careful design work and is a contributing factor in maintaining a quiet cabin and providing
excellent fuel economy.

Power, Plus Efficiency
A choice of two responsive DOHC engines will be available: a 3.5-liter V6 or 2.7-liter
four-cylinder engine. Both engines offer the latest in efficient, lightweight technology, including
Dual Variable Valve Timing with intelligence (VVT-i), roller rocker arms and an Acoustically
Controlled Induction System (ACIS) that changes the length of the air-intake pipe to supply
more torque on demand.
The 3.5-liter V6 makes 266 horsepower at 6,200 rpm, with expected EPA-estimated
mileage ratings of 18 mpg city/24 mpg highway (16 mpg city/22 mpg highway on AWD models).
It also has a 3,500-pound tow capacity. With 187 horsepower at 5,800 rpm, the 2.7-liter four-
cylinder engine produces responsive power that exceeds some competitors V6 performance,
while delivering expected EPA-estimated fuel efficiency ratings of 19 mpg city and 26 mpg on
the highway.
Both engines are matched with state-of-the-art, electronically controlled six-speed
transmissions with sequential shift that provide smooth gear-shift feeling, quiet performance and
a lightweight, compact size.
The suspension uses front MacPherson struts, combined with rack-and pinion steering
for smooth, linear steering feel. Electronic Power Steering (EPS) delivers a more solid direct
on-road feel. With a wider stance, the new Sienna has a more direct steering feel. Under-body
aero parts also contribute to dynamic performance.

Models and Features
The Sienna will come in five grades: Sienna grade, LE, SE, XLE and Limited. All-wheel-
drive is available with the V6 on LE, XLE and Limited models.
With five distinct model choices, the new Sienna can be tailored to a wide range of
purposes and pocketbooks. The Sienna can be configured with seven- or eight-passenger
seating, in front-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive, with a range of prices and features to
accommodate different mixes of practical needs and high aspirations.
The Sienna and LE grades are available with either the 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine or
the 3.5-liter V6. The value-driven Sienna grade and popular LE are equipped with an array of
standard features that include: cruise control, Daytime Running Lights with manual on/off
feature, tri-zone air conditioning, six- or eight-way-adjustable driver's captain's chair, power
windows with auto up/down and jam protection, AM/FM CD player with four speakers, XM
compatibility, auxiliary jack, power door locks, remote keyless entry, and three 12V outlets,
among other amenities. The Star Safety SystemTM, which includes Anti-lock Brakes (ABS),
Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), Brake Assist (BA), Vehicle Stability Control (VSC),
and Traction Control (TRAC), is standard on all models.
The LE V6 model is upgraded with even more features including dual power-sliding
doors and power rear door, a power driver seat with power lumbar support, electrochromatic
rearview mirror with Homelink™, backup camera, rear window sunshades, AM/FM/MP3 CD
player, integrated XM® satellite radio (subscription required), auxiliary audio jack, USB port with
iPod® connectivity, and hands-free phone capability and music streaming via Bluetooth®
wireless technology, and steering wheel audio controls. These features can be added to the
four-cylinder model as a package.
The XLE builds on the LE, adding features such as leather-trimmed seats, moonroof,
and an anti-theft system with engine immobilizer, remote keyless entry, and heated front seats.
Select optional XLE equipment includes a 10-speaker JBL® premium sound system with voice-
activated DVD Navigation and Panorama rear camera with integrated back-up guides, XM®
NavTraffic (subscription required), rear-seat Dual View Entertainment system, and an auxiliary
audio jack and USB port with iPod® connectivity.
The Limited is designed for customers who want all the features with more luxury. The
standard equipment list is extensive, including new second-row Lounge Seating and a power
60/40 Split & Stow third-row seat, front and rear parking sonar, dual moonroof, Smart Key, and
Safety Connect™. Select options include those available on the XLE plus HID auto high-beam
auto-high beam headlamps, rain-sensing wipers, and Pre-Collision System (PCS) with Dynamic
Radar Cruise Control.

New Sporty SE
Given its upgraded engineering, every Sienna will ride well and track cleanly through
corners, but none more so than the newest addition to the line: the sporty SE.
The SE is designed for those who appreciate an even sportier design with responsive
performance. The front has a more aggressive appearance and the side skirting visually lowers
the vehicle. Aerodynamic sculpting hugs the standard 19-inch alloy wheels, which are specially
tuned for sportier handling. Separating the SE further from other grades, the smoked tail lamps
create a visually prominent statement. The SE sits lower, on a sport-tuned suspension for
quicker feedback and better handling. Additionally, the SE is built with exclusive
instrumentation and unique interior colors and trim

Comfort Remains Key
The cabin of the new Sienna represents a conceptual leap forward, blending options for
more individual space, better cargo capacity, and improved group interaction.
The interior is more than two inches longer, and the seats now have longer ranges of
travel, making it possible to comfortably accommodate a wider range of heights and sizes.
The front seats have more rearward travel, and the steering wheel has a less upright
position, so the driver can adopt a comfortable driving posture. The driver's instruments and
controls are clear and concise, and the greater cabin width helps create extended personal
space for both driver and front passenger.
Numerous storage bins, cupholders and cargo spaces have been strategically placed in
convenient locations. A conversation mirror, integrated into the sunglass case in the overhead
console, allows visual contact with rear seat passengers.
Throughout the cabin, there is an open field of view to create an airy, roomy ambiance.
With wider fields of vision rearmost passengers can see forward more easily.
Both seven- and eight-seat cabins can be configured for a full contingent of passengers,
a load of cargo, or a convenient mix of both. In seven-seat cabins, the second row captain
chairs slide 23 inches, moving to the rear to create legroom for the tallest passengers and
easier ingress and egress. They can be moved forward close to the front seats to make it easy
to care for a child passenger, while also allowing easy access for third-row passengers.

