If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
He said that he can either raise tolls or tax. I like this plan of taxing vehicles that are not efficient. Deval can do whatever he wants, just as long as he fixes these damn roads. You can loose a whole wheel in some of the potholes around here.
One of the benefits of internet birthdays is that you don't have to worry about cleaning anything up, before or after the party. Hangovers are still optional though.
I have a simple solution for this: Don't live in Massachusetts. You can keep your gas guzzler, and, as a bonus, you don't have to put up with all the Massholes.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@FromaBuick6: This is the ultimate direction for places like MA (and CA).
The former has, for many years, benefitted from a critical mass of banking, bio research, and educational institutions. But at some point, the first two of those are going to start packing up and moving to Charlotte or Raleigh/RTP (hate to pick on NC, but those two towns are the first to come to mind). Or even just to closer places, say NH or DE. And the state will suddenly wonder where the hell all the businesses went--because ultimately, business are made up of people and funded by people, so the nebulous idea of "increasing business taxes" eventually comes home to roost. A little OT, there, sorry.
I work for a small business as a contract administrator with NASA, and between CA and Federal taxes, the tax rate on our company is something like 45%.
And yet, our roads still suck, our education system is in the shitter, and we seem to perpetually suffer from too few law enforcement officers. It kind of makes you wonder where the hell all of this money is going.
@Ash78: Businesses are leaving California in droves and people along with it. I read somewhere that California actually saw a decline in residents last year for the first time in nearly forever.
It's just getting too damn expensive to live out here. In many parts of the country, a yearly salary of $45k is enough to get a nice little apartment close to town and get a decent car to drive around, but in LA, 45k gets you a run-down shithole in east LA that you have to share with two roomates in order to afford, and you're lucky if you can find a cheap enough car to drive around that is less than ten years old.
Eventually, California will wind up like southern Florida: populated only by rich old cheesedicks.
I'm struggling, on general principle, to find something snarky to say to indicate my general disdain of Massachusetts. But this actually sounds like a pretty good idea.
Massachusetts wanted to make it very difficult to register light diesels. There was a time in which you could not sell one of the more efficient vans in the state, the Diesel Sprinter. In 2002, Mass adopted the California CARB standards, and at that time, there were "pre-emmission" sprinters available to California, and then Massachusetts. Here in Connecticut, I had to turn away customers from Massachusetts because they wouldn't have been able to register them. New York picked up the same standards in late 2003, and again, no sale to NY residents. That was until the Sprinter adopted the 50 state emission standards (Which, for the first year proved disastrous, as the electronic EGR Valves were failing at an almost 90% rate.
Anyway, my point is that this is really nothing new for Massachusetts.
@Tomsk is all about Murlopnik weekends!: You're probably right, but believe it or not, this is the nicest car I've ever had- no dents, no deep scratches, 3 1" or less surface-rust spots, and that blue paint is sexy as hell in person.
No, I'm afraid the plan is still to convert the ol' F150 into "Kermit The Ford".
Man that really twists my nipples when politicians try to cover a shameless grab for money by making it out to be "green". Are they going to look at the total lifecycle environmental impact of a vehicle? Hell no. They are going to say, "You want that large, evil SUV? OK, here pay more." What is this tax going to pay for?
I don't like tax hikes, especially with our current economy, but if you're going to raise taxes at least be honest about it.
@engineerd: It is no longer a matter of going green, it is a matter that we're going to run out of oil.. so what do you prefer, go ahead and do what you've been doing up to now and in a few decades nothing is left, or adjust little by little to using less oil and using more alternative sources, so in a few decades you can still drive a car?
@sos10: OK, then why don't they say that? And if they are truly concerned about use of gasoline, then why don't they increase the gas tax? That would be the direct way to address that concern. You pay for what you use. If you drive your Hummer H2 like a grandma and get 14 mpg you will be paying less than someone driving their Crown Vic like a hoon and getting 12 mpg.
I fully agree that we, as consumers, should be making smarter choices and being better stewards of our planets resources. I don't agree with politicians putting tax hikes -- that are necessary because they mismanaged the current tax revenues -- in a green cloak to get them passed without being honest about what the true impact is.
