uh oh. I think I see cups forming on this awd vehicle riding on the edge of the tires. This will not be passing maine state inspection. In fact if it is not a chevy or a ford, our posse of monkey iq'd 4 inch lift kits and lack of fender flares will run over your ricer...the awd klux klan has spoken. How dare such an old ricer continue to run...
O.k., anyone calling the rear suspension independent needs to either crawl underneath a few more vehicles, or get their eyes checked.
The big long tubular control arm with purely transverse bushings, connected to what is unmistakeably a bottom bracket is a BIG giveaway for a solid axle. If it were independent, the LCA would connect to the frame right where that bottom bracket is.
If you look at where the brake hardware is, you can understand that the axle tube itself is hidden behind the skidplate.
Second: the suspension is compressed, as it is on the uphill side of that rock slope, further hiding the axle tube and pumpkin.
I know it's cool to bash The 'Yote now that they're all #1 and stuff, but this is a full frame Soove, that's reasonably sized, and seems to be factory equipped with some impressive offroad gear.
The only people who have any right to call this soft are those who daily drive a TJ with a soft top.
@Feds: I guess I didn't look close enough. The angle on that left rear wheel should have been a dead giveaway, too.
Below I said I wouldn't be disappointed if it switched to IRS. However, they way the SUV market has changed and shrunk, it's better that they keep it. Comfort is great and all, but I'd just assume they didn't soften the 4Runner anymore. They don't need another Highlander.
And, you're right, this is no softroader. My '05 handles just about everything I throw at it, and it's nice having heated seats and climate control while I'm at it. Of course, I still need to take off those pansy-ass running boards.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
Edited by If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face at 08/27/09 4:06 PM
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@FromaBuick6: I've got some buddies with tricked-out rails that would take offense. A good locker, decent deflection on the suspension, and the right gearing can get you pretty darned far afield. And that's just in a VW buggy.
@Elhigh: Well, that's different. I should have put a disclaimer on my statement. Also, having a RWD SUV for towing purposes is fine, too.
It's the people who use their SUV as nothing more than a glorified station wagon that are the morons. At least with 4WD, you have better all weather traction, but there are so many better alternatives to a 2WD, truck-based SUV for carpool duty.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@FromaBuick6: My Forester is just a wagon in my book, but I hear you. And yet, when we had that ice storm a couple of winters ago, I was the one leaving the Target lot in a straight line.
Stomp it and all four wheels spin, which is frankly a hoot. And the car slides straight downhill, sideways.
in the past 3 years or so ive be extremely impressed with every car company when it came to redesigns or facelifts. I cannot think of any manufacturer (except Acura) who has not brought about a big improvement over the older models.....except Toyota. The Camry is ugly. The Rav4 is fugly. The LandCruiser is misproportioned. The Corolla is too cutesy. And the Prius is..a Prius. And this is no better.
I used to pine for new 'Yodas like these until my horrible experience with my '03 Tacoma. I bought a brand-new 2003 TRD 4x4 Tacoma and was the sole owner until last year, at 120,000 miles, the engine decided to scatter while simply merging on the freeway. I took great care of that truck. But that day it threw a rod right through the block. I worked with Toyota service to try to get some help on the repairs, despite the mileage because, quite simply, Toyotas are not supposed to do that. They gave me the run-around and I ultimately dropped a used engine in it and sold it. Now we just have Hondas. Based on this and a lot of other information, I feel like Toyota is going downhill.
@redman042: 5 years and 120,000 miles? I fail to see the problem. If a vehicle lasts more than 100,000 miles, I'm usually pretty happy. Hell, if you had a Chevy, the domestic guys wouldn't be able to shut up about what great longevity that is. Besides, at that point, I'm just bored with it and want a new one anyway.
As for Toyota service...yeah, that's always been crap. I've yet to meet a Toyota dealer I don't despise. Don't fault the car based on the dealership/service dept. experience - independent shops are around for a reason.
I don't think Toyota's going downhill as much as the competition's caught up with them. My family's had Toyotas pretty consistently since '80, and none of them were perfect. At the very least, they all had at least one obnoxious, maddening rattle, squeak or defect. I've had Hondas, too, and overall they've been better in terms of reliability and customer service. However, Hondas a) don't come in the form of a real truck or SUV and b) are ugly as fuck.
Toyota has room for improvement all around, but who doesn't?
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
The design looks a bit cleaner up front. The wheels seem to be out of alignment, but this might just be an optical illusion. I just hope it has no more new acronyms.
It looks like it could be better than I feared. The styling looks awfully blocky, but maybe not in a bad way. The front end reminds me 3rd gen 4Runner, and that's a good thing.