A sliding center console on the XLE all-wheel-drive and Limited grades can be shared
between the front seats and second row passengers. The illuminated console slides into the
second row area to provide convenient access for both rows, so the need for storage and
passenger comfort can be equally served.

For even more passenger comfort, there is standard second-row lounge seating on the
Limited grade, which includes leg and foot support. Second-row captain chairs on all grades
have dual armrests, and a one-motion release mechanism in case the seat needs to be
removed.
On eight-passenger models, the second-row center seat can be removed and stowed in
the left side of the rear-storage area. When the center seat is stowed, a cupholder and storage
tray is revealed. The eight-passenger interior can easily be optimized for seven passengers,
and quickly reconfigured back for eight.
The second-row seats also feature a Tip Up and Long Slide feature, allowing them to
slide forward and back on extended rails, making more room for people or cargo as the need
arises. All second row seats, regardless of configuration, move out of the way with one touch to
gain easy access to the third row seats.
The 60/40 Split and Stow third-row seating folds flat with one motion manually, with the
Limited front-wheel drive receiving a power feature. The third row has been moved about two
inches rearward for enhanced comfort. With the third-row seat in use, there is enough storage
for five golf bags or four large suitcases. Four handy grocery hooks, with two in the back and
two in the second row seatbacks, add storage convenience.
It is easier than ever to load the Sienna, thanks to wider doors and one-touch second-
row seats. By sliding the second-row seats all the way to the rear, a walk-in aisle is created,
making it easier to enter, exit, install a child seat, or place a child in a seat. The second-row
seats can be moved all the way to the front, just behind the front row, to maximize rear cargo
capacity, especially with the third-row stowed flat.
With the third row seat stowed and the second row seat removed, the cargo area is
approximately eight feet long and four feet wide. The back door opening is broad and spacious,
set at a height that makes loading and unloading easy.
A cabin air filter is standard along with an air-conditioning system that controls the
temperature of three separate zones.

Innovative Technologies
A Toyota first rear-seat Dual View Entertainment Center is another innovative option.
The system uses two displays side-by-side to create a seamless 16.4-inch widescreen image
from a single source. When two separate entertainment options are called for, the system can
split the screen into two individual screens, each with input from separate sources. Used as a
single screen, it can be easily seen from the third row, and it can be operated from any seat via
remote control. Used as two screens, the system can accommodate the preferences of two
separate passengers who might want to play a video game or watch a second DVD
simultaneously via auxiliary inputs.
Other technological upgrades include a Toyota-first Panorama Camera rear monitor. It
provides two views behind the vehicle including a 180-degree view, and on-screen back-up
guides, helping drivers to reverse out of parking spots or driveways.

Safety for All
An enhanced version of Toyota's Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) is standard on all 2011
Sienna models. VSC coordinates the Anti-lock Brake System (ABS), Electronic Brake force
Distribution (EBD), Brake Assist with Traction Control (TRAC) and Electric Power Steering
(EPS), to help provide a the driver a better-integrated, controlled vehicle in the event of an
emergency maneuver.
A Pre-Collision System (PCS) with pre-collision seatbelt system is an available option on
Limited, as is the latest in advanced vehicle control technology: Vehicle Dynamics Integrated
Management (VDIM). The VDIM system coordinates brake control with engine output and
steering inputs, allowing all the control and safety systems to cooperate seamlessly. Unlike
reactive traction systems, VDIM operates proactively. During normal driving, the system works
smoothly to enhance control even before the vehicle reaches its limits.
Seven airbags are standard equipment, including dual-stage front and seat-mounted
side airbags for driver and front passenger, plus a new driver's side knee airbag. Side curtain
airbags cover the length of the cabin, from the front seats to the third row.
The new Safety Connect™ telematics system is standard on Limited and optional on
XLE. Safety Connect offers four safety and security features: Automatic Collision Notification,
Stolen Vehicle Location, Emergency Assistance Button (SOS), and Roadside Assistance. A
complimentary one-year trial subscription is included.

In case of airbag deployment or severe rear-end collision, Automatic Collision
Notification is designed to automatically call a response center. If a response agent cannot
communicate with the occupants, the agent can contact the nearest emergency-services
provider to dispatch assistance.
Pushing the in-vehicle "SOS" button allows drivers to reach the response center to
request help in an emergency as well as for a wide range of roadside assistance needs. If a
Sienna equipped with Safety Connect is stolen, agents can work with local authorities to help
locate and recover the vehicle.
The all-new 2011 Sienna will begin arriving at Toyota dealerships in February 2010.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5417264&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hyundai Feasts In November, Sales Up 46%]]> The biggest winner this November appears to be Hyundai, with sales up 46% month-to-month with 2008. The losers? Chrysler and Suzuki, dropping 25% and 52%, respectively. The Carpocalypse ain't over yet.

November 2008 wasn't a particularly golden month for sales, meaning any increase or decrease needs to be considered in context of previous sales. For instance, Ford and Toyota's November sales were roughly on par with last year but both companies are down between 20-24% through the first eleven months of the year compared to 2008.