@engineerd: Why don't they just say that? Well, maybe in bad times like this, you don't want to sound apocalyptic? Of course it is not a perfect solution, but an easy one.. it works in europe.
Taxing Hummers is the first step down a slippery slope. Next thing you know, they'll be taxing mattress mamboing, pickle-tickles, yodeling in the valley, makin' bacon, knocking boots, bumping uglies, lunch at the Y, and even slapping fees on reverse cowgirls. And we can't get enough of reverse cowgirls.
@graverobber: 100% Shovel Ready!: Ah yes, the reverse cowgirl (not to be confused with the invervted callgirl). Excuse me while I call my lady and tell her how much I love her.
The gas tax is the most fair. The vehicles that use the most gas, pay the most tax. Case closed. Why should registration for a guzzling vehicle that's used only on the weekends have a higher registration fee than a Prius that get driven 20,000 miles annually?
@PetroSapien: as a resident of said state, I find the gas tax much more appealing for two reasons:
1) I actually support it anyway. We pay too little for gas in this country, IMO, and it might do us and indeed everyone around the world to make it a bit more of a commodity. Driving is viewed as a right, basically, not a privelege anymore.
2) A gas tax is a lot better than the state putting a black box in your car and moving to the same road tax/tolling system they have in London right now, which is the other option Gov. Patrick is debating. That is friggin' scary. Part of the appeal of having a car is some freedom to get away and with that in your car, you aint never gonna be alone.
Ultimately I don't they'll go the black box route becuase it will cost too much in infrastructure and bureaucracy to get it going and maintain. Then again, this IS Massachusetts, and stuff like that has never stopped them from doing idiotic things in the past.
God I want to get the hell out of this state sometimes...
@nhubbell84: Well, if you seriously think that you're not paying enough for gas, let me oblige you by charging an additional tax. Keep track of your gasoline purchases, and for every gallon you purchase, send me one dollar. In fact, I'd invite anyone who feels they pay too little for fuel to do the same; you'd all be accomplishing two things — assuaging your guilty consciences and helping fund my eccentricities.
What; you don't like that second part? You'd rather fund someone else's eccentricities? Fine! Be that way!
Teehee. Government. They're silly. They tell automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars and then jack up the gas tax up when people use less fuel. They've gotta compensate some way, right?
@Illegal_Machine: And if you DO drive a Camry with plastic 15" hubcaps, you're DEFINITELY breaking at least 15 laws simultaneously, but the police don't give a shit.
Until you cross the border into my state, then we pull your ass over.
How about a toll based on your vehicle weight? That sounds like the best proxy for what this is trying to accomplish. And it would be objectively fair, since tolls are supposed to provide revenue for road repair and service (why are you laughing?)
@Ash78: Massachusetts has toll roads based on vehicle weight already. The major highway across the state is the Mass Turnpike (I-90) and it's a toll road.
Because I think that the aim of this is to encourage consumers to purchase more fuel efficient cars. And while weight is a significant variable in determining fuel efficiency, light weight does not necessarily mean good fuel efficiency. For instance, none of us can argue that the F430 isn't a lightweight, and yet it gets worse mileage than a diesel Cherokee, which weighs far more.
Several months back, Jalopnik posted an article in which they argued that the best way to achieve the goal of encouraging consumer to by fuel efficient vehicles is to increase the gas tax, and as much as I hate the idea, I still believe that they are correct.
@pauljones-feeling the carpocalypse hangover: I'm also for increased gas tax as the least of all evils. We've already shown our inelasticity to $3 or even $4 gas prices. And heck, most freight carriers and airlines are still doing the fuel surcharges. Might as well give that excess economic surplus to road construction instead of Exxon and OPEC. Our roads suck. Hard.
@Ash78: Ash, I'll take an example I came across recently. 2 Axle cars driving on the turnpike from the Springfield toll entrance, and driving west are not charged at all. If you have a pickup, you are charged. If that pickup or van has dual wheels on the rear axle, you are charged more, and so on.
When this goes into place, I believe the amount you will be charged will be based on what the title, or the certificate of origin states the GVW is. This is tied into the VIN Number at the Motor Vehicle Registry. And, to my knowledge, it will also be tied into the Easy Pass Electronic system, if you want to use your electronic toll paying system.
