If I tally up all the horsepower of everything in my possession, I still don't crack the 300hp limit. This includes a couple of cars, a tractor, the weedwacker, blender - everything. In fact, I think I have to add AT LEAST two vehicles from work to get to 600hp.
I wouldn't blame the car just yet. I get the feeling there is a lot the article isn't telling us. It was probably tuned by people who had no clue what they were doing. On top of that....
You guys do realize that they are PURPOSELY testing the limits of the car, right? That's what these so-called tuners do. They find weak points, show everyone that it broke, and then they SELL upgraded parts to people who want to have a 1000bhp car.
I was hoping for a piston through the hood. But I admire the attitude. You'll peg it next time, fellas. I'm also sure that Nissan won't be asking any bothersome questions when you drag this into the garage on the end of a hook.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@leavethegun-takethecannoli: What? If you put that much nitrous in anything, you should expect problems. Especially on top of an already modified engine.
@elwood: Not necessarily. I know people who run 200+ shots on modified Volvos running 11s and they have always driven the car home from the track. Like leavethegun said, 150 really isn't a large shot. Pretty typical actually...
@racerx: There is the million dollar question. You can bolt on all the shit you want ("Hey y'all watch this" kinda mods) but without the proper supporting mods and tune; it. will. die...
@racerx: Well, the post says that the 150 shot was on top of a car already making 600 whp. So if that's true, they undoubtedly had some extra boost at work. Most likely on a stock bottom end, which is not necessarily a recipe for success with a good amount of nitrous.
I wouldn't expect any engine that's making about 33% more power over stock at the wheels to survive another 30% or so more power without some detrimental effects. And who knows how many times they tried this before something blew up.
@elwood: This is true, they could have done it 500 times.
I don't know, 600 at the engine with boost isn't that much anymore. Not for Godzilla.
A friend of mine owns Pruven Performance, and his 2.0 inline four eclipse produced well over 550 at the wheels, over ten years ago. He has since sold the car, but before he did, he stroked it out, cranked the boost, upgraded the electronics, and so on, and was producing well over 600 horses. Of course, the motor was built.
@leavethegun-takethecannoli: Sorry, I didn't realize this thing was producing 600 at the wheels. Even so, it has a larger displacement, it should handle it.
@leavethegun-takethecannoli: But what I'm saying is, 600 at the wheels on stock internals is different than your buddy (and Pruven Performance makes some awesome stuff) making 550 at the wheels on a built engine. 60% more power than stock (their extra boost plus the nitrous) is right about at the upper limits of what anyone should expect any stock engine to be able to take.
@elwood: I wish we had more specifics. When a new car is released they give us the f*cking diameter of the bolts holding the seatbelts in place. With this they don't tell us how much boost they're running or anything.
@leavethegun-takethecannoli: Not really, If you read the original post on NAGTROC, Samurai Speed stated that they were intentionally wanting to blow the motor so that they could find the limits of the new motor.
@The Jester of Darkness: I saw that. I wasn't talking about Smaurai Speed, I was talking about other members.
@elwood: It's true, the previous Skylines were so unbelievable, that I am constantly being upset by this cars performance. I think they could have done a much better job on their motor and transmission. And don't even bring up launch control, I don't even like it.
I don't get the point of Nitrous Oxide in road cars. It's just so stupid. What is the point of potentially ruining your car for straight line speed that you may not be able to control.
04/16/09
And yet somehow I'm vehicularly satisfied.
04/16/09
...wait, this is Jalopnik... Sorry...
WHAT A PIECE OF SHIT! :D
04/16/09
04/16/09
And, well, it is.
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
[www.autoblog.com]
04/16/09
04/16/09
I would think a cheap supercar would hold together a little better.
I guess you get what you pay for.
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
@racerx: There is the million dollar question. You can bolt on all the shit you want ("Hey y'all watch this" kinda mods) but without the proper supporting mods and tune; it. will. die...
04/16/09
I wouldn't expect any engine that's making about 33% more power over stock at the wheels to survive another 30% or so more power without some detrimental effects. And who knows how many times they tried this before something blew up.
04/16/09
I don't know, 600 at the engine with boost isn't that much anymore. Not for Godzilla.
A friend of mine owns Pruven Performance, and his 2.0 inline four eclipse produced well over 550 at the wheels, over ten years ago. He has since sold the car, but before he did, he stroked it out, cranked the boost, upgraded the electronics, and so on, and was producing well over 600 horses. Of course, the motor was built.
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
Anyway, can you say forged internals?
04/16/09
@elwood: It's true, the previous Skylines were so unbelievable, that I am constantly being upset by this cars performance. I think they could have done a much better job on their motor and transmission. And don't even bring up launch control, I don't even like it.
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
04/16/09
The interwebz can help you with that:
04/16/09