Jalopnik 
Enter your username and password.
-
more about #2010fiskerkarma more comments → jedchev: This car has what it takes. All of the other hybrids are uglier, more expensive and slower than their rivals. People buy them to pay their penance for... more » Pessimippopotamus: Wait. Wasn't this posted yesterday? The hamsters powering the Matrix must be getting hungry again. more » Fletch Lives: How can it possible take 6 seconds for a 400Hp car with a ton of torque to get to 60. Something is wrong there. more » Jones Foyer: Plug-in hybrid numbers seem like a cheat to me, like getting parking at the top of Pike's Peak and taking advantage of potential energy to get numbers... more » GIC asks not for whom the bell tolls: What's with the .2? They must have been incredibly anal with their testing regimen if they're reporting to the tenth of a gallon. Why would you e... more » Alfisted: Fisker may have the edge now but I'm sure the official EPA numbers will be cut. As far as styling, it is a sharp looking sedan. more » aSoundofSleep-less nights: I wouldn't buy one even if it got 100mpg and had a fellate me while I drive option. Not only because it's uglier than a pile of flaming cat diarrhea b... more » Hello Mister Walrus: You can't compare the fuel economy of a non-plug in Prius to that of a plug-in hybrid... more » -
#ifeelgassy
Fisker Gives Karma 67.2 MPG Estimated Fuel Economy Rating, Beats All Current Hybrids
67.2MPG. That's the fuel economy figure Fisker calculated for the Fisker Karma using SAE standard estimations. If true, it puts the plug-in, mustachioed hybrid ahead of the current champ, the 2010 Toyota Prius at 50MPG. We'll see. Press release below. More »