I really like my '05, so as long as this isn't unnecessarily bigger or heavier, I'd be willing to trade for a used one of these in about five years.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@Mad_Science: Exactly. As great as the first 4Runner was, the two door body style was not at all practical, removable roofs are a bitch and nobody who isn't a die-hard off-roader wants a solid front axle.
Fact is, the current incarnation of the 4Runner is a dying breed. Some of us like truck-based, 4 door SUVs that can tackle just about terrain, carry lots of stuff, tow at least 5,000 lbs and carry 5 people in reasonable comfort. The TrailBlazer is dead, the Explorer's about to die and the only alternatives are the Grand Cherokee and Pathfinder.
So everybody needs to quit whining about model bloat and how much Toyota sucks these days. The 4Runner's a damn fine automobile and one of the best real SUVs left.
Edited by If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face at 08/27/09 1:52 PM
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
I grew up in a family that needed a "real" SUV: 4 kids, towing a boat, frequent snow trips = 1995 4x4 3/4 Ton Suburban.
The rise of "SUV as around-town car" really brought about the watering down of "real" SUVs as most of the sales were going to people who wanted the image of a truck, but had no need for the utility and no desire for the truck-like handling.
In a way, the movement of The Herd to CUVs should hopefully free up SUVs to get back to what made them useful to the people who used them.
I'd seriously consider a 4th gen 4Runner. Not particularly handsome, but it could be a great all-arounder. Lots of aftermarket support.
@Mad_Science: I terribly miss my '89. It was a weird, great little truck.
Also: the two door/removeable top body style is fine if the top is off and your friends aren't too fancy to use the back tire as a step. If that's a problem, get the minivan you really need and stop bitching.
@Mad_Science: After seeing the image above, I was desperately looking for the solid axle. Sadly, the return of 85 and prior 4runners is not about to happen. That said, i can't complain as I just got my old SAS'd '88 back two weeks ago. The old one's are true legends. Personally, I dispise the new FJ because I compared it to the FJ40's and 60's of old. I'm close to pulling the trigger on an 1990 Land Cruiser as a haul everything I need vehicle.
That said, we own a 3rd gen 4 runner. It's been a great vehicle, nonetheless.
@Sloop_John_B: Yeah, "FJ" in the name was a mistake. They should've called it the 4Runner Classic or something.
The 3rd gen 4runners are my 2nd favorite to the 1st gen. They got more power out of the V6 and moved to coilovers. Oh, and you can get them with the rear e-locker.
My father in-law's about to sell his '93(?) FJ80 with a 3.5" lift and 35" tires...if you're in SoCal and interested. Great ride, he just doesn't use it much.
@Sloop_John_B: If they ditched the solid rear axle, I for one will not be disappointed. On my 4th gen, the live axle isn't uncomfortable or intrusive, provided you're on smooth pavement.
Yeah, a solid axle is better for off-roading, but if Grand Cherokee owners can have IRS, so can I.
Edited by If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face at 08/27/09 3:49 PM
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
Looks like it has the Tundra rust prone frame and probably the faulty engine. Thankfully it does look like they left off the tailgate from the Tundra that is known to fall off for no apparent reason. Honestly if you buy a Toyota from the 2000's and it is not a car you got PUNKED!!!
Is it still overweight, overplush and underuseful? Pass, thanks.
Bring back the removable top. That way when I want to carry big stuff, I can. As it is now, if I wanted to put a bunch of friends in a big, numb car, I'd drive a Taurus.
Let's see - bigger tires, more plastic, still no solid axle, is that independent rear? Can't quite tell. Fugly Tundra-inspired front design, fake mesh grille, integrated turn signal that's so far out of the housing you could barely call it integrated, and is that a dent on the lower front?
Bet it's got a Camry interior with plush heated leather seats, a DVD entertainment center and 64.5 cupholders. Oh and an MSRP higher than what my parents paid for their house.
It appears to have... warts on its headlights. I assume this is to <strike>give bat-wielding vandals a better target</strike> bypass the usual side-mounted-turn-signal regulations?
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
The big long tubular control arm with purely transverse bushings, connected to what is unmistakeably a bottom bracket is a BIG giveaway for a solid axle. If it were independent, the LCA would connect to the frame right where that bottom bracket is.
If you look at where the brake hardware is, you can understand that the axle tube itself is hidden behind the skidplate.
Second: the suspension is compressed, as it is on the uphill side of that rock slope, further hiding the axle tube and pumpkin.
I know it's cool to bash The 'Yote now that they're all #1 and stuff, but this is a full frame Soove, that's reasonably sized, and seems to be factory equipped with some impressive offroad gear.
The only people who have any right to call this soft are those who daily drive a TJ with a soft top.
