• more about #spyphotos more comments →
    bmoreDLJ: Oooo...a white one. more »
    pauljones: Way to go, Honda. You just completely killed your chances of appealing to today's youth base by making the car a hybrid, and thus somewhat difficult (... more »
    Scandinavian Flick: VoltTEC just kicked in yo! more »
    bmoreDLJ: Mmm...sexy... more »
    Scaramanga: We shouldn't get too worked up about performance numbers, down the road there likely will be "Si" or "Type R" variant. CR-Z is aimed as a mass market... more »
    tonyola: All of you folks carping about the acceleration times are missing the point of the original CRX. It wasn't a drag racer - it was a dinky, moderately-p... more »
    Jeb_Hoge: Styling by Renault, powertrain by Fisher-Price. more »
    GreenN_Gold: Honda forgot to ask themselves one important question when they skipped straight from CR-X to CR-Z. CR-Why? more »
    MaWeiTao: The snout is a little odd and the rest of it looks too much like the Insight. I guess it's an improvement over current Hondas, but then again, that is... more »
    weatherman: Performance is about the same as a base CRX back in the day, which is to say not great but I'm sure it feels peppy because of the size. And it looks g... more »
    bmoreDLJ: It REVEALS a Mazda... more »
    VeeArrrSix: I guess it's a smidge faster to 60 than the 1.9L TDI that I used to drive... but that returned 47-50 MPG. more »
    Ash78, cube farmer: Those are pretty good numbers...for a midsize diesel vehicle. I think Honda's trying to do a REAL successor to the original Insight, but calling it C... more »
    Sloop_John_B: 9.7? Really? If it's a CRX successor don't neuter it in the acceleration department just for the sake of MPG. Besides, the original somehow did BOT... more »
    philibuster: Here's a tip for you would-be photographers of magazines: use a freaking scanner. more »
  • We can't find any posts with those tags. Or check your spelling and try again.