Man Ben, this is pretty low for you and Jalopnik. I love visiting this site even though you guys also trash the sport I love, NASCAR, but this is a new low I think. First off this isn't some political blog last time I checked. If I wanted someone's opinion about something Rush said I definitely would think jalopnik is one of the last places I would find it. But hey now that you posted this B.S. I sure hope you guys will start posting stories about how liberal tv/radio personalities think that those who disagree with the auto industry bailouts (or other whack job ideas like how Obama thinks he can magically cut waste out of government spending to fund his health care plan AFTER setting new records for Government debt) are just crazy ass racists that are against Obama's policies because he's black and NOT because he's spending all of our g** d*** money.
Secondly, even mentioning the name Rush Limbaugh is like starting a fight between Jeff Gordon and Dale Earnhardt fans AT TALLADEGA. Either you love the guy or you hate him, and unless you are stupid enough to not know this universal fact I would say you guys must be hurting really bad for page hits because no matter what is said about Rush, good or bad, the shit is gonna hit the fan, big time. I mean hell why don't you also start preaching to us how global warming is going to kill us all in 5 years or that we all need to start driving hybrids because "media matters said so". I can't believe you are some mouthpiece of this insane organization.
The problem is that those who hate Rush happen to be people who listen to media matters for their biased info instead of actually listening to Rush's Show. My guess is if you listened to Rush's show constantly, like I do, you wouldn't be saying the things you are because 9 times out of 10 it turns out people agree with what he says. In fact, Media Matters constantly attacks conservative radio and tv hosts with remarks that are usually taken completely out of context. Why do you think Media Matters only plays or shows snippets out of these huge monologues? The best part is that the people they attack have the best ratings in their segment. They've attacked Fox News constantly but that news channel crushes the competition. Also, Rush is the #1 Radio show in America with roughly 14 million listeners by some estimates so I don't think he'd be that popular if he were a right-wing racist nutjob. Also, you're damn right these people are biased and for you to post something like this is reckless and inflammatory. CLEARLY you did this on purpose to start a brawl between your readers.
This brings me to my conclusion. Over the past year or so since I started visiting this site it has been somewhat enjoyable. I found this site by being an avid kotaku reader. Unfortunately, this website does not have the standards I have found at Kotaku or Gizmodo it seems. It is not acceptable, in my opinion, to try and provoke flame wars between your readers. Maybe if this site had such a theme it would be acceptable, but in my opinion this post is complete trash. The intent of it is trash, the actual story itself is trash because the truth has been warped, and you have lost me as a visitor. I doubt you or other people will care, to be honest I don't that much, but luckily for me there's millions of other sites out there and I am sure I can find one that is above starting petty arguments for page hits, AND HOPEFULLY they have editor's that can think for themselves. Good luck in the future, I hope nobody starts trying to get advertisers off your website. After all, it is your opinion/beliefs and nobody would be misunderstanding enough to punish you for that I am sure.
@dalejrfanfreak: After reading your post, I hope they post more political news on this blog, if this is where you come to read. Why? Because it's almost 3pm Texas time, and you are, without a doubt, point by point, the dumbest person I've met on the internet today.
@Jes St.Lawrence: Hey if you think I am dumb "point by point" then why don't you prove me wrong on my points. Of course, I would suppose someone like you is a classic liberal and can only resort to name calling and insults instead of an actual debate about something. Only two things come from texas...which one are you?
I realize that a lot of people have a lot of strong opinions about what is and is not related to the cult of cars. I also realize that people have a lot of strong opinions about Rush Limbaugh.
Personally, I think he's as big a clown as any other radio personality. But you know what? That's completely beside the point in light of what went down in this post.
What has gotten into Jalopnik today?
I agree that this wasn't a particularly choice story to post on Jalopnik, but on the other hand, I don't run Jalopnik, erego my opinions in that context mean precisely dick. Ben posted it because he felt it was worth posting. There is shit that we can do about that. It's that simple.