A raised gas price would be the best option for achieving the goal at hand, but it would be a killer for people like me, whose roundtrip commute is 80+ miles per day.
@UDMan: I see pauljones already said everything I wanted to say... oh well.
Does anyone know if any studies have been done about the environmental impact of tolls? The Mass Pike isn't too bad (tolls at exits only, where you're slowing down anyway), but I couldn't believe when I went to Denver and Dallas recently and the newer highways had frequent tolls along open stretches of road. Didn't stopping every few miles to pay a piddling $0.75 strike any road designers as being stupid and wasteful?
@lankybits: Within the New York Metro area, and specifically on the New Jersey Turnpike, they now have these "easy pass" lanes in which you pass under them, at or near the speed limit, and the toll is automatically deducted from your Easy Pass account. Of course, if you still want to pay with cash, you will have to go into the standard cash lanes, but at least the lines are muh shorter than they would have been without easy pass.
@Ash78: I think you're missing the point. Some vehicles are heavy and get poor mileage because they need to be to accomplish a certain task. Towing a boat, carrying a large amount of cargo, transporting a large family. To tax this would be seen as either anti-business or anti-family. What they are really after is taxing vehicles that are heavy and get poor mileage for no good reason. Perhaps, if we're really lucky, the government will come up with an index where they can evaluate vehicles based on the mileage they get in proportion to what a more appropriate vehicle would get. Perhaps they can add tax percentage points if it meets certain criteria. The number of cylinders, engine placement, existence of a truck type bed on a car. They could start here:
Which, considering that we theoretically live in a democracy in which the government is made for the people, of the people, doesn't say a whole about us, either.
@Ash78: While we have shown the ability to pay higher gas prices, demand for gasoline actually decreased. In our present state, we could not afford higher gas taxes or prices. That gas prices dropped so rapidly was actually a great stimulus boost for our economy. It was akin to approximately $300 billion in actual money. If gas prices and taxes are increased at this time, the negative impact on our our already horrible economy will be devastating. Although people will still buy gas, other retail sales will suffer as a result.
@Tiberiuswise: It's dubious ground to tread on when the government is deciding "taxing vehicles that are heavy and get poor mileage for no good reason."
02/19/09
Best legislation ever.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
It's your birthday?
Hot damn! Happy Birthday!
*and no, I am not going to ask how old you are
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
Happy Birthday Heart Clicks all around!
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
One of the benefits of internet birthdays is that you don't have to worry about cleaning anything up, before or after the party. Hangovers are still optional though.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
The former has, for many years, benefitted from a critical mass of banking, bio research, and educational institutions. But at some point, the first two of those are going to start packing up and moving to Charlotte or Raleigh/RTP (hate to pick on NC, but those two towns are the first to come to mind). Or even just to closer places, say NH or DE. And the state will suddenly wonder where the hell all the businesses went--because ultimately, business are made up of people and funded by people, so the nebulous idea of "increasing business taxes" eventually comes home to roost. A little OT, there, sorry.
02/19/09
Not really over-the-top at all.
I work for a small business as a contract administrator with NASA, and between CA and Federal taxes, the tax rate on our company is something like 45%.
And yet, our roads still suck, our education system is in the shitter, and we seem to perpetually suffer from too few law enforcement officers. It kind of makes you wonder where the hell all of this money is going.
02/19/09
02/19/09
It's true.
It's just getting too damn expensive to live out here. In many parts of the country, a yearly salary of $45k is enough to get a nice little apartment close to town and get a decent car to drive around, but in LA, 45k gets you a run-down shithole in east LA that you have to share with two roomates in order to afford, and you're lucky if you can find a cheap enough car to drive around that is less than ten years old.
Eventually, California will wind up like southern Florida: populated only by rich old cheesedicks.
02/19/09
Masshole and proud, dammit!
02/19/09
02/19/09
Anyway, my point is that this is really nothing new for Massachusetts.
02/19/09
I just picked up a helluva deal from my sister-in-law, thanks to the Mass emissions law- '97 Cougar XR7, $100.
02/19/09
So what's your theme going to be? The Tax Man Cometh?
02/19/09
02/19/09
No, I'm afraid the plan is still to convert the ol' F150 into "Kermit The Ford".
