I love that first picture: Texting, wheel canted in a mild left turn, impending collision with at least two lanes of oncoming traffic. Really drives the point of the article home.
I realize it was likely taken in a parking lot, but in the spirit of the article it's better my way.
I'm sure we all drive enough that we have learned to spot someone on their phone before we are within sight of the driver. Going 10 under then speeding up to 5 over then braking randomly to 10 under then pacing the car in the lane next to them. Texters are the same, but the random speed-up/brake cycle is about 2x the frequency of the on-the-phone dipshit.
Look, I'm all about personal freedom. However, your freedom to swing your fist stops at my face. In the same vein, your freedom to engage in activities which distract you while hurtling a 2000+ lb. car down the road stop as soon as you pose a threat to everyone else on the road.
So, what's my solution? Sure, you can text or talk on the phone all you want while driving. However, if you cause or are involved in an accident while engaging in one of these activities the penalties skyrocket.
@engineerd: I agree that a person's freedoms extend up to the point that they interfere with mine. I used to be less interested in this issue, but I have seen how some people my age(low 20s) or any age simply cannot handle both driving and typing messages on the phone at the same time. Your reaction time is dramatically reduced which inevitably will lead to an accident at some point. This is where your freedom's infringe on mine - your freedom to drive recklessly vs. my freedom to get where I am going safely and in one piece.
So I'll throw my two cents in for what it's worth: my solution is for states to pass legislation banning the use of cell phones while driving as a primary offense. Officers can see you using your phone, especially at night, and the person would probably be too distracted to see them coming anyway. As far as I can see it, the only way to prevent someone from risking their lives and the lives of others is to completely ban their use behind the wheel - with hands free use being a possible exception. Face it, people got along fine before cell phones became so mainstream and honestly anyone who is that important won't be driving themselves anyway. If you absolutely NEED to contact someone, there are plenty of shoulders and exits to pull off and make your call/text.
I also agree with your idea of extreme financial/prison penalties for anyone causing an accident with fatalities because of a cell phone. I think cell phone records should be pulled in every fatal accident, if nothing else just as a way to determine cause and sevarity of this issue.
Anyway, just my two cents. Feel free to disagree if you are so inclined.
First of all I want to know what is so damn important that these weenies need to be on the phone so much. I swear some of these idiots can't go 5 friggin' minutes without talking or texting to someone. I'd like to put that phone somewhere extremely uncomfortable, like the back seat of a Volkswagen.
According to 99% of the conversations I've ever overheard, mostly in highly inappropriate places to have a phone conversation, most of these fuckwits don't have 2 IQ points to rub together.
They sure as hell don't need to share their vapid thoughts in real time with other terminally inattentive halfwits while tying up the fast lane on the freeway.
That's just my opinion though. I could be wrong...
@mytdawg: I like the use of vapid, weenies, and fuckwits. Oh, and lets not forget the "terminally inattentive halfwits". That was insult gold.
But seriously, I agree completely. I can't add much, since you have already said it all with a wonderfully razor sharp tongue.
Edit: Why can't I heart click you?
These laws are good in spirit, but just aren't enforceable. Is a cop going to pull me over just for holding up my phone? What if i was just checking the time? I wonder what circumstances must exist to be pulled over.
@tonyfreak215: Most of these laws fall under the "Seconday" category mentioned in the article. Basically its revenue added for the State when the cop pulls you over for something else and you happen to be texting on a cellphone.
Depending on what trim that Cobalt is, doing something dumb like texting might be the only way to make the drive exciting. I mean, exciting in the same sense that slapping a bear on the ass is exciting.
Having learned to drive in France where traffic laws are the same across the entire country, I'm always surprised by the wild differences from state to state (not to mention city to city within the same state!)...
@Dwegmull, 2.0: As this is 'murica, we hate coherent laws about anything. Absolutely everything must be left up to states! State rights uber alles!
Ridiculous sarcasm aside, the difference in driving laws always amaze me too. I honestly have no idea what the seatbelt laws are in the states that neighbor mine, let alone anything more complex then that. I always try to go for the safest/least likely to get me pulled over option, but I really wish there was a more standard system.