Don't like the post? Then don't comment in it. Move on to other posts that you know you will enjoy reading more. Some of you may notice that I don't post in every thread on a given day; only those that I feel that I can contribute an intelligent or a hopefully witty response. Otherwise, I leave it to the other comment-fu masters on this site, like Ash, Dearthair, Braff, Polar, Engineerd, and many, many others.
There were some halfway reasonable responses in this thread that I took the time to read through. To those that made an effort to comment intelligently or in good humor, thank you. You were relative rarities in this particular post, but you still made the post and comments worth reading.
And you know what, I also enjoyed reading the posts that respectfully disagreed with Ben's choice of post. Why? Because they made the effort to show RESPECT. They tried to communicate that they had nothing against Ben, just this particular post. There were several such comments in this post, and are good examples of how to appropriately state a dissenting opinion.
To the rest of you who sat there and simply insulted Ben and the remainder of the Jalopnik staff, or added comments such as (and I quote); "Rush=Douche", "Rush: The Ultimate Tool", and "prescription drugs run out", I'm pretty damn disappointed. That was pathetic. You can do much, much better than that.
Respectful posting is paramount here, as we, the commenters, do not own or run this site. We are guests here. Invited and welcome guests to be sure, but guests nonetheless.
@pauljones: oh and one more thing, if I don't like the post that doesn't mean you can go off and tell people to ignore it. If people followed that philosophy in life I suppose we'd just ignore everything that bugged us and let people get away with crap. Heck, if you don't like my response, or if I name call, or if I steal your car, just ignore it k? It's hard to "enjoy other posts" when Ben just turned this site upside down.
@dalejrfanfreak: The primary point of pauljones post was that the Commentariat should attempt to demonstrate a level of respect to their fellow commenters, and to the editor. If someone fails to do so, it behooves us to attempt to elevate the level of discussion. By doing so, you are exposing said person as the elephant in the room.
If that person IS the editor, then so be it. We are all guilty of it from time to time. I myself have many times let my Fine Irish Temper™ get the better of me, and have made many posts of which I am not proud.
My advice, given unsolicited, and as gently as possible, is that generally the guidance Mr. Jones hands out is worthwhile, and worth listening to. Attempting to "call him out" as you just did is counterproductive. If you'd like to comment on something you disagree with, that is your prerogative. But doing so disrespectfully is a quick way to get yourself Burberry Banhammered. Trust me on this one, I speak of first-hand knowledge.
@MrHowser: No, the Jez banhammer is likely covered in sequins and barbed wire. While I can't say much, let's just say my original statement is still accurate; it was Burberry that hit me.
Wow. Where the hell do you get your information? And how do you get "fight between black and white students" from that video? 2 Black kids beat the living crap out of the one white kid for absolutely no reason. The majority of the kids on the bus were black and cheering on as the white kid got beat up. You think what Rush said sarcastically is going to set civil rights back?! Watch the video and read what he actually said here and educate yourself.
@wtf007: You know, having actually taken a bus like that to go to school by the projects (yes, I actually went far out of my own neighborhood to go to school by the projects...really long story) I don't think it's racially motivated at all. People would just randomly get beat up and everyone would go nuts no matter who was getting their butt kicked, black, white, hispanic, asian, whatever. I'm sure even the people who went to nice schools can remember a couple times when kids would chant "fight, fight fight!" at two guys going at each other. Well, public schools anyway.
I'm not saying that nobody on the whole bus could have been racist, but the whole bus acting like that is more a reflection of how out of control inner city school kids are. I mean I got racial slurs thrown at me by kids of all colors, but I also had friends of all colors so it's just how it is in rough city schools. Assuming it's racially motivated just because a lot of the kids happen to not be white is a big jump in logic and I'm saying this having been on the receiving end of unfair fights before.
