As much as everyone here would like it, how much would you like to bet if this came out, that it would be on the future list of "Great cars nobody bought" ? hm?
I'm going to cause a stick here and say I don't like it. It looks like a Vibe that's been photoshopped bigger.
Give me near this performance in a Chevy or (shudders) a Buick pricetag and I'd bite.
I just don't think Caddy should be selling wagons or trucks.
@Turboner: more people should buy wagons, more manufacturers should sell them in a mid-size or compact size.
But I disagree with saying all brands should sell wagons.(i'm an owner of a V40 FWIW - and the car I really wanted was a Camry wagon /ducks head to avoid the backlash/)
I'll never understand why the Car Blog world loves Family Trucksters, er Wagons, and hates Crossovers.
SUVs must die, but fat assed wagons are not the answer.
@Bacchus1976: Because crossovers are merely FWD sedans with tall bodies, feigning their perceived capabilities. A RWD wagon can still tow and still be fun to drive whereas a crossover can't do much but emasculate the driver.
Anybody who has driven a Toyota Highlander can agree with me here.
@pres: Oh please. The FWD v. RWD discussion is a entirely different subject. Most wagons are FWD and there's no reason crossovers can't be RWD, many are as a matter of fact.
Wagons are no more useful than sedans to most people, they have the same entry point and the same seating. Crossovers with their higher ride hide and entry points actually offer benefits to people who need easier access.
These blogs are full of hatch fetishists.
@Bacchus1976: There's no reason you need a high center of gravity to drive around town. A higher ride "hide", I think you mean height, doesn't help with easier access at all. It does the opposite of help.
@Turboner: Most people feel safer and more comfortable in a car that sits higher. It provides a better view of traffic and surroundings.
Additionally higher cars are easier to load, especially with kids and carseats.
I've yet to hear how a Wagon improves dramatically over a Sedan. It's the exact same seating and ride as a sedan with an extra 8 cubic feet of storage.
A CUV offers that same storage plus some, higher ride height, easier entry and a better look. Plus....it's what people are buying!
@Bacchus1976: Yes, this blog is populated by hatch and wagon fans. You say that you have yet to hear how a wagon improves dramatically over a sedan, but you provide your own answer in the next sentence - more room for junk than in your trunk.
This site is populated by folks who, wait for it... like to drive. My experience has been that the SUV and CUV provide a less fun driving experience than does a wagon or hatch.
My daily driver is a Saab 9000 Aero, it provides a much more involving driving experience than would a ponderous SUV or CUV. Further, my people don't do automatics. You'll have to pry the clutch pedal from my cold, dead toes.
So, to summarize: I have an "active lifestyle", like to drive, require a manual transmission, and require a vehicle capable of hustling quickly through windy roads. Sounds to me like a CTS-V SportWagon is a contender on my Saab's replacement list.
@Bacchus1976: What's so wrong with a good hatchback, wagon or sport-back? It it so bad to be able to carry a ton of stuff while still being sporty? For instance, I was able to put a 42" TV in my hatch, close it and not even have it interfere with my roll cage. Now you tell me, why wouldn't I want or like a hatchback?
@Bret: You have a very myopic view of "fun". An automatic CUV is infinitely more fun to drive in and around snow covered Chicago streets than some wagon.
Sports cars are meant to be driven around twisty roads. Driving around twisty roads is not a primary goal of 95% of the auto market.
@Bacchus1976: Perhaps you and I have different definitions of the word "fun"? I'll take my myopic view with my Blizzak equipped hatchback in the snow, thank you very much.
Being somewhat eco-conscious, my wife and I carpool in a loud, stiffly sprung Miata (it's our economy car - the Saab gets 19mpg). A week's worth of groceries fit, even if we have to stack the mondo-pack of TP on the rollbar backstays.
My point really is that while 95% of the driving market isn't concerned about having fun on twisty roads, I'm sure that 95% of the Jalopnik commentariate is concerned with that. This is why I hang out here.
Stick around (I'll promote your comments so they're visible), we're a fun group. Not all of us are as weird as me I commute in a light weight track/autocross car with no power amenities and race a Peugeot with a bunch of surrender monkeys. While I can see the utility offered by a CUV, I don't see myself buying one over a wagon that I can take to a track day, or use to tow race cars.
