This in a rear wheel drive converted 1984 or 1985 Ford Tempo two-door would be something interesting. I've seen a big block Ford stuffed into one ('85 GL Coupe), but nothing modern (or 1994+ for that matter). #raptor
@günter macbeetle, codename: chrystlubitshi: What, what, what? Did someone say GT? Wow, that is some engine, isn't it? I think I'll stick with the 5.4-liter engine. Thanks for thinking of me! ;) #raptor
@skaycog: aww come on, no replacement for displacement and all...
though.. i guess they way they have the 5.4 crammed in there it'd take a lot of re-engineerding to do... and why mess with something that works so well already. (you're quite welcome nudge nudge ;) #raptor
@skaycog: You're right to stick with the 5.4L it's lighter and with the internals package all you need to do is turbo the thing and you're pumping out over 1000hp. #raptor
What is it about this truck that makes it so, so beautiful? There is something about the design that is simple and American. Something that reaches into the lower levels of testosterone production and calls out for more. But, there is more to this simple, yet exciting design. I think it something that says, "this is all a truck needs to be", yet it provides more. Maybe it brings back memories of when trucks were trucks and not over bloated cars (I'm looking at you Honda). It's hard to put a finger on it. Simplicity like the Ranger, maybe? I don't know. #fordraptor
@FTGDWolverineEdition'09: Same here. Hauls ass and groceries. Only thing I am disappointed that it doesn't come supercharged or turbocharged. But 411hp is fine. #fordraptor
I give automotive outlets the same respect on links that they give us. When they don't respect our stories enough to link to us -- even quoting us -- we won't respect their stories enough to link to them.
@Ray Wert: I give automotive outlets the same respect on links that they give us. When they don't respect our stories enough to link to us -- even quoting us -- we won't respect their stories enough to link to them.
@Ray Wert: I'd say there's a difference between a press release that you somehow had an exclusive on and original content like the Edmunds walkaround. Particularly given that it's their picture.
You still have no excuse for copying their last line.
Also, there's this whole concept of taking the high road, being the setting the better example. Just a thought.
For starters, it wasn't a press release. We interviewed him. The quote from our Q&A is just as much a product of our hard work as their sentence is.
Secondly, if we'd taken the low road we would have run the story sans credit. Edmunds gets credit on this. In fact, we give them credit fully above the jump on our front page. They gave us credit too. Buried a bit, but they still gave it to us.
You see, we're not arguing that they stole our story. We're arguing that if they want links where credit is given, they need to do the same with us. That's called being fair.
@Ray Wert: Fair enough on the Press release Vs Interview. That's roughly fair tit-for-tat that they excerpted your quote and you grabbed their picture without a direct photo credit.
Your line of argument here suggests to me that you intentionally created the post as a response to them picking up on your exclusive Delorean thing without a link.
I still contend that taking the high road and being the better man is preferable to sinking to the levels of others.
That's all debatable, but the big one for me is:
They end with "lift with the knees" and you do the same. No quotes, no attribution. You put this forward like it's your own clever idea.
From a creative integrity standpoint that's pretty weak.
@Mad_Science: No offense, but I think you're seriously overreacting. The "lift with the knees" line is so trite as to be incapable of original attribution and unworthy of any other kind of attribution. It's no different with ending a weather story with "hot enough for ya?"
Edited by snapoversteer 'bout to get told at 10/12/09 2:45 PM
snapoversteer 'bout to get told was starred
snapoversteer 'bout to get told was unstarred
@snapoversteer should STFU because: I admit that it's small, but it's like when your friend copies some joke or something that you just delivered. It's just not cool.
As far as making a big thing out of this, I observed that Ray didn't put a link over to the content he was referring to and pointed out that he copied the line. He brought up the not-linking pissing match justification.
...and since I keep harping on taking the high road and I'm not into abusing dead equines, I'm checking out of this little debate.
the 31x10.5x15s on my pathfinder weighed in around 100lbs. It was a bitch to get them mounted when you had a spare. At nearly 10x that weight, that is an utter joke. I mean, even 300lbs is well above most people's lifting capacity. Ford better crank out an onstar service pretty quick, or there will be alot of pissed off dead people in the middle of the desert.
11/12/09
11/12/09
That's Houston all over, as if designed by a cartographer with tourettes. #raptor
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
though.. i guess they way they have the 5.4 crammed in there it'd take a lot of re-engineerding to do... and why mess with something that works so well already. (you're quite welcome nudge nudge ;) #raptor
11/12/09
11/12/09
There again, 550hp is probably more than enough for me. When I get one, we'll go on that drive off into the sunset. #raptor
11/12/09
11/12/09
Honey, get the big stocking down from the attic!
What drives the timing? Belt or chain, or be still my heart, gears? (Yeah, I wish). #raptor
11/12/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
What is it about this truck that makes it so, so beautiful? There is something about the design that is simple and American. Something that reaches into the lower levels of testosterone production and calls out for more. But, there is more to this simple, yet exciting design. I think it something that says, "this is all a truck needs to be", yet it provides more. Maybe it brings back memories of when trucks were trucks and not over bloated cars (I'm looking at you Honda). It's hard to put a finger on it. Simplicity like the Ranger, maybe? I don't know. #fordraptor
11/03/09
11/03/09
And I don't even like trucks that much to begin with. Drool! #fordraptor
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
[blogs.insideline.com]
10/11/09
10/12/09
It's just we thought "no link" is the new link etiquette these days from Edmunds given their recent non-linkage to us on our stories:
[www.insideline.com]
I give automotive outlets the same respect on links that they give us. When they don't respect our stories enough to link to us -- even quoting us -- we won't respect their stories enough to link to them.
10/12/09
Kudos!!
10/12/09
You still have no excuse for copying their last line.
Also, there's this whole concept of taking the high road, being the setting the better example. Just a thought.
10/12/09
For starters, it wasn't a press release. We interviewed him. The quote from our Q&A is just as much a product of our hard work as their sentence is.
Secondly, if we'd taken the low road we would have run the story sans credit. Edmunds gets credit on this. In fact, we give them credit fully above the jump on our front page. They gave us credit too. Buried a bit, but they still gave it to us.
You see, we're not arguing that they stole our story. We're arguing that if they want links where credit is given, they need to do the same with us. That's called being fair.
10/12/09
Your line of argument here suggests to me that you intentionally created the post as a response to them picking up on your exclusive Delorean thing without a link.
I still contend that taking the high road and being the better man is preferable to sinking to the levels of others.
That's all debatable, but the big one for me is:
They end with "lift with the knees" and you do the same. No quotes, no attribution. You put this forward like it's your own clever idea.
From a creative integrity standpoint that's pretty weak.
10/12/09
10/12/09
As far as making a big thing out of this, I observed that Ray didn't put a link over to the content he was referring to and pointed out that he copied the line. He brought up the not-linking pissing match justification.
...and since I keep harping on taking the high road and I'm not into abusing dead equines, I'm checking out of this little debate.
10/12/09
10/09/09
Metric shit-ton BTW...
10/09/09
10/10/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
"Hey, Triple-A??? Yeah, I'm out here stuck with a flat - can you send a tow truck... and a truss?"
10/09/09