As a shareholder in Chrysler (we all are, remember?) I have no problem with execs flying on private jets. For one thing, they make a shit ton of money. When you break down their compensation by hour forcing them onto commercial flights doesn't make sense financially. For another thing, they can work on a private jet. They can't really work on a commercial flight because it's not a secure environment. Peering eyes could catch a glimpse of company confidential information. There are also security issues, which are greater now with the anti-exec sentiment in the country.
I'm all about them flying on private jets when on company business.
@engineerd: I have to agree with you on this. When CTR owned the company I supposedly work for, we had 5 jets and it made things way more efficient for our execs, depending on where you were traveling.
Also, private jets are like thrill rides. I was shocked the first time we took off because they are only interested in getting to cruising altitude as fast as possible because the thin air makes for much better mpg (so to speak). It felt like I was on the space shuttle.
@GreenN_Gold: Not that simple. If you force them to pay people less (like the Obama administration is doing), the high quality execs will go to companies not over-regulated by Uncle Sam or, worse, oversees. All you will be left with are the crappy execs just happy to have a job.
I agree that executive compensation in this country is problematic, but not because of the numbers. My problem is shareholders have allowed companies to decouple pay from performance. If a CEO leads a company to record profits he deserves to be paid well.
@GreenN_Gold: They should be paid equivilent to what their work is work. Limiting executive pay is the stupidest idea in the world. It provides no incentive to put in the extra time, make products that work and make your company more profitable. Wrong answer. Soviet Russia is calling your name, there everyone gets paid the same. Except for the central planners, they got whatever they wanted. Just because you jealous of their resources doesn't give you the right to attempt to limit or take them.
@acarr260: You need a special "SaveChrysler" Firefox plugin for that. It was a $1 billion project by the NSA in their free time now that terrorists are too poor to blow s**t up.
@Ol'DocBigBlock: OK, if they do that I don't feel so bad about my tax dollars going to support them. Sure, it's still unAmerican, but that is just badass.
I heard they forced Bob Nardelli out of the plane mid-flight. I hope his golden parachute worked, but with Chryslers build quality it will be interesting to know how hard he will hit the ground.
@jark: If you ever have the chance to visit South Florida, Sebring convertibles make up about 25% of all vehicles on the road there. It's quite a sight to behold.
Global business demands a private aircraft at the ready for exactly the scenarios mentioned above.
Time is money and sometimes it is no object. Most people will never know what this truly means.
What they'll be doing now is chartering private jets instead of leasing or owning them. This is good news for my father who owns and operates a private jet charter company out of Windsor. They operate a Cessna Citation X, which is currently the fastest passenger plane out there. That really matters.
Come to think of it, several automakers have hired him in the past.
Business goes on, Jealous Joe Blow is appeased that the Gubment stuck it to them evil CEOs.
I'm going to play a devil's advocate here. Why are products not being designed in house? Why do you have to fly engineers across country to get to a plant that manufactures something thousands of miles away. If that is the case, that I am certain that not all 30 of them are coming out of the same city anyways, therefore requiring multiple corporate jets. I understand that the government does not get the whole concept of corporate jets being actually valuable, but the bigger issue is that the execs are receiving bonuses and perks that equal other peoples lifetime earning. Golden parachutes for people that failed huge business should not be the answer just because that is the lifestyle that they are used to. I recently got laid off and my severance package consisted of paying out my unused vacation days. I say f the executive privilages and let them really earn the money that they make.
@oddboxalfa: As I mentioned elsewhere, most experts do come from the same place as the workforce has been chopped down considerably. Used to be that plants where entirely self sufficient, but expertise on many levels has been centralized because it costs to much to have that kind of redundancy.
05/13/09
I think I found a loophole
05/13/09
05/13/09
I'm all about them flying on private jets when on company business.
05/13/09
Also, private jets are like thrill rides. I was shocked the first time we took off because they are only interested in getting to cruising altitude as fast as possible because the thin air makes for much better mpg (so to speak). It felt like I was on the space shuttle.
05/13/09
I have a simple solution. Pay them less. :)
05/13/09
I agree that executive compensation in this country is problematic, but not because of the numbers. My problem is shareholders have allowed companies to decouple pay from performance. If a CEO leads a company to record profits he deserves to be paid well.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
*kind of a repeat of the other day.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
You've earned a heart click for your starving comments today.
05/13/09
05/13/09
/Truestory
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
10 points to anyone who knows where that came from.
12/19/08
are looking to the U.S. Government for their own Rescue Package!
12/19/08
Time is money and sometimes it is no object. Most people will never know what this truly means.
What they'll be doing now is chartering private jets instead of leasing or owning them. This is good news for my father who owns and operates a private jet charter company out of Windsor. They operate a Cessna Citation X, which is currently the fastest passenger plane out there. That really matters.
Come to think of it, several automakers have hired him in the past.
Business goes on, Jealous Joe Blow is appeased that the Gubment stuck it to them evil CEOs.
12/19/08
Ben's scenario justifies the use a charter jet or having a corporate jet (or jet timeshare). Also, the whole CEO salary/hour makes sense as well.
Provided they need to be flying to begin with.
What this doesn't justify is Mullaly flying home every weekend or trips to football games (not that I know that happens...but waste creeps in).
Not to mention one needn't have a super-opulent interior and five-star dining on board every jet.
I will agree that this is more about posturing than a relevant portion of the companies' balance sheets.
12/19/08
12/19/08
Why are products not being designed in house? Why do you have to fly engineers across country to get to a plant that manufactures something thousands of miles away.
If that is the case, that I am certain that not all 30 of them are coming out of the same city anyways, therefore requiring multiple corporate jets.
I understand that the government does not get the whole concept of corporate jets being actually valuable, but the bigger issue is that the execs are receiving bonuses and perks that equal other peoples lifetime earning. Golden parachutes for people that failed huge business should not be the answer just because that is the lifestyle that they are used to. I recently got laid off and my severance package consisted of paying out my unused vacation days.
I say f the executive privilages and let them really earn the money that they make.
12/19/08