Overall, the companies turning around their sales appear to be the ones introducing a lot of new product in the last year. [Automotive News (subs. req)]

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5416364&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TIMELINE: Toyota Reacts To Floor Mat Fiery Death Problem]]> Toyota enjoys enormous sales due in part to a reputation for quality. A reputation contradicted by the "floor mat fiery death" problem. This timeline (click to enlarge) shows how long it took Toyota to react and recall millions of vehicles.

This isn't the first major Toyota recall or even the first time Toyota's response has been called into question. In 2006, the company's Hilux trucks experienced safety issues and Toyota was forced to recall more than a million of them. It took the company a long time to admit fault and they were criticized by the Japanese government for their foot-dragging.

Steps to correct the problem have come from Toyota since the death of a CHP officer and his family in a loaned Lexus in August. The 911-call from the officer claiming he couldn't brake or stop the car from accelerating made national news. A month later the Department of Transportation issued a recall on floor mats in certain Toyota and Lexus vehicles, thought to be at blame for the crash, and Toyota followed with a temporary fix until they issued the full recall last week.

Despite the recent flurry of activity, the timeline shows Toyota has been aware of the problem since at least April of last year.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5415394&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fifth Gear Brings Hot Wheels To Life, Sets Real-Life Loop-The-Loop Record]]> Fifth Gear replicates the classic Hot Wheels loop-the-loop, performing the world record for the largest 360 degree loop in a real car, a Toyota Aygo. Here's how they did it.

First, Fifth Gear needed to find out how fast he needed to go to hit the 40-foot-tall full-size Hot Wheels loop. The physics equations are pretty simple for finding what the minimum speed the car can have at the top of the loop to perform a successful loop. The answer, in this case, given the car's weight and the size of the loop, was 36 MPH.

A bigger issue, however, was the question of what that gravitational forces would exert on the car given that forward momentum. Given speed and weight, we can expect to see a sizable gravitational force — say, six G's — upon the occupant. So, will Fifth Gear's stunt driver be able to overcome that gravitational force? Well, yeah, duh. But let's watch it anyway.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5415082&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toyota Recalls 110,000 Tundra Pickups For Frame Corrosion]]> Toyota, bowing to owner reports, issued a safety recall today on 110,000 2000-2003 Tundras sold in 20 cold-weather states and DC to fix frame rust problems that could cause fiery death the spare tire to fall off the truck.

Toyota Announces Safety Recall on 2000 through 2003 Tundra Frame Rear Cross Member

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. will launch a Safety Recall involving approximately 110,000 Tundra vehicles sold in the United States.

Certain 2000 through 2003 model year Tundra vehicles operated in cold climate areas with high road salt use, may exhibit excessive corrosion on the frame rear cross- member. In the worst case, the spare tire stowed under the truck bed may become separated from the rear cross member. Spare tire separation will create a road hazard for following vehicles and increase the likelihood of a crash.

Eventually, excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member may also affect the functionality of the rear brake line at the proportioning valve. If this occurs, it can lead to the loss of the rear brake circuits which will increase vehicle stopping distances and the risk of a crash.

In addition to the District of Columbia, the involved cold climate states with high road salt usage are: Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.

Beginning in December 2009 through early 2010, owners of the involved vehicles will receive a Safety Recall notification via first class mail asking them to take their vehicles to a Toyota dealer for an initial inspection of the rear cross member. During this inspection, the rear cross-member including the surrounding components such as, the brake line at the proportioning valve (which is mounted on the cross-member assembly) will also be inspected. Based upon the inspection, Toyota will do one of the following at no charge:

Tundra

If there is no significant corrosion of the rear cross-member assembly or the rear brake line at the proportioning valve, owners will be notified of that fact and requested to subsequently bring their vehicle back to the dealership so that a corrosion-resistant compound can be applied to the rear cross-member. Toyota will notify the owner when the corrosion-resistant compound is available.

If significant corrosion is detected such that the rear cross-member can no longer safely support the spare tire and replacement components are available, the cross- member assembly will be replaced. In the event replacement components are not available, a temporary solution, such as the removal of the spare tire and securing it to the truck bed, will be performed until parts are available.

In those relatively rare cases where the rear cross-member is significantly corroded and can no longer safely support the spare tire, but the rear cross-member cannot be replaced due to excessive frame corrosion at the mounting location (e.g., if the side rails are too damaged), Toyota will develop an appropriate remedy for those vehicles on a case-by- case basis.

This inspection will take approximately 20 minutes depending on dealer scheduling.

Until your vehicle is inspected, you may minimize the risk of the spare tire separating from the rear cross-member by removing it. If you choose to do so, please be sure not to be under the rear cross-member or spare tire carrier during the lowering process. In addition, if placing the spare tire in the truck bed or other area of the vehicle, it should be secured when driving.

Customers with questions are asked to call the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1 800 331-4331.

###

[Toyota via PickupTrucks]

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5412206&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[IIHS Fires Back, Tells Toyota To Put Cars Where Its Mouth Is]]> Toyota stamped their feet earlier claiming the IIHS Top Safety Pick awards were "extreme and misleading." Now, Russ Rader of the IIHS responds, saying, basically, Toyota can put its cars where its mouth is.

Well, Russ didn't actually say that. He's too nice to say something like that. But, what he does say seems to refute Toyota's inference that IIHS selectively choose certain vehicles for testing and the insinuation that the IIHS was trying to mislead the public by only selecting three cars to fail an "extreme" test. Russ tells us

"Toyota was notified in January that roof strength would be a new test. The IIHS asked automakers to flag any vehicles they'd like to have included. Toyota had plenty of opportunity to flag other Toyota, Lexus or Scion models — including being present at roof strength tests at the IIHS facility — but choose not to. So IIHS assumed that there were no models that met the new guidelines. If there are other vehicles Toyota would want to include they were able to submit them at that time or at any time in the process — including right now."

