Anyway, there are one... two cars on that list that I'd not mind owning. Sadly, one of them is a 27-year-old pickup truck, and another is a minivan (Mazda5).
Entertaining analysis aside, I still can't trust the Passat on this list. Anything German is costly, even our damn '99 Jetta. And if the insurance is cheap, fixing them is expensive, unless you wrench yourself. Good luck doing that on the newer cars as VW would rather you not.
@evoCS-Hench-Minion at *location CLASSIFIED*: VW would rather you not do it, and would rather independent shops do it; they'd rather their dealers were responsible for the weekly goings-over as new problems crop up.
Also, the Jeep surprises me. I would have thought that given the age demographic that usually buys them, along with the potential uses of a Wrangler, that there would be a lot of insurance claims on them.
And if you drive about two hours outside of LA and out to the deserts, it isn't unheard of to see a couple of dumbass kids racing around the desert in a Wrangler. There's also the all the major off-road trails around California, like the Rubicon Trail. I figure that's got to add up to some serious claim numbers.
@Maxx Cracker: PT Cruiser would be expensive to insure, due to the large amount of battering they get from other drivers. They say it is from a subconscious reaction from looking at the car that makes you want to murder it in the face.
I was going to say a Deuce and a half, but how much does this thing weigh? Seriously, this would make a full size open pit mine ore hauler do wheelstands. I want to hear it run through open exhausts, full throttle. Please.
page editor: clicking on next page pretends to go there, then kicks back to page 1. Anyhoo, that engine is quite large. A normal v12 diesel in a rig is amazing, this engine must have some serious honda crushing power. for the comment about hondas and thier 100 hp per liter: hp is a gay number. It is for feminism. It is homosexual. It is richard simmons flambouyant! My mom for example, she is 500hp per liter. Wanna know what she thinks of hondas? ALL ENGINE POWER IS TORQUES RESULT. ok kids? now lets stop feeding the carpocalypse and use real math again....someday? how far is the flying circus called transverse going to kill u sall...
@bdon: Actually, Horsepower is a pretty epic win over torque. Torque is a static number, just an amount of force. Horsepower is torque over time. HP=Torque x RPM / 5250. What you end up with is a number that represents real world power, not just a static measurement.
Oh, and HP per Liter is a totally rad measurement. A tiny honda B16 making 1500 hp is a lot cooler than an 800 inch big block rat motor making 1500 hp.
A single HP number is more meaningful than torque, for sure. However, what one really cares about in a car that accelerates and decelerates is the torque curve.
Unless you're going to run the engine at it's peak HP point all the time, you care more about how much torque is available from 1500-5000 (or wherever) RPM. That defines how a pull away from a stop would feel. (Hondas suck at this, btw).
Additionally, HP/liter is a completely useless number. HP/lb of engine or HP/gallon/hour for how much power a motor is making for a given rate of fuel consumption is a lot more meaningful.
06/08/09
06/08/09
Anyway, there are one... two cars on that list that I'd not mind owning. Sadly, one of them is a 27-year-old pickup truck, and another is a minivan (Mazda5).
Wouldn't turn down a Passat, either.
06/08/09
Don't you know wagons is where it is at?
06/08/09
I'd very much take a new Volvo/Merc/Subaru/damn-near-any wagon over one, but if I had to get a minivan, that would be it.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
So what are my choices here- a Kia or two, a gaggle of minivans- or a Lincoln Town Car?
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
And if you drive about two hours outside of LA and out to the deserts, it isn't unheard of to see a couple of dumbass kids racing around the desert in a Wrangler. There's also the all the major off-road trails around California, like the Rubicon Trail. I figure that's got to add up to some serious claim numbers.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
In the shop?
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
05/06/09
05/06/09
...for about four and a half seconds before it melts the pistons and valves.
05/05/09
05/06/09
05/05/09
05/05/09
05/05/09
Oh, and HP per Liter is a totally rad measurement. A tiny honda B16 making 1500 hp is a lot cooler than an 800 inch big block rat motor making 1500 hp.
05/05/09
A single HP number is more meaningful than torque, for sure. However, what one really cares about in a car that accelerates and decelerates is the torque curve.
Unless you're going to run the engine at it's peak HP point all the time, you care more about how much torque is available from 1500-5000 (or wherever) RPM. That defines how a pull away from a stop would feel. (Hondas suck at this, btw).
Additionally, HP/liter is a completely useless number. HP/lb of engine or HP/gallon/hour for how much power a motor is making for a given rate of fuel consumption is a lot more meaningful.