The real question is where the heck the bus driver is in this video? People got into fights on the bus back then but it never got out of control like that because the bus driver would settle it down. But then again I remember we had a pretty badass bus driver, IIRC he was some sort of ex Irish-American gang member with quite a few interesting tattoos (you know, only in retrospect do I realize how messed up this really all is but back then this all seemed totally normal, like everyone's bus driver had prison tats).
You need a pretty hardcore bus driver to keep order on buses like this, so I guess we were pretty lucky back then to have our badass ex-gangster bus driver. I recall my mom always giving him a nice thank you card with cash tucked inside for the holidays to thank him for making sure that I didn't get myself beaten too badly like this kid.
Man I should totally run for president on this platform of making all bus-drivers ex-gang members who won't be afraid to break up a fight amongst inner city kids.
@MrHowser: Health care? I mean if you're not into it the plan that's great, that's our right. The various stimulus plans had to be done quickly during the crisis and it remains to be seen if they will end up being successful.
But all of this hatred, refusal to allow children to see his speeches, and overwhelming response from the Rush types over every move 9 months into his presidency points to one thing imo.
My favorite is the "One Big Ass Mistake America" bumper stickers. I wouldn't trust a historian to call a President a mistake so soon let alone the mouthbreathers that have these on their pickup trucks.
@bonestock94: When the President's Economic Advisors predict 9% unemployment without the stimulus, spend billions of our tax money, unemployment goes to 9.6% in August, how can they still call it a success? I'm not sure my definition of success is the same as theirs. It may take time to shake out, which I concede, but if opponents can't call it a failure, supporters cannot call it a success.
Health care... Such an emotionally charged issue. It's not fair that some people have it and others don't. Who said life is fair? Yes, I have insurance, and yes, I will be thankful for it should I ever need it, but let's look at this reasonably. 100 years ago, cancer, heart attacks, major trauma would almost certainly kill you. Cures for these things didn't exist. Now. with new technology and medicine (developed with the profits of the "evil drug/medical companies") people (or their insurance) can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on curing/living with these conditions. I believe that fines for not carrying medical insurance will drive the price of insurance up to just above the fine level - might as well get something, instead of nothing.
Obama is trying to make this country much more like Western Europe, and paying for it by taxing those who make the most money. In 2004, [www.taxfoundation.org] of Americans didn't pay income taxes, and that number is growing. Some sources say that the bottom 50% of American wage earners pay 2.89% of all federal income taxes. This is ridiculous! People who don't pay taxes voting to increase the tax load on those who do. It won't take us anywhere good, believe me.
Edited by MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy at 09/17/09 9:07 PM
MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy was starred
MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy was unstarred
@MrHowser: I accept your argument, I'm not sure where I stand currently so I don't have a retort. My only argument is not to call the guy a failure so quickly. I'm annoyed by the people that dismissed this guy out of the gate for seemingly racial issues rather than having educated reasons for opposing his policies. Clearly you fall into the latter category, I wish more people did.
@bonestock94: I appreciate your honesty. I have no problem with different views than my own, it just bugs me when the views are based solely on emotions or what is trendy. Have some facts/figures to back up stories, and I'll happily talk politics. But call me a racist/sexist/homophobe/Islamophobe simply because I support a certain policy or hold a certain Judeo-Christian value, and I will know that intellectual honesty is not important to your line of thinking.
Yes, there are some folks who don't like Obama because he's black. I don't like his ideas about where the country should go. I'm quite certain I would enjoy having a drink and smoking a cigar with him, as long as we didn't discuss the future of the country.
area_educator promoted this comment
Edited by MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy at 09/18/09 1:31 AM
MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy was starred
MrHowser: Now on XBL as NoReturnPolicy was unstarred
@MrHowser: They "don't pay taxes"? Enough of this stupidity.
People too poor to pay federal income taxes pay payroll taxes on the first dollar they earn and, thanks to Greenspan's influence, the payroll tax rate went up up while corporate and marginal taxes went down. Payroll taxes account for 42% of federal tax revenues and are the most regressive of all federal taxes. [www.taxpolicycenter.org]
According to the GAO, furthermore, the tax burden increased on the middle class this decade while that of top earners declined.
