newtaurussho - Jalopnik

posts about #newtaurussho more →
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
New Taurus SHO's Torque-gasmic EcoBoost Engine, Exploded!
2010 Ford Taurus SHO, Driven
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: Live And With A Ridiculous Torque Curve
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: The Sleeper Awakens!

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

DoctorNine
06/20/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
I would think an AWD Flex with the same engine would be more desirable. No SHO should be >3500 lbs. And they should have 6 speed manuals. Otherwise, I really no point to them. Especially at this Gross Vehicle Weight. And I use the word GROSS advisedly.
Reply

DoctorNine was starred DoctorNine was unstarred

MushyHeirloom
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
So it's the Barry Williams SHO?
Reply

MushyHeirloom was starred MushyHeirloom was unstarred

Tanshanomi
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
"Had the car been called the Mandel Bread Ecoboost we'd be pleasantly surprised by its competence and quality, but badged as a SHO, we were disappointed..."

We want to wipe out "Holden GTO syndrome" in YOUR car's lifetime.
Reply

Tanshanomi was starred Tanshanomi was unstarred

Unregular
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
Ford has benchmarked the $60,950, 350 HP Audi A6 4.2 and the $37,995 SHO exceeds expectations by being better to drive, faster, larger inside and nicer looking.

waaaaaiiiiit just a minute here.

nicer looking?
Reply

Unregular was starred Unregular was unstarred

Wes Siler
06/19/09

@Unregular: Yeah, the A6 only looks good from front-on. Every other angle it's incredibly awkward.
Reply

Wes Siler was starred Wes Siler was unstarred

Unregular
06/19/09

@Wes Siler: eh - beholder, I guess...

Reply

Unregular was starred Unregular was unstarred

pauljones
06/19/09

@Unregular: Definitely a beholder thing. The one thing that Audi never seems to get right in its cars is the roofline. The new A5 is better, but not still leaves a little something to be desired.

The Taurus, on the other hand, suffers from no such mis-proportioning.
Reply

pauljones was starred pauljones was unstarred

philibuster
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
Ford really needs to shoehorn this engine into the fusion. And then call that the fusion SHO. And offer it in manual-only. And it would be the spiritual successor to the original Taurus SHO.
Reply

philibuster was starred philibuster was unstarred

Ben Wojdyla
06/19/09

@philibuster: +1,000
Reply

Ben Wojdyla was starred Ben Wojdyla was unstarred

TTopJohn
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
It sounds like it's a quick, comfortable, good handling car that just isn't quite the same as its much smaller adn lighter 89-95 predecessor. So not flat out badass when measured against the original and the 2nd gen, but really pretty good compared to other currently available new cars.

We need some info on why that 133mph speed limiter is there - is it just a politically correct thing, or will we break something (engine, trans, propshaft) or leave the surface of the earth if we program it away and run the 155+ that this thing must be capable of based on frontal area and horsepower?
Reply

TTopJohn was starred TTopJohn was unstarred

Ben Wojdyla
06/19/09

@TTopJohn: The 133 MPH is there to protect you from yourself. Believe me, that engine has a helluva lot more than 133 MPH in it.
Reply

Ben Wojdyla was starred Ben Wojdyla was unstarred

Gearhead_42 - Nibbles ate my garage!
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
1100 pounds in 20 years...

Yep, that about sums up what's wrong with the car industry right there!
Reply

If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face
06/19/09

@Gearhead_42: It weighs about the same as a late-'70s pre-downsizing LTD. That blows my mind.
Reply

Maymar
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
I'm not as excited by this Mandel Bread as I hoped I'd be, but I'm more worried because it sounds a little too close to Lincoln's Biscotti. I know, the Lincoln is more expensive, but still, I'd hope the Ford would be a little lighter, fluffier, and athletic (yes, I want athletic baked goods).

Plus, it's too heavy to ever be eligible for LeMons.
Reply

Maymar was starred Maymar was unstarred

Ben Wojdyla
06/19/09

@My A Arm: Isn't the LeMons weight limit 5,000 lbs?
Reply

Ben Wojdyla was starred Ben Wojdyla was unstarred

Maymar
06/19/09

@Ben Wojdyla: I thought it was 4200lbs - the only reason I sorta remember is because as I understand, B-body sedans are eligible, but the 4500-lbs wagons are too heavy.
Reply

Maymar was starred Maymar was unstarred

MikeD74
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
Not sure what, but there is something I don't like about this car.
Reply

MikeD74 was starred MikeD74 was unstarred

SirNotAppearing
06/19/09

@MikeD74: There's no camino option?
Reply

SirNotAppearing was starred SirNotAppearing was unstarred

smalleyxb122
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
That is a seriously nice looking car, but without a real manual trans, and RWD, I just can't get excited about it. And at $40k, it should tick every box on my automotive wants.

With that said, 5.2 seconds to 60? Damn!

Good on ya' Ford. You've got some skilled designers. Now just get some enthusiasts as engineers to address the architecture (RWD, manual transmission), and you'd have something.
Reply

smalleyxb122 was starred smalleyxb122 was unstarred

rickerbr
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
Yawn, Ford/GM 6sp slushbox only (which is good for a torque converter box, but that is so 1999).

