The New York Times is reporting on New Geography's ideas. That talks about other kinds of urban renewal, you should read it sometime.
Ben, what's your bright idea to deal with the many areas of Detroit with only a few houses standing per block? Do you object to Flint's plan to demolish 6,000 abandoned houses? What happens next? #detroit
NYT at least should have considered popular opinion, I mean, we youngsters aren't gonna take a liking to their publication if Eminem ain't rappin' 'bout D-town no mo'.
Also, here's an idea, why don't you farm where there's actually, you know, land? #detroit
Nicely done piece. As a native Californian with lots of family in the Detroit area, I have a combination of perspectives--while Detroit is undeniably in a sad state, the idea of throwing it away and starting over is an amateurish ploy for attention. It's easy to have a condescending attitude toward a place if you've never really experienced it, which the NYT apparently hasn't. #detroit
I agree with you concerning the zero-viability equation of any full scale, corp0rate-level farming in reclaimed Urban Areas (I spent many a summer at my grandparents dairy farm) but, to be fair, two points should be made:
1-this is not a Times editorial, or even a Times reporter's idea-it's basically a link to an article in something called 'New Geography' [www.newgeography.com]
Even so, the term "failed city" is disparaging to those who live in Detroit, past and present, and should have been addressed.
2-reading that article, it's author reflects much more on urban gardening plots than any type
of large scale farming, and these vegetable gardens on vacant lots are common in any city. However, the article does contain a certain level of hippie/commune/Whole Earth Catalog-type aphorisms ("...open land, fertile soil, ample water, willing labor..." etc.) that seem like possible wishful thinking, though it does contain instances of people actually doing this stuff-in Detroit. Would be interesting for someone living there to ferret out these (supposed) urban "farmers" and get the straight scoop.
3. I recently read an article (L.A. Times I believe) about people who knock on doors in urban SoCal areas that have fruit trees in their yards, and set up a collective to share the produce that otherwise just goes to waste (how many lemons can one family use?) So, good stuff can happen if someone's willing to work at putting it into action. #detroit
Let me say, that I am also a Detroiter. Some Detroiters (including one of the guys from Slows BBQ, which is amazing) put this together. It pushes towards urban farming. #detroit
@d3c509b aka Steve: I'm not against big urban gardening, I think it's pretty cool in fact. I am annoyed by the notion of urban farming. Somewhere the term "urban farming" happened, and it's not exactly accurate. Commercial farming of corn, beans, sugar beets, etc is simply not feasible in a city. Food growing in giant gardens is. #detroit
Great piece, Ben. Thanks for wrecking all of our zombie apocalypse/Mad Max fantasies about Detroit.
You're right that the article is off base. But there's more to the story, and to the idea than what you present.
Urban 'farming' isn't and shouldn't look like large scale US agriculture. It can't be done on large tracts, with large machinery and industrial chemicals - as you point out. And there are issues of preexisting infrastructure and contamination that have to be considered and dealt with responsibly.
However, land can be farmed or gardened successfully in large and small plots, from community gardens up to about an acre or so, in a scattered site patchwork approach.
Well tended smaller gardens can have values and productivity far in excess of typical large farms. People can intensively tend higher value crops, more closely planted, with multiple yearly harvest by hand, and outstrip what a typical farm can do, mainly by growing vegetables, rather than grains, corn and soy.
Maybe this is a hobby for folks, and they don't have to worry about the economics of getting paid. And there's certainly a large gap between what farmers get paid, and what the same items costs in a local market. Plus, you can grow food that tastes better and requires less energy inputs when you're doing it for yourself locally.
Detroit and many other cities and towns do have real issue of declining populations to deal with. Uses for all of the vacant buildings, homes, factories and lots have to be found. Maintaining vacant properties in perpetuity is not a solution. If Detroit cannot attract more industry, and find ways to put people to work, people will continue leaving.
It is better for there to be a strategy for how best to contend with declining populations and economies, than simply to wade about in the wreckage. Part of that solution may well include transforming some previously developed areas into agricultural, open space or forested places. #detroit
Good piece, Ben, but I think you're oversimplifying the New Geography Article for the sake of vilifying the Times. In fact, if you read that article there are some very important ideas in there about how to sustain a city despite a decreasing population. If people continue to leave Detroit as they have been, the city that remains will be increasingly unlivable unless there is some urban planning put in to it. The Urban Core/Urban Village model makes a lot of sense - it retains the character and industry of the urban center while coalescing smaller towns out of the remaining neighborhoods.
As for the "Urban Farming" idea, it is different than just farming. It's something in between large scale gardening and small scale farming, and it makes a lot of sense. They're not talking about bulldozing the entire city of Detroit, they're talking about zoning it so that people can garden for profit on land that they work themselves. And what else are you going to do with the land? You could turn it into parks I guess, or just let it lie fallow, but if people want to work it and it could provide a source of income and sustenance, that seems like a better use to me. #detroit
Did anyone follow the links to the complete NewGeography article?