As for healthcare, we pay more per capita than any other nation and accept inferior healthcare outcomes. That's not capitalism, it's corruption.
@Jes St.Lawrence: I need to make sure I understand a few things from your reply before I misinterpret them and make a clown of myself.
When you say payroll taxes, you are talking about federal income tax, plus SS and Medicare - everything that is withheld, correct?
Also, how do you define "inferior healthcare outcomes?" My righty friends say that health care is rationed/inferior in "socialized medicine" countries, and my lefty friends can't wait to jump on that train. All I hear is anecdotal evidence.
I, for one, would like to see a federal tax based on consumption, rather than earnings. We should reward those who choose to save their money rather than blow it by letting them keep every cent they earn. Want a fancy new car? Uncle Sam's going to get you. Want to put it all away for retirement? Have fun, it's all yours. It would tax the rich as much as they feel like spending, and there can be an allowance for groceries/basic living expenses we all incur. That seems like a pretty progressive tax to me - what do you think?
@MrHowser: I worked on something like that for a couple weeks. The wall I hit was ordinary people buying or selling their house and getting hosed. Do let me know if you come up with anything and the numbers work out.
@skitter: Oh trust me, I'm not really a numbers guy. I'm just the idea man.
In all seriousness, that is one of the issues I see with the idea. I would say that primary residence expenses (rent/house purchase) would be exempt from taxation, like un-prepared food now. Is that tax-exempt everywhere? It is everywhere I've lived in the states. Perhaps some transport expenses are exempt too... I don't know. It's still in the concept stages.
@Jes St. Lawrence: Other nations have subsidized education and/or health care with similar tax rates, or possibly a little higher. What is it we have in the states that prevents us from doing that?
Consider the source: Rush is norhing but a glorified disc jockey who didn't finish college and has never worked for any length of time outside the media.
@Drachen: As opposed to all the other self-important TV/radio personalities whose BAs in journalism or communications suddenly make them an authority on everything?
Oh, and the "they didn't go to college, so they don't know what they're talking about" theory is pathetic and insulting. I have an engineering degree, but that doesn't mean I know any more about politics, or what it's like to live, work and pay taxes in America than somebody who didn't go to college. This nation is full of brilliant self-taught gearheads, craftsmen, writers, musicians, artists and, yes, even political pundits. In fact, unless you study a technical field, medicine or teaching, I'd say college is a waste of four years of your time and money.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@FromaBuick6: I think the important thing to agree on here is that self-important TV/radio personalities are all douchebags, no matter what political side they're on, and whether or not they attended/finished college.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@Drachen: I know, and have known, men who are extremely knowledgeable in their particular field of expertise, and they never went to college. One guy I know, that is employed as an engineer, is an expert in electron beam welding and if he were to leave the facility he works in it would be a huge blow to that company. Another guy I know placed third nationally in some PLC programming rodeo event and has had very little formal training; Honda sponsored him. This guy I met several years ago works for a major power company and is an expert in air compression and gives seminars all over the country. My favorite example is my great uncle who did not even finished high school (sixth grade, I think) , but was a licensed high rise architect whose expertise in that field was widely known in his day.
You may not like Limbaugh, but the college thing is a no go. He must be doing something right, he’s worth millions and he didn’t get a bailout. Gates and Dell didn’t finish either.
Maybe Limbaugh is simply proposing a form of economic stimulus? Selling twice as many buses would be an earnings booster for busmakers. Call it something catchy, like "Buses for Bigots," and it might have legs.
I need segregated hearing. Not racially segregated, mind you. I need assholes like Rush Limbaugh and the lot as far from range as possible, because when I think about how many M5's I could own with his money, and the kind of crap he spews to earn it, it seriously makes me want to off myself.
