It's not a bad idea. You say "Ram" you know you are talking the Ram. You say "Viper", you know you are talking about the Viper. The Ram brand will have sufficient brand recognition to be equally successful after its spinoff. But they must know to keep product lines separate and avoid brand engineering like that which plagued other car companies with many divisions. As the old saying goes, Jack of all trades, master of none. Each brand should have a specific focus and really, really excel (spot the two car names in that sentence :P).
(Also, when you say "Sebring", you know it's the Sebring, the worst car in the world. Don't spin that off. KILL IT!)
At first this seemed like a good idea to me, but they should keep the Dodge name with the trucks and only keep a few cars as Dodge's too. Only the Challenger, Viper, and Charger cars should be badged as Dodge's. Any other small/econo cars they want to sell should be under the Fiat marque.
They want to remove the Dodge brand from Ram... but not from Viper? Or is that in the works? Because the fact that the Viper is "dodge" always seemed silly to me.
Maybe now Jeep will actually make Jeeps, instead of bloated, gigantic H3 wannabes for the Burb dweller. I saw a four door Rubicon the other day and it was bigger, taller and I presume heavier than my F100. That's just not right. And, I'll guarantee my F100 has seen rougher terrain than that Rubicon will ever see.
@CptSevere: I have to disagree with part of your argument. Had you mentioned either the Nitro-jeep thing or the caliber-jeep thing I would've agreed, those are not REAL Jeeps. But you went with the Rubicon. That's one of (if not THE) most off-road capable Jeeps in there lineup. The Rubicon, in essence, is just an upgraded Wrangler. While I don't disagree that the one you saw hasn't been on a dirt road, let alone a rock crawl, it's fully capable of it. 4 doors or not it's still a BAMF off roader. And to compare it to a GMC Jimm... I mean H3 is silly (Should've compared it with the Jeep Patriot, s'all I'm sayin)
@egoods: I heartily agree that those other pseudo Jeeps don't deserve the name. I'm just saying that the Wrangler should be more bare bones simple, like the CJ's that it replaced. Maybe Jeep should revive the Willys brand and build something the size of a Sidekick, but with clearance and of course live axles.
Our crappy cars (Avenger, Caliber, Nitro, etc.) are have really brought down the Dodge brand image. The trucks are pretty good so they can't be Dodges anymore.
either that or Ram becomes Chrysler's version of GMC.
The trucks are winners, keep 'em and just call them Rams.
At first, I had the impression they were going to drop "Dodge" all together, and rebrand the cars as Rams, too. That-- Ram cars-- seemed stupid.
I realized I was wrong. But, the part about dropping "Dodge" all together didn't seem so stupid.
Dodge was the much maligned car of Al Bundy. A Dodge Stratus was why you don't talk to Will Ferrel like that. They've been the butt of jokes for quite some time.
If you're going to distance the winners from the losers, why not just lose the losers?
If Dodge Cars were only the Challenger, the Charger (cause apparently people are into those two?), and the Viper, would there be any need to spin off Ram?
I wonder how it's working for Yamaha. They stopped calling their cruisers, which already featured "star" in most model names, "yamahas" and started calling them "Stars".
So, the replacement for the Yamaha Vmax is the Star V-max.
Also, they have the Star Road Star, the Star DragStar, etc.
To top it all off, it seems like whenever I read about Star, it's always "Yamaha Star".
(Type "Star" that many times, and it starts to look pretty weird.)
I look forward to a review of the 2012 Dodge Ram Ram 1500
Now I have a question, by all logic, wasn't Ram already a different brand? While the line did carry the same name as the rest of the Dodge line, I belive that any Dodge Chrysler Jeep dealership carry 4 brands. When Dodge was closing dealerships, they listed D, C, J or DT. Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep or Dodge Trucks. So they're just renaming what was already there.
10/06/09
10/06/09
(Also, when you say "Sebring", you know it's the Sebring, the worst car in the world. Don't spin that off. KILL IT!)
10/05/09
They're hoors I tell ya... HOORS...
10/05/09
Well, a Charger would be cool, even if only for fleet use
EDIT: I forgot they made the Challenger. Yep.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
So I'm assuming this new RAM brand will include the Dakota and the next Durango. What about the Caravan? Are they going to call them RAM Vans again?
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Do we get these again?
10/05/09
@pj134: I was hoping to see this one:
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
either that or Ram becomes Chrysler's version of GMC.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
At first, I had the impression they were going to drop "Dodge" all together, and rebrand the cars as Rams, too. That-- Ram cars-- seemed stupid.
I realized I was wrong. But, the part about dropping "Dodge" all together didn't seem so stupid.
Dodge was the much maligned car of Al Bundy. A Dodge Stratus was why you don't talk to Will Ferrel like that. They've been the butt of jokes for quite some time.
If you're going to distance the winners from the losers, why not just lose the losers?
If Dodge Cars were only the Challenger, the Charger (cause apparently people are into those two?), and the Viper, would there be any need to spin off Ram?
I wonder how it's working for Yamaha. They stopped calling their cruisers, which already featured "star" in most model names, "yamahas" and started calling them "Stars".
So, the replacement for the Yamaha Vmax is the Star V-max.
Also, they have the Star Road Star, the Star DragStar, etc.
To top it all off, it seems like whenever I read about Star, it's always "Yamaha Star".
(Type "Star" that many times, and it starts to look pretty weird.)
I look forward to a review of the 2012 Dodge Ram Ram 1500
10/05/09
10/05/09
@pj134: That is Fraulein approved!
10/05/09
Make new ones of these and we'll talk.
10/05/09
@pj134: they have made them for years. Not for the US market though.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
@Steve_in_NC: sorry... obsessing
10/05/09
10/05/09