LandofMinos, Prediction, probability of procuring a poncy Prius for purchase. Piss off! was starred
LandofMinos, Prediction, probability of procuring a poncy Prius for purchase. Piss off! was unstarred
That's funny, all the '80s Toyota pickups I've ever seen have terrible body rust (ie, holes you could toss a cat through on the bed) but totally solid frames. You would think that Toyota would've figured out how to make their trucks rust at a consistent rate by now.
@discontinu uity: Yeah, Detroit figured out how to make an acceptable interior and Korea managed to make an engine that would last more than 100k... where's Japan with the rustproofing?
For that matter, we're still waiting for the Germans to master wiring, too.
A lot of guys in Minnesota find creative ways to keep their frames from rusting out. One guy I met slathers his frame rails in used motor oil. I looked underneath his '87 pickup and the frame looked nearly brand new.
I'm going to apply a few coats of Chassis Saver to mine. Maybe Toyota should do that on the current trucks that are still on the road.
@Alfisted: It's also standard on pretty much every Jaguar ever produced. It's amazing that more companies didn't adopt the undercarriage oiler, although I guess it requires you to top off your oil fairly often. I think, between that and the quality of piston rings, valve seals, etc..., I can understand why old Jags had ~12 quart oil capacities...
My Explorer is on the original motor and transmission and will hit 200k miles early next year. It has single-handedly changed my opinion on American made vehicles--I was just playing D.A.
If you’ll notice the frame is nearly gone, but it looks as though there is not a hint of rust on the body panels, so though the truck is rusted in the core, the exterior still looks great. There is an analogy here regarding Japanese social culture, in regards to outward perception verses the actual result.
@Flathead Smith: and if you bothered to read the linked "article" you would find that all the trucks in question, including earlier Tacomas all apparently share a common US supplier from OHIO:
"1995-2004 Tacoma pickups and 2000-01 Tundras shared the same frame supplier: Toledo, Ohio-based Dana Holding Corporation. In investigating the Tacoma’s rust complaints, Toyota discovered that Dana hadn’t properly prepped Tacoma frames to resist corrosion before they were shipped to Toyota’s NUMMI manufacturing plant, where the Tacoma was assembled."
so it seems to be US supplier problem at the moment, not one of Japanese Social Culture.
@microcars: Your argument conveniently ignores the fact that Dana built and supplied these frames to Toyota's specification. If these frames were not in compliance with Toyota's engineering specifications, they would not have been used. Ergo, regardless of who made the parts in question, this is Toyota's fault and responsibility because they dictated the specs and agreed by using the parts that they were indeed within spec. Looking at the steel used in the readily visible parts of the truck, which doesn't seem to be rusted at all even though it's obviously not undercoated, I'd say that this has everything to do with the Japanese social culture's emphasis on maintaining a good appearance while neglecting the underlying issues (which in this case turn out to be much more important in the long run).
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@Mike the Dog: These things were built by the UAW in California using Dana supplied frames and you're blaming cultural stereotypes of the Japanese. Unlike the owners of most vehicles sabotaged by the UAW, at least Toyota owners have been spared by Toyota's willingness to stand behind their product. Perhaps they'll learn that there is no point standing behind UAW product, much as the 'big 3' have, but so far they've put their customers first while you blame them for crappy union workmanship.
@CJinSD: The cultural stereotype thing was a joke. We make jokes on Jalopnik from time to time.
And again, as much as I dislike the UAW, you are also ignoring Mike's point. No matter what the UAW workers produce, it is the corporation that is accepting that work, and in doing so certifying that the work is satisfactory according to their specifications. Therefore, quality issues are the fault of the corporation, not the worker or the supplier.
@microcars: If you would have bothered to read my post, you would have noticed that I said it was "an analogy". I did not mention anything about frame sourcing or causes.
Typically a company’s response is to blame the supplier; think of Ford and Firestone. Toyota has a Quality Control Department, and if there was a specification for an anti-corrosion compound they would have checked for it.
This is conjecture on my part, but I believe the frames were made of rather low quality steel based on the pictures I’ve seen. Even though a vendor supplied these frames, Toyota would have been intimately involved in the sourcing of the steel. Low quality steel will corrode at a higher rate than its higher carbon content counterparts, and the steel used in the frame was approved/specified by Toyota.
