The current Ford Explorer isn't based on the Ford Ranger. I don't think the Explorer has been 'based' on the Ranger for a model revisions. Anyone know the truth to this one?
So, the Ranger will continue on, as it is a cash cow. This new Explorer most likely will NOT look like this, similar, maybe.
@mwc5446: The Explorer's had a separate platform since the 2002 model year, but the Sport and Sport Trac used the Ranger platform until the former was cancelled after '03 and the latter redesigned for the '07 model year. (None were sold for '06, as the '07 was introduced early in the year.)
I actually think that the Flex is a pretty darned good vehicle. They don't need to compete with themselves in this particular segment. If anything, they need to pay more attention to smaller cars.
I think Explorer should stay BOF, and "merge" with Expedition. There should be Explorer and Explorer XL (formerly Expedition) sharing everything but a longer frame. This hits the market for towing SUV's, which is still large.
Leave Flex/Edge/Escape to cover soft roaders.
Flex and this Explorer will be the exact same thing, with different styling. There will continue to be a need for towing with a SUV, and not everyone wants an Expedition sized vehicle for that.
The Expedition is quite large, but the current Explorer is managable to park, can tow a good load, is decent on fuel and actually kinda hauls ass with the 3-valve 4.6
So basically they are doing a redesign of the Taurus X and changing the name to Explorer? Am I missing something?
Don't get me wrong, I think that making the Explorer car-based is probably a smart move business-wise, I lament the death of the truck-based SUV. I had an '02 Explorer (1st year of the latest body style) and I loved it.
Oh well, I told my wife I want an M5 Touring as my next car.
You will not be the last person in Detroit if you buy a god damned M5 (I believe you have the goal of last person here). You would be hung before then.
I did ask my father-in-law a while back if I could park in his driveway if I get anything other than a Ford. He said, "Sure, if you give me your Mustang."
In all reality, especially since the M5 Touring is not sold in the US (bastards!), I will have to go further down the list:
They should just forget this whole thing, and rename the Flex the Explorer . Forget continuing this aberrant SUV trend that has proven to be a bad idea socially and environmentally. Stop making automotive crack, just because the population wants it. It's bad for them. Take some initiative. Darth Vader DIES in the sequel. Just Say No.
Sounds like a case where they're porting the Explorer name over in a poorly-thought-out manner (like Taurus for Five Hundred). The Explorer was THE original mainstream SUV. It's the Honda Accord of SUVs. Many people actually do tow things with them. What's going to happen with a FWD unibody version?
How about the cannibalization issue? Escape/Flex/Edge...
@danio3834: The Taurus X is gone now, but otherwise, I agree.
The Flex is a big enough vehicle that it can be effectively marketed to a different audience.
The Escape would be the one I would buy if I had to, considering it has most of the usable space of a current Explorer in smaller, cheaper, slightly more fuel efficient package.
The Explorer/Edge thing, though, leaves them in a tough spot. They are now both going to be midsize crossovers marketed right next to each other? I hope not. One would think they had learned the mistake of marketing the Freestyle/Taurus X and the Edge next to each other.
I think they ought to let the Explorer name die, and continue to develop the platform for use on the next Edge and MKX.
@pauljones: I like the idea of "merging" the Edge and Explorer, but I think killing the Explorer name would be a mistake.
Second only to Mustang, Explorer is the most valuable sub-brand Ford has probably ever had. So between the two, I think Edge should disappear in favor of a mix of the two vehicles (named Explorer).
My thought was that the fact that you still see the "Exploder" jokes around was indicative of the fact that the Explorer name still has quite a bit of negative connotation attached to it, while the Edge name, though not as historic, is new, has been generally well-accepted, and does not have any major blemishes on it.
But I do agree that the Explorer is a valuable name plate, and truth be told, I don't care what they name it, as long as they do wind up merging them and not selling two competing products in the same niche.
Flex and Explorer will now also be the same, 3 row CUV's.
I've never understood all of this. My thoughts are that maybe distinctly different styling appeals to different markets, so it is similar to sharing a platform across badges, but with the same badge.