Renn is not advocating the complete razing of the city of Detroit. It's pointed out that San Francisco, Boston and Manhattan can all fit
within the limits of city. Since the mass exodus of people in the 60s, large parts of Detroit are no longer being utilized to their full capacity.
The general idea would follow the "shrinking cities" theory. A central urban core surrounded by smaller urban villages and agricultural land. In turn, Detroit could potentially become a city that produces a majority of the food it consumes.
Obviously there are practical issues such as polluted land, removal of infrastructure etc. But I hope that people would've read the complete article before making comments and rash generalizations about the ideas put forth. #detroit
That is painfully ignorant. As you said, urban farming basically means gardening, and it's not a bad thing, just taking unused lots and turning it into a garden to give people cheap veggies. But the idea of doing it on large scale in obviously toxic soil is hilariously idiotic.
On another note, I've heard the idea of tearing down the NYT headquarters after they go bankrupt and turn it into a free-range chicken farm. This will be doubly beneficial as it will provide cheap, healthy chickens for the poor and serve as gainful employment for the laid off staff of the old Times.
Edited by dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! at 11/09/09 2:10 PM
dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! was starred
dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! was unstarred
Great article, Ben. I can really feel the resentment between the lines from years of witnessing smug Left-Coast elites advocating something they don't know a damn thing about. If some pretentious kids straight out of journalism school said that plowing down my hometown was a good idea, I'd have a more difficult time holding back. #detroit
I live here in Detroit. There are large areas of the city that are completely vacant land. I am talking about entire neighborhoods that are giant fields of grass with a few abandoned cars and maybe a house or 2 in a 10-20 acre field.
I met a guy this weekend that brought this up. I had no idea it was even being talked about. But his friend is involved with this idea. He owns something like 250 acres of empty land in Detroit. He said that the soil samples not only came out good but BETTER than expected.
Right now the only thing keeping him from moving forward is the city won't change the tax zoning to make it worth developing the land into farmland.
I totally see this as a good idea. Not only would it put some use to the vast tracts of empty wasteland in Detroit, but it might actually bring some kind of community to Detroit that is not part of the Gangs and Homelessness that is currently filling the outlying neighborhoods. #detroit
@SGTalon: Where are these 10-20 acre fields of empty grass? The only place I'm aware of was a rotten neighborhood that was razed and is now a tax free Renaissance zone.
Still, having land and farming it are two different things. #detroit
@Ben Wojdyla: Check out Google Maps In the area just south of the Ambassador Bridge between Fort Street and the river. There are a few streets with houses, but tons of 1-5 acre fields, basically entire city blocks that are empty fields.
The guy i talked to said his friends stuff is in North East Detroit. I have not seen that stuff personally but the stuff along Jefferson i have personally seen.
It feels like the area i live in now. North of 26 Mile Road along I-94. Lots of 5-20+ acre fields with a few houses in between. #detroit
@Ben Wojdyla: Yeah get off the freeways and you would be amazed at how many neighborhoods have already been leveled and just have grass. Usually it is the really old areas that all of our Devil's Night fires took care of the vacant houses :) #detroit
@SGTalon: I'm fully aware of the urban prairies, but nothing even close to 20-acre stretches. There's weird empty land with brand new streets just north of down town. I'm just saying there isn't anything even close to big enough to make an economically viable full scale farm. I'd be the first one on the tractor if there was. #detroit
@Ben Wojdyla: I don't think anyone is talking about the BIG tractors with this. I think they are going for the sidejob type of farms. My area is full of them. Guys with smaller tractors that can't pull more than a 8 row plow type thing. Harvest by hand or small harvesters.. basically the type of farm that 1 or 2 people can handle.
By my house 80% of the farms do 2-10 acre plots at a time. Usually rented from the real land owner.
I think it could work. And i am by no means a tree hugger! #detroit
Ben, it's not gardening. It's the latest repackaging of slum clearance, and the fact that it's white hippies and progressives pushing a racist urban renewal device would be ironic if it weren't so unsurprising. #detroit
@snapoversteer 'bout to get told: The fact that it's wrapped up in an "environmentally conscious" appeal to the "green movement" makes it truly a sign of the times. #detroit
11/10/09
The New York Times is reporting on New Geography's ideas. That talks about other kinds of urban renewal, you should read it sometime.
Ben, what's your bright idea to deal with the many areas of Detroit with only a few houses standing per block? Do you object to Flint's plan to demolish 6,000 abandoned houses? What happens next? #detroit
11/09/09
Also, here's an idea, why don't you farm where there's actually, you know, land? #detroit
11/09/09
11/09/09
1-this is not a Times editorial, or even a Times reporter's idea-it's basically a link to an article in something called 'New Geography' [www.newgeography.com]
Even so, the term "failed city" is disparaging to those who live in Detroit, past and present, and should have been addressed.
2-reading that article, it's author reflects much more on urban gardening plots than any type
of large scale farming, and these vegetable gardens on vacant lots are common in any city. However, the article does contain a certain level of hippie/commune/Whole Earth Catalog-type aphorisms ("...open land, fertile soil, ample water, willing labor..." etc.) that seem like possible wishful thinking, though it does contain instances of people actually doing this stuff-in Detroit. Would be interesting for someone living there to ferret out these (supposed) urban "farmers" and get the straight scoop.
3. I recently read an article (L.A. Times I believe) about people who knock on doors in urban SoCal areas that have fruit trees in their yards, and set up a collective to share the produce that otherwise just goes to waste (how many lemons can one family use?) So, good stuff can happen if someone's willing to work at putting it into action. #detroit
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
Gardening is a "productive hobby". I am all for "productive hobbies"
Farming is a "profitable profession."
And you're not gonna make a very profitable profession farming in Detroit, even on free/stolen land. #detroit
11/09/09
You're right that the article is off base. But there's more to the story, and to the idea than what you present.
Urban 'farming' isn't and shouldn't look like large scale US agriculture. It can't be done on large tracts, with large machinery and industrial chemicals - as you point out. And there are issues of preexisting infrastructure and contamination that have to be considered and dealt with responsibly.
However, land can be farmed or gardened successfully in large and small plots, from community gardens up to about an acre or so, in a scattered site patchwork approach.
Well tended smaller gardens can have values and productivity far in excess of typical large farms. People can intensively tend higher value crops, more closely planted, with multiple yearly harvest by hand, and outstrip what a typical farm can do, mainly by growing vegetables, rather than grains, corn and soy.
Maybe this is a hobby for folks, and they don't have to worry about the economics of getting paid. And there's certainly a large gap between what farmers get paid, and what the same items costs in a local market. Plus, you can grow food that tastes better and requires less energy inputs when you're doing it for yourself locally.
Detroit and many other cities and towns do have real issue of declining populations to deal with. Uses for all of the vacant buildings, homes, factories and lots have to be found. Maintaining vacant properties in perpetuity is not a solution. If Detroit cannot attract more industry, and find ways to put people to work, people will continue leaving.
It is better for there to be a strategy for how best to contend with declining populations and economies, than simply to wade about in the wreckage. Part of that solution may well include transforming some previously developed areas into agricultural, open space or forested places. #detroit
11/09/09
Hey, there's always Gary, Indiana to exercise your post-apocalyptic fantasies in. #detroit
11/09/09
As for the "Urban Farming" idea, it is different than just farming. It's something in between large scale gardening and small scale farming, and it makes a lot of sense. They're not talking about bulldozing the entire city of Detroit, they're talking about zoning it so that people can garden for profit on land that they work themselves. And what else are you going to do with the land? You could turn it into parks I guess, or just let it lie fallow, but if people want to work it and it could provide a source of income and sustenance, that seems like a better use to me. #detroit
11/09/09
Renn is not advocating the complete razing of the city of Detroit. It's pointed out that San Francisco, Boston and Manhattan can all fit
within the limits of city. Since the mass exodus of people in the 60s, large parts of Detroit are no longer being utilized to their full capacity.
The general idea would follow the "shrinking cities" theory. A central urban core surrounded by smaller urban villages and agricultural land. In turn, Detroit could potentially become a city that produces a majority of the food it consumes.
Obviously there are practical issues such as polluted land, removal of infrastructure etc. But I hope that people would've read the complete article before making comments and rash generalizations about the ideas put forth. #detroit
11/09/09
On another note, I've heard the idea of tearing down the NYT headquarters after they go bankrupt and turn it into a free-range chicken farm. This will be doubly beneficial as it will provide cheap, healthy chickens for the poor and serve as gainful employment for the laid off staff of the old Times.
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
I met a guy this weekend that brought this up. I had no idea it was even being talked about. But his friend is involved with this idea. He owns something like 250 acres of empty land in Detroit. He said that the soil samples not only came out good but BETTER than expected.
Right now the only thing keeping him from moving forward is the city won't change the tax zoning to make it worth developing the land into farmland.
I totally see this as a good idea. Not only would it put some use to the vast tracts of empty wasteland in Detroit, but it might actually bring some kind of community to Detroit that is not part of the Gangs and Homelessness that is currently filling the outlying neighborhoods. #detroit
11/09/09
Still, having land and farming it are two different things. #detroit
11/09/09
11/09/09
The guy i talked to said his friends stuff is in North East Detroit. I have not seen that stuff personally but the stuff along Jefferson i have personally seen.
It feels like the area i live in now. North of 26 Mile Road along I-94. Lots of 5-20+ acre fields with a few houses in between. #detroit
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
By my house 80% of the farms do 2-10 acre plots at a time. Usually rented from the real land owner.
I think it could work. And i am by no means a tree hugger! #detroit
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09