So basically, bring it Toyota, don't sing it.

This doesn't refute Toyota's other contention that the new test is "extreme." As we said before, we're not sure whether or not the new roof-crush test is extreme, but we will point out again that not only did other automakers have vehicles that passed it, but the 'yota Camry passed it as well. We'll also reiterate we're not sure how far the argument of "it was too hard" will go with consumers and the general public.

Toyota would probably do more to show it stands by their vehicles ability to pass this new roof-crush test by flagging their entire lineup to allow the IIHS to test it. Unless, of course, they know the vehicles won't pass — which, in essence, proves the IIHS point.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5407648&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toyota Calls IIHS Top Safety Pick Results "Extreme And Misleading"]]> Irv Miller, public affairs head of Toyota USA, just posted the automaker's official response to not receiving any 2010 IIHS Top Safety Pick awards. What's it say? The IIHS didn't test every Toyota and the new test is really hard.

Toyota's claiming the roof crush test — only applied to three Toyotas — the RAV4, Camry and Yaris — is harder than federal standards:

"This is the first year IIHS has included its own roof strength tests, which exceed federal standards, for TSP consideration. All Toyota vehicles meet or exceed Federal Safety Standards for frontal and side impact, roof crush resistance and rollover protection."

So, let's get this straight: you're upset because your cars don't meet a tougher standard than the federal guidelines — a standard other automakers are capable of meeting — and you expect the consumer to accept that argument? Really? Seriously?

But wait, there's also the fact that the Camry actually passed this much more difficult roof crash test. So why didn't the mid-size get a Top Safety Pick? Well, because, as the IIHS said in their press release late last night,

"The midsize Toyota Camry would have qualified with good ratings, except for its rear crash evaluation. This car's seats and head restraints are rated marginal for protection against whiplash injury. A change to good would have earned the Camry a Top Safety Pick for 2010."

Where's Toyota's explanation for why the Camry failed to garner a Top Safety Pick this year? It certainly wasn't the more-stringent roof crush test.

Full response from Toyota below:

2010 IIHS Top Safety Pick Awards Tells Just Part of the Story

On November 18, 2009, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) issued a news release headlined: "27 Winners of 2010 Top Safety Pick Award." Within the release, IIHS states: "Missing the mark: Not a single model from the world's biggest automaker by sales is represented among this year's winners. Toyota and its Lexus and Scion subsidiaries had a strong showing in 2009 with 11 winners but were shut out for 2010."

Toyota is confident its vehicles are among the safest on the road today and is committed to the highest levels of vehicle safety and quality.

In 2009, Toyota won more IIHS Top Safety Pick (TSP) awards than any other manufacturer. Toyota continues to improve vehicle passive and active safety, including improvement of past winners of IIHS TSP.

IIHS' statement that Toyota was shut out for 2010 is extreme and misleading, considering there are 38 Toyota, Lexus and Scion models, and only three were tested for roof strength by IIHS: Camry, RAV4 and Yaris.

This is the first year IIHS has included its own roof strength tests, which exceed federal standards, for TSP consideration. All Toyota vehicles meet or exceed Federal Safety Standards for frontal and side impact, roof crush resistance and rollover protection.

While passive collision protection is very important, Toyota also provides an array of active, passive, pre-collision and collision avoidance features. The "Star Safety System" is standard equipment on all Toyota and Lexus models.

The Insurance Institute's ratings are one of many vehicle safety and quality metrics.

Irv Miller
Group Vice President, Environmental and Public Affairs
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5407606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BMW, Toyota Don't Make IIHS 2010 Top Safety List]]> This year, people aren't thinking about buying a car the IIHS considers one of the 27 safest for 2010. They're thinking about pink slips, erectile dysfunction, and suicide. According to the IIHS, these people should buy Toyotas and BMWs.

Though BMW and Toyota aren't the only major automaker to not make the list of 27 vehicles, they're the most notable considering Chrysler managed to get four vehicles on the list and Volvo managed the same despite having belts on their XC60 disengage in a side-crash.

Click on the thumbs in this gallery and you can see the full list of IIHS-ordained cars in each category. For the most part, it's a sign of the cars you're least likely to want to drive. For instance, they explicitly exclude the WRX and SI versions of the Impreza and Civic.