Also take a look at the nose on picture with the huge grill and look at it side by side with the Max Mosley pic. Separated at birth?

Seriously, put the F150 grill on an F150, not a car. It didn't work for Dodge either.
Reply

rickerbr was starred rickerbr was unstarred

Ben Wojdyla
06/19/09

@rickerbr: Wes isn't kidding, the new 6 speed auto is very good, I was impressed when I drove the MKS with Ecoboost. Considering how low the take-rate is for manual transmissions any more, it doesn't make sense to invest in a system that'll get a minuscule take rate. I despise the unenlightened driving hordes who've made that so, but I applaud Ford for making the right business decision and sinking money into an excellent automatic instead of a so-so auto and an also-ran manual.
Reply

Ben Wojdyla was starred Ben Wojdyla was unstarred

rickerbr
06/19/09

@Ben Wojdyla: Manuals are dead in the US. But to not have an automated manual in a car that they are trying to claim is an A6 for half the price is going to be a tough sell. I've driven a Malibu LTZ with the same gearbox and while it's not bad, once you get used to sub 20ms shifts, no slushbox is ever good enough.
Reply

rickerbr was starred rickerbr was unstarred

Ben Wojdyla
06/19/09

@rickerbr: Think what you want, but spend any seat time in it and try to refute our assertions.
Reply

Ben Wojdyla was starred Ben Wojdyla was unstarred

If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
4,368 lbs? Are you kidding me? This thing ways 68 pounds MORE than my 4th-gen, body-on-frame, 4wd 4Runner.

That's absolutely ridiculous.
Reply

If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face
06/19/09

@FromaBuick6: Weighs, not "ways."

/dumbass
Reply

Braff
06/19/09

@FromaBuick6: yeah this is Audi A8L territory
Reply

Braff was starred Braff was unstarred

A strolling player
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
This only further serves to remind me how suck-tastic my Prius is.
Reply

A strolling player was starred

long_live_the_E36
06/19/09

@Ambiguously Strolling Player: Dear god, why would you do that? Why would you admit to Prius ownership on the Jalop?
Reply

long_live_the_E36 was starred

.357
06/19/09

@long_live_the_E36: It's OK. He's cool.
Reply

.357 was starred .357 was unstarred

Mad_Science
06/19/09

@long_live_the_E36: I'll take 50/50 odds he's done more dragstrip passes in the Prius than you have in whatever you drive everyday.
Reply

Mad_Science was starred Mad_Science was unstarred

A strolling player
06/19/09

@long_live_the_E36: I keep it real. Nevermind the COTD it got me.

And, in the interest of full disclosure, I did not write that comment. I'm not going to name names, but she really likes Volvos. My vocabulary is a little better than "suck-tastic". ;)
Reply

A strolling player was starred

Mad_Science
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
I guess my biggest question is why isn't this a Lincoln? (...or-God help me-Mercury...?)

Oh wait, that's the MKS. Basically, the Taurus is treading all over its territory.

I gotta wonder if they would've been better off driving the Taurus downmarket some and letting the Lincoln have the high end.

Looks like a great product, but I'm just not sure the world is ready for $40k Tauruses.
Reply

Mad_Science was starred Mad_Science was unstarred

pauljones
06/19/09

@Mad_Science: Just pray that it opens the door for a new RWD Continental.
Reply

pauljones was starred pauljones was unstarred

engineerd
06/19/09

In reply to 2010 Ford Taurus SHO: First Drive
Your review sounds disappointed, and is making me disappointed. I haven't even driven one, though, so I should reserve my complete opinion until I do so.

Speaking of reserving opinion until you drive a car, I have a Camry rental car right now. Styling of the Camry isn't bland...it's ugly. Lumpy. Like a fat chick squeezed into bike shorts and a sports bra that are 2 sizes too small. Driving dynamics are, as I've read here many times, bland. It's comfortable, but sterile is maybe too generous. If I really squeaze hard on the go-pedal is will show signs of life, then promptly settle back into nothingness.

It is an appliance.
Reply

engineerd was starred engineerd was unstarred

SirNotAppearing
06/19/09

@engineerd hates hydrogen leaks: What suprised me was how crappy the interior was. Huge plastic dash, and exposed rough seams where two pieces of plastic came together on the arm rests. Seemed very cheap to me.
Reply

SirNotAppearing was starred SirNotAppearing was unstarred

If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face
06/19/09

@engineerd hates hydrogen leaks: My dad has a beige '05 LE, and I swear it's the dullest car in the history of the world. The new ones uglier, for sure, but at least the interior is less plain. After having a couple of Accords, which were so much better to drive, I don't know how he was able to stomach buying that car. I'm to the point where I get depressed just riding in that car.

My parents also had a base model 2nd-gen Camry when I was a kid. Despite having such luxurious options as painted steel wheels, heavy-duty cloth/vinyl upholstery and no trim or moldings whatsoever, it didn't feel nearly as Walmart as the current cars.
Reply

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion