Doesn't look at all like a Jaguar from the front. There is too much Volvo S80 there. They need to lower the vertical dimension of the grille, and give it more Jag styling cues. Also the rear lights are Volvo-esque. I suppose gradually, they will improve the front end.
It has, after all, been only a scant few months since they escaped the clutches of Ford's styling machine.
Seeing it from more angles now, I am sold. Here's why:
Picture 4: That is a thoroughly modern silhouette and profile. The details here that I like are the rear quarter window shape. That is a wonderful curve - reminiscent, slightly, of a 911 - albeit more pointed. That gives it a very nice athletic and aggressive stance.
Picture 6: It still has charm. The grille may be carried over from the XF and the front end is nearly a dead ringer for the XF in its entirety. But, ask yourself, did they get the XF front end wrong? No. This is where they are making the new Jag. That grille has a connection to the past, but the general style is all new. If you think about it, most people when asked to quickly clarify the most memorable thing about the outgoing XJ would probably say the headlights - the front of the car. Here we go again, then.
Picture 19: The back actually does work. I still think it borrows heavily from the C6, but again - bad thing? The back of the C6 is lovely. It is stately and simple and elegant. It might not be an AMV8, but you'll know what it is when you drive up behind one. That said, I really don't like the leaping cat - a bit ostentatious I feel.
Picture 34: I'll end with this one. It just looks good. Great proportions. Some interesting elements, and not likely to stand out in a sea of Ferraris. That's just about everything a Jag is supposed to do stylistically.
I'm not sure about this, but I agree that you can't judge a car from the pictures alone. I mean, I remember when the Maserati GranTurismo was revealed, I immediately thought, "Wow, that is easily the sexiest car I've ever seen, but I'd better wait to see it in real life, because it might be a bit of a porker." And remember the E65 7-series that introduced the world to the Bangle Butt? We all fell over the pictures of that, praising it for how sleek and low it looked and gasping in awe at how well resolved the rear fenders and trunk were. You'd never have known that in the flesh it looked like an inflated manatee with a congenital tail deformity. So despite the fact that the new XJ looks like someone forgot to strip the disguise off its arse end before they pulled the sheets off it, I'm confident that these photos taken by professional photographers in ideal lighting conditions at angles chosen to make this car look the very best it can could be distorting the hooker-carrying potential of this ride, and in the flesh it doesn't look like the unfortunate recipient of a junk transplant from a Ford Scorpio.
I'm definitely a fan. Sure, some of the details are wonky, but it's about time Jaguar got away from the stuffy Victorian-era drawing rooms filled with old toffs reminiscing about the Boer War and into the 20th century or so. They don't have to lose their "British charm," but even old Jaguars were cutting edge for the time, which is something people tend to forget.
I like the new style. Another thing to consider is that it might look different in real life. I thought the XF looked meh in pictures, but I was very impressed when I saw the actual car. Maybe it has to do with scale - these cars are a lot bigger than the pictures make them appear.
I like this. It's sleek and modern. But, I still absolutely adore the outgoing model. So, if I owned Jaguar, I would sell both. This as a higher priced super sleek luxury express, and the XJ as the classic, Olde England piece of awesome. Here's a picture just for the hell of it.
I really like the XF style, but I just don't envision it translating to a bigger size like this. This car looks a lot like if Audi wanted to make an A6 "CC" to compete with the Mercedes CLS. Not terrible, but that rear end (C-pillars and taillights) are horrid.
I happen to like it. It's not that there was anything at all wrong with the previous design, but as far as redesigns go, this one wasn't bad. It's a little Audi-ish in profile, but that doesn't mean it isn't attractive. Plus, that beatiful interior makes up for any exterior styling awkwardness.
Now if only I could get the previous-gen styling with the new-gen interior...
@ironghost: You say that like it's a bad thing. The Intrepid was (still is) a good looking car crippled by being an affordable domestic produced in the late 90's (which is putting it in beater territory). Besides, it's closer to the 300M or LHS.
Robert Cumberford says that Japanese cars are designed to be seen up close and European cars are designed to be seen at a distance.
The first teaser shots had me wincing, but I have to admit it looks better in some of these shots with the camera backed off quite a bit, such as in images 17 and 25. it still has a lot of problems, but at least the design makes a little more sense to me now.
@YankBoffin: While I never winced, I have had trouble warming up to this car. It's not ugly, it's just such a departure from what the XJ used to be. That interior sure is pretty, though.
It was a threadjack before but now this is the proper environment. I thought it looked horrible in the photos but it gets really good in motion. Unfortunately, there's no audio in the video.
Yeah, I like it, a lot. It definitely looks like a big, imposing executive saloon, but the ZF-derived styling keeps it athletic. I won't say it's perfect, but it's much more stylish than anything the Germans have, and I'd expect it to significantly undercut the Quattroporte in price.
07/14/09
It has, after all, been only a scant few months since they escaped the clutches of Ford's styling machine.
07/14/09
The insignia on the steering wheel isn't close to straight.
/sarcasm
07/14/09
07/14/09
Picture 4: That is a thoroughly modern silhouette and profile. The details here that I like are the rear quarter window shape. That is a wonderful curve - reminiscent, slightly, of a 911 - albeit more pointed. That gives it a very nice athletic and aggressive stance.
Picture 6: It still has charm. The grille may be carried over from the XF and the front end is nearly a dead ringer for the XF in its entirety. But, ask yourself, did they get the XF front end wrong? No. This is where they are making the new Jag. That grille has a connection to the past, but the general style is all new. If you think about it, most people when asked to quickly clarify the most memorable thing about the outgoing XJ would probably say the headlights - the front of the car. Here we go again, then.
Picture 19: The back actually does work. I still think it borrows heavily from the C6, but again - bad thing? The back of the C6 is lovely. It is stately and simple and elegant. It might not be an AMV8, but you'll know what it is when you drive up behind one. That said, I really don't like the leaping cat - a bit ostentatious I feel.
Picture 34: I'll end with this one. It just looks good. Great proportions. Some interesting elements, and not likely to stand out in a sea of Ferraris. That's just about everything a Jag is supposed to do stylistically.
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
I like this. It's sleek and modern. But, I still absolutely adore the outgoing model. So, if I owned Jaguar, I would sell both. This as a higher priced super sleek luxury express, and the XJ as the classic, Olde England piece of awesome. Here's a picture just for the hell of it.
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
Now if only I could get the previous-gen styling with the new-gen interior...
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
The first teaser shots had me wincing, but I have to admit it looks better in some of these shots with the camera backed off quite a bit, such as in images 17 and 25. it still has a lot of problems, but at least the design makes a little more sense to me now.
07/14/09
07/14/09
It was a threadjack before but now this is the proper environment. I thought it looked horrible in the photos but it gets really good in motion. Unfortunately, there's no audio in the video.
07/14/09
Yeah, I like it, a lot. It definitely looks like a big, imposing executive saloon, but the ZF-derived styling keeps it athletic. I won't say it's perfect, but it's much more stylish than anything the Germans have, and I'd expect it to significantly undercut the Quattroporte in price.
07/14/09
07/11/09