I've struggled with a response to all of this for a good hour. I agree with some of your collective comments, but have to remind you; whether it's Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Al Franken, they will always look to generate controversy to further their cause. How else would a hairdresser from NY become a household name in civil rights (Al Sharpton)? I'd imagine the majority of us are closer to middle of the road than staunch liberals or conservatives, anyway. (Ben, you're the exception -MediaMatters- SHAME!).
Just remember, whatever these buffoons say will make you think about how YOU feel about the subject matter, and allow YOU to decide how you feel and what's really right.
And for the record, it IS Jalop-nik, not POLIT-nik.
engineerd promoted this comment
Edited by Timtoolman, sporadically speaking at 09/17/09 5:08 PM
Timtoolman, sporadically speaking was starred
Timtoolman, sporadically speaking was unstarred
How dare you express a political opinion I disagree with!! This isn't why I read Jalopnik. I read Jalopnik to make jokes about Government Motors and bitch about Cash for Clunkers and complain about how the greens want to take away my Camaro.
@scroggzilla raids again: Actually, ACORN is pretty fucked up. A couple people with hidden cameras went to ACORN offices in four major cities and showed that the organization is staffed by people that are ready and willing to break the law in many ways.
They're helpful, sure, but helping a pimp wanting to claim tax exemption for el salvadorean sex slaves? That's way out of order, and they need to either clean house quick, or shut the hell down.
As odd as it is for me to say it, the right-wing was right to distrust that organization.
Also, screw Rush Limbaugh. He's an idiot. The buses don't need to be segregated: the hands of the bus driver need to be untied. Failing that, throw a cop on buses randomly - either undercover as a driver, or flying the flag as a warning, or friggin' both.
Every so often, the old Jalopnik tends to post a story that really doesn't do anything but generate views, kind of like a post whore. This is one of those postings.
Mr. Krewson is usually guilty of doing this, but look, he's originally from the Onion. And his post whoring included one with random shots of Megan Fox. But it did generate a large number of views, along with the usual banal comments.
More of these types of postings are on their way, as Jalopnik doesn't generate the number of views that Kotaku, Gizmodo, or even Jezebel generate. You also have to see where the authors come from, as their bonus level is based on the number of posts, along with the number of views.
If this all sounds like I'm deriding Ben for this, quite the contrary. I say go for it, keep up with the non car related posts, because there is a payroll to make, servers to pay for, and investors to satisfy. And it doesn't come cheap.
@UDMan: Someday I'll figure out what your problem with me and the Onion is, but for now, I'll just point out that Megan Fox thing, huge hit with the commenters though it was, wasn't me.
just so you guys all know - "sarcastic" and "out of context" arent' the same thing. he was certainly using an extreme comment sarcastically, but that comment was NOT "out of context" - it was just a hyperbolic, sarcastic comment illustrating a point. (or attempting to illustrate)
@Unregular: Heh. My right-wing friends all call me a left wing douchebag (actually, dickhead, but hey). Minus the question mark, of course. So, even Stevens!
I did miss you, though. Even commented on it a couple times. You bring a certain open-mindedness, restraint, and civility to conversations like this that we just can't get anywhere else.
Rush Limbaugh is probably laughing his ass off at the hysteria his words have caused. That's what he does. He takes things to an extreme to prove a point, and to get a rise out of people.
@Deartháir II: The Return: Eminem raps, Limbaugh bloviates. They're both talented in their respective fields. Whether you like their application of their talents is another matter.
09/18/09
09/18/09
Secondly, even mentioning the name Rush Limbaugh is like starting a fight between Jeff Gordon and Dale Earnhardt fans AT TALLADEGA. Either you love the guy or you hate him, and unless you are stupid enough to not know this universal fact I would say you guys must be hurting really bad for page hits because no matter what is said about Rush, good or bad, the shit is gonna hit the fan, big time. I mean hell why don't you also start preaching to us how global warming is going to kill us all in 5 years or that we all need to start driving hybrids because "media matters said so". I can't believe you are some mouthpiece of this insane organization.
