@SeanKHotay: They haven't been for years now. It still looks bad if you amortize the sunk R&D costs over the number of cars produced, but if they double the number of hybrids sold, that number drops by 50%. If they sell ten times as much, it drops by 90%.
I'll get a Vette. 430 horses with 26 MPG. Plus, Although gas is going back up, I have a feeling it will stay @ around 2 bucks. I'm fine with that, but I won't be one of the idiots buying an H2.
The Prius numbers look pretty favorable against the Jetta TDI, esp. if it comes in at the same $22K price tag. Neither car will get rebates, so it comes down to outright mileage vs. fun-to-drive.
The real advantage for the TDI, barring the usually VW gremlins, is potential lifespan. The diesel will probably chugging long after the Prius batteries have kicked the bucket, and the layout is easier to maintain. On the other hand, VW repair is expensive and replacement batteries on the Toyotas aren't atrociously expensive anymore (just mildly). Tough one.
@brandegee: Not so sure if the Jetta TDI is easier to maintain.. The prius has much less moving parts (no belts at all for example)
Potential lifespan? Maybe you're confused with the robust and simple diesels à la Mercedes 300 tdi from the past, these ones are pretty complicated and their longevity has to be seen first.
@devilock138: Hence why hybrids aren't gaining much foothold in Europe.
It's all a matter of context...hybrids' relative success in the US has been heavily because people's mental framework of fuel economy has been influenced by trucks and SUVs for so long. If our market had been 50%+ small cars (rather than 50% trucks) for the past decade, I'm guessing hybrids wouldn't have offered much relative benefit and might have been shelved by now. Just a theory.
Oh the door handles are not on the same spot..Now it becomes hard to choose. I think I like the door handle position on the Honda more. So Honda it is.
Jalopnik obviously hasn't driven the 2010 Prius, so I think this comparison is premature, especially when you do "by the numbers" and compare "fun to drive".
But I do agree that the real factor of importance is the price. If the Insight can get the pricing ~$19k, then it would obviously get a strong advantage over the Prius which should be $22-23k. People want to save money afterall.
But the "eco" factor is really strong as well. And things like solar roof really impress that market segment.
Please name one currently selling Toyota model that is fun to drive, and I will consider your argument that the Insight might not win in this category.
I'd have to have both. I mean, splitting them is hard, the Prius, with its sleek, high-tailed , almost Insight-like styling, or the Insight with its sleek, high-tailed, Priusesque design.
Actually, maybe neither. I'll wait until a couple of Japanese car firms release two nearly identical hybrid cars. Then deciding won't be so hard.
I'd like to see Toyota put a standard 1.8L drivetrain and a 5MT into the Prius body.
But they would never do that, because it would probably get over 40mpg combined and teach people that the hybrid drivetrain is only part of the story. If we accepted the rest of the aero/rolling drag compromises, we could improve EVERY car's economy pretty substantially. Of course, that would stifle development of hybrid drivetrains, but it would be a nice experiment to determine how much of the overall economy is coming from the drivetrain itself.
@Ash78: I've had similar thoughts. I really like BMW's approach to integrating fuel-saving tech onto traditionally powered vehicles. The M3 for instance uses regenerative braking to generate electricity so it can use a smaller, less powerful alternator.
It'd be great to see something like the Honda Fit sold with a manual transmission and its current engine, but all the aero aids and other simple stuff that really helps boost mileage. Something like the old CRX HF.
@Ash78: Quite a bit of the mpg's for these two cars comes from the bodies and tires. These two cars have aerodynamic bodies, smallish frontal areas, and low rolling resistance tires.
What really gets me is you can get a Jetta TDI with better mileage and better looks than the Insight. Of course, then you wouldn't be able to take part in the ecosnobbery that surrounds these two cars.
Or you can get the Ford Fusion ECOnetic oil-burner which gets 65 mpg -- better than the Prius. [www.businessweek.com]
@engineerd: Between lagging public perception and stupid legislation, I'm convinced that diesel is perpetually doomed to mostly fail in small cars in the US. Very, very irritating.
@Ash78: You mean ultra-low sulfur diesel? I completely agree. Diesel used to be cheaper than gas, as it should be since it is easier to make. However, ever since them mandated unltra-low sulfur diesel, there is a $0.80 premium per gallon. At $1.60 for gas and $2.40 diesel, you lose money on your more efficient diesel engine.
@maximum-sienna: Yes, ULSD and the ever-changing field of whether the EPA should focus on particulates/soot, nitrogen oxides, or CO2 (or all of them!). It sure makes it hard to win with the lawmakers' moving targets.
