Hah, bonus points for Bo Knows callback.
As far the car, I can't tell if it's coming or going, especially since the top shot looks just like the rear of a Beetle.
I was on the Formula SAE team at my school; this is where a team of students design, build and a race a car. Here were some of the requirements for the formula car when I was on the team: Engine no larger that 610 CC, air intake restriction of 1 inch (I think) for gasoline, it was different if ethanol was used, fully independent suspension, four wheel brakes and other requirement. Anyway what we ended up with was a very fast car that could hit 60 in under 4 seconds and handled like it was on rails.
Along side us in our shop, was the Solar Powered Car Team. The solar car might, on a completely full charge, hit 40 or 45 mph for a very short time and I’m sure that was a scary proposition. The thing was shaped like a large wing/teardrop and very light considering its size. I heard more than one say it was extremely scary to be passed by a car on the road in the thing, because it was unstable when buffeted by the wind. The drivers also were extremely hot while driving, because the car was nearly completely closed for streamlining purposes. This sun powered car handled as one would expect a vehicle to handle that used bicycle wheels, only that the added weight and flimsy build made it far worse than any bicycle.
Many (if not all) of the guys on the solar powered team had very liberal inclinations, and so were trying to prove the viability of the solar car. Several of the solar guys went out of their way to ignore us and our wicked ways, except when they needed our superior fabrication skills. Every now and then though, you would see one of them dreamily looking at our car with a longing look of regret, perhaps wishing to switch to the darkside (literally and figuratively), because they knew in their heart of hearts that the solar powered car sucked.
@Flathead Smith: Wow, your solar car team must've sucked. A good solar car can hit 80 mph and sustain 45, can take buffeting as well as if not better than a normal car (less side area), and does not use bicycle tires (although that was once common).
On my solar car team, we had way more gearheads than tree-huggers. I think it was viewed by most as a real engineering challenge, not as an eco-ego thing.
@Noiresque: Your right, I may be slightly off on my numbers. Those were the numbers I remembered, but now that I’m thinking about it, they may have had a higher top speed and possibly could sustain 40 or 45 if the sun was fully exposed. This was about 15 years ago and I’m sure the technology has improved.
@Flathead Smith: Dunno where you went to college, (or when), but you must have had a pretty poor solar car team. Solar cars have been able to top out at ~80mph or so since the late 90's. We could build them faster if we wanted to, but since on the race we're limited by the public speed limits, there's no reason to make them faster. As fun as an FSAE car may be to drive, I'd never trade my solar car driving experience for that. 82mph, on pure solar power, in a 400lb vehicle, in Taiwan? That was damn cool.
The funny thing, at our school, it's the other way around. The solar car team is all of the hard core engineering and fabrication guys, while the FSAE guys flounder about and sometimes don't finish their car in time for competition. Pure solar vehicles will never be practical for consumer use. Who the hell cares? It's a real engineering challenge and a fantastic experience. Where else would I get to play with bleeding-edge technology?
You can have your toy race car, where the rules had to explicitly force teams to re-design part of the car each year.
@Flathead Smith: I've made some air intakes and other random parts for some of those formula SAE cars using 3D Printers at work. We've done it for sponsorship for a few uni's now.
@theholymac: The Solar Team at our school pretty much kept the same car for several years before they would build another. So usually there were very small incremental improvements. Usually there wasn’t much going on.
The Formula Team on the other hand was not allowed to enter the same car each year, which always meant there was a redesign in the works (actually a school could enter the same car, but there was a big points deduction). Formula SAE requirement to build a new car every year kept our shop hopping, what with designers designing, welders welding, machine tools turning, body forming, sheet aluminum bending and eating pizza a midnight, made for good interesting times.
@Flathead Smith: Gotcha, yeah, pretty poor solar car team. It's *possible* to re-use the old cars when the rules don't change much, but it's not exactly competitive.
We design and build a new car 100% from scratch every two years (including all of the electronic systems. Nothing off the shelf here, folks!), it keeps our shop moving the same way.
Well, since solar power tends to attract a certain "green" demographic with a shockingly effective radius, I can see how the naming convention would fit it. It's merely a warning to the rest of us, to keep an eye, and nose, out for it's fans following in it's wake.
It's an atypical shape for a solar car, but much more practical as well.
I still see separate chassis structure, which is somewhat lame. Don't talk to me about saving ounces of paint until the batteries and solar cells are load bearing.
Honestly, I'd drive it to work, so long as I could keep the RX-7 and DR-Z for the weekends.
@Feds: It's not so much lame as necessary. If the solar cells are rigidly attached to something that's going to flex under load or pothole impact, they'll crack. In that case it's worth extra weight to have more of the array staying intact and producing power. As it is, on a multi-day race they're going to be replacing at least one or two broken cells per day. Making the batteries load bearing would be about as safe as making the gas tank on a regular car structural, which is why it's generally prohibited by event rules.
