I see a lot of people are interpreting minivan as small conversion van. That would be an Astro/Safari not a minivan. Chrysler defined the class, what all other minivans are now. A minivan is this:
Not based on a car, van, or truck platform.
Taller than a Caprice wagon.
Shorter than a Caprice wagon.
At least 50% more cu ft than Caprice wagon.
Largely reconfigurable/removable seats inside.
Not RWD.
Engine and transmission do not intrude into the footwell.
Very car like driving dynamics.
Also Chrysler worked with Matra to design what the Espace was to become. It is as if Chrysler defined minivan twice at the same time.
I'll credit where credit is due. While I'm not a fan of the driving dynamics, looks or much else about minivans, they are damned good at what they do.
My father was once a wagon owner, then, suddenly in the late 80s discovered minivans. Since then it he has had a succession of Chrysler minivans and loved them all despite my constant persuasion to purchase a more "capable" vehicle. I ended up buying one of those for our towing/race track use. His minivans always served as our crew vehicle.
While its not glamorous, I did much young driving and hooning in a minivan. They were great for teenage "camping" expeditions with friends etc. Much fun was had in the mommy-wagon.
Probably the most under-appreciated vehciels on the road.
If you're a used car buyer, they are a great value as nothing depriciates faster than a minivan.
Minivans are awful. They are bought by idiots who have nothing to live for besides keeping their boring children alive long enough to be able survive on their own. They are built by idiots who got demoted for forgetting to put the door on a sports car. They are designed by people who get excited over getting to places on time. And, worst of all, they started life in a corporate committee- a compromise to the highest degree. I love you Jalopnik, but I will not take part in your minivan day.
After 30+ years of owning VW vans, my German immigrant grandfather discovered the Plymouth Voyager in 1992. He used it for hauling wood (among other things), as he was a carpenter. It was more than that, though. It was a sign that after 40 years of living as a foreigner in a foreign land, my grandfather finally considered himself an American.
And if you believe my grandfather was an idiot, then we're going to have a problem here.
@Pete Gaines: I'm not much of a minivan fan, but I find that story oddly touching and even inspiring. The feeling at home in a new country part, I mean, not the Plymouth Voyager part.
I must say, though, that I think he should have sprung for the Chrysler Town & Country instead of the Voyager. Fake wood paneling on a carpenter's vehicle is just too good to pass up.
So, what set THE Chrysler minivan apart from the other small vans of the day?
State-side anyway, there was nothing like it currently available in the 1980s. It was car-based, had 3 rows of seats, and was taller and more practical than a station wagon.
Conversely, the Vanagon was bigger, higher off the ground, and didn't exactly drive like a car the way Americans expected. Those little Japanese vans: they were seen more as utility vehicles.
I think what set the Caravan up as the ultimate family transportion solution came down to the finer details, too. It was styled inside and out as nicely as, or nicer than their k-car sedans. Not only was it smaller than other vans, it was JUST THE PERFECT SIZE for family needs.
@sos10: this may be a horrible horrible thing to say.... but who would have preferred this for the 4 door porsche design?? they could have even still called it the panamera... i'd want one.... anyone? anyone?
I used to be very anti-minivan. I just couldn't see the appeal, but then again I'm not a parent. Then I spent some time with my girlfriend's sister who has two kids and holy crap they make sense. Not only that, but her late model Ford Freestar was actually pretty damn nice inside. Okay, maybe they're not so evil.
If I was forced to buy a new minivan, I think the Mazda5 would be a good choice since I would want it to have some athletic ability, and the Mazda3 platform is a good place to start. The Mazda5 is just about the same size as the first Chrysler minivans!
@LTDScott, Porcubimmer pilot: Absolutely, if I ruled the world (you never know), I would force every minivan buyer with less than 3 kids to buy a Mazda5. Most people just don't need a MPV. But remember, its the government's job to encourage people to do things-not force it. That, kiddies, is called socialism .
@LTDScott, Porcubimmer pilot: The Freestar's not bad inside if you're good at disregarding hard plastics and inside windowsills almost three inches higher than the beltline.
@MaxSmart32: Sigh. Was going to respond with a post relating to the 1950 VW Type 2 T1 (Transporter) bug-box... but I can't find wheelbase, total length, total width numbers anywhere. Oh sure, lots of figures for the later vans. Nothing for the first-gen.
If I recall, however, it was just a little bigger than the Falcon van... but almost ten years earlier.
But you're right. Let's not beat up on Mopar when she's down.
The sad part about this is that I don't think there's room for any more revolutionary vehicle layouts here.
Minivan 2.0 (Mazda5) was pretty well-timed and POORLY executed, due in part to CAFE calling it a "car," while the Mazda CX-7 and 9 are "trucks". IIRC, the 5 is the #1 or #2 selling Mazda in Canada...but dead last in the US. I think they moved around 15,000 units here last year.
I say this only because I feel a Mazdaspeed5 (or even a diesel version) or a Ford S-Max would be the ideal car for about half the American population. People used to buy primarily on style, but there's a renewed consumer pragmatism in the current economic climate.
But then again, gas is as low as $1.50 in some parts of the country, so I guess it's back to SUVs again.
@The Name's Ash78, Housewares: The S-Max really is a quality minivan,we only had one for a day on hire,i couldn't believe how good it was to drive, i can't understand why Ford don't sell them in America.
Minivan implies to me a small van. The minivan, as introduced by Chrysler was always, in my mind, a bloated wagon.
Chevy's Astro was, and will remain in my eyes the purest form of a mini van. To borrow and bastardize a pitch line from Ertl, the Astro is just like the real thing, only smaller.