@Bret: 95% of the Jalopnik crowd (and the Auto media community as a whole) are obsessed with sport driving. I get this, however the Auto media has a disproportionate effect on what the manufacturers are producing and have greatly contributed to the fact that cars today get much worse fuel economy than cars from 20 years ago.
I love sport driving as much as the next guy. My only cars have been 2-door coupes and my next car will be a RWD 2-door lux-coupe. However I think it's silly to ask all cars to be competent sport driving machines. If you're buying a car to haul lots of stuff with, get a car that hauls stuff really well....not hauls stuff OK and corners good.
@Bacchus1976: To the contrary, I would argue that the insurance lobby and creeping levels of perceived need for luxury and safety devices have increased average vehicle weight to the point that, even with the great increases in engine efficiency, vehicle fuel efficiency has stagnated. The popular auto media has helped increase the average count of cupholders per vehicle, but have cuckolded the enthusiast driver with increased mass, superfluous to us safety devices (I buckle up all the time and fear an airbag to the helmet on the track) and pointless frills (DVD touchscreen infotainment?).
I'm afraid I don't agree with your sentiment about hauling stuff necessitating I buy a vehicle that hauls stuff really well. Should I buy a Yukon XL just because I have to haul my kid and her stuff to college and back? But wait, a Sprinter van hauls stuff even better than the Yukon. See where I'm going with this? I don't want to have to buy a Freightliner just in case.
No, I'll take my hatchback and pack a little lighter. I actually just picked up a Thule rack off Craigslist for an extra bit of roof mounted carrying capacity.
It is possible for me to have my cake of sporty car safety, maneuverability and efficiency (I've hyper-miled the Saab to 32mpg freeway) as well as "my-sized" carrying capacity; all without needing to drive a boring CUV that dangerously can't stop as quick as my car, but might hold an extra suitcase or two, all while getting comparatively crap fuel mileage.
I'm selling myself more and more on the CTS... Beats the old days of the Miata and a trailer, though that was really fun...
@Bacchus1976: If all cars are competent sport driving machines, the net result is a highway system full of safer more manuverable vehicles. I'm not talking about stiffly sprung boy racers, I'm talking about competence in the style of a Camry SE(boring but competent), a Malibu, or an Audi A6. They don't give up when you attempt a sporting manuver, be it to dodge something or for your own personal amusement. Cars are more likely to have this level of competence than SUVs or Crossovers precisely because of the compromises that have to be made to accomodate an SUV ride height. Wagons are cars, and cars are more compenent than SUVs, so a good number of use like wagons more than SUVs.I value personal automotive choice, so I don't want to seen SUVs and Crossovers banned, but I would love to see more wagons.
@Bacchus1976: I'll never understand why people post "I'll never understand" comments on sites. If you don't understand the wagons then don't buy one. If you don't understand the wagon love then don't click on the wagon articles and wade through the related comments...
Do you really have to rant about every single thing you don't understand?
Sweet baby Jesus, this might be the first step towards weaning Americans off of the SUV teat and back towards good old wagons. If a CTS-V Wagon doesn't do anything for you, I'd call a coroner.
Does anybody outside of car nerds actually have any interest in these kinds of luxo-speed-wagons? They're always intriguing and exciting while having a touch of sensibility (read: excellent cargo space) but they inevitably sell like garbage. The only possible sales success I can think of is the Dodge Magnum.
This one of those cars I'd love to see go into production, but wouldn't buy. Maybe in ten years if I'm married and have a kid or two I'd buy a used one.
But will it come with a stick? Or will the 5 units that GM expects to sell justify only certifying the automatic?
Frankly, while I find the idea of a CTS-V wagon intriguing and would like to subscribe to its newsletter, I'd be more interested in the 300 hp version with a manual transmission (and a decent lease deal). My current family car has more power than I know what to do with and I'm getting weary of the 11-15 mpg that I get in real-world driving--I am certain a CTS-V would be no better and probably would be worse.