@CJinSD: Okay, I'm going to say this slowly, so you understand. The UAW didn't build these trucks, NUMMI did. UAW employees didn't work up the engineering specs for the frames. UAW employees didn't test and approve the pre-production examples that were provided by Dana. UAW employees didn't quality test and approve in-production samples of these frames and reach the conclusion that they were within specification. NUMMI salaried employees are responsible for all of those things, as well as the specs of the exterior sheetmetal, which they were apparently much more stringent about. Whether or not this can be traced to a cultural stereotype is really irrelevant, although it's much more plausible than your blanket blackwashing of a bunch of line workers bolting together the parts they're given. This isn't about the parts being put together sloppily, this is about specifications that weren't adequate to get the job done going past several levels of review without being challenged. None of those review levels fell under the purview of the UAW, to my knowledge. Hell, I'm not even 100% sure that NUMMI is a UAW plant.
EDIT: After doing a little research, I discover that NUMMI is indeed a UAW plant, but that doesn't affect most of the above.
I have no love for unions in general, but it pains me to see people bashing on them for issues that they plainly aren't responsible for.
Edited by Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. at 10/07/09 11:13 AM
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@microcars:
Where is the almighty quality control from Toyota? Don't they check on their suppliers to see how such an important part such as this is built?
@Mike the Dog: Good point, and well put. To add to it, I have to relate the story of my high school band teacher who many times - when he was at his most frustrated with his students - told us the following.
You're going to end up doing/people like you are the reason for/etc. etc. etc. ... "my Oldsmobile with the light in the glove box that won't turn off."
I'm not sure if he was trying to say that we were going to end up poorly motivated assembly line workers with no regard for QA? Or maybe he was saying we were going to be the managers who crushed those workers' spirits, leading to poor motivation and no regard for QA. Either way, it was mostly funny just because he kept saying it, every time he'd get super frustrated.
Mike the Dog promoted this comment
Racin_G73 - dirt track legend (some day ... maybe) was starred
Racin_G73 - dirt track legend (some day ... maybe) was unstarred
@Mike the Dog: Being wrong about the UAW's presence at NUMMI and at Dana Holdings doesn't affect most what you wrote on the subject? What would affect your opinion on this, just for context? Toyota and Dana almost certainly have UAW slugs doing their quality inspections in those plants. Sure, it is Toyota's fault. It is Toyota and Dana Holdings' fault for keeping factories open once the UAW has infected them. They're still better than Ford, GM or Chrysler because they have at least tried to protect their customers from losses resulting from UAW workmanship.
@CJinSD: Smooth move. You just answered your own question and made yourself look a little foolish at the same time.
It doesn't matter who does the work or where. If a UAW guy is the one handling the inspections, then it is because Toyota put him there. Even then, Toyota still has its own inspectors that sign off on them before Toyta accepts the completed vehicles. Therefore, it is still Toyota's fault.
I tend to side against what the UAW has become, but even so, statements like yours reflect poorly on both sides.
@microcars: Typically steel with higher carbon content will also have other alloying agents which resists corrosion.
But, the rust formed on lower alloy steels is not as tightly bound to the surface, which in effect means that the rust flakes off promoting more rust. The higher content carbon steels do rust, but the rust is tightly bonded to the surface of the steel which acts as a barrier to further corrosion.
Then there is cast Iron which has very high carbon content and will flash rust, but then is corrosion resistant.
@CJinSD: Very little of what I said there was opinion. I have worked in plenty of manufacturing environments and in none of them were decisions about parts sourcing and suitability made by hourly employees. In fact, Every quality control person I've ever dealt with who had the power to accept/reject material or parts for any but the most basic, visual reasons was salaried and not a union member. This actually doesn't even address the point I made originally, that the engineers who determined the specifications and the multiple levels of oversight that approved not only the specifications but the supplied pre-production parts and in-process parts were definitely not UAW members. Your use of the phrase "UAW slugs" and equating UAW presence with "infection" reveals your ingrained bias and apparently deeply held anti-labor sentiments, so I will not further attempt to change your mind with facts, as I know from experience that this is futile. I would like to know however, how not being 100% sure = being wrong, especially after I went and found out for sure and reported that fact?
Edited by Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. at 10/07/09 4:22 PM
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@racin_g73: Which leads to the question "why didn't he take the Oldsmobile back to the dealer and get the switch adjusted/replaced?" It sounds like a five minute fix that any one of the lot porters could have handled (and would probably have been a no-charge to boot). I guess he preferred to have a reminder of how much he hates people with dirty fingernails.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@pauljones: after inspecting one or two, Toyota should have been able to trust Dana to do the right thing. Surely you dont think that a Toyota exec has to inspect EVERY chassis? Get real!
@tad49: Yes, I do. That is par course for this kind of manufacturing.
This isn't the same as manufacturing a tv or a microwave. When it comes things like cars, a reputation for reliability and toughness is important, and Toyota understands that, and have made tough, reliable cars in the past.