27 winners of 2010 TOP SAFETY PICK award; new requirement to win is good rating for protection in rollovers
ARLINGTON, VA - Nineteen cars and 8 SUVs earn the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's TOP SAFETY PICK award for 2010 For the first time, good performance in a roof strength test to measure protection in a rollover is required to win. TOP SAFETY PICK recognizes vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, rear, and now rollover crashes based on good ratings in Institute tests. Winners also must have electronic stability control, which research shows significantly reduces crash risk. This is the second time the Institute has tightened criteria since announcing the first recipients in 2005.
Subaru is the only manufacturer with a winner in all 4 vehicle classes in which it competes. This automaker earns 5 awards for 2010. Ford and subsidiary Volvo have 6 winners, and Volkswagen/Audi has 5. Chrysler earns 4 awards, continuing a recent trend of improving the crashworthiness of its vehicles. Two new small cars, the Nissan Cube and Kia Soul, join the TOP SAFETY PICK list for 2010.
"With the addition of our new roof strength evaluation, our crash test results now cover all 4 of the most common kinds of crashes," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "Consumers can use this list to zero in on the vehicles that are on the top rung for safety."
Good rollover ratings: A new requirement for strong roofs winnows the list of TOP SAFETY PICK winners from a record 94 in 2009. The addition of this criterion recognizes manufacturers with vehicles that provide good protection in rollovers, which kill more than 9,000 people in passenger vehicles each year. The first rollover ratings were released in March. Vehicles rated good have roofs more than twice as strong as the current federal standard requires. The Institute estimates that such roofs reduce the risk of serious and fatal injury in single-vehicle rollovers by about 50 percent compared with roofs meeting the minimum requirement.
"Cars and SUVs that win TOP SAFETY PICK are designs that go far beyond minimum federal safety standards," Lund points out.
Missing the mark: Not a single model from the world's biggest automaker by sales is represented among this year's winners. Toyota and its Lexus and Scion subsidiaries had a strong showing in 2009 with 11 winners but were shut out for 2010. Four other manufacturers whose vehicles have earned TOP SAFETY PICK in the past didn't have a qualifying vehicle for 2010: BMW, Mazda, Mitsubishi, and Saab. The Honda Accord picked up the award the past 2 years, but the 2010 didn't earn the required good roof strength rating to qualify (the roof is rated acceptable). The Ford Fusion is another midsize car that dropped off the list for the same reason.
"Honda and Ford would have to make only minor changes to achieve good ratings for roof strength, as the Accord and Fusion just missed the mark," Lund explains.
The midsize Toyota Camry would have qualified with good ratings, except for its rear crash evaluation. This car's seats and head restraints are rated marginal for protection against whiplash injury. A change to good would have earned the Camry a TOP SAFETY PICK for 2010. Other automakers have improved head restraints to win. For example, inadequate head restraints kept earlier Chrysler models from earning awards, but in 2010 the Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Journey, and Jeep Patriot all earn good ratings and TOP SAFETY PICK. Likewise, General Motors upgraded the seats and head restraints in the Chevrolet Malibu to win.
Volvo glitch: The Institute identified a problem with the Volvo XC60 in the side test. A piece of plastic trim on the driver seat pushed against a service release button for the safety belt, which then detached from its anchor during the test.
"This would be a serious issue if it happened in a real crash, but it's not likely to happen and it's fixable," Lund explains. "Still, belts shouldn't come loose in a crash test. Volvo is fixing the problem so it won't be an issue with XC60 models produced after November 2009. TOP SAFETY PICK applies only to these modified XC60s."
Consumers who own 2010 XC60s already on the road should see their Volvo dealer for repairs, Lund advises.
Improved protection: Front and side impacts and rollovers killed 24,056 passenger vehicle occupants in 2008. Rear-end crashes usually aren't fatal but result in a large proportion of crash injuries. Neck sprain or strain is the most commonly reported injury in two-thirds of insurance claims for injuries in all kinds of crashes.
"In safety terms, we've come very far, very fast in just the past decade," Lund says. "When the Institute began conducting frontal tests for consumer information in 1995, few vehicles earned top ratings. Now almost all do. Most cars failed the side tests we added in 2003. Test results in that initial round were so bad we nearly broke our budget for repairing the crash test dummy, but now most vehicles ace the side test thanks to side airbags and stronger side structures. Factor in improved head restraints to protect against whiplash and electronic stability control to prevent crashes, and consumers are the clear winners."
Safety equipment is increasingly standard. Ninety-two percent of 2010 model cars, 99 percent of SUVs, and 66 percent of pickup trucks have standard side airbags with head protection. Electronic stability control is standard on 85 percent of cars, 100 percent of SUVs, and 62 percent of pickups.
"Now that roof strength is a priority, we think manufacturers will move quickly to bolster roofs to do well in our roof strength test. This means consumers likely will have more TOP SAFETY PICK choices for 2011," Lund predicts.
Keep in mind vehicle size and weight, he adds, because larger, heavier vehicles generally afford better protection in serious crashes than smaller, lighter ones. Even with a TOP SAFETY PICK, a small car isn't as crashworthy as a bigger one.
The Institute awarded the first TOP SAFETY PICK winners to 2006 models and then raised the bar the next year by requiring good rear test results and electronic stability control as either standard or optional equipment. Early this year the Institute alerted auto manufacturers to the new criteria for roof crush and asked them to nominate candidates for testing.
How vehicles are evaluated: The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on 2 instrumented SID-IIs dummies representing a 5th percentile woman, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact.
Rear crash protection is rated according to a two-step procedure. Starting points for the ratings are measurements of head restraint geometry - the height of a restraint and its horizontal distance behind the back of the head of an average-size man. Seat/head restraints with good or acceptable geometry are tested dynamically using a dummy that measures forces on the neck. This test simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph. Seats without good or acceptable geometry are rated poor overall because they can't be positioned to protect many people.
In the roof strength test, a metal plate is pushed against 1 side of a roof at a constant speed. To earn a good rating for rollover protection, the roof must withstand a force of 4 times the vehicle's weight before reaching 5 inches of crush. This is called a strength-to-weight ratio. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. A marginal rating value is 2.5. Anything lower than that is rated poor.