@Ash78: I actually saw an RS6 Avant (the new twin turbo one) in Washington, DC the other day--I assume it was someone affiliated with VoA, which just moved their HQ to this area. That thing is a monster.
I've seen a couple of RS4 Avants, but only in Germany.
@FormerlyPreferredCustomer: Seriously? That's huge news - I can't imagine any reason there would even be an RS6 Avant within US borders if Audi weren't at least considering selling it here.
A possible CTS-V wagon and an RS6 Avant on US soil? Jalopnik, you have made my day.
@brownie demands JFG revival: I wouldn't get too excited. Car companies bring all sorts of crazy things into the country without any intention of selling them here--call it "evaluation," though it may also just be local execs wanting to play with the latest toys.
Back in the day, when I lived in Detroit, I saw a Sierra Cosworth with M plates drive by my house, and saw a Lotus Omega driving around near the Milford proving ground, too. Unfortunately, neither of those ever made it stateside.
@Jagvar: And the E55 Estate before that. I see a few E63 and E55 estates running around Dallas - so cool to have those four exhaust pipes coming out from the back of a wagon.
@FormerlyPreferredCustomer: +1. I regularly see all kinds of stuff around Dearborn. Euro Focuses, Aussie Utes, Falcons...you name it.
The crappy pic attached is from my phone when I ran across some FPV twins and an Aussie Escapey thingy doing some testing.
I don't get this at all. They would be dropping an engine they already have into a chassis that's already been crash tested. If GM can't figure out how to make money by doing that, they deserve to be bankrupt.
Paul Eisenstein at The Detroit Bureau is reporting GM is shelving plans for a 570 HP Camaro Z28. The reason? It would be prohibitively expensive for GM at this time. With a program price around $50 million, the Z28 got the axe in favor of other efforts.
GM doesn't have $50 mill to blow on this thing, and if they did, they need to spend that money on other shizz, like the Volt and Cruze. Once those start selling and generating revenue, GM can revisit the Z28 concept.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
Give me near this performance in a Chevy or (shudders) a Buick pricetag and I'd bite.
I just don't think Caddy should be selling wagons or trucks.
08/11/09
08/11/09
But I disagree with saying all brands should sell wagons.(i'm an owner of a V40 FWIW - and the car I really wanted was a Camry wagon /ducks head to avoid the backlash/)
08/11/09
SUVs must die, but fat assed wagons are not the answer.
08/11/09
Anybody who has driven a Toyota Highlander can agree with me here.
08/11/09
Wagons are no more useful than sedans to most people, they have the same entry point and the same seating. Crossovers with their higher ride hide and entry points actually offer benefits to people who need easier access.
These blogs are full of hatch fetishists.
08/11/09
08/11/09
Additionally higher cars are easier to load, especially with kids and carseats.
I've yet to hear how a Wagon improves dramatically over a Sedan. It's the exact same seating and ride as a sedan with an extra 8 cubic feet of storage.
A CUV offers that same storage plus some, higher ride height, easier entry and a better look. Plus....it's what people are buying!
08/11/09
This site is populated by folks who, wait for it... like to drive. My experience has been that the SUV and CUV provide a less fun driving experience than does a wagon or hatch.
My daily driver is a Saab 9000 Aero, it provides a much more involving driving experience than would a ponderous SUV or CUV. Further, my people don't do automatics. You'll have to pry the clutch pedal from my cold, dead toes.
So, to summarize: I have an "active lifestyle", like to drive, require a manual transmission, and require a vehicle capable of hustling quickly through windy roads. Sounds to me like a CTS-V SportWagon is a contender on my Saab's replacement list.
08/11/09
@Bacchus1976: What's so wrong with a good hatchback, wagon or sport-back? It it so bad to be able to carry a ton of stuff while still being sporty? For instance, I was able to put a 42" TV in my hatch, close it and not even have it interfere with my roll cage. Now you tell me, why wouldn't I want or like a hatchback?
08/11/09
Sports cars are meant to be driven around twisty roads. Driving around twisty roads is not a primary goal of 95% of the auto market.