Lots of motorcycles put fuel in their frames, so the structural gas tank is moot. Batteries are big plastic boxes. I don't see too much reason that the box could not be tweaked to serve as chassis structure.
Also, designing solar cells capable of supporting structural loads is the kind of thing that is right up a university's alley.
I guess I just expect too much out of research institutions. The reason I didn't get into FSAE at Waterloo was because the team captain told me flat out there was nothing to be gained from opening up the engine and reducing rotating/reciprocating mass.
@Feds: Solar cells are silicon wafers, about as fragile as eggshells or potato chips. They are about as non-load-bearing as you can get. They are applied to a structural surface, and that's not going to change any time soon.
@Feds: Except that every student design competition that uses any kind of batteries requires them to be commercially available and un-modified. Partly for safety/insurance reasons and partly to keep the better funded programs from sub-contracting out custom battery development. Maybe if you had spent your undergrad years getting involved with these kinds of projects instead of whining about how the team captains didn't love your brilliant ideas you would be aware of these things.
Well, this one goes where most of the entries don't: vertical panels. And on a sunny day, there's actually useful power to be had from vertical surfaces.
Unlike other entries, this one also doesn't seem to demand you be a miniaturized elf to either clamber in, or to fit comfortably once ensconced. Unless it's pictured life-size, I might fit in there. I'm not a big guy, but I'm not tiny, either.
Damn Panera and their tasty, tasty sandwiches.
So, the size limits on the panels: do those apply only to the total footprint of the car? Or is there a gross limit on total area of power collection devices? Because if it's the first, then it could be workable to actually build a car with more than one meter of height, and gain back the increased drag in increased collection area.
Oooh, the side view is so pretty. I do like competent streamlining.
@Quattro-luvr: They don't look like ribbon cells. Evergreen's "String Ribbon" is proprietary tech, very cool stuff. But they're not a flexible design, either.
These cells look like they're pretty conformable, so I'm inclined to say thin-film, even though I know they would take a huge hit in power to go that route. I dunno, who's making a flexible crystalline silicon panel?
@Ash78: Hippies don't like funk. They share with fratboys a love for frisbee games, Widespread Panic, and Phish. And they'll call Dave Matthews Band "funky", but that's about as close as they get.
I'm conveniently ignoring the hippies from PCU, obviously.
HoonThatFerrari promoted this comment
Naturally Exasperated shaves his legs. It's just common courtesy. was starred
Naturally Exasperated shaves his legs. It's just common courtesy. was unstarred
The solar powered Toyota story was obviously a red herring leaked by Toyota itself to distract outsiders from their real next killer app: a unicorn fart and rainbow powered Toyota!
Thank God! I was dreading having to give my greenie co-worker a drive to work all winter because his solar-powered car would be dead by October in Michigan.
You disappoint me, Ben. I thought your photoshop skills were better than that. Why not include a bandanna-clad, gold chain wearing Raisin Bran sun posing in front of a Prius?
@rlj676-new job, same problems: My neighbor is the environmental reporter for the local NPR station. They have photovoltaics on the roof, gray water recycling and native plantings in the yard. They drive a . . . wait for it . . . Prius.
Solar power is awesome. I know a guy who covered half his barn roof with them and the local power company sends him a check each month for contributing to the grid.
My folks are using them on their renovated home. They're zero maintenance and lower the electric bill. Stick it to the man!
@Bumblebee: Hang on to your shoes. Photovoltaics are poised to make a big jump in bang-for-the-buck. Nanosolar has perfected a roll-to-roll process that can make photovoltaics panels in a huge industrial printing-press fashion, like generating miles and miles of newsprint, except it's on a metallic foil backing and semiconductor dopants and whatnot, it's just astounding. Current estimates place the cost to produce at about $0.99 per watt.
It isn't as efficient at converting light to power as some other methods, but damn - it's under a buck a watt! Where I live that puts the payback at just three or four years.
@Elhigh: Sounds great--If you can get the payback period WITHIN the average home ownership timeframe (which I believe is 7 years), it's a slam dunk. People need to see results in front of them. I think the only reason more people aren't on the PV bandwagon is the 10-20 year payoff period, depending on where they live.
@The Name's Ash78, Housewares: I'd be more inclined to calculate the value of the solar panels as to how much value they add to the property, and not how soon they pay for themselves according to the power bill.
09/02/09
As far the car, I can't tell if it's coming or going, especially since the top shot looks just like the rear of a Beetle.