Kudos to Chrysler for making the "first" of what had already been around for decades and using it to define a market segment. Much as the Ford Explorer was the "first" SUV.
@Mad_Science: For towing. You can tow with an Econoline, a Chevy Van, etc... but FWD minivans suffer from Eldorado Syndrome, being (recently) large, (somewhat) powerful and having all that weight on the wrong end.
The Aerostar's the closest thing to the Astro, of course.
Renault claim to be the first to make MPV/Minivans & Chrysler for making them popular in North America according to madeitupapedia [en.wikipedia.org] Don't VW Minivans count from the 60's?
@layabout: I promise to quit bugging you, but the Espace and Caravan both show 1984 as the first model year. I'll give mopar the win for making it popular.
About damn time. It's already 8:05 around here. Maybe you should have let Murilee handle Maximum Minivan Day, he would have gotten it started at an appropriate hour. Honestly, you kids these days, sleeping in late, playing your rhythmic spasm-dancing-type music.
Why in my day... uphill both ways... ant another thing... you kids... off my lawn... we liked it dagnabbit.
/Sorry, I seem to have had a little stroke there...
11/12/08
Not based on a car, van, or truck platform.
Taller than a Caprice wagon.
Shorter than a Caprice wagon.
At least 50% more cu ft than Caprice wagon.
Largely reconfigurable/removable seats inside.
Not RWD.
Engine and transmission do not intrude into the footwell.
Very car like driving dynamics.
Also Chrysler worked with Matra to design what the Espace was to become. It is as if Chrysler defined minivan twice at the same time.
11/12/08
11/12/08
My father was once a wagon owner, then, suddenly in the late 80s discovered minivans. Since then it he has had a succession of Chrysler minivans and loved them all despite my constant persuasion to purchase a more "capable" vehicle. I ended up buying one of those for our towing/race track use. His minivans always served as our crew vehicle.
While its not glamorous, I did much young driving and hooning in a minivan. They were great for teenage "camping" expeditions with friends etc. Much fun was had in the mommy-wagon.
Probably the most under-appreciated vehciels on the road.
If you're a used car buyer, they are a great value as nothing depriciates faster than a minivan.
11/12/08
I love you Jalopnik, but I will not take part in your minivan day.
11/12/08
After 30+ years of owning VW vans, my German immigrant grandfather discovered the Plymouth Voyager in 1992. He used it for hauling wood (among other things), as he was a carpenter. It was more than that, though. It was a sign that after 40 years of living as a foreigner in a foreign land, my grandfather finally considered himself an American.
And if you believe my grandfather was an idiot, then we're going to have a problem here.
11/12/08
I must say, though, that I think he should have sprung for the Chrysler Town & Country instead of the Voyager. Fake wood paneling on a carpenter's vehicle is just too good to pass up.
11/12/08
State-side anyway, there was nothing like it currently available in the 1980s. It was car-based, had 3 rows of seats, and was taller and more practical than a station wagon.
Conversely, the Vanagon was bigger, higher off the ground, and didn't exactly drive like a car the way Americans expected. Those little Japanese vans: they were seen more as utility vehicles.
I think what set the Caravan up as the ultimate family transportion solution came down to the finer details, too. It was styled inside and out as nicely as, or nicer than their k-car sedans. Not only was it smaller than other vans, it was JUST THE PERFECT SIZE for family needs.
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
Not that the Blue Jays are any real competition, mind.
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
If I was forced to buy a new minivan, I think the Mazda5 would be a good choice since I would want it to have some athletic ability, and the Mazda3 platform is a good place to start. The Mazda5 is just about the same size as the first Chrysler minivans!
11/12/08
11/12/08
Not bad at all.
11/12/08
90-inch wheelbase,
168.4 inches in total length
65 inches in width
1983 Plymouth Voyager
SWB: 112-in wheelbase
SWB: 175.9 inches in total length
72.2 in in width
Other than having a FF layout...seems to me someone beat them to the punch.
Oh, but let's not beat up Mopar when she's down...
11/12/08
If I recall, however, it was just a little bigger than the Falcon van... but almost ten years earlier.
But you're right. Let's not beat up on Mopar when she's down.
*sneaky-kick-when-nobody's-looking...*
11/12/08
You mean this guy?
Or the SoCal skateboarder wannabee from the early '80s?
11/12/08
Minivan 2.0 (Mazda5) was pretty well-timed and POORLY executed, due in part to CAFE calling it a "car," while the Mazda CX-7 and 9 are "trucks". IIRC, the 5 is the #1 or #2 selling Mazda in Canada...but dead last in the US. I think they moved around 15,000 units here last year.
I say this only because I feel a Mazdaspeed5 (or even a diesel version) or a Ford S-Max would be the ideal car for about half the American population. People used to buy primarily on style, but there's a renewed consumer pragmatism in the current economic climate.
But then again, gas is as low as $1.50 in some parts of the country, so I guess it's back to SUVs again.
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
Chevy's Astro was, and will remain in my eyes the purest form of a mini van. To borrow and bastardize a pitch line from Ertl, the Astro is just like the real thing, only smaller.
Kudos to Chrysler for making the "first" of what had already been around for decades and using it to define a market segment. Much as the Ford Explorer was the "first" SUV.
11/12/08
Van = Big Box on wheels to which "driving dynamics" do not apply. Thus, drive wheels are largely irrelevant.
11/12/08
The Aerostar's the closest thing to the Astro, of course.
11/12/08
11/12/08
...kids these days... off my lawn...
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
[en.wikipedia.org]
[en.wikipedia.org]
11/12/08
11/12/08
Why in my day... uphill both ways... ant another thing... you kids... off my lawn... we liked it dagnabbit.
/Sorry, I seem to have had a little stroke there...
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08