The problem is that those who hate Rush happen to be people who listen to media matters for their biased info instead of actually listening to Rush's Show. My guess is if you listened to Rush's show constantly, like I do, you wouldn't be saying the things you are because 9 times out of 10 it turns out people agree with what he says. In fact, Media Matters constantly attacks conservative radio and tv hosts with remarks that are usually taken completely out of context. Why do you think Media Matters only plays or shows snippets out of these huge monologues? The best part is that the people they attack have the best ratings in their segment. They've attacked Fox News constantly but that news channel crushes the competition. Also, Rush is the #1 Radio show in America with roughly 14 million listeners by some estimates so I don't think he'd be that popular if he were a right-wing racist nutjob. Also, you're damn right these people are biased and for you to post something like this is reckless and inflammatory. CLEARLY you did this on purpose to start a brawl between your readers.
This brings me to my conclusion. Over the past year or so since I started visiting this site it has been somewhat enjoyable. I found this site by being an avid kotaku reader. Unfortunately, this website does not have the standards I have found at Kotaku or Gizmodo it seems. It is not acceptable, in my opinion, to try and provoke flame wars between your readers. Maybe if this site had such a theme it would be acceptable, but in my opinion this post is complete trash. The intent of it is trash, the actual story itself is trash because the truth has been warped, and you have lost me as a visitor. I doubt you or other people will care, to be honest I don't that much, but luckily for me there's millions of other sites out there and I am sure I can find one that is above starting petty arguments for page hits, AND HOPEFULLY they have editor's that can think for themselves. Good luck in the future, I hope nobody starts trying to get advertisers off your website. After all, it is your opinion/beliefs and nobody would be misunderstanding enough to punish you for that I am sure.
09/18/09
09/18/09
You need help. Help is at hand.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/17/09
I realize that a lot of people have a lot of strong opinions about what is and is not related to the cult of cars. I also realize that people have a lot of strong opinions about Rush Limbaugh.
Personally, I think he's as big a clown as any other radio personality. But you know what? That's completely beside the point in light of what went down in this post.
What has gotten into Jalopnik today?
I agree that this wasn't a particularly choice story to post on Jalopnik, but on the other hand, I don't run Jalopnik, erego my opinions in that context mean precisely dick. Ben posted it because he felt it was worth posting. There is shit that we can do about that. It's that simple.
Don't like the post? Then don't comment in it. Move on to other posts that you know you will enjoy reading more. Some of you may notice that I don't post in every thread on a given day; only those that I feel that I can contribute an intelligent or a hopefully witty response. Otherwise, I leave it to the other comment-fu masters on this site, like Ash, Dearthair, Braff, Polar, Engineerd, and many, many others.
There were some halfway reasonable responses in this thread that I took the time to read through. To those that made an effort to comment intelligently or in good humor, thank you. You were relative rarities in this particular post, but you still made the post and comments worth reading.
And you know what, I also enjoyed reading the posts that respectfully disagreed with Ben's choice of post. Why? Because they made the effort to show RESPECT. They tried to communicate that they had nothing against Ben, just this particular post. There were several such comments in this post, and are good examples of how to appropriately state a dissenting opinion.
To the rest of you who sat there and simply insulted Ben and the remainder of the Jalopnik staff, or added comments such as (and I quote); "Rush=Douche", "Rush: The Ultimate Tool", and "prescription drugs run out", I'm pretty damn disappointed. That was pathetic. You can do much, much better than that.
Respectful posting is paramount here, as we, the commenters, do not own or run this site. We are guests here. Invited and welcome guests to be sure, but guests nonetheless.
Dust yourselves off and try again.
09/17/09
09/17/09
If so, Beyonce can channel me any time.
09/18/09
09/18/09
If that person IS the editor, then so be it. We are all guilty of it from time to time. I myself have many times let my Fine Irish Temper™ get the better of me, and have made many posts of which I am not proud.