In fact, they take it so seriously that when a batch of discarded prototype TRD superchargers for the first-gen Tundras were found being sold online, Toyota sued the crap out the employee responsible for letting them out.
And also, it wouldn't be Toyota exec, but rather someone appointed by a Toyota exec.
@tad49: Surely you don't think a Toyota exec inspects any chassis? Get real! they have qualified engineers and safety people that they pay very well to attend to that. Inspecting one or two and then expecting every single one after that to be perfect and in-spec is not only moronic, I can assure you Toyota doesn't do it. Ever heard of ISO 9001, QS 9000* and about a hundred other alpha-numeric quality standards? They're a pain in the ass to keep up with, but they do a real good job of making sure that the parts that go into our cars are deemed satisfactory by the final assembler before they're installed.
*Note: These designations may be incorrect/outdated, but I think you can get the point.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@bradyb: wow, the Ford really seems to have it's shit together, I'd like to see an SVT Raptor do that test ;) And yes, the bed flex on the Toyo is spectacular.
TexanIdiot25- needs moar horse powah promoted this comment
JawzX2: Hoon The Earth @ www.cafepress.com/jawzx2 was starred
JawzX2: Hoon The Earth @ www.cafepress.com/jawzx2 was unstarred
TexanIdiot25- needs moar horse powah promoted this comment
Psiu! Puxa!: You're right, Mopar or no car! was starred
Psiu! Puxa!: You're right, Mopar or no car! was unstarred
I'm not sure who made the frame for these or the coating, but I've heard Dana is at fault. Not thick enough metal plus a sheisty coating make for a great combo. Could you imagine when the tech puts this thing on the lift and the spring lets go....wow.
@djmohab2: Dana is not the only frame supplier but is apparently the only one supplying substandard frames.
I'm no expert but I'd guess specs or no specs, whatever causes the rust is not detectable during whatever inspection people seem to think is taking place.
@djmohab2:
so by accepting delivery they agreed that all the frames were good?
By your logic Firestone is off the hook for all those bad tires they supplied to Ford.
@microcars: Um, tires and frames are a little different. For starters, tires are wear parts and not structural members, therefore they're not expected to outlast the drivetrain and body. Also, it was demonstrated that failure to maintain proper tire pressure was partially to blame in many of the blowout incidents (coupled with the dynamically unstable design of an SUV, it's tragedy looking for a place to happen). When was the last time you bought a brand new pickup truck frame without a truck attached to it? Better yet, when was the last time you found the air pressure in your frame was low?
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
@passersby: Where did you read that there were other suppliers of these frames during these periods and that the Dana frames are the only ones failing? I must have missed that part of the linked article.
Edited by Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. at 10/07/09 9:58 PM
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
Somehow, not surprising. Maybe it's the fact that I STILL see fairly new Honda, Nissan and Toyota vehicles with rust forming in the usual places. Where as the domestics and Europeans seem to have gotten rust prevention down to a pretty decent rate.
Ideally, a truck frame shouldn't be rusting, but if you put upwards of $20K into a truck, the least you can do is take a monthly cursory glance at its underside before the rust gets dangerously bad.
With a pickup this is easier to do due to the ground clearance, and with trucks being used for work (i.e. moving, hauling, towing, etc.), it's even more important to make sure everything is structurally ship-shape.
So, anyone out there with a Toyota pickup (Marty McFly, I'm looking at you): kindly take a quick look underneath it for signs of rust. It just might save lives.
@bmoreDLJ: Perhaps, but I would also argue that if you're going to put $20k+ into a pickup, the least you can do is put into a pickup from a manufacturer that isn't known for having that problem.
I notice that it only mentions 01-04 pickups; I wonder if any of the 99-00 trucks are having that issue.
@bmoreDLJ: There should be absolutely no worry of a rusty frame on a late model truck, period. This is inexcusable. If your spending any money on a late model, that frame needs to outlast the rest of the ruck. I don't even see rust this bad on 30-50 year old trucks left in fields.
@Flathead Smith: Seen that done a few times. I've never done it because I refuse to stamp my name on the job. Most rust out just past the area welded because most don't clean and seal it up properly when they are done.
10/07/09
Seriously, how the hell would such a reputable car maker have let this happen?
10/07/09
10/07/09
For that matter, we're still waiting for the Germans to master wiring, too.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
I'm going to apply a few coats of Chassis Saver to mine. Maybe Toyota should do that on the current trucks that are still on the road.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Well there is also the fact the oil *does* wash off slowly and enters our soil/food supply/water table eventually.