08/27/09
Below I said I wouldn't be disappointed if it switched to IRS. However, they way the SUV market has changed and shrunk, it's better that they keep it. Comfort is great and all, but I'd just assume they didn't soften the 4Runner anymore. They don't need another Highlander.
And, you're right, this is no softroader. My '05 handles just about everything I throw at it, and it's nice having heated seats and climate control while I'm at it. Of course, I still need to take off those pansy-ass running boards.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
For shame, 'yota.
08/27/09
08/27/09
And the 2wd version?
Oh, wait, they don't sell a 2wd version here anymore.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
It's the people who use their SUV as nothing more than a glorified station wagon that are the morons. At least with 4WD, you have better all weather traction, but there are so many better alternatives to a 2WD, truck-based SUV for carpool duty.
08/28/09
Stomp it and all four wheels spin, which is frankly a hoot. And the car slides straight downhill, sideways.
08/27/09
08/27/09
Otherwise, I agree.
08/27/09
08/27/09
As for Toyota service...yeah, that's always been crap. I've yet to meet a Toyota dealer I don't despise. Don't fault the car based on the dealership/service dept. experience - independent shops are around for a reason.
I don't think Toyota's going downhill as much as the competition's caught up with them. My family's had Toyotas pretty consistently since '80, and none of them were perfect. At the very least, they all had at least one obnoxious, maddening rattle, squeak or defect. I've had Hondas, too, and overall they've been better in terms of reliability and customer service. However, Hondas a) don't come in the form of a real truck or SUV and b) are ugly as fuck.
Toyota has room for improvement all around, but who doesn't?
08/27/09
08/27/09
I really like my '05, so as long as this isn't unnecessarily bigger or heavier, I'd be willing to trade for a used one of these in about five years.
08/27/09
Unfortunately, they had to use "FJ" so everyone started comparing it to the FJ40s of old.
I owned an 85 and a 87 4Runner. No one's building a car like that ever again.
If you're overcome with nostalgia quit bitching and just go buy one. You can get a decent example for $3-4k, a great one for $5-6k
08/27/09
@Mad_Science: Those 4Runners were cool, mean mofos. I love the internal rollbar design.
08/27/09
@kerc (wants a Mustang!): I agree.
08/27/09
@Mad_Science:
08/27/09
Fact is, the current incarnation of the 4Runner is a dying breed. Some of us like truck-based, 4 door SUVs that can tackle just about terrain, carry lots of stuff, tow at least 5,000 lbs and carry 5 people in reasonable comfort. The TrailBlazer is dead, the Explorer's about to die and the only alternatives are the Grand Cherokee and Pathfinder.
So everybody needs to quit whining about model bloat and how much Toyota sucks these days. The 4Runner's a damn fine automobile and one of the best real SUVs left.
08/27/09
I grew up in a family that needed a "real" SUV: 4 kids, towing a boat, frequent snow trips = 1995 4x4 3/4 Ton Suburban.
The rise of "SUV as around-town car" really brought about the watering down of "real" SUVs as most of the sales were going to people who wanted the image of a truck, but had no need for the utility and no desire for the truck-like handling.
In a way, the movement of The Herd to CUVs should hopefully free up SUVs to get back to what made them useful to the people who used them.
I'd seriously consider a 4th gen 4Runner. Not particularly handsome, but it could be a great all-arounder. Lots of aftermarket support.
08/27/09
Also: the two door/removeable top body style is fine if the top is off and your friends aren't too fancy to use the back tire as a step. If that's a problem, get the minivan you really need and stop bitching.
08/27/09
"Secure" is a relative term, as both of mine were stolen, never to be heard from again.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
That said, we own a 3rd gen 4 runner. It's been a great vehicle, nonetheless.
08/27/09
The 3rd gen 4runners are my 2nd favorite to the 1st gen. They got more power out of the V6 and moved to coilovers. Oh, and you can get them with the rear e-locker.
My father in-law's about to sell his '93(?) FJ80 with a 3.5" lift and 35" tires...if you're in SoCal and interested. Great ride, he just doesn't use it much.
08/27/09
Yeah, a solid axle is better for off-roading, but if Grand Cherokee owners can have IRS, so can I.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
I drive a Volvo, and I'm calling Toyotas bland and ugly. That's right.
08/27/09
08/27/09
Bring back the removable top. That way when I want to carry big stuff, I can. As it is now, if I wanted to put a bunch of friends in a big, numb car, I'd drive a Taurus.
08/27/09
Bet it's got a Camry interior with plush heated leather seats, a DVD entertainment center and 64.5 cupholders. Oh and an MSRP higher than what my parents paid for their house.
08/27/09
08/27/09
The tires are 355mm, it's the truck that's scaled up.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09