@rlj676-Carbon Footprint Size - Clownshoe: I think that, out of all of those, Flex is at least the most unique. To your point about snow clearance the other day, the Flex strikes me as more of a low-clearance wagon, while even a softened Explorer could coexist with it okay. Style and space-wise, they're different enough, despite similar seating.
I'm more concerned about the ever-growing Escape and the nouveau Edge--which, as I stated above, I feel should be "merged" with Explorer. Offer an optional third-row and call it done (which is what Explorer already does, unless row 3 is now standard).
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
The dealer up in Hillsborough (adds that to spellchecker) (adds "spellchecker" to spellchecker) has/had two of 'em - one light blue, one cranberry, both with white roofs. I quite like 'em, but they're bigger than what I'd want.
This is the final call for the Ranger. Think about it when the Explorer goes FWD based there will be no need for the basic platform that makes up the Ranger. So Ford Must either make a serious upgrade to the small truck platform or make a version of the Dodge Rampage. Bigger but no guts because it is still FWD based.
@marc2068: Unless plans have changed, my understanding is that Ford will replace the Ranger with a slightly shrunken F150 called the F100. Personally I think this will result in a vehicle larger then Ranger buyers want an smaller than F-series buyers want, but I guess we shall see...
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@Mike the Dog will work for a Preview Button!: Word is the F100 was canned in favour of putting Ecoboosts into F150s instead. Disappointing news, I have no use for anything as big as an F150 where I live.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@Mike the Dog will work for a Preview Button!: It sounds like they're getting turbocharged motors, so they won't be too underpowered, but I don't think you'll be doing any towing with those torque curves.
@despisethesun: I realized that right after I hit submit, but figured most here would get what I meant. Good luck getting a pickup owner to understand that you have to rev the snot out of it to get any power.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
I thought that sgarting with the 2002 Model Year the Explorer got a new frame and no longer shared a chassis with the Ranger. I think the explorer would make a good platform to start out with for the F100, I honestly don't really like the idea of basing it off the Taurus X platform, I mean Taurus X and Flex together were redundant, so how is this Explorer going to be any more different than the Flex, besides more stiltage. The Explorer does full fill a certain role as a mid size body on frame SUV with pretty good tow capability...once the trailblazer platform dies out, all thats left is i guess, Durango/Aspen and who really wants one of those?
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
I like the new Escape quite a bit. It has a very nice interior, more than enough power, and is as useful to suburban America as a Tahoe or Expedition will ever be. It began as a compact SUV, but it has gotten to be as large as the early Explorers, and has 90% of the current Explorer's usable space. It is by no means a compact SUV anymore.
Whenever I take my car in for servicing, I usually rent an Escape for a day or two from the Enterprise Rental office down the street.
@pauljones: I guess I haven't seen any new Escapes up close. To my perception they're quite a bit smaller, but platform bloat and feature creep being what they are I shouldn't be surprised.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
03/30/09
So, the Ranger will continue on, as it is a cash cow. This new Explorer most likely will NOT look like this, similar, maybe.
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
I thought I was the only oddball in the thread that like the Flex.
03/30/09
Leave Flex/Edge/Escape to cover soft roaders.
Flex and this Explorer will be the exact same thing, with different styling. There will continue to be a need for towing with a SUV, and not everyone wants an Expedition sized vehicle for that.
03/30/09
The Expedition is quite large, but the current Explorer is managable to park, can tow a good load, is decent on fuel and actually kinda hauls ass with the 3-valve 4.6
I guess its just kinda caught in the middle.
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
Don't get me wrong, I think that making the Explorer car-based is probably a smart move business-wise, I lament the death of the truck-based SUV. I had an '02 Explorer (1st year of the latest body style) and I loved it.
Oh well, I told my wife I want an M5 Touring as my next car.
03/30/09
You will not be the last person in Detroit if you buy a god damned M5 (I believe you have the goal of last person here). You would be hung before then.
03/30/09
Ah...Detroit.
Kind of like the Civil War south, except with UAW execution squads instead of KKK lynch mobs.
03/30/09
I did ask my father-in-law a while back if I could park in his driveway if I get anything other than a Ford. He said, "Sure, if you give me your Mustang."
