"Uh, Mr. Long, your engine had 0.17 CID too much bore, we are going to suspend you and fine you $200,000, payable to our bank account via Western Union or Credit card. Please note we no longer accept cheques."
"But what? NASCAR is full of bore and you fine me for only 0.17 CID?"
"Hey, Mr. Long, don't try to play smart and get out of this one. Pay the damn fine and accept the punishment if you wanna get out of more trouble. Have you got anything to say to contest it that doesn't involve wordplay?"
"Yes. Sir, you must not punish me, for I accidentally measuring device."
For Carl its not so much the money (which he doesn't have), its the fact the he is suspended from attending NASCAR events for 8 races. He is a spotter for a Nationwide team and this judgment bans him from the track. In other words, Carl can't even do his day job, let alone race whenever he can scrape up the money.
Soak the block in ice water, and have them remeasure. 0.17 cubic inches works out to .001 on the bore diameter of a 350. Cooling the block ought to shrink it enough.
@Gearhead_42: Without knowing off hand, the bore X stroke of an actual NASCAR engine, I ran with the specs from a 350. I figured it should be in the ballpark.
@Alphamazing: I reran my calculations, and I'll let you re-run yours. I had a decimal wrong somewhere (350.017, d'oh!), but I didn't forget to square root it. I ran the numbers again, and I'm getting 4.00184 for the bore. 2*sqrt(350.17/8/3.48/pi)
@smalleyxb122: Hey, idiot, your first calculations were correct (4.00097 bore), but using a calculated 3.48151438 stroke, instead of the spec'd 3.48. The fact that back calculating that answer with 3.48 gets 350.017 is purely coincidental.
You're thinking of Stanton Barrett. Carl Long works as a spotter for a Nationwide series team, and does work for other race teams in addition to racing in Cup part time.
@Alphamazing: I see now where your calculations go out of whack. The change in cross sectional area due to a bore increase is not the same as the cross sectional area of a bore equal to the increase, since it is affected by the initial bore size.
The larger the initial bore; the greater the increase will be with delta being constant.
06/18/09
06/18/09
"But what? NASCAR is full of bore and you fine me for only 0.17 CID?"
"Hey, Mr. Long, don't try to play smart and get out of this one. Pay the damn fine and accept the punishment if you wanna get out of more trouble. Have you got anything to say to contest it that doesn't involve wordplay?"
"Yes. Sir, you must not punish me, for I accidentally measuring device."
"You accidentally what?"
"The measuring device."
"..."
06/18/09
Shocking.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
You're thinking of Stanton Barrett. Carl Long works as a spotter for a Nationwide series team, and does work for other race teams in addition to racing in Cup part time.
06/18/09
06/18/09
AND fined 200000000 pounds, of course.
06/18/09
Who'd he piss off last week?
06/18/09
06/18/09
It also works out to a .09124 in increase in bore (2.318mm) which is way more than machining tolerances can allow for.
06/18/09
.00066" increase in bore
06/18/09
0.17 in^3 over on the engine = .02125 in^3 per cylinder
.0215 in^3 = (PI/4)(bore^2)*stroke
.0215 in^3 = (PI/4)(bore^2)*3.25
bore^2 = 0.008325027792499 in^2
bore = 0.091241590256303 in
0.0912416 in * 25.4 in/mm = 2.3175 mm
06/18/09
Bore radius ^2 * pi * Stroke * # of cylinders = displacement
Another 0.09" of bore would be something like 16 cubic inches overall.
06/18/09
06/18/09
Take a 350.
Bore it out 60 over (0.06")
It is now a 360.
06/18/09
The larger the initial bore; the greater the increase will be with delta being constant.
06/18/09
NERD ALERT.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
It must suck to be an example.
06/18/09
06/18/09
I can hear that conversation now...
"Yeah, I'm well endowed, about 11 inches!"
06/18/09
"Really?"
"Nah, its like a midget elf's micropenis."
"...really?"
"Nah, its just a big fat cock."
06/18/09
06/18/09
Caution: that may backfire against your ego, however.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09