Our entire transport infrastructure is built on diesel. How we've gone so long with so little attention or relief from Washington is beyond me. Our own refineries load diesel fuel onto ships and send it to Asia and Europe while our own economy suffers in part due to inflated diesel prices.
But let's just throw some money at consumers instead, that'll solve everything!
@NewbiusMaximus: The logical solution here sounds like diesel hybrids, which I'm surprised haven't been discussed much at all. Best of both worlds.
Diesels are always going to be dirtier on particulates (which are proven to increase lung cancer and URIs). But they can be pretty darn competitive with hybrids on CO2, which is part of why Europe has been eating them up for so long.
@Ash78: A nice thought but without an actual test, it remains just a nice guess.
There are (have been) many european cars that are similar in size, have the same kind of engine, weight and aerodynamics, so maybe you could look into a comparison. Wont be easy to find one that get's over 40 combined, if at all.
If they really wanted to improve the mileage, they'd just drop the hybrid part of the drivetrain. It'd just be slower.
I think what people forget is that the point of a hybrid is really to _improve performance_. The electric motor and batteries are just there to make the car accelerate faster. Outside of the slight mileage boost from driving the first mile on battery (more of a gimmick than anything), the fuel economy gains come from using a smaller engine. You don't need a big engine when you are cruising at a steady speed, it just wastes more fuel.
Ford is going the direction of a smaller engine with turbocharging and direct injection with their Ecoboost line. That seems to be a winning combination, too.
@Sketch242: Remember, there are a whole bunch of variations on this. The Accord Hybrid, for instance, works like you describe, for the most part. It's got a regular V6 with a hybrid powerplant as its posse, resulting in a car with well over 300 horses combined, but the "footprint" of a regular 170-horse V6.
Others, however, use the hybrid for increased efficiency. The least fuel-efficient point is when the car is idling, and then leaving a full-stop. If the electric engine can get the car rolling so there is minimal strain on the gas engine, it uses a lot less gas. I believe the Escape Hybrid is set up this way.
There is an advantage to a Hybrid. It means that you can put in an engine far too small for the vehicle and still operate normally. Problem is, nobody's doing that.
@engineerd: Funny that Ford and GM are achieving the same thing from totally different perspectives, without complex hybrids.
As I've said (enough times that people are probably sick of hearing it), I did an extended test of a G8 GT on cruise control on the highway. It got better than 7L/100km, which I think is around 30 mpg, thanks to cylinder deactivation. In a big, full-sized car, from a 6L V8 that will eat sports cars when you want it to. Tell me why that's not a GREAT option in a car? I'll take that over a hybrid, thanks.
Oh Lord, free me from the specter of an electric world,and deliver me into a sane future filled with biogas/biobutanol and internal combustion goodness.
Lord i am cast adrift into the desert of bland electric auto homogenation which still relies on Coal Power. Lord show me the way, to not step on the rights of others to drive what they want, and yet forgive me my trespasses in dreaming of Green Internal Combustion.
@dustystrings: Look, this all may sound well and good to enthusiasts like us, but I really hope they sell these in droves. I hope these things fly off dealer lots, and that the environmentalists, politicians, ignorant college kids, coffee-shop employees, and the government will be satisfied with how many of them are being sold. Because when non-enthusiasts like my mother and your doting neighbors who barely drive to the grocery store and aren't worried if somebody dents the door with a shopping cart buy these just for the mileage alone, then it leaves us gearheads and real men (and badass women) with our '67 Chevelles and Corvette ZR1s and cars that don't actually suck. And with all the gasoline that the non-enthusiasts save, then we can simply siphon off the rest, presumably in the K-Mart parking lot.
Call me cynical, but I think we've reached a saturation point. Everyone I know who would buy a hybrid has a Prius already. Seriously, out of our office parking lot of 35-40 cars, 8 of them are Prii. Game over.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
"Looks bad" = "loss"
"Looks bad 90% less" still = "loss"
The Prius 1.0 was sold at an average $6000 loss by Toyota acrossed it's lifetime.
The Insight 1.0 was, too, but I don't know the exact figure(s).
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
The real advantage for the TDI, barring the usually VW gremlins, is potential lifespan. The diesel will probably chugging long after the Prius batteries have kicked the bucket, and the layout is easier to maintain. On the other hand, VW repair is expensive and replacement batteries on the Toyotas aren't atrociously expensive anymore (just mildly). Tough one.
01/13/09
Potential lifespan? Maybe you're confused with the robust and simple diesels à la Mercedes 300 tdi from the past, these ones are pretty complicated and their longevity has to be seen first.
01/13/09
01/13/09
It's all a matter of context...hybrids' relative success in the US has been heavily because people's mental framework of fuel economy has been influenced by trucks and SUVs for so long. If our market had been 50%+ small cars (rather than 50% trucks) for the past decade, I'm guessing hybrids wouldn't have offered much relative benefit and might have been shelved by now. Just a theory.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
Now if only GM could make it.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
But I do agree that the real factor of importance is the price. If the Insight can get the pricing ~$19k, then it would obviously get a strong advantage over the Prius which should be $22-23k. People want to save money afterall.
But the "eco" factor is really strong as well. And things like solar roof really impress that market segment.
01/13/09
Please name one currently selling Toyota model that is fun to drive, and I will consider your argument that the Insight might not win in this category.
01/13/09
01/13/09
Actually, maybe neither. I'll wait until a couple of Japanese car firms release two nearly identical hybrid cars. Then deciding won't be so hard.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
But they would never do that, because it would probably get over 40mpg combined and teach people that the hybrid drivetrain is only part of the story. If we accepted the rest of the aero/rolling drag compromises, we could improve EVERY car's economy pretty substantially. Of course, that would stifle development of hybrid drivetrains, but it would be a nice experiment to determine how much of the overall economy is coming from the drivetrain itself.
Just a quick apples & oranges point.
01/13/09
It'd be great to see something like the Honda Fit sold with a manual transmission and its current engine, but all the aero aids and other simple stuff that really helps boost mileage. Something like the old CRX HF.
01/13/09
What really gets me is you can get a Jetta TDI with better mileage and better looks than the Insight. Of course, then you wouldn't be able to take part in the ecosnobbery that surrounds these two cars.
Or you can get the Ford Fusion ECOnetic oil-burner which gets 65 mpg -- better than the Prius. [www.businessweek.com]
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
Our entire transport infrastructure is built on diesel. How we've gone so long with so little attention or relief from Washington is beyond me. Our own refineries load diesel fuel onto ships and send it to Asia and Europe while our own economy suffers in part due to inflated diesel prices.
But let's just throw some money at consumers instead, that'll solve everything!
/rant off
01/13/09
01/13/09
Diesels are always going to be dirtier on particulates (which are proven to increase lung cancer and URIs). But they can be pretty darn competitive with hybrids on CO2, which is part of why Europe has been eating them up for so long.
01/13/09
There are (have been) many european cars that are similar in size, have the same kind of engine, weight and aerodynamics, so maybe you could look into a comparison. Wont be easy to find one that get's over 40 combined, if at all.
01/13/09
If they really wanted to improve the mileage, they'd just drop the hybrid part of the drivetrain. It'd just be slower.
I think what people forget is that the point of a hybrid is really to _improve performance_. The electric motor and batteries are just there to make the car accelerate faster. Outside of the slight mileage boost from driving the first mile on battery (more of a gimmick than anything), the fuel economy gains come from using a smaller engine. You don't need a big engine when you are cruising at a steady speed, it just wastes more fuel.
01/13/09
Ford is going the direction of a smaller engine with turbocharging and direct injection with their Ecoboost line. That seems to be a winning combination, too.
01/13/09
Others, however, use the hybrid for increased efficiency. The least fuel-efficient point is when the car is idling, and then leaving a full-stop. If the electric engine can get the car rolling so there is minimal strain on the gas engine, it uses a lot less gas. I believe the Escape Hybrid is set up this way.
There is an advantage to a Hybrid. It means that you can put in an engine far too small for the vehicle and still operate normally. Problem is, nobody's doing that.
01/13/09
As I've said (enough times that people are probably sick of hearing it), I did an extended test of a G8 GT on cruise control on the highway. It got better than 7L/100km, which I think is around 30 mpg, thanks to cylinder deactivation. In a big, full-sized car, from a 6L V8 that will eat sports cars when you want it to. Tell me why that's not a GREAT option in a car? I'll take that over a hybrid, thanks.
01/13/09
01/13/09
Oh Lord, free me from the specter of an electric world,and deliver me into a sane future filled with biogas/biobutanol and internal combustion goodness.
Lord i am cast adrift into the desert of bland electric auto homogenation which still relies on Coal Power. Lord show me the way, to not step on the rights of others to drive what they want, and yet forgive me my trespasses in dreaming of Green Internal Combustion.
01/13/09
It all works out in the end.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/05/09