Paragraphs 1 and 2 - hyperbole. There is one useful verb - "is introducing."
Paragraph 3 - history. It's new, but not so new - Yurp's had it a couple of years. Evidently it didn't suck. Good work, there. Won big awards in motoring hotbeds like Greece, Chile and Bulgaria. Also did big in Japan, where it is marketed as a large car.
Paragraph 4 - Mazda made it fekkin' small. Really fekkin' small. But they made it cute, adorable even. And things that are adorable are more adorable when they're small. Like kittens. And you know what else? Kittens piddle in your shoes.
Paragraph 5 - Mazda wants you to think your itty tiny kitten like happy car is fun, zippy, dynamic, et cetera. How'd they make it be all those things? They made it fekkin' small. And they made it cute. Dunno how the hell making it cute makes it dynamic, but there it is. Also, they're not calling the design language "Nagare" anymore, either. What the hell is Nagare? It sounds like that seaweed that goes around my California rolls.
Paragraph 6 - It supposedly does things other cars in the segment don't do, like turn in the direction you turn the steering wheel, stop when you push one pedal and go when you push the other. Fuel stinginess is somehow part of the dynamic driving experience. Skipping fuel stops does increase your average speed, so maybe that sorta counts.
Paragraph 7 - the heading talks about powertrain, but the paragraph talks about how it speeds up when you step on the big pedal, and slows down when you let off. And it does that really, really well - almost as if the pedal were connected directly to the engine. Except it isn't.
@SlowMo (actually, there's no E on my R): Where the hell'd he go, anyway? Somebody send the 2 to drag his sorry ass back here, I can't keep banging my hamlike paws on these little buttons all day, I've got careers to ruin and hopes to dash.
Holy crap, I could not be a copy writer for auto press releases. They've got four paragraphs about its dynamic performance with no information whatsoever about the drivetrain. It hurt my brain just to read it.
@FTGDWolverineEdition'09: Fiesta ≥ 2? It must assume that you are going to start italics or something similar and forgot the rest of the code, and erases it.
FTGDWolverineEdition'09 promoted this comment
Edited by Ruthless, If you let me at 12/02/09 3:24 PM
Ruthless, If you let me was starred
Ruthless, If you let me was unstarred
@FTGDWolverineEdition'09: If the 2 comes in a 3-door hatch I may rethink my plans for a Fiesta purchase but otherwise I think the Fiesta is the slightly cuter sister.
@brc is never late, because of his v8: Funny how the most common cars to locals can be exotic to outsiders. The LC next to the tree is in the airport parking lot in Proserpine--we just don't have a lot of dirt lots for commercial airports in the US, and we generally don't drive our snorkeled cars to get there!
@theeastbaykid: true enough. I was guilty of photographing a Hummer H1 the first time I saw one in LA.
I went to a party at a friends place recently. On his property was parked 5 white trayback 'cruisers, all of varying vintage and specification. I was practically the only person in a normal car - and we're not in a remote area by any means. I think they ran the same basic bodyshape for 20 years, and it was rare that someone went for anything but white. Heck, my first ever go at driving was in an FJ40 trayback on a friends' farm - I could barely touch the pedals and the whole experience ended up in a creek - but I digress.
I've said for years that I'd kill for an E30 estate, and I meant it. Not sure it can compete with that panel van, though! So much cool stuff down under that we never caught a glimpse of...
I remember seeing a black SP250 around Cocoa Beach in the 1970s. You have to wonder about the Daimler directors standing around the styling buck and saying "We have to build this!". Perhaps a moment of desperation? Daimler had frittered away too much money on a wide variety of luxury cars selling in small numbers. There was also the matter of a managing director and his wife using company funds for a ridiculously extravagant lifestyle, including several over-the-top show cars like the one I've pictured. It was on its last legs as an independent manufacturer and would very soon find itself in the not-so-loving arms of Jaguar. Maybe the SP250 was hideous, but it was also pretty fast for the time - top speed was close to 125 mph.
@tonyola: 125 mph is definitely very fast for the time...similar front-end to the fast Studebakers. The Majestic Major, with the larger 4.5-litre V8, also had a top speed above 120 mph despite being extremely heavy. It's mystery to me why Jaguar never bothered to install these engines in their cars.
The SP250 was such a weird car for a company best known for making the limousine of choice for super-high-end hotels all over the world. Hong Kong, in particular, swore by them.