In all reality, especially since the M5 Touring is not sold in the US (bastards!), I will have to go further down the list:
*Taurus SHO
*M3 Sedan
*3 Series
*Fiesta (4-door)
*Jetta TDI Wagon
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
/Looks at empty bowl;ducks
03/30/09
03/30/09
How about the cannibalization issue? Escape/Flex/Edge...
03/30/09
Ahem
Escape
Taurus X
Edge
Flex
new Exploder?
03/30/09
The Flex is a big enough vehicle that it can be effectively marketed to a different audience.
The Escape would be the one I would buy if I had to, considering it has most of the usable space of a current Explorer in smaller, cheaper, slightly more fuel efficient package.
The Explorer/Edge thing, though, leaves them in a tough spot. They are now both going to be midsize crossovers marketed right next to each other? I hope not. One would think they had learned the mistake of marketing the Freestyle/Taurus X and the Edge next to each other.
I think they ought to let the Explorer name die, and continue to develop the platform for use on the next Edge and MKX.
03/30/09
Second only to Mustang, Explorer is the most valuable sub-brand Ford has probably ever had. So between the two, I think Edge should disappear in favor of a mix of the two vehicles (named Explorer).
03/30/09
My thought was that the fact that you still see the "Exploder" jokes around was indicative of the fact that the Explorer name still has quite a bit of negative connotation attached to it, while the Edge name, though not as historic, is new, has been generally well-accepted, and does not have any major blemishes on it.
But I do agree that the Explorer is a valuable name plate, and truth be told, I don't care what they name it, as long as they do wind up merging them and not selling two competing products in the same niche.
03/30/09
Edge and Escape are really who are the same now.
Both are 2 row CUV's.
Flex and Explorer will now also be the same, 3 row CUV's.
I've never understood all of this. My thoughts are that maybe distinctly different styling appeals to different markets, so it is similar to sharing a platform across badges, but with the same badge.
03/30/09
I'm more concerned about the ever-growing Escape and the nouveau Edge--which, as I stated above, I feel should be "merged" with Explorer. Offer an optional third-row and call it done (which is what Explorer already does, unless row 3 is now standard).
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
i live in Boston.
they do like their Explorers around here... but no Flexeses.
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
The dealer up in Hillsborough (adds that to spellchecker) (adds "spellchecker" to spellchecker) has/had two of 'em - one light blue, one cranberry, both with white roofs. I quite like 'em, but they're bigger than what I'd want.
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/30/09
1) Continue the current platform without any other models to share it.
2) Base the new Explorer on the F100, which will make it bigger and cut into Explorer and Expedition sales.
3) Base it on a car platform, which should make it more economical at the expense of off-road utility.
Since the vast majority of them never even see dirt roads very often, the third option seems to make the most sense.
03/30/09
I thought that sgarting with the 2002 Model Year the Explorer got a new frame and no longer shared a chassis with the Ranger. I think the explorer would make a good platform to start out with for the F100, I honestly don't really like the idea of basing it off the Taurus X platform, I mean Taurus X and Flex together were redundant, so how is this Explorer going to be any more different than the Flex, besides more stiltage. The Explorer does full fill a certain role as a mid size body on frame SUV with pretty good tow capability...once the trailblazer platform dies out, all thats left is i guess, Durango/Aspen and who really wants one of those?
03/30/09
03/30/09
03/30/09
I like the new Escape quite a bit. It has a very nice interior, more than enough power, and is as useful to suburban America as a Tahoe or Expedition will ever be. It began as a compact SUV, but it has gotten to be as large as the early Explorers, and has 90% of the current Explorer's usable space. It is by no means a compact SUV anymore.
Whenever I take my car in for servicing, I usually rent an Escape for a day or two from the Enterprise Rental office down the street.
03/30/09
03/30/09
The original Explorer started out at 174in(length) x 70in(width) x 65in(height), and has now grown to be be 193in x 73in x 72in
The current Escape is 174in x 71in x 68in.
The Explorer has had some serious model bloat. It will be interesting to see if the 2011 Explorer continues that trend.
03/30/09
You ain't got no alibi
03/30/09