With all the scowling, frowning, and troubled worried-looking cars out there, it's nice to know someone's out there making happy cars. After all, anyone with a pulse who drives one will have the exact same face as the car.
The MX-5/Miata has lost all of its appeal to me. The first and second generation were fine little cars with enough curves to give them character. Then came the bar-of-soap third generation of 2005. Uh-oh. Looks kind of dull. To offset the dullness, Mazda gave the car a drastic lobotomy. Now all it can do is smile and drool. Another nice car spoiled.
I like the back-to-basics idea of the Superlight. The Miata has certainly packed on a few pounds over the past two decades. Lightweight is good. If only you guys had some sort of compact, lightweight, high-revving engines in place of that 1.8L boat anchor. Oh, I don't know... (Sam Kinison scream coming) maybe A FREAKIN' ROTARY ENGINE??? WHAT THE F IS WRONG WITH YOU MORONS?? YOU'VE GOT GUYS TRIPPING OVER ROTARY ENGINES AT YOUR FACTORY, BUT YOU NEVER PUT ONE IN A FREAKIN" LIGHTWEIGHT SPORTS CAR!!!
Mazda really ought to do a better job of seizing the opportunities at hand. They remind me of the guy who fell in a barrel full of boobs and came out sucking his thumb.
@NiceNurseRatched: As a former rotary owner I'll just say this now: rotaries suck. They drink oil, get terrible gas mileage, no torque, require $5000 sitting around for the inevitable rebuild.
Mazda does need a new engine - a turbo 2.0 liter. Hell, source the 4B11T from Mitsubishi if you can't design one yourself.
Mazda has nearly ruined a lot of great vehicles over the years (3rd gen R-7, RX-8) putting these crap motors in their cars.
As a current rotary owner, I'll just say that they are awesome little engines, especially in naturally aspirated form. With no changes to the internals, I am now putting out ~30-40% more horsepower than the factory spec, and it still puts out more torque lower down than a 4-cyl at the same power would.
Mine have always been dead reliable, and even when they've blown up, I've been able to limp home (one from more than 6 hours away). Try that with a burned piston or broken rod.
Now, without proper care and feeding, they get temperamental. Especially under turbocharging.
That said, Nice Nurse has it right, the rotary is much better suited to a proper sportscar than it is to the sporty-GT known as the RX-8.
@Electro_Boogie:
Are you joking? The rotary is awesome. You are right about the gas mileage but come on. Who cares about the oil consumption? It doesnt drink that much oil and its cheap to top off. The wankel has torque when its boosted. FDs are plenty fast. I also don't know of a more fun engine than a rotary. It runs smooth and you can rev the nuts off it. In fact, revving the engine hard is actually good for its health so you can drive it like you stole it and not feel bad.
Coming from a history of loving the frogeye Sprites, I can't get past this little rascal's face. It looks like a hoot. It looks like it likes being a hoot. I can't fault that.
Paul Y. don't drive too fast. promoted this comment
Edited by Adamskiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiy at 09/16/09 6:59 AM
Adamskiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiy was starred
Adamskiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiy was unstarred
09/16/09
hi guiz :)
09/16/09
Nothing.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
Where have I seen that grill before?
09/16/09
BTW, did you ever get a different hard top?
09/16/09
I like the back-to-basics idea of the Superlight. The Miata has certainly packed on a few pounds over the past two decades. Lightweight is good. If only you guys had some sort of compact, lightweight, high-revving engines in place of that 1.8L boat anchor. Oh, I don't know... (Sam Kinison scream coming) maybe A FREAKIN' ROTARY ENGINE??? WHAT THE F IS WRONG WITH YOU MORONS?? YOU'VE GOT GUYS TRIPPING OVER ROTARY ENGINES AT YOUR FACTORY, BUT YOU NEVER PUT ONE IN A FREAKIN" LIGHTWEIGHT SPORTS CAR!!!
Mazda really ought to do a better job of seizing the opportunities at hand. They remind me of the guy who fell in a barrel full of boobs and came out sucking his thumb.
09/16/09
Mazda does need a new engine - a turbo 2.0 liter. Hell, source the 4B11T from Mitsubishi if you can't design one yourself.
Mazda has nearly ruined a lot of great vehicles over the years (3rd gen R-7, RX-8) putting these crap motors in their cars.
09/16/09
Wow, once bitten...
As a current rotary owner, I'll just say that they are awesome little engines, especially in naturally aspirated form. With no changes to the internals, I am now putting out ~30-40% more horsepower than the factory spec, and it still puts out more torque lower down than a 4-cyl at the same power would.
Mine have always been dead reliable, and even when they've blown up, I've been able to limp home (one from more than 6 hours away). Try that with a burned piston or broken rod.
Now, without proper care and feeding, they get temperamental. Especially under turbocharging.
That said, Nice Nurse has it right, the rotary is much better suited to a proper sportscar than it is to the sporty-GT known as the RX-8.
09/16/09
Are you joking? The rotary is awesome. You are right about the gas mileage but come on. Who cares about the oil consumption? It doesnt drink that much oil and its cheap to top off. The wankel has torque when its boosted. FDs are plenty fast. I also don't know of a more fun engine than a rotary. It runs smooth and you can rev the nuts off it. In fact, revving the engine hard is actually good for its health so you can drive it like you stole it and not feel bad.
09/16/09
I thought the photoshop contest had ended?
09/16/09
09/16/09
I'm a fast zippy car! Wahoo!
Coming from a history of loving the frogeye Sprites, I can't get past this little rascal's face. It looks like a hoot. It looks like it likes being a hoot. I can't fault that.
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
I see your Miata and raise you one Celica (click the picture):
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
Looks very happy
09/16/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Seriously?
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
@Buickboy92: I see some resemblance.