This is an abomination, not because of the way it looks, but because you'll never forget that it is badge engineering of a kind way worse than even GM ever tried.
A 10,000 RPM redline insures that every F450 sold in Beverly Hills will never be shifted out of second gear...that fly honey on Rodeo with the DSL and fresh rhinoplasty gotta hear that engine, yo!
If I'm more excited about the clapped-out Celica that won LeMons, or the fact that a Wagovan finished second, than I am about this Ferrari, does that make me a Communist? I'm sure they're great and all, and I respect the passion and engineering, but I have no urge to ever own something like this.
@optional flavor: No, I agree. 99% of Ferrari drivers, and at least three-quarters of Jalops (myself included) don't have the skill to pilot a Ferrari. But a Wagovan or Celica? Definitely. Slow car fast > fast car slow.
I'd be wary of Autoplus' artists' renditions of work; over the years the cars they previewed in the magazine (mostly the Pugs, Renaults and Citroëns) have looked much better than the real vehicles.
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ: I don't think those are really competing products. The only reason that you would ever buy an Atom is to track-race it - I mean, it doesn't even have a roof. Ferraris rarely see track days.
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ: C'mon, you will look like an imbecile driving around in a Ariel Atom, the Atom it's 90% track use, on the other hand you can use a supercar only on the road and no one will call you a lunatic. So I'il have the Ferrari please, or better give me the LF-A, or better a ZR-1 to smoke the preppy german performance cars owners.
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ: You'd pay 160k on an Atom instead of a Ferrari? I mean, I'd get the Ferrari first, and with any cash left over I'd get an Atom. I mean, it's 160k. And, it doesn't really seem like the most reliable daily driver. (The Ferrari would at least get you home.)
@Ambiguously Unfunny Serial Killer: If I was rich enough to buy either one, for sure it would be the Busa V8 powered Ariel Atom, don´t forget I live in Brazil were most of the time the weather is fine ;)
One would think that something named "Super Duty" would be oriented toward work, not some pretty chrome-laden kid hauler. This hardly appears like a truck at all.
Ford needs to do the right things in the right order:
1) Update the Ranger
2) cancel all Lincoln truck rebadge jobs and special "King Ranch" and "Eddie Bauer", "Tonka", and "Super Chief" editions. They're really not worth the effort.
3) offer two distinctly differentiated trim levels of F-series trucks: one for Work, one for Luxury. simplified configurations (e.g., no 6-foot bed option with the Work-level trim).
4) implement smarter engine management to save fuel -- a manually activated economy mode that cuts fuel to cylinders when not towing or hauling; an engine auto-stop like the BMW 1-series, or whatever it takes to get ahead of the next fuel crisis.
5) for light-duty models (F150), REDUCE THE WEIGHT. Drop the useless chrome trim and cushy appointments. A truck should NOT be a rolling living room.
6) Don't cancel manual transmissions. Offer at least one powertrain that goes all-out for fuel economy. There are many truck owners who carry low-density cargo - need the volume, but don't want or need towing the torque of a huge V8 w/auto tranny.
7) Big and bold is one thing (necessary for street credibility, we all know) but being an aerodynamic brick isn't necessary. Ford has been proudly advertising how the 2009 F150 has the lowest aerodynamic Cd in its class -- now how about cutting down the wind noise and bringing the Cd down about 20% on the Super Duty?
"Ford should cancel everything that makes their trucks so damn profitable, and build them to satisfy the 0.2% demographic that wants these things (insert list here).....but still wouldn't buy one."
@rlj676-Carbon Footprint Size - Clownshoe: You nailed it. I don't need a truck, but have considered one, lightly-used a couple years old, if fully equipped to luxury-car standards. Like the Lincoln MK150, or whatever it is. It caters to people like me, who want a luxury car, but might need a truck a few times a year. I don't need a stripped-down work truck, nor would I want it. I want a nice car, with a luxurious ride, and space to haul my shit.
07/02/09
07/02/09
07/02/09
Damn inflation.. now you have to buy an Aston to get one.
07/02/09
07/02/09
I bet if you check ebay right now, you can already order this as a bodykit for an IQ.. I can here the chinese fiberglass chop guns running from here..
07/02/09
07/02/09
/sorry
07/02/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
I´ll stay with the first.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
03/25/09
Ford needs to do the right things in the right order:
1) Update the Ranger
2) cancel all Lincoln truck rebadge jobs and special "King Ranch" and "Eddie Bauer", "Tonka", and "Super Chief" editions. They're really not worth the effort.
3) offer two distinctly differentiated trim levels of F-series trucks: one for Work, one for Luxury. simplified configurations (e.g., no 6-foot bed option with the Work-level trim).
4) implement smarter engine management to save fuel -- a manually activated economy mode that cuts fuel to cylinders when not towing or hauling; an engine auto-stop like the BMW 1-series, or whatever it takes to get ahead of the next fuel crisis.
5) for light-duty models (F150), REDUCE THE WEIGHT. Drop the useless chrome trim and cushy appointments. A truck should NOT be a rolling living room.
6) Don't cancel manual transmissions. Offer at least one powertrain that goes all-out for fuel economy. There are many truck owners who carry low-density cargo - need the volume, but don't want or need towing the torque of a huge V8 w/auto tranny.
7) Big and bold is one thing (necessary for street credibility, we all know) but being an aerodynamic brick isn't necessary. Ford has been proudly advertising how the 2009 F150 has the lowest aerodynamic Cd in its class -- now how about cutting down the wind noise and bringing the Cd down about 20% on the Super Duty?
03/25/09
Let me re-phrase that for you.
"Ford should cancel everything that makes their trucks so damn profitable, and build them to satisfy the 0.2% demographic that wants these things (insert list here).....but still wouldn't buy one."
03/25/09
Like a G8 Sportwagon. Fucking Pontiac.