My advice, given unsolicited, and as gently as possible, is that generally the guidance Mr. Jones hands out is worthwhile, and worth listening to. Attempting to "call him out" as you just did is counterproductive. If you'd like to comment on something you disagree with, that is your prerogative. But doing so disrespectfully is a quick way to get yourself Burberry Banhammered. Trust me on this one, I speak of first-hand knowledge.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
[www.rushlimbaugh.com]
09/20/09
I'm not saying that nobody on the whole bus could have been racist, but the whole bus acting like that is more a reflection of how out of control inner city school kids are. I mean I got racial slurs thrown at me by kids of all colors, but I also had friends of all colors so it's just how it is in rough city schools. Assuming it's racially motivated just because a lot of the kids happen to not be white is a big jump in logic and I'm saying this having been on the receiving end of unfair fights before.
The real question is where the heck the bus driver is in this video? People got into fights on the bus back then but it never got out of control like that because the bus driver would settle it down. But then again I remember we had a pretty badass bus driver, IIRC he was some sort of ex Irish-American gang member with quite a few interesting tattoos (you know, only in retrospect do I realize how messed up this really all is but back then this all seemed totally normal, like everyone's bus driver had prison tats).
You need a pretty hardcore bus driver to keep order on buses like this, so I guess we were pretty lucky back then to have our badass ex-gangster bus driver. I recall my mom always giving him a nice thank you card with cash tucked inside for the holidays to thank him for making sure that I didn't get myself beaten too badly like this kid.
Man I should totally run for president on this platform of making all bus-drivers ex-gang members who won't be afraid to break up a fight amongst inner city kids.
09/17/09
09/17/09
There, fixed that for ya.
I love that the President is black. I just don't agree with a lot of his goals.
09/17/09
But all of this hatred, refusal to allow children to see his speeches, and overwhelming response from the Rush types over every move 9 months into his presidency points to one thing imo.
My favorite is the "One Big Ass Mistake America" bumper stickers. I wouldn't trust a historian to call a President a mistake so soon let alone the mouthbreathers that have these on their pickup trucks.
09/17/09
Health care... Such an emotionally charged issue. It's not fair that some people have it and others don't. Who said life is fair? Yes, I have insurance, and yes, I will be thankful for it should I ever need it, but let's look at this reasonably. 100 years ago, cancer, heart attacks, major trauma would almost certainly kill you. Cures for these things didn't exist. Now. with new technology and medicine (developed with the profits of the "evil drug/medical companies") people (or their insurance) can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on curing/living with these conditions. I believe that fines for not carrying medical insurance will drive the price of insurance up to just above the fine level - might as well get something, instead of nothing.
Obama is trying to make this country much more like Western Europe, and paying for it by taxing those who make the most money. In 2004, [www.taxfoundation.org] of Americans didn't pay income taxes, and that number is growing. Some sources say that the bottom 50% of American wage earners pay 2.89% of all federal income taxes. This is ridiculous! People who don't pay taxes voting to increase the tax load on those who do. It won't take us anywhere good, believe me.
09/17/09
09/18/09
Yes, there are some folks who don't like Obama because he's black. I don't like his ideas about where the country should go. I'm quite certain I would enjoy having a drink and smoking a cigar with him, as long as we didn't discuss the future of the country.
09/18/09
09/18/09
People too poor to pay federal income taxes pay payroll taxes on the first dollar they earn and, thanks to Greenspan's influence, the payroll tax rate went up up while corporate and marginal taxes went down. Payroll taxes account for 42% of federal tax revenues and are the most regressive of all federal taxes.
[www.taxpolicycenter.org]
According to the GAO, furthermore, the tax burden increased on the middle class this decade while that of top earners declined.
As for healthcare, we pay more per capita than any other nation and accept inferior healthcare outcomes. That's not capitalism, it's corruption.