Just don't do it. Texting and using cellphones takes your attention away from driving. Driving deserves your full attention. Using your thumbs to text also reduces your ability to physically control the car.
I'd recommend an updated application of Don Sherman's age old wisdom: If you cause a crash while doing this, then you will not receive insurance coverage. Have a nice day. He originally suggested it for seatbelt injuries. People might think twice before doing it if they consider the consequences.
Why would you disseminate information about where it's legal or not? It's still a dumbass move no matter what. I hope they put jammers in all new cars that make anyone's phone that's on explode.
Alright. I know its dangerous, but if I want to text while driving, then I'm gonna do it. Its also illegal in Maryland, where I live, but you know what? This is America, and I can choose to break the laws I don't like, right?
I'm not a 15 year old girl. I think I can manage to mash out less than 160 characters without murdering a bus full of toddlers.
07/13/09
Here in Washington it's secondary, so the law has done nothing.
07/13/09
I realize it was likely taken in a parking lot, but in the spirit of the article it's better my way.
07/13/09
Keerist, I know people who can't let an incoming text go 10 seconds without immediately replying.
It's really quite pathetic, especially when your inattention and cluelessness is backed by a 2,000 pound auto.
07/13/09
I wish they were piloting autos with only 2,000 lbs. of mass....
07/13/09
07/13/09
Look, I'm all about personal freedom. However, your freedom to swing your fist stops at my face. In the same vein, your freedom to engage in activities which distract you while hurtling a 2000+ lb. car down the road stop as soon as you pose a threat to everyone else on the road.
So, what's my solution? Sure, you can text or talk on the phone all you want while driving. However, if you cause or are involved in an accident while engaging in one of these activities the penalties skyrocket.
But, how do you prove it?
07/13/09
07/13/09
So I'll throw my two cents in for what it's worth: my solution is for states to pass legislation banning the use of cell phones while driving as a primary offense. Officers can see you using your phone, especially at night, and the person would probably be too distracted to see them coming anyway. As far as I can see it, the only way to prevent someone from risking their lives and the lives of others is to completely ban their use behind the wheel - with hands free use being a possible exception. Face it, people got along fine before cell phones became so mainstream and honestly anyone who is that important won't be driving themselves anyway. If you absolutely NEED to contact someone, there are plenty of shoulders and exits to pull off and make your call/text.
I also agree with your idea of extreme financial/prison penalties for anyone causing an accident with fatalities because of a cell phone. I think cell phone records should be pulled in every fatal accident, if nothing else just as a way to determine cause and sevarity of this issue.
Anyway, just my two cents. Feel free to disagree if you are so inclined.
07/13/09
According to 99% of the conversations I've ever overheard, mostly in highly inappropriate places to have a phone conversation, most of these fuckwits don't have 2 IQ points to rub together.
They sure as hell don't need to share their vapid thoughts in real time with other terminally inattentive halfwits while tying up the fast lane on the freeway.
That's just my opinion though. I could be wrong...
07/13/09
But seriously, I agree completely. I can't add much, since you have already said it all with a wonderfully razor sharp tongue.
Edit: Why can't I heart click you?
07/13/09
07/13/09
Lesson learned: Don't get pulled over.
07/13/09
Here in VA, it's a secondary offense. I'll be curious to hear stats as to how many offenses are cited- my guess is not that many.
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
@engineerd: Hey! How dare you insult our national treasur... Ah, screw it, my experience with curling was an episode of Corner Gas
07/13/09
07/13/09
Ridiculous sarcasm aside, the difference in driving laws always amaze me too. I honestly have no idea what the seatbelt laws are in the states that neighbor mine, let alone anything more complex then that. I always try to go for the safest/least likely to get me pulled over option, but I really wish there was a more standard system.
07/13/09
07/13/09
I'd recommend an updated application of Don Sherman's age old wisdom: If you cause a crash while doing this, then you will not receive insurance coverage. Have a nice day. He originally suggested it for seatbelt injuries. People might think twice before doing it if they consider the consequences.
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
I'm not a 15 year old girl. I think I can manage to mash out less than 160 characters without murdering a bus full of toddlers.
07/13/09