08/11/09
Being somewhat eco-conscious, my wife and I carpool in a loud, stiffly sprung Miata (it's our economy car - the Saab gets 19mpg). A week's worth of groceries fit, even if we have to stack the mondo-pack of TP on the rollbar backstays.
My point really is that while 95% of the driving market isn't concerned about having fun on twisty roads, I'm sure that 95% of the Jalopnik commentariate is concerned with that. This is why I hang out here.
Stick around (I'll promote your comments so they're visible), we're a fun group. Not all of us are as weird as me I commute in a light weight track/autocross car with no power amenities and race a Peugeot with a bunch of surrender monkeys. While I can see the utility offered by a CUV, I don't see myself buying one over a wagon that I can take to a track day, or use to tow race cars.
08/11/09
I love sport driving as much as the next guy. My only cars have been 2-door coupes and my next car will be a RWD 2-door lux-coupe. However I think it's silly to ask all cars to be competent sport driving machines. If you're buying a car to haul lots of stuff with, get a car that hauls stuff really well....not hauls stuff OK and corners good.
08/11/09
I'm afraid I don't agree with your sentiment about hauling stuff necessitating I buy a vehicle that hauls stuff really well. Should I buy a Yukon XL just because I have to haul my kid and her stuff to college and back? But wait, a Sprinter van hauls stuff even better than the Yukon. See where I'm going with this? I don't want to have to buy a Freightliner just in case.
No, I'll take my hatchback and pack a little lighter. I actually just picked up a Thule rack off Craigslist for an extra bit of roof mounted carrying capacity.
It is possible for me to have my cake of sporty car safety, maneuverability and efficiency (I've hyper-miled the Saab to 32mpg freeway) as well as "my-sized" carrying capacity; all without needing to drive a boring CUV that dangerously can't stop as quick as my car, but might hold an extra suitcase or two, all while getting comparatively crap fuel mileage.
I'm selling myself more and more on the CTS... Beats the old days of the Miata and a trailer, though that was really fun...
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
Do you really have to rant about every single thing you don't understand?
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
And with the V, it's not lacking power either, now I'm just hoping Americans warm to the wagon, and eventually, an El CTS-Vmino comes out.
08/11/09
I like your El CTS-Vmino idea!
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
Frankly, while I find the idea of a CTS-V wagon intriguing and would like to subscribe to its newsletter, I'd be more interested in the 300 hp version with a manual transmission (and a decent lease deal). My current family car has more power than I know what to do with and I'm getting weary of the 11-15 mpg that I get in real-world driving--I am certain a CTS-V would be no better and probably would be worse.
08/11/09
oh, and the seats, the upgraded seats need to be standard :)
08/11/09
Have you considered donating the extra hp to a poor person like me? Will get you some extra karma points.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
The R63 I've actually seen...once. It was beige and parked at a TJ Maxx. Go figure.
08/11/09
But I've still never seen an E63 or an RS4 Avant (sedans only).
08/11/09
I've seen a couple of RS4 Avants, but only in Germany.
08/11/09
A possible CTS-V wagon and an RS6 Avant on US soil? Jalopnik, you have made my day.
08/11/09
Back in the day, when I lived in Detroit, I saw a Sierra Cosworth with M plates drive by my house, and saw a Lotus Omega driving around near the Milford proving ground, too. Unfortunately, neither of those ever made it stateside.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
@FormerlyPreferredCustomer: +1. I regularly see all kinds of stuff around Dearborn. Euro Focuses, Aussie Utes, Falcons...you name it.
The crappy pic attached is from my phone when I ran across some FPV twins and an Aussie Escapey thingy doing some testing.
08/11/09
^^ I just copy pasted my comment from yesterday.
08/11/09
08/11/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
Writ by Ben on 3-20-09:
Paul Eisenstein at The Detroit Bureau is reporting GM is shelving plans for a 570 HP Camaro Z28. The reason? It would be prohibitively expensive for GM at this time. With a program price around $50 million, the Z28 got the axe in favor of other efforts.
GM doesn't have $50 mill to blow on this thing, and if they did, they need to spend that money on other shizz, like the Volt and Cruze. Once those start selling and generating revenue, GM can revisit the Z28 concept.