Large Cars:
Buick LaCrosse
Ford Taurus
Lincoln MKS
Volvo S80

Midsize Cars:
Audi A3
Chevrolet Malibu built after October 2009
Chrysler Sebring 4-door with optional electronic stability control
Dodge Avenger with optional electronic stability control
Mercedes C class
Subaru Legacy
Subaru Outback
Volkswagen Jetta sedan
Volkswagen Passat sedan
Volvo C30

Small Cars
Honda Civic 4-door models (except Si) with optional electronic stability control
Kia Soul
Nissan Cube
Subaru Impreza except WRX
Volkswagen Golf 4-door

Midsize SUVs
Dodge Journey
Subaru Tribeca
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC90

Small SUVs
Honda Element
Jeep Patriot with optional side torso airbags
Subaru Forester
Volkswagen Tiguan

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5407052&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Do Republicans Hate American Automakers?]]> A German company is battling with a Japanese one to become the world's biggest automaker. Italians own Chrysler. It's like World War II except we're losing. So why are Republicans suddenly on the side of the automotive Axis powers?

It was little more than half-a-century ago the armies of Rome, Berlin and Tokyo were defeated by Detroit's "Arsenal of Democracy" equipped by American carmakers. Yet to hear it lately from conservatives and leaders in the Republican Party, American automakers are what's wrong with this country, should be boycotted, and go bankrupt.

Senator John McCain told reporters that we should have never bailed out Chrysler and GM and let them go under.

"No, I don't think we ever should have bailed out Chrysler and General Motors," McCain told The Detroit News. "We should have let them go into bankruptcy, emerge and become viable corporations again."

This, of course, while he was out drumming up support for his 2010 Senate run while serving as the grand marshal of a NASCAR event where the very good ol' boys he was drumming up support from were watching Chrysler and GM products race. And, as The Detroit News points out, we did let them go into bankruptcy. We're still waiting to find out whether they'll emerge as stronger companies.

Confusingly, McCain seems to be channeling John Kerry in being for the bailout before he was against it. Now, of course, he's going so far as to refer to it as "Socialism."

And just this weekend RNC Chairman Michael Steele responded to the news of GM going further in debt by pointing out this statement:

"Today's release of General Motors' financial results is further proof that President Obama's economic experiments are wrong for America."

Of course, GM lost $4.2 billion in the third-quarter last year so this is actually an improvement, of sorts. And GM also announced they'd be repaying loans ahead of schedule.

So who do the Republicans like? At last year's Detroit Auto Show we had a conversation with Senator Bob Corker, the Republican who lead the charge against the bailout, and he talked about the Volkswagens he loves. Not a surprise given VW is joining Nissan in building a huge plant in his state.

In fact, there have been a number of foreign car companies moving better-than-minimum-wage assembly plants into states represented by Republican senators, including BMW in South Carolina, Toyota in Texas, Nissan/VW in Tennessee, and Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai in Alabama. Of course, we can't blame the Chrysler-Fiat "Global Strategic Alliance" alliance on the Republican party.

So when the far right goes to Boycott GM they're doing so for the benefit of companies like Volkswagen and Toyota, who have both surpassed GM as the world's largest automaker in the last year.

Ironically, this is the same Republican party upset about the Chinese purchase of Hummer. As Republican Representative Duncan Hunter told the Wall Street Journal: "Any money that is going to China or to Chinese companies is contributing in some way to China's military buildup."

So supporting American car companies is socialism and supporting every other country's investments in production capacity is capitalism and therefore good for America.

But hey, the Germans, Japanese, Chinese and Italians are our friends so who says we need any domestic car production or car companies? Of course, we're probably just paranoid. Maybe the real reason the Republicans hate GM and Chrysler is just that they really like Ford.

Photo Credit: DiggerHistory

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5405935&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Is This The Toyota Prius Wagon?]]> Among the eco-minded set there's been a lot of speculation over a possible Toyota Prius Wagon. Is this photo from Woody's Car Site it? We'll let GreenCarReports untangle the rumors.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5405846&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toyota Cartoon Explains To Kids Why Their Cars All Look Alike]]> This screen-cap is from a cartoon Toyota produced to help kids understand how their cars are made. It starts with a meeting, charts and one paranoid engineer noticing "they all look the same..." [Toyota]

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5404257&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toyota Prius Is A "Butt Buddy?"]]> This Australian ad for the Hybrid Synergy Technology used in the Toyota Prius and other hybrids draws a parallel between gas/electric harmony and having a weird guy attached to your butt all day. Ya know, that actually kinda makes sense.

[via CreativityOnline]

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5404074&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Automaker Future "Youthmobile" Concepts Are Wacky]]> The 6th Annual Design Challenge winner will be announced at the LA Auto Show, picked from this selection of six radical concepts designed for sale in thirty years to appeal to the cell phone, internet and Guitar Hero generation.

Most of the concepts have pretty regular wacky shapes and smart grid communications features the futurists are always in love with, of course they're all "green" and electric, but one in particular made us shake our heads. Whoever came up with the "GM Car Hero" needs a very stern talking to.

Southern California Automotive Design Studios Envision the Ultimate Youthmobile in Year 2030
The winner of the 6th Annual Design Challenge will be announced Dec. 3rd at the LA Auto Show

LOS ANGELES - Nov. 4, 2009 /PRNewswire/ - As timeless as hanging out at the mall, automobiles have played an important role in young people's social lives, have acted as a means of self-expression and more importantly a necessary tool for interacting with friends. Today, communication technology is changing how we connect and perhaps even the role the car plays in young people's lives.

Southern California design studios will envision what a new generation of drivers, raised with cell phones, online communities and webcams will demand from their vehicles in the year 2030.

The design studios for Audi, GM, Honda, Mazda, Nissan and Toyota reached 21 years into the future and designed their interpretation of Youthmobile 2030. Designs range from vehicles that incorporate human DNA allowing changes in the shape, color and materials to vehicles that link into a mass transit system where drivers not only share the commute but trade music and compare class schedules.