02/19/09
If 4.6, awesome car, nice price. If 3.8, crackpipe.
02/19/09
Buddy of mine had an '89 a few years back, and I thought it was a pretty decent car.
02/19/09
I don't like tax hikes, especially with our current economy, but if you're going to raise taxes at least be honest about it.
02/19/09
02/19/09
I fully agree that we, as consumers, should be making smarter choices and being better stewards of our planets resources. I don't agree with politicians putting tax hikes -- that are necessary because they mismanaged the current tax revenues -- in a green cloak to get them passed without being honest about what the true impact is.
02/19/09
02/19/09
Just use it, its not doing any good in the ground.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
"Missionary style would pay less and you'd have a range, that kind of thing."
02/19/09
Some of us can't get any, at all.....:(
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
and graverobber: 100% Shovel Ready!, sometimes i worry
02/19/09
Not that I have any 1st hand knowledge of such things.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
1) I actually support it anyway. We pay too little for gas in this country, IMO, and it might do us and indeed everyone around the world to make it a bit more of a commodity. Driving is viewed as a right, basically, not a privelege anymore.
2) A gas tax is a lot better than the state putting a black box in your car and moving to the same road tax/tolling system they have in London right now, which is the other option Gov. Patrick is debating. That is friggin' scary. Part of the appeal of having a car is some freedom to get away and with that in your car, you aint never gonna be alone.
Ultimately I don't they'll go the black box route becuase it will cost too much in infrastructure and bureaucracy to get it going and maintain. Then again, this IS Massachusetts, and stuff like that has never stopped them from doing idiotic things in the past.
God I want to get the hell out of this state sometimes...
02/19/09
What; you don't like that second part? You'd rather fund someone else's eccentricities? Fine! Be that way!
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
Basically, if you don't drive a Camry with plastic 15" hubcaps you're breaking about 15 laws at any given time.
02/19/09
Until you cross the border into my state, then we pull your ass over.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09
Forgive my ignorance...most states in this region, save for FL, have zero toll roads. I've only ever seen charges based on number of axles.
02/19/09
Because I think that the aim of this is to encourage consumers to purchase more fuel efficient cars. And while weight is a significant variable in determining fuel efficiency, light weight does not necessarily mean good fuel efficiency. For instance, none of us can argue that the F430 isn't a lightweight, and yet it gets worse mileage than a diesel Cherokee, which weighs far more.
Several months back, Jalopnik posted an article in which they argued that the best way to achieve the goal of encouraging consumer to by fuel efficient vehicles is to increase the gas tax, and as much as I hate the idea, I still believe that they are correct.
02/19/09
02/19/09
When this goes into place, I believe the amount you will be charged will be based on what the title, or the certificate of origin states the GVW is. This is tied into the VIN Number at the Motor Vehicle Registry. And, to my knowledge, it will also be tied into the Easy Pass Electronic system, if you want to use your electronic toll paying system.
02/19/09
A raised gas price would be the best option for achieving the goal at hand, but it would be a killer for people like me, whose roundtrip commute is 80+ miles per day.
02/19/09
Does anyone know if any studies have been done about the environmental impact of tolls? The Mass Pike isn't too bad (tolls at exits only, where you're slowing down anyway), but I couldn't believe when I went to Denver and Dallas recently and the newer highways had frequent tolls along open stretches of road. Didn't stopping every few miles to pay a piddling $0.75 strike any road designers as being stupid and wasteful?
02/19/09
02/19/09
I think you're missing the point. Some vehicles are heavy and get poor mileage because they need to be to accomplish a certain task. Towing a boat, carrying a large amount of cargo, transporting a large family. To tax this would be seen as either anti-business or anti-family. What they are really after is taxing vehicles that are heavy and get poor mileage for no good reason. Perhaps, if we're really lucky, the government will come up with an index where they can evaluate vehicles based on the mileage they get in proportion to what a more appropriate vehicle would get. Perhaps they can add tax percentage points if it meets certain criteria. The number of cylinders, engine placement, existence of a truck type bed on a car. They could start here:
[jalopnik.com]
02/19/09
02/19/09
Which, considering that we theoretically live in a democracy in which the government is made for the people, of the people, doesn't say a whole about us, either.
02/19/09
02/19/09
02/19/09