@brandegee: William Lyons, the head of Jaguar, was notoriously protective of the make and refused to acknowledge that any ideas from "outside" might be of benefit to his cars. Too bad - the 4.5 would have been a natural for the Mark X and XJ6. Some Jaguar Mark II sedans were given the 2.5 and badged Daimler 2 1/2 Liter and V8-250 - these were said to be nicer to drive than the Mark IIs, though not as powerful as the 3.4/3.8 Jags.
I just re-read The Unfair Advantage over the Thanksgiving holiday, and it reminded me of what a horrible car the Daimler SP250 was. Styling aside (which, of course, is purely subjective) the fiberglass body was flimsy, the gearbox was clunky, and in pretty much every race Mark Donohue entered with his it would overheat and wipe out the center main bearing. Plus, they were no bigger or roomier than a Sunbeam Alpine, not much faster than a Triumph TR4, and nearly as expensive as an E-Type. About the only nice thing Donohue said about it was that it made a great noise from the 2.5-liter hemi-head V8.
TheEastBayKid's pictures make me think I could deal with engine rebuilds every few hundred miles, if only I could sit in that interior, look over that curved hood and motor off into the sunset. I'll just have to remember to keep a bunch of center main bearings in the trunk.
@CptSevere: Nope - it had a Daimler-built 2.5-liter hemi v8 that has a reputation of being an outstanding engine for the time. Daimler did a lot of wrong things after WW II, but their hemi V8s in 2.5 and 4.5 sizes were a big exception.
12:02 AM
small car: compensating for teh loose vadge.
12/02/09
Paragraph 3 - history. It's new, but not so new - Yurp's had it a couple of years. Evidently it didn't suck. Good work, there. Won big awards in motoring hotbeds like Greece, Chile and Bulgaria. Also did big in Japan, where it is marketed as a large car.
Paragraph 4 - Mazda made it fekkin' small. Really fekkin' small. But they made it cute, adorable even. And things that are adorable are more adorable when they're small. Like kittens. And you know what else? Kittens piddle in your shoes.
Paragraph 5 - Mazda wants you to think your itty tiny kitten like happy car is fun, zippy, dynamic, et cetera. How'd they make it be all those things? They made it fekkin' small. And they made it cute. Dunno how the hell making it cute makes it dynamic, but there it is. Also, they're not calling the design language "Nagare" anymore, either. What the hell is Nagare? It sounds like that seaweed that goes around my California rolls.
Paragraph 6 - It supposedly does things other cars in the segment don't do, like turn in the direction you turn the steering wheel, stop when you push one pedal and go when you push the other. Fuel stinginess is somehow part of the dynamic driving experience. Skipping fuel stops does increase your average speed, so maybe that sorta counts.
Paragraph 7 - the heading talks about powertrain, but the paragraph talks about how it speeds up when you step on the big pedal, and slows down when you let off. And it does that really, really well - almost as if the pedal were connected directly to the engine. Except it isn't.
8 - suspension. Struts, torsion beam. Minivan. Next!
9 - It's chock-full of Dynamat! And it's really fekkin' small, and we tried to make it pointy at both ends.
10 - They tried to make it lighter but figured out that they couldn't. It's really fekkin' small, but in a wreck it won't get a lot smaller. You hope.
11 - Be real - this ain't your fun car. This is your dragging your sorry ass back to the cube farm car.
12 - Noise.
Long on Marketese, short on facts and figures.
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
I don't want to be able to use the rear window on a hatchback as the head rest.
12/02/09
12/02/09
They should have called it the Mazda Supernova Girl.
12/02/09
12/02/09
But again it's like saying one twin sister is better than the other. Maybe I like the mole next to her lips better.
p.s: Why doesn't the damn code allow for the symbol "greater?"
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
12/01/09
I went to a party at a friends place recently. On his property was parked 5 white trayback 'cruisers, all of varying vintage and specification. I was practically the only person in a normal car - and we're not in a remote area by any means. I think they ran the same basic bodyshape for 20 years, and it was rare that someone went for anything but white. Heck, my first ever go at driving was in an FJ40 trayback on a friends' farm - I could barely touch the pedals and the whole experience ended up in a creek - but I digress.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
The SP250 was such a weird car for a company best known for making the limousine of choice for super-high-end hotels all over the world. Hong Kong, in particular, swore by them.
11/29/09
11/29/09
TheEastBayKid's pictures make me think I could deal with engine rebuilds every few hundred miles, if only I could sit in that interior, look over that curved hood and motor off into the sunset. I'll just have to remember to keep a bunch of center main bearings in the trunk.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/30/09
11/29/09
I LOVE those wheel arches. So flowing.