09/02/09
Along side us in our shop, was the Solar Powered Car Team. The solar car might, on a completely full charge, hit 40 or 45 mph for a very short time and I’m sure that was a scary proposition. The thing was shaped like a large wing/teardrop and very light considering its size. I heard more than one say it was extremely scary to be passed by a car on the road in the thing, because it was unstable when buffeted by the wind. The drivers also were extremely hot while driving, because the car was nearly completely closed for streamlining purposes. This sun powered car handled as one would expect a vehicle to handle that used bicycle wheels, only that the added weight and flimsy build made it far worse than any bicycle.
Many (if not all) of the guys on the solar powered team had very liberal inclinations, and so were trying to prove the viability of the solar car. Several of the solar guys went out of their way to ignore us and our wicked ways, except when they needed our superior fabrication skills. Every now and then though, you would see one of them dreamily looking at our car with a longing look of regret, perhaps wishing to switch to the darkside (literally and figuratively), because they knew in their heart of hearts that the solar powered car sucked.
09/02/09
On my solar car team, we had way more gearheads than tree-huggers. I think it was viewed by most as a real engineering challenge, not as an eco-ego thing.
09/02/09
Our auto shop classes would change your oil, brakes, align the front end.
Damn, I'm old.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
The funny thing, at our school, it's the other way around. The solar car team is all of the hard core engineering and fabrication guys, while the FSAE guys flounder about and sometimes don't finish their car in time for competition. Pure solar vehicles will never be practical for consumer use. Who the hell cares? It's a real engineering challenge and a fantastic experience. Where else would I get to play with bleeding-edge technology?
You can have your toy race car, where the rules had to explicitly force teams to re-design part of the car each year.
09/02/09
They're awesome : )
09/02/09
The Formula Team on the other hand was not allowed to enter the same car each year, which always meant there was a redesign in the works (actually a school could enter the same car, but there was a big points deduction). Formula SAE requirement to build a new car every year kept our shop hopping, what with designers designing, welders welding, machine tools turning, body forming, sheet aluminum bending and eating pizza a midnight, made for good interesting times.
09/02/09
We design and build a new car 100% from scratch every two years (including all of the electronic systems. Nothing off the shelf here, folks!), it keeps our shop moving the same way.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
How fast does it go?
Who gets to drive?
J/K
09/02/09
2. The fastest
+1
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
I still see separate chassis structure, which is somewhat lame. Don't talk to me about saving ounces of paint until the batteries and solar cells are load bearing.
Honestly, I'd drive it to work, so long as I could keep the RX-7 and DR-Z for the weekends.
09/02/09
09/02/09
COTD: Conformo of the day.
Lots of motorcycles put fuel in their frames, so the structural gas tank is moot. Batteries are big plastic boxes. I don't see too much reason that the box could not be tweaked to serve as chassis structure.
Also, designing solar cells capable of supporting structural loads is the kind of thing that is right up a university's alley.
I guess I just expect too much out of research institutions. The reason I didn't get into FSAE at Waterloo was because the team captain told me flat out there was nothing to be gained from opening up the engine and reducing rotating/reciprocating mass.
09/02/09
When I see gigantic batt packs like in the Volt, I see opportunity to at least make the damned battery support its own weight.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
Kinda the same argument I got from said FSAE captain: "The rules give you a restrictor plate, why would we waste time opening the engine?"
Which is why I spent my undergrad years designing and building my own stuff instead.
09/02/09
Unlike other entries, this one also doesn't seem to demand you be a miniaturized elf to either clamber in, or to fit comfortably once ensconced. Unless it's pictured life-size, I might fit in there. I'm not a big guy, but I'm not tiny, either.
Damn Panera and their tasty, tasty sandwiches.
So, the size limits on the panels: do those apply only to the total footprint of the car? Or is there a gross limit on total area of power collection devices? Because if it's the first, then it could be workable to actually build a car with more than one meter of height, and gain back the increased drag in increased collection area.
Oooh, the side view is so pretty. I do like competent streamlining.
09/02/09
So are the panels using ribbon tech, crystal? What is it?
09/02/09
These cells look like they're pretty conformable, so I'm inclined to say thin-film, even though I know they would take a huge hit in power to go that route. I dunno, who's making a flexible crystalline silicon panel?
09/02/09
09/02/09
Better pack some deodorant with the sunblock.
09/02/09
09/02/09
I'm conveniently ignoring the hippies from PCU, obviously.
09/02/09
09/02/09
And I should never ignore PCU. Stop the penis-party!
09/02/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
Wait, so some wealthy smug-monger has that "super-green" cabin setup? Is it Ed Begley?
01/05/09
01/05/09
My folks are using them on their renovated home. They're zero maintenance and lower the electric bill. Stick it to the man!
01/05/09
It isn't as efficient at converting light to power as some other methods, but damn - it's under a buck a watt! Where I live that puts the payback at just three or four years.
01/05/09
01/05/09