Entries will be judged by Tom Matano, Director of Industrial Design at San Francisco's Academy of Art University; Imre Molner, Dean of Detroit's College for Creative Studies; Stewart Reed, Chair, Transportation Design, Pasadena's Art Center College of Design and Jason Hill, Principal of Eleven, LLC and Designer of the Aptera electric and plug-in hybrid/electric vehicle.

"Automotive designers have always been fascinated with the next generation of drivers and this year's Design Challenge has provided them with the opportunity to use their creative talents to revisit the concept of 'the car' with new eyes, using the hottest technologies to both explore and fulfill the needs of young people," said Chuck Pelly, director of Design Los Angeles and partner in The Design Academy, Inc.

About the Design Challenge:

The Design Challenge is part of the Design Los Angeles automobile designers' conference that is held every year during the Los Angeles Auto Show press days, Dec. 2 & 3, 2009. For the last six years a new Design Challenge theme is chosen and the major Southern California Automotive Design Studios battle against each other to showcase their talents and further explore new ideas in automotive design. The Design Los Angeles Conference also gives designers access to design industry leaders and provides the opportunity to address common industry issues.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5401238&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Have the Taliban Abandoned Toyotas for American Pickup Trucks?]]> If you’re a militiaman rolling in hostile terrain, your best vehicle choice is the Toyota pickup. A minuscule clue in the latest issue of The New Yorker suggests that all that is about to change.

Like the AK-47 assault rifle and the RPG–7 bazooka, the Toyota pickup truck has become an icon of irregular armies worldwide. When mounted with an anti-aircraft cannon or a rocket laucher on its bed, it is called a technical and technicals have helped militas wage and win war against armies equipped with mechanized divisions. There was even a conflict in 1987 called the Toyota War, in which Chad’s Toyota-equipped troops defeated Muammar al-Gaddafi’s Libyan army.

The practice is not local to Africa. In Afghanistan, it was an influx of Toyota pickups from Pakistan’s ISI spy agency which transformed the Taliban from a Kandahar militia to a force which took over most of Afghanistan with remarkable speed, defeating established mujahideen commanders with decades of experience.

This has nothing to do with good guys, bad guys or tribal affiliations and all to do with the Toyota pickup’s extreme reliability on hostile terrain. You have no doubt seen the famous Top Gear episode where a Toyota Hilux is subjected to every manner of destructive testing short of a thermonuclear explosion yet it keeps on ticking—but you may not have seen this image from 2002, where US Special Forces soldiers ride in a quad cab Toyota identical to the ones used by their Taliban foes:

But all that may be about to change.

The only clue is a few pixels of an illustration which accompanies Seymour Hersh’s latest piece for The New Yorker, where he reports on the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal—or its lack thereof. It was created by the acclaimed French illustrator Guy Billout and if you lean in close, the truck you see the Taliban soldiers riding in is rather striking:

It’s not a Toyota. It’s a quad cab Dodge—a Dakota to my untrained eye, but it could be a Ram as well. This might be an inconsequential detail if the magazine in question was not The New Yorker, famous for their fact checking team. And the truck is definitely not some sort of generic placeholder pickup: it has a Dodge grille.

Cooperation between American companies and the Taliban would not be without historical precedent. Back in 1995 before they conquered Kabul and became host to Al-Qaeda, Unocal executive Marty Miller was involved in negotiations with the Taliban leadership for a natural gas pipeline which was to run from Turkmenistan to Pakistan, straight through Taliban territory. While the deal eventually fell through, Miller visited Kandahar several times and at one point even had Taliban leaders flown to Houston for Christmas, of all holidays.

Perhaps Toyota, with its humbling losses and its exit from Formula One, has gone over the hill—while Chrysler has found itself a particularly lucrative market for trucks, where demand for new vehicles is guaranteed not by rebates but by American firepower. And nobody likes to stick with a loser. Least of all the Taliban.

Photo Credit: SAEED KHAN/AFP/Getty Images, TERENCE WHITE/AFP/Getty Images, Paula Bronstein/Getty Images, Guy Billout, EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images, U.S. Air Force

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5401213&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Volkswagen-Porsche World's Largest Automaker, Toyota The New GM]]> VW-Porsche has overtaken Toyota as the world's largest automaker, at least through the first nine months of 2009, having produced 4.4 million cars to Toyota's 4.0 million. Somebody warn Poland.

This information can be heavily qualified because this is only through the first three quarters of the year and comes after Toyota drastically cut back on production in the first half while Volkswagen took advantage of cash-for-clunkers schemes and other government support for its vehicles in markets like China.

But none of that changes the fact that Volkswagen has quickly passed Toyota and GM at the top of the heap. We'll see if it lasts all year and, hopefully, if it works out any better for them. [The Guardian]

Photo Credit: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400753&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Case for a Contemporary Citroën SM]]> The Art Deco love child of Citroën and Maserati is long gone, dead and buried like its contemporary the Concorde. But have we really lost the need for a grand tourer with speed and style in spades?

Infrequent bursts of fawning published in these pages will prove that the Citroën SM, in its quiet yet revolutionary way, is perhaps the most remarkable automobile ever manufactured. Yet owning one is clearly out of the picture.

Consider: if the engine goes, you’ll have to find a mechanic familiar with 40-year-old carbureted Maserati engines. Then, if anything else goes, you’ll need another mechanic intimate with 40-year-old hydropneumatic Citroëns. If you multiply the respective probabilities of finding such mechanics, you will feel the blood drain from your face.

