I have typically beaten highway ratings pretty easily, but city ratings always seem optimistic to me, even with A/C off and very conservative driving.
I still think both rating should be more objective. Like steady 20mph in 2nd gear (as a proxy for city) and steady 70mph in top gear (proxy for highway).
So, what will happen to these numbers in the next 5-10 years? Will it improve further, or will it stall due to the end of C4C?
As an European these numbers really surprise me, as 23 mpg is almost considered a gas guzzler value here. Even for a gasoline powered mid sized car.
@Triborough: Why would these numbers be necessarily inflated? People were incentivezed to buy slightly more efficient cars than usual -- I fail to see why this would be in any way surprising.
Dear Powers that Be, how about a hand out for the rest of us, you know the people with good credit, bought a home we can afford, pay our bills on time, and buy cars that don't suck and get good milage. WTF, where is our hand out.
@flipnut: Word UP. A few grand post-tax would be nice. That way I could replace my mailbox, service my car, get some branches trimmed, and add some pennies to my piggy bank. Call it a "good citizen award."
@Shamoononon, Vampire Grater: Manual transmissions tend to transmit power more efficiently, thus you aren't wasting as much, thus you get better economy.
Also in your example, the manual has a gear that the auto doesn't, that means you can control your revs more precisely.
As for your poor mileage, don't rev the nuts off of it. Driven thriftily you should be able to get just about any manual equipped car to blow by it's EPA estimates. According to the EPA my car gets 28mpg highway, real world, driving like a granny, I can squeeze 32-33 out of the thing in town... and I have the ability to hit every single light red.
Yup, checked my daughter's 97 Saab Turbo Cab and it magically now gets 19MPG! Oh well, I'm seriously considering crushing the car anyway as sweet revenge on the Saab engineers who designed the convoluted folding top mechanism on this POS!
The old EPA mileage numbers were not really low, its that they were gamed by the car manufacturers. Or do you not remember the hybrid fuel controversy and other fiascos?
I actually sold cars for quite some time and it was well known that the average driver who is not a grandma hypermiling downhill both ways at 10mph under the speed limit would not realistically achieve the EPA numbers under any stretch of imagination.
Why are hybrid cars around? Hint: it's not for efficiency or green. Its' because part of the EPA test involves idling, which is where they can easier game the system. It's good to see tougher testing, but, y'know.
That's fine, I really didn't want to help pay $4500 for my neighbor to get a $30k car that's priced $20k more than they really need and probably not worth more than $10k at best anyway, from a crooked company that I've helped bail out and financed by a crooked company that I've also helped bail out.
09/29/09
I like intake roar.
09/29/09
09/29/09
Any vehicle can be driven more efficiently than what the sticker claims, by simply giving a shit about how much fuel you use.
09/29/09
I have typically beaten highway ratings pretty easily, but city ratings always seem optimistic to me, even with A/C off and very conservative driving.
I still think both rating should be more objective. Like steady 20mph in 2nd gear (as a proxy for city) and steady 70mph in top gear (proxy for highway).
09/29/09
As an European these numbers really surprise me, as 23 mpg is almost considered a gas guzzler value here. Even for a gasoline powered mid sized car.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
07/27/09
It's other peoples money and I want it now!!
07/28/09
07/28/09
Being responsible does not pay, aparently.
07/27/09
"
4 cylinder, 2.3 Liter, Automatic 4-spd, Regular Gasoline, (FFS), CLKUP
MPG: City - 18, Highway - 23
4 cylinder, 2.3 Liter, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline, (FFS)
MPG: City - 21, Highway - 24
"
Okay, how can they justify giving a manual transmission a higher MPG?
Also, those stats are lies, it was getting maybe 16 MPG at most. I have the Manual.
07/27/09
Also in your example, the manual has a gear that the auto doesn't, that means you can control your revs more precisely.
As for your poor mileage, don't rev the nuts off of it. Driven thriftily you should be able to get just about any manual equipped car to blow by it's EPA estimates. According to the EPA my car gets 28mpg highway, real world, driving like a granny, I can squeeze 32-33 out of the thing in town... and I have the ability to hit every single light red.
07/27/09
07/27/09
Please bump up the Supras, please bump up the Supras...
Please bump up the 928s, please bump up the 928s...
Pleas bump up the 300ZX, please bump up the 300ZX...
Please bump up the 3 series, please bump up the 3 series...
You guys get the idea...
07/27/09
07/27/09
07/27/09
07/27/09
07/27/09
I actually sold cars for quite some time and it was well known that the average driver who is not a grandma hypermiling downhill both ways at 10mph under the speed limit would not realistically achieve the EPA numbers under any stretch of imagination.
Why are hybrid cars around? Hint: it's not for efficiency or green. Its' because part of the EPA test involves idling, which is where they can easier game the system. It's good to see tougher testing, but, y'know.
07/27/09
But I'm not bitter.