If that's what you support, be honest about it.
09/18/09
When you say payroll taxes, you are talking about federal income tax, plus SS and Medicare - everything that is withheld, correct?
Also, how do you define "inferior healthcare outcomes?" My righty friends say that health care is rationed/inferior in "socialized medicine" countries, and my lefty friends can't wait to jump on that train. All I hear is anecdotal evidence.
I, for one, would like to see a federal tax based on consumption, rather than earnings. We should reward those who choose to save their money rather than blow it by letting them keep every cent they earn. Want a fancy new car? Uncle Sam's going to get you. Want to put it all away for retirement? Have fun, it's all yours. It would tax the rich as much as they feel like spending, and there can be an allowance for groceries/basic living expenses we all incur. That seems like a pretty progressive tax to me - what do you think?
09/18/09
09/18/09
In all seriousness, that is one of the issues I see with the idea. I would say that primary residence expenses (rent/house purchase) would be exempt from taxation, like un-prepared food now. Is that tax-exempt everywhere? It is everywhere I've lived in the states. Perhaps some transport expenses are exempt too... I don't know. It's still in the concept stages.
@Jes St. Lawrence: Other nations have subsidized education and/or health care with similar tax rates, or possibly a little higher. What is it we have in the states that prevents us from doing that?
09/17/09
09/17/09
Oh, and the "they didn't go to college, so they don't know what they're talking about" theory is pathetic and insulting. I have an engineering degree, but that doesn't mean I know any more about politics, or what it's like to live, work and pay taxes in America than somebody who didn't go to college. This nation is full of brilliant self-taught gearheads, craftsmen, writers, musicians, artists and, yes, even political pundits. In fact, unless you study a technical field, medicine or teaching, I'd say college is a waste of four years of your time and money.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/18/09
You may not like Limbaugh, but the college thing is a no go. He must be doing something right, he’s worth millions and he didn’t get a bailout. Gates and Dell didn’t finish either.
09/17/09
09/17/09
/rant
09/17/09
Just remember, whatever these buffoons say will make you think about how YOU feel about the subject matter, and allow YOU to decide how you feel and what's really right.
And for the record, it IS Jalop-nik, not POLIT-nik.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
They're helpful, sure, but helping a pimp wanting to claim tax exemption for el salvadorean sex slaves? That's way out of order, and they need to either clean house quick, or shut the hell down.
[bighollywood.breitbart.com]
As odd as it is for me to say it, the right-wing was right to distrust that organization.
Also, screw Rush Limbaugh. He's an idiot. The buses don't need to be segregated: the hands of the bus driver need to be untied. Failing that, throw a cop on buses randomly - either undercover as a driver, or flying the flag as a warning, or friggin' both.
09/18/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
Mr. Krewson is usually guilty of doing this, but look, he's originally from the Onion. And his post whoring included one with random shots of Megan Fox. But it did generate a large number of views, along with the usual banal comments.
More of these types of postings are on their way, as Jalopnik doesn't generate the number of views that Kotaku, Gizmodo, or even Jezebel generate. You also have to see where the authors come from, as their bonus level is based on the number of posts, along with the number of views.
If this all sounds like I'm deriding Ben for this, quite the contrary. I say go for it, keep up with the non car related posts, because there is a payroll to make, servers to pay for, and investors to satisfy. And it doesn't come cheap.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/18/09
09/17/09
people LOOOOVE yelling "out of context!"
09/17/09
So, we knew you'd be back. You almost made it a full month, though! Nice job!
09/17/09
09/17/09
What Rush said was sarcastic. What everyone else is doing is taking it out of context.
Rush can't take his own words out of context. The context that is missing is that it was said sarcastically.
09/17/09
I did miss you, though. Even commented on it a couple times. You bring a certain open-mindedness, restraint, and civility to conversations like this that we just can't get anywhere else.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
He's sort of the Eminem of talk radio.
09/17/09
09/17/09