The nightmarish nature of this scenario is not specific to the United States: contrary to popular belief, Europe does not have trees with mixed bunches of Maserati and Citroën mechanics cavorting on low-hanging branches either.

Yet the SM exerts a powerful visceral tug. Its parts are remarkable by themselves, but the SM is clear testament to the idea that on occasion the whole is indeeed greater than the sum of parts. The strange yet mellifluous 90° V6, the DIRAVI steering, the hydropneumatics, the incredible cabin: the SM’s components combine to make a car that has the ability to cruise in complete comfort at 125 MPH between fillups without breaking down.

Think about that: neither occasional bursts of speed for joy or overtaking nor a single cross-continental blitz with the result of you being on time and your car a smoldering wreck, but a grand tourer for regular grand tours.

The world has since moved on from such earthbound flights of fancy. The SM’s was a world infinitely less hostile to the automobile than ours. Its vehicular contemporaries were:

  1. A hypersonic civilian jetliner flirting with time travel
  2. A military spy plane made of titanium which could outrun anti-aircraft rockets
  3. An air-cooled twelve-cylinder racing car with 1500 HP
  4. A giant space rocket which regularly whisked American men from the gravitational pull of the Earth to deposit them on the surface of the Moon
  5. The Lamborghini Miura

Yes, wow. That was four decades ago.

Perhaps we should all just forget about the Citroën SM. Ours is a world not of grand tours but of shuffling in socks through airports and molassing along at 65 MPH in plastic cabins.

Yet imagine! Just imagine a contemporary SM.

The Japanese would have to build it. The Japanese are less interested in haphazard, grandiose revolution than in taking established concepts and polishing them to perfection. The way Toyota usurped Mercedes-Benz’s lead in luxury sedans to produce the last word in personal transportation inside motorized whales, the Lexus LS600hL.

But a modern SM is not a Toyota job. In spite of occasional displays of deep petrolhead inspiration—the 2000GT, the AE86, the LFA—Toyota does not make touring cars you’d like to tour in high style in. The modern SM should be a Honda, built on Soichiro Honda’s legacy of mechanical madness and racing chops.

In fact, Honda has already made something akin to a modern SM: the NSX of 1991, a perfect, luxurious grand tourer disguised as a mid-engined sports car and generally mistaken for a Ferrari. Plus, they have taken the SM’s glass headlights enclosure and installed it on the current Civic, which is as close in chutzpah to the SM as a mass-market hatchback can be.

(And it’s not like cooperation between Japanese and French carmakers is such a long shot either. In fact, Citroën already makes a crossover called the C-Crosser on a Japanese platform, the Mitsubishi GS: a base for excellence like the Evo X and also for the abomination that is the Chrysler Sebring.)

Honda could pull it off. As for what our slow world could do with the perfect idea of the touring car executed with Japenese attention to detail, I do not have a clue. But do we really want to go down in history as the generation which has all but abandoned forward motion?

Photo Credit: PlingPlöng/Flickr, afghtiga/Flickr, Infinite Jeff/Flickr, cosmicspanner/Flickr, Ignacio Conejo/Flickr, Jim Ross/NASA, nielsvk/Flickr, Steve Kay/Flickr

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400240&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First-Gen Celica Still Going Strong In Nicaragua!]]> This is Down On The Street Bonus Edition, where we check out interesting street-parked cars located in places other than the Island That Rust Forgot. How about an early Celica in Granada, Nicaragua?


These cars are rare even in their native Japan, so it was an exciting moment for loyal Jalopnik reader Nick to spot one in Central America. Hey, check out that Dave Zinn Toyota emblem on the trunk lid; looks like this car made the drive from Florida to about 1,000 miles to the southwest. Here's what Nick has to say about his find.

So I live in Argentina (originally from Vermont) and had the chance to go to Nicaragua with my dad recently. I spent a couple days attending a fair trade conference and then had some time on my own to travel. I was in Granada when I spied this beautiful toyota than I just had to take some photos of. Unfortunately the windows were completely tinted so I had no shot at seeing inside but I tried my best to capture the car.

I am an avid jalopnik reader without actually knowing much about the history and inner-workings of cars and I've always enjoyed the DOTS section. There is something about older cars that excites me. With this car, I especially liked the "liftback" badge which I had never seen. The whole GT thing also helps.

I've got quite a backlog of DOTSBE vehicles built up, so I'll try to do at least a few every weekend from now on. Thanks for sending 'em in, and for your patience if you've been waiting a year... or two.


DOTS FAQ

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5399665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pass The Billabong And Stare At The Venza's Headliner]]> Designed for Billabong, this Toyota Venza by Street Image has the requisite body kits, wheels and paint for a SEMA vehicle. It even has a winch to pull boarders. But it's the surfgasmic headliner grabbing all the attention.


Yes, a Toyota Venza with a built-in shower for post-surf rinsing and a TRD brake kit is distinguished not by the seats made of wet-suit material or the built-in WiFi (seen it, done it). Custom headliners aren't completely new, as anyone who has traveled in the back of a stretch Hummer can tell you, but this one may start a new era of tackiness in mainstream custom vehicles.

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5397799&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toyota Quits Formula One, Cries About It]]> After spending nine years and over $2.4 billion dollars without a single race victory, Toyota has officially dropped out of Formula One. As you can see from the photo, Toyota Motorsport Chairman Tadashi Yamashina was quite broken up about it.

Of course, this means there's no longer a Japanese manufacturer in Formula One with Honda gone and no carmaker from the Land of the Rising Sun in a position to throw that much money away. [AutoNews]

]]>
http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5396842&view=rss&microfeed=true