As much as I am a Chevy fan, this time I'm going to have to vote Nash Statesman. Comparatively few were made. Fewer yet survive. Need parts? Better brush up on those library research and machining skills. It also seems to be the worst of the four in terms of material condition.
So, you will put yourself through all manners of hell trying to restore a total basket case with a barely existent spare parts source, and to top it all off, the only recognition you will get from the word "Nash" is a Nash Bridges reference. No one these days has any idea what the hell a Nash is, and thusly none will truly appreciate the shit you went through.
That is truly the most hellish of the four, and thusly I feel is the meritorious victor of this edition of Project Car Hell.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
Voted for both the Ford and the Nash: the Ford as a restored driver with a hopped-up 351W, the Nash as a heavily-modded machine from Hell, preferably with later AMC power (401? Wedge it in!), or even an Int'l Harvester 392 for added frustration and head-scratching.
So, wicked cool hauling wagon or hippie-graffitied Pininfarina hellbeast with thirteen-letter-shit-spreader power and eighty-seven yard turning circle? Your choice, amigos.
Too bad the Nash isn't a 1956, which is easily one of the top-five ugliest cars of the 1950s -- right behind the 1957 Hudson Hornet. AMC designers had to work hard to kill those brands.
I inexplicably don't really like the Nash, and although the Chevy is fairly well stripped of its parts, you've already mentioned how easy the parts are to find. The Dodge could be mostly complete, and that's good, since a lot of those bits might be difficult to find.
The Ford has an undeniable coolness, and although the running gear will be a cakewalk, the wagon specific pieces (of which it's probably missing several) are going to be fun (in the most facetious use of the word) to track down.
The wagon gets my vote.
Fortunately I don't need a '50s project car, since I already have a '79 Checker.
@Ford Tempo Fanatic: You've completely destoyed my image of you. I've always imagined you as the guy in Alaska with something like 3-4 Tempos in the driveway. I imagine one is well used but surprisingly clean, 2 definitely showing their age but running and useable and another one for parts... but that's all just the story I made up. A '54 Ford??? hmmm I have to recalibrate.
@SlowMo (actually, there's no E on my R): Picture this. A log cabin in the Alaskan wilderness, with a garage the size of the house itself. Parked inside his brother's project VW Beetle and my truck (1990 Ford F-150 with some goodies under the hood). Parked right in front of the house, a not-showroom but still well cared for 1989 Ford Tempo. In paid storage, a 1954 Ford F-300 Big Job waits for funds to have a new engine dropped in.
Hmmmm. None of these are my faves. As much as I love cars, there are a few 50 models I feel an aversion to--must be some childhood trauma. Chevy--done to death, I'd rather have something weirder, like a 58. Ford, never felt it for those mid 50s years--though this IS a wagon, so bonus points there; and oddly, as much as I love MoPars, that is one model I am not crazy about--maybe because it's too tame for a Mopar. That leaves us in Wisconsin. Seriously that wreck is actually this:?? I am way too old to tackle that. So, 55 Ford wagon it is, I guess.
i love Nash. doesn't matter what model... and i also have a deep love of the tri-5 chevys........ but nothing will ever beat 2-door wagon, nomad-der (see that, eh?) what make or model! i must have it!
as far as PCH goes.. i imagine the nash is probably the worst to try to work with... not enough examples to pull junkyard pieces off of let alone finding reproduction pieces...
i'll take the "easy (wagon)" way out with the ford... the 55 chev would be too easy.
i got through all of that without mentioning the dodge... umm.. since i want to own a mid to late 40's led sled.. this would be about the latest model i could pull that look off in.. hmmmmmm... though going lead-sled.. it's not a matter of PCH.. it's a matter of how 'slim-is-my-wallet'....
Edited by chrystlubitshi kicked the star habit at 12/05/09 5:48 PM
chrystlubitshi kicked the star habit was starred
chrystlubitshi kicked the star habit was unstarred
I'm out of my element here; everyday American Iron of this vintage has never tugged at my heartstrings. I like the look of the nose of the Dodge, but not the rear, wagons are always a plus, and the Chevy seems like the best all rounder, but even outside a two-project system, like most elections there's nothing I really want.