If every car came slathered in motor oil, I'd assume we'd have quite a problem.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Okay, but being the Toyota fanboy I am (not), I have to assume that your F-150 has had the motor rebuilt 5 times and is on its 3rd transmission.
10/07/09
10/07/09
My Explorer is on the original motor and transmission and will hit 200k miles early next year. It has single-handedly changed my opinion on American made vehicles--I was just playing D.A.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
"1995-2004 Tacoma pickups and 2000-01 Tundras shared the same frame supplier: Toledo, Ohio-based Dana Holding Corporation. In investigating the Tacoma’s rust complaints, Toyota discovered that Dana hadn’t properly prepped Tacoma frames to resist corrosion before they were shipped to Toyota’s NUMMI manufacturing plant, where the Tacoma was assembled."
so it seems to be US supplier problem at the moment, not one of Japanese Social Culture.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
And again, as much as I dislike the UAW, you are also ignoring Mike's point. No matter what the UAW workers produce, it is the corporation that is accepting that work, and in doing so certifying that the work is satisfactory according to their specifications. Therefore, quality issues are the fault of the corporation, not the worker or the supplier.
10/07/09
+2/10
10/07/09
Typically a company’s response is to blame the supplier; think of Ford and Firestone. Toyota has a Quality Control Department, and if there was a specification for an anti-corrosion compound they would have checked for it.
This is conjecture on my part, but I believe the frames were made of rather low quality steel based on the pictures I’ve seen. Even though a vendor supplied these frames, Toyota would have been intimately involved in the sourcing of the steel. Low quality steel will corrode at a higher rate than its higher carbon content counterparts, and the steel used in the frame was approved/specified by Toyota.
10/07/09
EDIT: After doing a little research, I discover that NUMMI is indeed a UAW plant, but that doesn't affect most of the above.
I have no love for unions in general, but it pains me to see people bashing on them for issues that they plainly aren't responsible for.
10/07/09
"Low quality steel will corrode at a higher rate than its higher carbon content counterparts"
So the addition of Carbon helps with corrosion resistance?
You need to brush up on your metallurgy.
10/07/09
Where is the almighty quality control from Toyota? Don't they check on their suppliers to see how such an important part such as this is built?
10/07/09
You're going to end up doing/people like you are the reason for/etc. etc. etc. ... "my Oldsmobile with the light in the glove box that won't turn off."
I'm not sure if he was trying to say that we were going to end up poorly motivated assembly line workers with no regard for QA? Or maybe he was saying we were going to be the managers who crushed those workers' spirits, leading to poor motivation and no regard for QA. Either way, it was mostly funny just because he kept saying it, every time he'd get super frustrated.
10/07/09
10/07/09
+1/10
10/07/09
It doesn't matter who does the work or where. If a UAW guy is the one handling the inspections, then it is because Toyota put him there. Even then, Toyota still has its own inspectors that sign off on them before Toyta accepts the completed vehicles. Therefore, it is still Toyota's fault.
I tend to side against what the UAW has become, but even so, statements like yours reflect poorly on both sides.
10/07/09
But, the rust formed on lower alloy steels is not as tightly bound to the surface, which in effect means that the rust flakes off promoting more rust. The higher content carbon steels do rust, but the rust is tightly bonded to the surface of the steel which acts as a barrier to further corrosion.
Then there is cast Iron which has very high carbon content and will flash rust, but then is corrosion resistant.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
This isn't the same as manufacturing a tv or a microwave. When it comes things like cars, a reputation for reliability and toughness is important, and Toyota understands that, and have made tough, reliable cars in the past.
In fact, they take it so seriously that when a batch of discarded prototype TRD superchargers for the first-gen Tundras were found being sold online, Toyota sued the crap out the employee responsible for letting them out.
And also, it wouldn't be Toyota exec, but rather someone appointed by a Toyota exec.
10/07/09
*Note: These designations may be incorrect/outdated, but I think you can get the point.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
So, I take it TUNDRA is the Japanese word for JELLO?
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
I'm no expert but I'd guess specs or no specs, whatever causes the rust is not detectable during whatever inspection people seem to think is taking place.
10/07/09
so by accepting delivery they agreed that all the frames were good?
By your logic Firestone is off the hook for all those bad tires they supplied to Ford.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
With a pickup this is easier to do due to the ground clearance, and with trucks being used for work (i.e. moving, hauling, towing, etc.), it's even more important to make sure everything is structurally ship-shape.
So, anyone out there with a Toyota pickup (Marty McFly, I'm looking at you): kindly take a quick look underneath it for signs of rust. It just might save lives.
10/07/09
I notice that it only mentions 01-04 pickups; I wonder if any of the 99-00 trucks are having that issue.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09