As for coolness, it's a tossup between the Dodge hardtop or two-door Ford wagon. Hellishness? Oh, the Nash by a huge margin if you're really thinking about restoring it. Not only are parts scarce, but the Nash had the unhappy combination of rust-prone body and unitized construction. I've heard stories about these cars snapping in half because of the rust. "Rusted threw" floorboards should set off alarm bells right there. Those skirted front wheels will give a turning radius the size of a Wal-Mart parking lot. And being a Statesman sedan, it will never be worth much money - an Ambassador Country Club hardtop coupe with a continental spare would be a different matter.
@tonyola: The Ambassador Country Club hardtop is a beaut, but I prefer the 1955, and 1955 ONLY, Hudson Wasp and Hornet hardtop coupes, for their Hudson six-cylinder engines and more attractive looks than either the concurrent Nash or the 1956-57 Hudsons.
@Old Grimey: I agree, albeit in a back-handed way. In the rush to adapt the Nash body to the newly acquired Hudson, AMC designers didn't have a whole lot to work with. And clearly they weren't that tuned into Hudson's styling DNA anyway, e.g., even the classic side sweepsphere was ditched.
However, the 1955 Hudsons did look hugely better than the horrific 56-57s. The 1957 Nashes weren't quite so bad, but the inboard headlights on the 1955-56 look like they were designed by space aliens. Or the Chinese.
12/07/09
This is J-nik. The Ford is the only right answer.
12/05/09
As much as I am a Chevy fan, this time I'm going to have to vote Nash Statesman. Comparatively few were made. Fewer yet survive. Need parts? Better brush up on those library research and machining skills. It also seems to be the worst of the four in terms of material condition.
So, you will put yourself through all manners of hell trying to restore a total basket case with a barely existent spare parts source, and to top it all off, the only recognition you will get from the word "Nash" is a Nash Bridges reference. No one these days has any idea what the hell a Nash is, and thusly none will truly appreciate the shit you went through.
That is truly the most hellish of the four, and thusly I feel is the meritorious victor of this edition of Project Car Hell.
12/05/09
12/05/09
So, wicked cool hauling wagon or hippie-graffitied Pininfarina hellbeast with thirteen-letter-shit-spreader power and eighty-seven yard turning circle? Your choice, amigos.
12/05/09
Coolest? Ford, preferably with a north-south Ecoboost V6 transplant.
12/05/09
If you want a project that will be moderately practical when you're done, get the Ford wagon.
If you want a project that will be fairly sporty when you're done, get the Poly-powered Dodge.
If you want a true PCH, get the Nash.
12/05/09
12/05/09
The Ford has an undeniable coolness, and although the running gear will be a cakewalk, the wagon specific pieces (of which it's probably missing several) are going to be fun (in the most facetious use of the word) to track down.
The wagon gets my vote.
Fortunately I don't need a '50s project car, since I already have a '79 Checker.
12/05/09
12/05/09
12/06/09
12/06/09
12/06/09
12/06/09
12/05/09
12/05/09
as far as PCH goes.. i imagine the nash is probably the worst to try to work with... not enough examples to pull junkyard pieces off of let alone finding reproduction pieces...
i'll take the "easy (wagon)" way out with the ford... the 55 chev would be too easy.
i got through all of that without mentioning the dodge... umm.. since i want to own a mid to late 40's led sled.. this would be about the latest model i could pull that look off in.. hmmmmmm... though going lead-sled.. it's not a matter of PCH.. it's a matter of how 'slim-is-my-wallet'....
12/05/09
12/05/09
12/05/09
12/06/09
12/06/09
However, the 1955 Hudsons did look hugely better than the horrific 56-57s. The 1957 Nashes weren't quite so bad, but the inboard headlights on the 1955-56 look like they were designed by space aliens. Or the Chinese.
12/05/09